| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"wrab" |
| Date: |
18 Feb 2006 05:36:43 PM |
| Object: |
Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that excuse
works.
.
|
|
| User: "Chip Anderson" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
18 Feb 2006 05:42:43 PM |
|
|
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new quail stamps
that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say that the
posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight. What they are doing
is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the egregious
behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those trying to politicise
such a minor error.
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Blankenship" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
18 Feb 2006 07:31:35 PM |
|
|
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be?
Only about every post made here, blind boy.
Geezus.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chip Anderson" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
18 Feb 2006 09:34:01 PM |
|
|
"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:XTPJf.1757$VI6.892@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be?
Only about every post made here, blind boy.
So, you cannot cite a single example.
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Blankenship" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
18 Feb 2006 10:48:11 PM |
|
|
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EDBFB2415Bbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:XTPJf.1757$VI6.892@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that
excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be?
Only about every post made here, blind boy.
So, you cannot cite a single example.
I am not in the position to give you a brain transplant. If you are so
fucking inept that you can not decipher what is going on in our country, I
certainly can not help you.
" So, you cannot cite a single example."
Geezus, what are you, a zombie? Do your own homework.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chip Anderson" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
18 Feb 2006 11:40:17 PM |
|
|
"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:fMSJf.1784$VI6.1334@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EDBFB2415Bbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:XTPJf.1757$VI6.892@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse
present misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill
Clinton? The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code
violation, try telling the officer you shouldn't be cited
because of Ted Kennedy's worse conduct. See how well that excuse
works. Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress,
try telling her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See
how well that
excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be?
Only about every post made here, blind boy.
So, you cannot cite a single example.
I am not in the position to give you a brain transplant. If you are so
fucking inept that you can not decipher what is going on in our
country, I certainly can not help you.
" So, you cannot cite a single example."
Geezus, what are you, a zombie? Do your own homework.
Still nothing.
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Blankenship" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
19 Feb 2006 12:27:44 AM |
|
|
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EF17521A61bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:fMSJf.1784$VI6.1334@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EDBFB2415Bbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:XTPJf.1757$VI6.892@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse
present misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill
Clinton? The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code
violation, try telling the officer you shouldn't be cited
because of Ted Kennedy's worse conduct. See how well that excuse
works. Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress,
try telling her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See
how well that
excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be?
Only about every post made here, blind boy.
So, you cannot cite a single example.
I am not in the position to give you a brain transplant. If you are so
fucking inept that you can not decipher what is going on in our
country, I certainly can not help you.
" So, you cannot cite a single example."
Geezus, what are you, a zombie? Do your own homework.
Still nothing.
--
---
Chip
That's right dumbshit. The longer you sit there waiting for someone to
spoonfeed you info, the longer you are going to wait. Google up "failure"
for a start, just that word.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Billy" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
18 Feb 2006 09:15:17 PM |
|
|
"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:XTPJf.1757$VI6.892@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be?
Only about every post made here, blind boy.
Every post made here is the "present misconduct" he was talking about. Roy
Boy, you make no sense
Geezus.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tenjets" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
18 Feb 2006 06:05:45 PM |
|
|
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new quail stamps
that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say that the
posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight. What they are doing
is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the egregious
behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those trying to politicise
such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses, the minor
error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney appears to have used his
power to coverup the mishap and is deserving as much scrutiny for *that*
minor error as any of his predecessors in public office have received, from
Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chip Anderson" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
18 Feb 2006 07:19:39 PM |
|
|
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try
telling her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well
that excuse works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new quail
stamps that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say that the
posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight. What they are
doing is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the
egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those
trying to politicise such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses, the
minor error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney appears to
have used his power to coverup the mishap and is deserving as much
scrutiny for *that* minor error as any of his predecessors in public
office have received, from Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
Accidents will happen and thankfully, the injured man is recoverd and
returned home. As for a coverup, what coverup?
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.
|
|
|
| User: "tenjets" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
18 Feb 2006 07:32:41 PM |
|
|
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EC532EB9C7bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try
telling her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well
that excuse works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new quail
stamps that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say that the
posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight. What they are
doing is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the
egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those
trying to politicise such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses, the
minor error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney appears to
have used his power to coverup the mishap and is deserving as much
scrutiny for *that* minor error as any of his predecessors in public
office have received, from Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
Accidents will happen and thankfully, the injured man is recoverd and
returned home. As for a coverup, what coverup?
As I said, Cheney gave the impression that he had something to hide by
controlling how the story came to be known. That sounds like a coverup to
me. "What, if anything, was he covering up?" is a question for law
enforcement, congress, the press, etc to determine. I can't explain to you
why Cheney acts like a guilty person. Maybe that's just the way he is.
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chip Anderson" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
18 Feb 2006 09:33:07 PM |
|
|
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:ZUPJf.14840$2O6.3785@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EC532EB9C7bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse
present misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill
Clinton? The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code
violation, try telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because
of Ted Kennedy's worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try
telling her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well
that excuse works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new quail
stamps that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say that
the posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight. What they
are doing is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the
egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those
trying to politicise such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses, the
minor error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney appears to
have used his power to coverup the mishap and is deserving as much
scrutiny for *that* minor error as any of his predecessors in public
office have received, from Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
Accidents will happen and thankfully, the injured man is recoverd and
returned home. As for a coverup, what coverup?
As I said, Cheney gave the impression that he had something to hide by
controlling how the story came to be known. That sounds like a coverup
to me. "What, if anything, was he covering up?" is a question for law
enforcement, congress, the press, etc to determine. I can't explain to
you why Cheney acts like a guilty person. Maybe that's just the way he
is.
I see now. It is a matter of projection.
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.
|
|
|
| User: "tenjets" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
19 Feb 2006 12:35:07 AM |
|
|
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EDBD40BD4Dbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:ZUPJf.14840$2O6.3785@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EC532EB9C7bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse
present misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill
Clinton? The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code
violation, try telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because
of Ted Kennedy's worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try
telling her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well
that excuse works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new quail
stamps that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say that
the posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight. What they
are doing is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the
egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those
trying to politicise such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses, the
minor error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney appears to
have used his power to coverup the mishap and is deserving as much
scrutiny for *that* minor error as any of his predecessors in public
office have received, from Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
Accidents will happen and thankfully, the injured man is recoverd and
returned home. As for a coverup, what coverup?
As I said, Cheney gave the impression that he had something to hide by
controlling how the story came to be known. That sounds like a coverup
to me. "What, if anything, was he covering up?" is a question for law
enforcement, congress, the press, etc to determine. I can't explain to
you why Cheney acts like a guilty person. Maybe that's just the way he
is.
I see now. It is a matter of projection.
Missed. Nice try.
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chip Anderson" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
19 Feb 2006 01:00:40 AM |
|
|
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:vkUJf.10123$rL5.6808@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EDBD40BD4Dbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:ZUPJf.14840$2O6.3785@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EC532EB9C7bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse
present misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill
Clinton? The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code
violation, try telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because
of Ted Kennedy's worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try
telling her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well
that excuse works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new quail
stamps that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say that
the posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight. What they
are doing is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the
egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those
trying to politicise such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses, the
minor error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney appears to
have used his power to coverup the mishap and is deserving as much
scrutiny for *that* minor error as any of his predecessors in public
office have received, from Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
Accidents will happen and thankfully, the injured man is recoverd and
returned home. As for a coverup, what coverup?
As I said, Cheney gave the impression that he had something to hide by
controlling how the story came to be known. That sounds like a coverup
to me. "What, if anything, was he covering up?" is a question for law
enforcement, congress, the press, etc to determine. I can't explain to
you why Cheney acts like a guilty person. Maybe that's just the way he
is.
I see now. It is a matter of projection.
Missed. Nice try.
I beg to differ, but I hit the bullseye.
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.
|
|
|
| User: "tenjets" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
19 Feb 2006 01:19:55 AM |
|
|
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976FAD8B5417bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:vkUJf.10123$rL5.6808@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EDBD40BD4Dbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:ZUPJf.14840$2O6.3785@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EC532EB9C7bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse
present misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill
Clinton? The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code
violation, try telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because
of Ted Kennedy's worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try
telling her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well
that excuse works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new quail
stamps that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say that
the posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight. What they
are doing is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the
egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those
trying to politicise such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses, the
minor error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney appears to
have used his power to coverup the mishap and is deserving as much
scrutiny for *that* minor error as any of his predecessors in public
office have received, from Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
Accidents will happen and thankfully, the injured man is recoverd and
returned home. As for a coverup, what coverup?
As I said, Cheney gave the impression that he had something to hide by
controlling how the story came to be known. That sounds like a coverup
to me. "What, if anything, was he covering up?" is a question for law
enforcement, congress, the press, etc to determine. I can't explain to
you why Cheney acts like a guilty person. Maybe that's just the way he
is.
I see now. It is a matter of projection.
Missed. Nice try.
I beg to differ, but I hit the bullseye.
When you can't defend your argument, stay on point or counter logically,
attack your opponent. Didn't work. Missed by a mile. But, hey, you get an
opinion like everybody else.
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chip Anderson" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
19 Feb 2006 02:27:55 AM |
|
|
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:v_UJf.22227$_S7.2437@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976FAD8B5417bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:vkUJf.10123$rL5.6808@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EDBD40BD4Dbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:ZUPJf.14840$2O6.3785@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EC532EB9C7bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in
message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse
present misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill
Clinton? The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code
violation, try telling the officer you shouldn't be cited
because of Ted Kennedy's worse conduct. See how well that
excuse works. Similarly, when your wife catches you with your
mistress, try telling her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with
Monica. See how well that excuse works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new
quail stamps that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not
having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say
that the posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight.
What they are doing is pointing out that there is really no
comparison to the egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat
politicians for those trying to politicise such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses,
the minor error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney
appears to have used his power to coverup the mishap and is
deserving as much scrutiny for *that* minor error as any of his
predecessors in public office have received, from Clinton to
Kennedy to Nixon.
Accidents will happen and thankfully, the injured man is recoverd
and returned home. As for a coverup, what coverup?
As I said, Cheney gave the impression that he had something to
hide by controlling how the story came to be known. That sounds
like a coverup to me. "What, if anything, was he covering up?" is
a question for law enforcement, congress, the press, etc to
determine. I can't explain to you why Cheney acts like a guilty
person. Maybe that's just the way he is.
I see now. It is a matter of projection.
Missed. Nice try.
I beg to differ, but I hit the bullseye.
When you can't defend your argument, stay on point or counter
logically, attack your opponent. Didn't work. Missed by a mile. But,
hey, you get an opinion like everybody else.
When you can defend your argument, stay on point and counter with logic.
Or you could simply continue with astute observation, plink. Your turn,
and you can have the final word.
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Passerby Passerby @midnight.net" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
19 Feb 2006 09:56:43 PM |
|
|
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EC532EB9C7bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try
telling her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well
that excuse works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new quail
stamps that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say that the
posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight. What they are
doing is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the
egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those
trying to politicise such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses, the
minor error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney appears to
have used his power to coverup the mishap and is deserving as much
scrutiny for *that* minor error as any of his predecessors in public
office have received, from Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
Accidents will happen and thankfully, the injured man is recoverd and
returned home. As for a coverup, what coverup?
A "hunter"/gunhandler who misfires and doesn't look before shooting is
negligent. Period.
An accident...yes. Negligent...also. As in...You "accidentally" hit a
pedestrian because you failed to have your car under control. Accident?
Yes. Negligence? That too.
The coverup was in the sequence of events in how and when the "incident" was
first reported and to whom, finally reported and by whom to whom, and the
contradictory statements by the alleged lie-witness, Armstrong. She is
purported to have seen "the whole thing", but her first statement in an AP
interview was (paraphrased) that when she saw the "activity, her first
thought was that something had happened to the Vice. She also claimed "zip,
zero, nada" as to drinking. Cheney admitted to "one beer" (sneer thrown
in). Add to all of that, the initial hairbrained, arrogant, ill-conceived
attempt to blame the victim for not following "protocol".
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.
|
|
|
| User: "Billy" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
20 Feb 2006 10:02:28 AM |
|
|
"Passerby" <Passerby @midnight.net> wrote in message
news:V2bKf.48746$697.24389@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EC532EB9C7bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net:
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try
telling her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well
that excuse works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new quail
stamps that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say that the
posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight. What they are
doing is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the
egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those
trying to politicise such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses, the
minor error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney appears to
have used his power to coverup the mishap and is deserving as much
scrutiny for *that* minor error as any of his predecessors in public
office have received, from Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
Accidents will happen and thankfully, the injured man is recoverd and
returned home. As for a coverup, what coverup?
A "hunter"/gunhandler who misfires and doesn't look before shooting is
negligent. Period.
An accident...yes. Negligent...also. As in...You "accidentally" hit a
pedestrian because you failed to have your car under control. Accident?
Yes. Negligence? That too.
The coverup was in the sequence of events in how and when the "incident"
was first reported and to whom,
Shut the hell up until you at least learn the fact about the case. It was
reported to the police within minutes of the shooting.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Billy" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
18 Feb 2006 07:16:19 PM |
|
|
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new quail stamps
that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say that the
posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight. What they are doing
is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the egregious
behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those trying to
politicise
such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses, the minor
error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney appears to have used
his power to coverup the mishap and is deserving as much scrutiny for
*that* minor error as any of his predecessors in public office have
received, from Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
He did not try to cover it up, if Cheney had wanted to cover it up, you
would not know about it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tenjets" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
18 Feb 2006 07:25:27 PM |
|
|
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:0FPJf.78$vd2.47@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new quail stamps
that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say that the
posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight. What they are
doing
is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the egregious
behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those trying to
politicise
such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses, the minor
error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney appears to have used
his power to coverup the mishap and is deserving as much scrutiny for
*that* minor error as any of his predecessors in public office have
received, from Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
He did not try to cover it up, if Cheney had wanted to cover it up, you
would not know about it.
I suppose that makes you feel really good.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Billy" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
18 Feb 2006 09:11:10 PM |
|
|
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:bOPJf.14839$2O6.5198@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:0FPJf.78$vd2.47@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new quail
stamps
that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say that the
posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight. What they are
doing
is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the egregious
behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those trying to
politicise
such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses, the minor
error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney appears to have used
his power to coverup the mishap and is deserving as much scrutiny for
*that* minor error as any of his predecessors in public office have
received, from Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
He did not try to cover it up, if Cheney had wanted to cover it up, you
would not know about it.
I suppose that makes you feel really good.
To set the record straight after someone tries to smear the good name of my
Vice President, yes it does.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tenjets" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
18 Feb 2006 09:25:08 PM |
|
|
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:HkRJf.83$vd2.27@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:bOPJf.14839$2O6.5198@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:0FPJf.78$vd2.47@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that
excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new quail
stamps
that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say that the
posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight. What they are
doing
is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the egregious
behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those trying to
politicise
such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses, the
minor error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney appears to
have used his power to coverup the mishap and is deserving as much
scrutiny for *that* minor error as any of his predecessors in public
office have received, from Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
He did not try to cover it up, if Cheney had wanted to cover it up, you
would not know about it.
I suppose that makes you feel really good.
To set the record straight after someone tries to smear the good name of
my Vice President, yes it does.
Are you old enough to enlist? Your Vice President needs you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Billy" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
19 Feb 2006 05:30:44 PM |
|
|
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:oyRJf.10098$rL5.1968@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:HkRJf.83$vd2.27@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:bOPJf.14839$2O6.5198@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:0FPJf.78$vd2.47@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse present
misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code violation, try
telling the officer you shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's
worse conduct. See how well that excuse works.
Similarly, when your wife catches you with your mistress, try
telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that
excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new quail
stamps
that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say that the
posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight. What they are
doing
is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the egregious
behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those trying to
politicise
such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses, the
minor error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney appears to
have used his power to coverup the mishap and is deserving as much
scrutiny for *that* minor error as any of his predecessors in public
office have received, from Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
He did not try to cover it up, if Cheney had wanted to cover it up, you
would not know about it.
I suppose that makes you feel really good.
To set the record straight after someone tries to smear the good name of
my Vice President, yes it does.
Are you old enough to enlist? Your Vice President needs you.
I did my tour, why don't you step up?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chip Anderson" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
19 Feb 2006 08:24:50 PM |
|
|
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in news:0c7Kf.134$vd2.11@fed1read04:
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:oyRJf.10098$rL5.1968@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:HkRJf.83$vd2.27@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:bOPJf.14839$2O6.5198@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:0FPJf.78$vd2.47@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse
present misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill
Clinton? The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code
violation, try telling the officer you shouldn't be cited
because of Ted Kennedy's worse conduct. See how well that
excuse works. Similarly, when your wife catches you with your
mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that
excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new
quail stamps
that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say
that the posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight.
What they are doing
is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the
egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those
trying to politicise
such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses,
the minor error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney
appears to have used his power to coverup the mishap and is
deserving as much scrutiny for *that* minor error as any of his
predecessors in public office have received, from Clinton to
Kennedy to Nixon.
He did not try to cover it up, if Cheney had wanted to cover it
up, you would not know about it.
I suppose that makes you feel really good.
To set the record straight after someone tries to smear the good
name of my Vice President, yes it does.
Are you old enough to enlist? Your Vice President needs you.
I did my tour, why don't you step up?
It really doesn't matter to such as tenjets. If you have served in the
armed forces and you don't fit their world view, you become a
"swiftboater".
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Blankenship" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
19 Feb 2006 10:02:14 PM |
|
|
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976FD047A5A9Cbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in news:0c7Kf.134$vd2.11@fed1read04:
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:oyRJf.10098$rL5.1968@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:HkRJf.83$vd2.27@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:bOPJf.14839$2O6.5198@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:0FPJf.78$vd2.47@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse
present misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill
Clinton? The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code
violation, try telling the officer you shouldn't be cited
because of Ted Kennedy's worse conduct. See how well that
excuse works. Similarly, when your wife catches you with your
mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that
excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new
quail stamps
that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say
that the posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight.
What they are doing
is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the
egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those
trying to politicise
such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses,
the minor error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney
appears to have used his power to coverup the mishap and is
deserving as much scrutiny for *that* minor error as any of his
predecessors in public office have received, from Clinton to
Kennedy to Nixon.
He did not try to cover it up, if Cheney had wanted to cover it
up, you would not know about it.
I suppose that makes you feel really good.
To set the record straight after someone tries to smear the good
name of my Vice President, yes it does.
Are you old enough to enlist? Your Vice President needs you.
I did my tour, why don't you step up?
It really doesn't matter to such as tenjets. If you have served in the
armed forces and you don't fit their world view, you become a
"swiftboater".
--
---
Chip
Do you think you could say anything more stupid and untrue? What are you
trying to accomplish by saying something so asinine?
.
|
|
|
| User: "tenjets" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
20 Feb 2006 12:43:58 AM |
|
|
"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:abbKf.3339$JR6.1830@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976FD047A5A9Cbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in news:0c7Kf.134$vd2.11@fed1read04:
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:oyRJf.10098$rL5.1968@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:HkRJf.83$vd2.27@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:bOPJf.14839$2O6.5198@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:0FPJf.78$vd2.47@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse
present misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill
Clinton? The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code
violation, try telling the officer you shouldn't be cited
because of Ted Kennedy's worse conduct. See how well that
excuse works. Similarly, when your wife catches you with your
mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that
excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new
quail stamps
that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say
that the posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight.
What they are doing
is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the
egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those
trying to politicise
such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses,
the minor error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney
appears to have used his power to coverup the mishap and is
deserving as much scrutiny for *that* minor error as any of his
predecessors in public office have received, from Clinton to
Kennedy to Nixon.
He did not try to cover it up, if Cheney had wanted to cover it
up, you would not know about it.
I suppose that makes you feel really good.
To set the record straight after someone tries to smear the good
name of my Vice President, yes it does.
Are you old enough to enlist? Your Vice President needs you.
I did my tour, why don't you step up?
It really doesn't matter to such as tenjets. If you have served in the
armed forces and you don't fit their world view, you become a
"swiftboater".
--
---
Chip
Do you think you could say anything more stupid and untrue? What are you
trying to accomplish by saying something so asinine?
I don't mind them taking that lame tactic. It just shows that Chips and
Billys have nothing but their fear. They don't even even have Bush and
Cheney. They're on their own and think that their love (!) of their leaders
is reciprocated. Poor bastards. As far as military experience goes, though,
I can say that Cheney has shot more people than I have, but, as both of us
came of age in the Vietnam era, we do have the same amount of time in
uniform.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chip Anderson" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
21 Feb 2006 07:04:59 PM |
|
|
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:OydKf.58751$PL5.16063@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com:
"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:abbKf.3339$JR6.1830@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976FD047A5A9Cbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in
news:0c7Kf.134$vd2.11@fed1read04:
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:oyRJf.10098$rL5.1968@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:HkRJf.83$vd2.27@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:bOPJf.14839$2O6.5198@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:0FPJf.78$vd2.47@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in
message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse
present misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or
Bill Clinton? The next time you're stopped for a Motor
Vehicle Code violation, try telling the officer you
shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's worse conduct.
See how well that excuse works. Similarly, when your wife
catches you with your mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well
that excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new
quail stamps
that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say
that the posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor
oversight. What they are doing
is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the
egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for
those trying to politicise
such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting
licenses, the minor error of shooting a person
notwithstanding. Cheney appears to have used his power to
coverup the mishap and is deserving as much scrutiny for
*that* minor error as any of his predecessors in public
office have received, from Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
He did not try to cover it up, if Cheney had wanted to cover
it up, you would not know about it.
I suppose that makes you feel really good.
To set the record straight after someone tries to smear the good
name of my Vice President, yes it does.
Are you old enough to enlist? Your Vice President needs you.
I did my tour, why don't you step up?
It really doesn't matter to such as tenjets. If you have served in
the armed forces and you don't fit their world view, you become a
"swiftboater".
--
---
Chip
Do you think you could say anything more stupid and untrue? What are
you trying to accomplish by saying something so asinine?
I don't mind them taking that lame tactic. It just shows that Chips
and Billys have nothing but their fear. They don't even even have Bush
and Cheney. They're on their own and think that their love (!) of
their leaders is reciprocated. Poor bastards. As far as military
experience goes, though, I can say that Cheney has shot more people
than I have, but, as both of us came of age in the Vietnam era, we do
have the same amount of time in uniform.
Have nothing but fear of what? You'll have to clue me on on this one. As
for loving my leaders, you must be joking.
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.
|
|
|
| User: "tenjets" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
22 Feb 2006 01:09:30 AM |
|
|
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9771C2AB9F05Cbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:OydKf.58751$PL5.16063@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com:
"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:abbKf.3339$JR6.1830@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976FD047A5A9Cbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in
news:0c7Kf.134$vd2.11@fed1read04:
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:oyRJf.10098$rL5.1968@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:HkRJf.83$vd2.27@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:bOPJf.14839$2O6.5198@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:0FPJf.78$vd2.47@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in
message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse
present misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or
Bill Clinton? The next time you're stopped for a Motor
Vehicle Code violation, try telling the officer you
shouldn't be cited because of Ted Kennedy's worse conduct.
See how well that excuse works. Similarly, when your wife
catches you with your mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well
that excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new
quail stamps
that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say
that the posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor
oversight. What they are doing
is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the
egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for
those trying to politicise
such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting
licenses, the minor error of shooting a person
notwithstanding. Cheney appears to have used his power to
coverup the mishap and is deserving as much scrutiny for
*that* minor error as any of his predecessors in public
office have received, from Clinton to Kennedy to Nixon.
He did not try to cover it up, if Cheney had wanted to cover
it up, you would not know about it.
I suppose that makes you feel really good.
To set the record straight after someone tries to smear the good
name of my Vice President, yes it does.
Are you old enough to enlist? Your Vice President needs you.
I did my tour, why don't you step up?
It really doesn't matter to such as tenjets. If you have served in
the armed forces and you don't fit their world view, you become a
"swiftboater".
--
---
Chip
Do you think you could say anything more stupid and untrue? What are
you trying to accomplish by saying something so asinine?
I don't mind them taking that lame tactic. It just shows that Chips
and Billys have nothing but their fear. They don't even even have Bush
and Cheney. They're on their own and think that their love (!) of
their leaders is reciprocated. Poor bastards. As far as military
experience goes, though, I can say that Cheney has shot more people
than I have, but, as both of us came of age in the Vietnam era, we do
have the same amount of time in uniform.
Have nothing but fear of what? You'll have to clue me on on this one. As
for loving my leaders, you must be joking.
Billy is the one with leader adoration. I'm classsing you in with him, sorry
if it's inappropriate.
Fear. I actually do know and work with a lot of conservatives. They actually
fear being locked up if liberal took control of the land (as if the 50 years
prior of this warranted that fear). I am not making this up. Respect to you
if you're not one of those kooks.
Cheney's activities still need to be examined.
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Billy" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
20 Feb 2006 01:58:27 PM |
|
|
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:OydKf.58751$PL5.16063@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:abbKf.3339$JR6.1830@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976FD047A5A9Cbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in news:0c7Kf.134$vd2.11@fed1read04:
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:oyRJf.10098$rL5.1968@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:HkRJf.83$vd2.27@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:bOPJf.14839$2O6.5198@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:0FPJf.78$vd2.47@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse
present misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill
Clinton? The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code
violation, try telling the officer you shouldn't be cited
because of Ted Kennedy's worse conduct. See how well that
excuse works. Similarly, when your wife catches you with your
mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well that
excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new
quail stamps
that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say
that the posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight.
What they are doing
is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the
egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for those
trying to politicise
such a minor error.
I doubt if wrab is speaking about stamps for hunting licenses,
the minor error of shooting a person notwithstanding. Cheney
appears to have used his power to coverup the mishap and is
deserving as much scrutiny for *that* minor error as any of his
predecessors in public office have received, from Clinton to
Kennedy to Nixon.
He did not try to cover it up, if Cheney had wanted to cover it
up, you would not know about it.
I suppose that makes you feel really good.
To set the record straight after someone tries to smear the good
name of my Vice President, yes it does.
Are you old enough to enlist? Your Vice President needs you.
I did my tour, why don't you step up?
It really doesn't matter to such as tenjets. If you have served in the
armed forces and you don't fit their world view, you become a
"swiftboater".
--
---
Chip
Do you think you could say anything more stupid and untrue? What are you
trying to accomplish by saying something so asinine?
I don't mind them taking that lame tactic. It just shows that Chips and
Billys have nothing but their fear. They don't even even have Bush and
Cheney. They're on their own and think that their love (!) of their
leaders is reciprocated. Poor bastards. As far as military experience
goes, though, I can say that Cheney has shot more people than I have, but,
as both of us came of age in the Vietnam era, we do have the same amount
of time in uniform.
You, my friend, are the one that told me to sign up, how is that my "lame
tactic"? You are the one that made the claim that "he appears" to have done
something, you have no proof of and only your own suspicion as evidence. How
is that a "lame attic" of mine?
.
|
|
|
| User: "tenjets" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Kennedy; Not Clinton |
20 Feb 2006 06:25:18 PM |
|
|
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ZapKf.219$vd2.195@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:OydKf.58751$PL5.16063@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:abbKf.3339$JR6.1830@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Xns976FD047A5A9Cbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in news:0c7Kf.134$vd2.11@fed1read04:
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:oyRJf.10098$rL5.1968@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:HkRJf.83$vd2.27@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:bOPJf.14839$2O6.5198@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:0FPJf.78$vd2.47@fed1read04...
"tenjets" <doh@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:tDOJf.10042$rL5.3333@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Chip Anderson" <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote in
message
news:Xns976EB4C32EB10bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18...
"wrab" <wrab@usa.com> wrote in
news:1140305803.399116.76450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
What benefit do some posters here get from trying to excuse
present misconduct by pointing fingers at Ted Kennedy or Bill
Clinton? The next time you're stopped for a Motor Vehicle Code
violation, try telling the officer you shouldn't be cited
because of Ted Kennedy's worse conduct. See how well that
excuse works. Similarly, when your wife catches you with your
mistress, try telling
her of Bill Clinton's misconduct with Monica. See how well
that
excuse
works.
What misconduct would that be? Are you speaking of the new
quail stamps
that hunters, at this time, get a warning for not having.
Without having seen the posts you are addressing, I will say
that the posters are not excusing the V.P.'s minor oversight.
What they are doing
is pointing out that there is really no comparison to the
egregious behaviour exhibited by Democrat politicians for | | | | | | | | | | | | |
