| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
29 Dec 2005 05:51:38 AM |
| Object: |
NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
From The Associated Press, 12/29/05:
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-newsbrief,0,1411218.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
NSA Web Site Plants 'Cookies' on Computers
NEW YORK (AP) --
The National Security Agency's Internet site has been placing files on
visitors' computers that can track their Web surfing activity despite
strict federal rules banning most of them.
These files, known as "cookies," disappeared after a privacy activist
complained and The Associated Press made inquiries this week, and
agency officials acknowledged Wednesday they had made a mistake.
Nonetheless, the issue raises questions about privacy at a spy agency
already on the defensive amid reports of a secretive eavesdropping
program in the United States.
______________________________________________________
How 'bout them cookies.
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
29 Dec 2005 11:33:01 AM |
|
|
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in your
browser.
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mej7r19qetvib4m57tavtqk4cahop79fnc@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/29/05:
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-newsbrief,0,1411218.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
NSA Web Site Plants 'Cookies' on Computers
NEW YORK (AP) --
The National Security Agency's Internet site has been placing files on
visitors' computers that can track their Web surfing activity despite
strict federal rules banning most of them.
These files, known as "cookies," disappeared after a privacy activist
complained and The Associated Press made inquiries this week, and
agency officials acknowledged Wednesday they had made a mistake.
Nonetheless, the issue raises questions about privacy at a spy agency
already on the defensive amid reports of a secretive eavesdropping
program in the United States.
______________________________________________________
How 'bout them cookies.
Harry
.
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Hewitt" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
29 Dec 2005 12:01:33 PM |
|
|
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
Whay are you putting hte onus on the victims, making us turn off cookies to
visit federal sites when we turn them on to visit other sites?
Shouldn;t we expevt our government to obey the laew?
Sorry, I forgot. This is the Bush administration. They don;t _have_ to obey
the law!!
Larry
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mej7r19qetvib4m57tavtqk4cahop79fnc@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/29/05:
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-newsbrief,0,1411218.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
NSA Web Site Plants 'Cookies' on Computers
NEW YORK (AP) --
The National Security Agency's Internet site has been placing files on
visitors' computers that can track their Web surfing activity despite
strict federal rules banning most of them.
These files, known as "cookies," disappeared after a privacy activist
complained and The Associated Press made inquiries this week, and
agency officials acknowledged Wednesday they had made a mistake.
Nonetheless, the issue raises questions about privacy at a spy agency
already on the defensive amid reports of a secretive eavesdropping
program in the United States.
______________________________________________________
How 'bout them cookies.
Harry
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
29 Dec 2005 02:01:07 PM |
|
|
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
Because they are the good guys, and you are the bad guys.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
31 Dec 2005 10:50:07 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote:
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in your browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
Because they are the good guys, and you are the bad guys.
Look at this Republican. His fascist regime commits crimes against
the law-abiding citizens and this rightard shitstain calls his
Fuhrer's criminals "the good guys" and his fascist regime's victims
"the bad guys."
That's Republicanism, folks. Hatred of the Constitution and the
rights, liberties, and freedoms that America stands for: That's what
Republicanism is.
---
http://www.ElmerFudd.US/ http://www.rightard.org/ http://www.thedarkwind.org/
"SUVs don't burn down by themselves." -- Some Elf
"What? You're not dead yet? Man, I gotta get a bigger voodoo doll!" - Barb
"Someone give bush a ***** so we can finally impeach him" -- AVet4Peace
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
01 Jan 2006 10:54:45 PM |
|
|
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORG> wrote in message
news:11renofgnieoud5@corp.supernews.com...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote:
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in
your browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
Because they are the good guys, and you are the bad guys.
Look at this Republican. His fascist regime commits crimes against
the law-abiding citizens and this rightard shitstain calls his
Fuhrer's criminals "the good guys" and his fascist regime's victims
"the bad guys."
That's Republicanism, folks. Hatred of the Constitution and the
rights, liberties, and freedoms that America stands for: That's what
Republicanism is.
Name calling moron with no argument. FOAD
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Hewitt" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
29 Dec 2005 04:31:03 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:41itk1F1dvp2iU1@individual.net...
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in
your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
Because they are the good guys, and you are the bad guys.
People who break the law are the good guys? Law abiders likeme ar eth bad
guys?
You are truly, truly mentally ill.
Larry
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
29 Dec 2005 04:53:44 PM |
|
|
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp1o86$354q$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:41itk1F1dvp2iU1@individual.net...
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in
your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
Because they are the good guys, and you are the bad guys.
People who break the law are the good guys? Law abiders likeme ar eth bad
guys?
You are truly, truly mentally ill.
Your humor module needs servicing.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Hewitt" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
30 Dec 2005 12:35:46 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:41j7nmF1f2oj4U1@individual.net...
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp1o86$354q$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:41itk1F1dvp2iU1@individual.net...
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in
your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
Because they are the good guys, and you are the bad guys.
People who break the law are the good guys? Law abiders likeme ar eth
bad
guys?
You are truly, truly mentally ill.
Your humor module needs servicing.
If your previous post was intended to be humorous then you have truly
proven that you are mentally ill.
Larry
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
30 Dec 2005 10:33:01 AM |
|
|
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp2kl3$3ghm$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:41j7nmF1f2oj4U1@individual.net...
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp1o86$354q$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:41itk1F1dvp2iU1@individual.net...
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature
in
your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
Because they are the good guys, and you are the bad guys.
People who break the law are the good guys? Law abiders likeme ar eth
bad
guys?
You are truly, truly mentally ill.
Your humor module needs servicing.
If your previous post was intended to be humorous then you have truly
proven that you are mentally ill.
Why do I find your diagnosis humorously uninformed, and mere childish
insult?
Mental defectives should not presume to diagnose their betters.
Jim E
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
03 Jan 2006 12:07:22 AM |
|
|
Jim E wrote:
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp2kl3$3ghm$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:41j7nmF1f2oj4U1@individual.net...
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp1o86$354q$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:41itk1F1dvp2iU1@individual.net...
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature
in
your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
Because they are the good guys, and you are the bad guys.
People who break the law are the good guys? Law abiders likeme ar eth
bad
guys?
You are truly, truly mentally ill.
Your humor module needs servicing.
If your previous post was intended to be humorous then you have truly
proven that you are mentally ill.
Why do I find your diagnosis humorously uninformed, and mere childish
insult?
Mental defectives should not presume to diagnose their betters.
Nice diagnosis there...
RT
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
29 Dec 2005 05:03:34 PM |
|
|
NSA tracks no more than butt hair follicles, correctly.
In their pursuit of "social criminals" they are batting LESS THAN ZERO.
a lovely sonnet on the free internet unencumbered by nose picking NSA
web surfer hack agents
***danke dearest TRUTH***
Your name is inexorably apropos. Keep up the EXCELLENT work. Don't
tire, just keep at those little worms who eat away at the decency of
mankind. In the end you can nourish yourself in cosumming them and
keep at it. Life is fantastic thus.
PROTEUS
http://www.angelfire.com/de/Boiishaft/proteus.html
This is exactly the type of brainwashing I'm talking about. You need to
think rationally, and you are far from being capable of that. For you
to say "conspiracy kook who dreams up the insane kook notion" just
proves it. You're automatically starting with the notion that any
theory that contradicts the government is a "insane kook notion"
dreamed up by a "conspiracy kook". You're fooling yourself into
thinking that these alternate theories are untrue even before you start
investigating it!
That's no way to solve a crime.
When was the last time Bush told America the TRUTH about anything? The
burden of proof should be on the government. They provided NO PROOF to
support their version of 9/11. Their version is filled with holes,
misinformation, and outright lies.
Take a look at the picture of the "confession video". It is NOT bin
Ladin. His facial structure is different.He wears a gold ring which is
against his religion. The writes with his right hand when the FBI's own
website says he's left handed. Some people will say... "bin Laden was
on steriods to treat his diabetes, which explains his puffy face", "his
left hand was hurt so used his right hand", "the gold ring was fake".
Us Americans are going ***out of our way*** to confirm the government's
story. We're saying that everything is just pure coincidence and
doesn't mean anything. But that is not rational! Maybe if there were
just one coincidence, then okay. But allllllllllll these coincidences?
That's not how things work.
There is soooooo much evidence showing the WTC came down from
controlled demoilitions. The government did not debunk all of it. The
burden of proof is on them, NOT US.
1. Firefighters, EMT, reporters, witnesses, FBI, etc said: explosions,
controlled demolitons, bombs, secondary devices, flashes popping around
the building, etc, etc, etc
2. Characteristics of controlled demolitions: Squibs, horizonal
ejection of debris, molten steel under the towers for weeks, etc etc
etc
3. Breaking Federal Law by destroying evidence from a crime scene. Not
just any crime scene... the BIGGEST terrorist attack in US history. Not
the mention, the first fire-induced steel framed building collapse in
world history.
4.Building 7 onwer Silverstein just happened to buy a 99 yr lease on
the whole WTC complex just 6 weeks before 9/11? Coincidence? Come on!
That's just SOME of the evidence. There's a TON more.
If one, or even two of the above were all that happened, then okay, it
would be very questionable. But not *all* those things happening. That
is not how the world works. Think about it.
TRUTH
Jim E wrote:
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp1o86$354q$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:41itk1F1dvp2iU1@individual.net...
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in
your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
Because they are the good guys, and you are the bad guys.
People who break the law are the good guys? Law abiders likeme ar eth bad
guys?
You are truly, truly mentally ill.
Your humor module needs servicing.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
29 Dec 2005 05:16:30 PM |
|
|
<proteus_the_slovene@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135897414.693136.15830@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
NSA tracks no more than butt hair follicles, correctly.
In their pursuit of "social criminals" they are batting LESS THAN ZERO.
a lovely sonnet on the free internet unencumbered by nose picking NSA
web surfer hack agents
***danke dearest TRUTH***
Your name is inexorably apropos. Keep up the EXCELLENT work. Don't
tire, just keep at those little worms who eat away at the decency of
mankind. In the end you can nourish yourself in cosumming them and
keep at it. Life is fantastic thus.
PROTEUS
http://www.angelfire.com/de/Boiishaft/proteus.html
This is exactly the type of brainwashing I'm talking about. You need to
think rationally, and you are far from being capable of that. For you
to say "conspiracy kook who dreams up the insane kook notion" just
proves it. You're automatically starting with the notion that any
theory that contradicts the government is a "insane kook notion"
dreamed up by a "conspiracy kook". You're fooling yourself into
thinking that these alternate theories are untrue even before you start
investigating it!
That's no way to solve a crime.
When was the last time Bush told America the TRUTH about anything? The
burden of proof should be on the government. They provided NO PROOF to
support their version of 9/11. Their version is filled with holes,
misinformation, and outright lies.
Take a look at the picture of the "confession video". It is NOT bin
Ladin. His facial structure is different.He wears a gold ring which is
against his religion. The writes with his right hand when the FBI's own
website says he's left handed. Some people will say... "bin Laden was
on steriods to treat his diabetes, which explains his puffy face", "his
left hand was hurt so used his right hand", "the gold ring was fake".
Us Americans are going ***out of our way*** to confirm the government's
story. We're saying that everything is just pure coincidence and
doesn't mean anything. But that is not rational! Maybe if there were
just one coincidence, then okay. But allllllllllll these coincidences?
That's not how things work.
There is soooooo much evidence showing the WTC came down from
controlled demoilitions. The government did not debunk all of it. The
burden of proof is on them, NOT US.
1. Firefighters, EMT, reporters, witnesses, FBI, etc said: explosions,
controlled demolitons, bombs, secondary devices, flashes popping around
the building, etc, etc, etc
2. Characteristics of controlled demolitions: Squibs, horizonal
ejection of debris, molten steel under the towers for weeks, etc etc
etc
3. Breaking Federal Law by destroying evidence from a crime scene. Not
just any crime scene... the BIGGEST terrorist attack in US history. Not
the mention, the first fire-induced steel framed building collapse in
world history.
4.Building 7 onwer Silverstein just happened to buy a 99 yr lease on
the whole WTC complex just 6 weeks before 9/11? Coincidence? Come on!
That's just SOME of the evidence. There's a TON more.
If one, or even two of the above were all that happened, then okay, it
would be very questionable. But not *all* those things happening. That
is not how the world works. Think about it.
TRUTH
KOOK !
.
|
|
|
| User: "c-bee1" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
30 Dec 2005 08:18:14 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:41j92cF1f2m7kU1@individual.net...
<proteus_the_slovene@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135897414.693136.15830@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
NSA tracks no more than butt hair follicles, correctly.
In their pursuit of "social criminals" they are batting LESS THAN ZERO.
a lovely sonnet on the free internet unencumbered by nose picking NSA
web surfer hack agents
***danke dearest TRUTH***
Your name is inexorably apropos. Keep up the EXCELLENT work. Don't
tire, just keep at those little worms who eat away at the decency of
mankind. In the end you can nourish yourself in cosumming them and
keep at it. Life is fantastic thus.
PROTEUS
http://www.angelfire.com/de/Boiishaft/proteus.html
This is exactly the type of brainwashing I'm talking about. You need to
think rationally, and you are far from being capable of that. For you
to say "conspiracy kook who dreams up the insane kook notion" just
proves it. You're automatically starting with the notion that any
theory that contradicts the government is a "insane kook notion"
dreamed up by a "conspiracy kook". You're fooling yourself into
thinking that these alternate theories are untrue even before you start
investigating it!
That's no way to solve a crime.
When was the last time Bush told America the TRUTH about anything? The
burden of proof should be on the government. They provided NO PROOF to
support their version of 9/11. Their version is filled with holes,
misinformation, and outright lies.
Take a look at the picture of the "confession video". It is NOT bin
Ladin. His facial structure is different.He wears a gold ring which is
against his religion. The writes with his right hand when the FBI's own
website says he's left handed. Some people will say... "bin Laden was
on steriods to treat his diabetes, which explains his puffy face", "his
left hand was hurt so used his right hand", "the gold ring was fake".
Us Americans are going ***out of our way*** to confirm the government's
story. We're saying that everything is just pure coincidence and
doesn't mean anything. But that is not rational! Maybe if there were
just one coincidence, then okay. But allllllllllll these coincidences?
That's not how things work.
There is soooooo much evidence showing the WTC came down from
controlled demoilitions. The government did not debunk all of it. The
burden of proof is on them, NOT US.
1. Firefighters, EMT, reporters, witnesses, FBI, etc said: explosions,
controlled demolitons, bombs, secondary devices, flashes popping around
the building, etc, etc, etc
2. Characteristics of controlled demolitions: Squibs, horizonal
ejection of debris, molten steel under the towers for weeks, etc etc
etc
3. Breaking Federal Law by destroying evidence from a crime scene. Not
just any crime scene... the BIGGEST terrorist attack in US history. Not
the mention, the first fire-induced steel framed building collapse in
world history.
4.Building 7 onwer Silverstein just happened to buy a 99 yr lease on
the whole WTC complex just 6 weeks before 9/11? Coincidence? Come on!
That's just SOME of the evidence. There's a TON more.
If one, or even two of the above were all that happened, then okay, it
would be very questionable. But not *all* those things happening. That
is not how the world works. Think about it.
TRUTH
KOOK !
rofl Like you'll ever be clean enough of THAT charge to speak up...!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
30 Dec 2005 10:30:19 AM |
|
|
"c-bee1" <c-bee1@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:Gkbtf.685770$xm3.662892@attbi_s21...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:41j92cF1f2m7kU1@individual.net...
<proteus_the_slovene@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135897414.693136.15830@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
NSA tracks no more than butt hair follicles, correctly.
In their pursuit of "social criminals" they are batting LESS THAN ZERO.
a lovely sonnet on the free internet unencumbered by nose picking NSA
web surfer hack agents
***danke dearest TRUTH***
Your name is inexorably apropos. Keep up the EXCELLENT work. Don't
tire, just keep at those little worms who eat away at the decency of
mankind. In the end you can nourish yourself in cosumming them and
keep at it. Life is fantastic thus.
PROTEUS
http://www.angelfire.com/de/Boiishaft/proteus.html
This is exactly the type of brainwashing I'm talking about. You need to
think rationally, and you are far from being capable of that. For you
to say "conspiracy kook who dreams up the insane kook notion" just
proves it. You're automatically starting with the notion that any
theory that contradicts the government is a "insane kook notion"
dreamed up by a "conspiracy kook". You're fooling yourself into
thinking that these alternate theories are untrue even before you start
investigating it!
That's no way to solve a crime.
When was the last time Bush told America the TRUTH about anything? The
burden of proof should be on the government. They provided NO PROOF to
support their version of 9/11. Their version is filled with holes,
misinformation, and outright lies.
Take a look at the picture of the "confession video". It is NOT bin
Ladin. His facial structure is different.He wears a gold ring which is
against his religion. The writes with his right hand when the FBI's own
website says he's left handed. Some people will say... "bin Laden was
on steriods to treat his diabetes, which explains his puffy face", "his
left hand was hurt so used his right hand", "the gold ring was fake".
Us Americans are going ***out of our way*** to confirm the government's
story. We're saying that everything is just pure coincidence and
doesn't mean anything. But that is not rational! Maybe if there were
just one coincidence, then okay. But allllllllllll these coincidences?
That's not how things work.
There is soooooo much evidence showing the WTC came down from
controlled demoilitions. The government did not debunk all of it. The
burden of proof is on them, NOT US.
1. Firefighters, EMT, reporters, witnesses, FBI, etc said: explosions,
controlled demolitons, bombs, secondary devices, flashes popping around
the building, etc, etc, etc
2. Characteristics of controlled demolitions: Squibs, horizonal
ejection of debris, molten steel under the towers for weeks, etc etc
etc
3. Breaking Federal Law by destroying evidence from a crime scene. Not
just any crime scene... the BIGGEST terrorist attack in US history. Not
the mention, the first fire-induced steel framed building collapse in
world history.
4.Building 7 onwer Silverstein just happened to buy a 99 yr lease on
the whole WTC complex just 6 weeks before 9/11? Coincidence? Come on!
That's just SOME of the evidence. There's a TON more.
If one, or even two of the above were all that happened, then okay, it
would be very questionable. But not *all* those things happening. That
is not how the world works. Think about it.
TRUTH
KOOK !
rofl Like you'll ever be clean enough of THAT charge to speak up...!
Please cite the last time I promoted some loony conspiracy theory .
Jim E
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "needledik doesnt have a canadian clue" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
30 Dec 2005 02:33:04 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:41j92cF1f2m7kU1@individual.net...
KOOK !
We KNOW you are, needledik.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
03 Jan 2006 12:06:53 AM |
|
|
Jim E wrote:
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
Because they are the good guys, and you are the bad guys.
But if YOU visit the site, you'd get the cookie too... Oh dear - that
means - you're a bad guy...
RT
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
31 Dec 2005 10:35:05 AM |
|
|
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
I don't think they are illegal, just against etiquette.
Whay are you putting hte onus on the victims, making us turn off cookies
to
visit federal sites when we turn them on to visit other sites?
Shouldn;t we expevt our government to obey the laew?
Sorry, I forgot. This is the Bush administration. They don;t _have_ to
obey
the law!!
Larry
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mej7r19qetvib4m57tavtqk4cahop79fnc@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/29/05:
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-newsbrief,0,1411218.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
NSA Web Site Plants 'Cookies' on Computers
NEW YORK (AP) --
The National Security Agency's Internet site has been placing files on
visitors' computers that can track their Web surfing activity despite
strict federal rules banning most of them.
These files, known as "cookies," disappeared after a privacy activist
complained and The Associated Press made inquiries this week, and
agency officials acknowledged Wednesday they had made a mistake.
Nonetheless, the issue raises questions about privacy at a spy agency
already on the defensive amid reports of a secretive eavesdropping
program in the United States.
______________________________________________________
How 'bout them cookies.
Harry
.
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Hewitt" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
31 Dec 2005 11:15:17 AM |
|
|
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:Zqytf.15965$tO4.10584@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in
your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
I don't think they are illegal, just against etiquette.
It is a regulation, not a statute.
My point is htat repuglicons are making excuses, again. They used to
campaign about making government run like business. A business that violated
a federal regulation would be subject to penalties, including everything
from a slap on the wrist to a fine to loss of the ability to do business
with the government to loss of licenses. A busiess employee who screwed up
like this would be terminated (unless he was a VP or higher).
But Bush's "responsible, ethical" government???
Nooooo. Excuses. Pooh poohing. Attacking the people who caight them.
Larry
Whay are you putting hte onus on the victims, making us turn off cookies
to
visit federal sites when we turn them on to visit other sites?
Shouldn;t we expevt our government to obey the laew?
Sorry, I forgot. This is the Bush administration. They don;t _have_ to
obey
the law!!
Larry
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mej7r19qetvib4m57tavtqk4cahop79fnc@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/29/05:
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-newsbrief,0,1411218.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
NSA Web Site Plants 'Cookies' on Computers
NEW YORK (AP) --
The National Security Agency's Internet site has been placing files
on
visitors' computers that can track their Web surfing activity despite
strict federal rules banning most of them.
These files, known as "cookies," disappeared after a privacy activist
complained and The Associated Press made inquiries this week, and
agency officials acknowledged Wednesday they had made a mistake.
Nonetheless, the issue raises questions about privacy at a spy agency
already on the defensive amid reports of a secretive eavesdropping
program in the United States.
______________________________________________________
How 'bout them cookies.
Harry
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bubali" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
31 Dec 2005 10:42:04 AM |
|
|
I don't think they are illegal, just against etiquette.
Take the "they are illegal, just against etiquette" and there you are ...you
don't think!
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:Zqytf.15965$tO4.10584@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in
your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
I don't think they are illegal, just against etiquette.
Whay are you putting hte onus on the victims, making us turn off cookies
to
visit federal sites when we turn them on to visit other sites?
Shouldn;t we expevt our government to obey the laew?
Sorry, I forgot. This is the Bush administration. They don;t _have_ to
obey
the law!!
Larry
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mej7r19qetvib4m57tavtqk4cahop79fnc@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/29/05:
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-newsbrief,0,1411218.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
NSA Web Site Plants 'Cookies' on Computers
NEW YORK (AP) --
The National Security Agency's Internet site has been placing files
on
visitors' computers that can track their Web surfing activity despite
strict federal rules banning most of them.
These files, known as "cookies," disappeared after a privacy activist
complained and The Associated Press made inquiries this week, and
agency officials acknowledged Wednesday they had made a mistake.
Nonetheless, the issue raises questions about privacy at a spy agency
already on the defensive amid reports of a secretive eavesdropping
program in the United States.
______________________________________________________
How 'bout them cookies.
Harry
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tempest" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
31 Dec 2005 02:19:50 PM |
|
|
Bubali wrote:
I don't think they are illegal, just against etiquette.
Take the "they are illegal, just against etiquette" and there you are ...you
don't think!
Taylor has this bad habit of being wrong on just about everything he posts.
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:Zqytf.15965$tO4.10584@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in
your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
I don't think they are illegal, just against etiquette.
Whay are you putting hte onus on the victims, making us turn off cookies
to
visit federal sites when we turn them on to visit other sites?
Shouldn;t we expevt our government to obey the laew?
Sorry, I forgot. This is the Bush administration. They don;t _have_ to
obey
the law!!
Larry
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mej7r19qetvib4m57tavtqk4cahop79fnc@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/29/05:
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-newsbrief,0,1411218.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
NSA Web Site Plants 'Cookies' on Computers
NEW YORK (AP) --
The National Security Agency's Internet site has been placing files
on
visitors' computers that can track their Web surfing activity despite
strict federal rules banning most of them.
These files, known as "cookies," disappeared after a privacy activist
complained and The Associated Press made inquiries this week, and
agency officials acknowledged Wednesday they had made a mistake.
Nonetheless, the issue raises questions about privacy at a spy agency
already on the defensive amid reports of a secretive eavesdropping
program in the United States.
______________________________________________________
How 'bout them cookies.
Harry
--
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do,
because I notice it always coincides with their own desires."
- Susan B. Anthony, 1896
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tempest" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
31 Dec 2005 02:17:39 PM |
|
|
Taylor wrote:
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
I don't think they are illegal, just against etiquette.
They are illegal, moron.
There's a specific law against it.
Whay are you putting hte onus on the victims, making us turn off cookies
to
visit federal sites when we turn them on to visit other sites?
Shouldn;t we expevt our government to obey the laew?
Sorry, I forgot. This is the Bush administration. They don;t _have_ to
obey
the law!!
Larry
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mej7r19qetvib4m57tavtqk4cahop79fnc@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/29/05:
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-newsbrief,0,1411218.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
NSA Web Site Plants 'Cookies' on Computers
NEW YORK (AP) --
The National Security Agency's Internet site has been placing files on
visitors' computers that can track their Web surfing activity despite
strict federal rules banning most of them.
These files, known as "cookies," disappeared after a privacy activist
complained and The Associated Press made inquiries this week, and
agency officials acknowledged Wednesday they had made a mistake.
Nonetheless, the issue raises questions about privacy at a spy agency
already on the defensive amid reports of a secretive eavesdropping
program in the United States.
______________________________________________________
How 'bout them cookies.
Harry
--
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do,
because I notice it always coincides with their own desires."
- Susan B. Anthony, 1896
.
|
|
|
| User: "Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
02 Jan 2006 09:33:01 AM |
|
|
"Tempest" <tempest@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43B6E8F1.2020208@hotmail.com...
Taylor wrote:
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:dp18es$2u07$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in
your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
I don't think they are illegal, just against etiquette.
They are illegal, moron.
There's a specific law against it.
Really? Name it.
Whay are you putting hte onus on the victims, making us turn off cookies
to
visit federal sites when we turn them on to visit other sites?
Shouldn;t we expevt our government to obey the laew?
Sorry, I forgot. This is the Bush administration. They don;t _have_ to
obey
the law!!
Larry
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mej7r19qetvib4m57tavtqk4cahop79fnc@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/29/05:
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-newsbrief,0,1411218.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
NSA Web Site Plants 'Cookies' on Computers
NEW YORK (AP) --
The National Security Agency's Internet site has been placing files on
visitors' computers that can track their Web surfing activity despite
strict federal rules banning most of them.
These files, known as "cookies," disappeared after a privacy activist
complained and The Associated Press made inquiries this week, and
agency officials acknowledged Wednesday they had made a mistake.
Nonetheless, the issue raises questions about privacy at a spy agency
already on the defensive amid reports of a secretive eavesdropping
program in the United States.
______________________________________________________
How 'bout them cookies.
Harry
--
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do,
because I notice it always coincides with their own desires."
- Susan B. Anthony, 1896
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lamont Cranston" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
29 Dec 2005 12:17:05 PM |
|
|
Larry Hewitt wrote:
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies. You can turn off this feature in your
browser.
It is illegal for fedeeal web sites to leave persistent cookies.
Why are you excusing them breaking the law.
Whay are you putting hte onus on the victims, making us turn off cookies to
visit federal sites when we turn them on to visit other sites?
Shouldn;t we expevt our government to obey the laew?
Sorry, I forgot. This is the Bush administration. They don;t _have_ to obey
the law!!
Laws are intended only for Democrats. Republicans are exempt.
Larry
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "ouroboros rex" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
29 Dec 2005 11:41:04 AM |
|
|
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:h5Vsf.14020$tO4.2254@tornado.texas.rr.com...
Almost all websites plant cookies.
Illegally?
You can turn off this feature in your
browser.
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mej7r19qetvib4m57tavtqk4cahop79fnc@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/29/05:
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-newsbrief,0,1411218.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
NSA Web Site Plants 'Cookies' on Computers
NEW YORK (AP) --
The National Security Agency's Internet site has been placing files on
visitors' computers that can track their Web surfing activity despite
strict federal rules banning most of them.
These files, known as "cookies," disappeared after a privacy activist
complained and The Associated Press made inquiries this week, and
agency officials acknowledged Wednesday they had made a mistake.
Nonetheless, the issue raises questions about privacy at a spy agency
already on the defensive amid reports of a secretive eavesdropping
program in the United States.
______________________________________________________
How 'bout them cookies.
Harry
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: NSA Web Site Tracks Web Surfers |
29 Dec 2005 12:49:30 PM |
|
|
Harry Hope wrote:
From The Associated Press, 12/29/05:
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-newsbrief,0,1411218.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
NSA Web Site Plants 'Cookies' on Computers
NEW YORK (AP) --
The National Security Agency's Internet site has been placing files on
visitors' computers that can track their Web surfing activity despite
strict federal rules banning most of them.
These files, known as "cookies," disappeared after a privacy activist
complained and The Associated Press made inquiries this week, and
agency officials acknowledged Wednesday they had made a mistake.
Nonetheless, the issue raises questions about privacy at a spy agency
already on the defensive amid reports of a secretive eavesdropping
program in the United States.
______________________________________________________
How 'bout them cookies.
How bout them cookies,
They only prove what complete software morons HP, HTML, San Fagciso,
Bill Gates, AT&T, Wal-Mart, and The ACLU are.
Harry
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
