| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Charles Farley" |
| Date: |
07 Feb 2006 06:06:24 PM |
| Object: |
NY Times: 'We're Afraid of Muslims Too' |
The New York Times
February 7, 2006
Those Danish Cartoons
By THE EDITORS
Cartoons making fun of the Prophet Muhammad that were published in a
Danish newspaper last September are suddenly one of the hottest issues
in international politics. Muslims in Europe and across the Middle East
have been holding protests with growing levels of violence and now loss
of life.
....
The New York Times and much of the rest of the nation's news media have
reported on the cartoons but refrained from showing them. That seems a
reasonable choice for news organizations that usually refrain from
gratuitous assaults on religious symbols, especially since the cartoons
are so easy to describe in words.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/07/opinion/07tue2.html
See also CNN, the Coward News Network:
Feb 2: "Storm grows over Mohammad cartoons"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/02/02/cartoons.wrap
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons in respect for Islam."
Feb 3: "Muslim anger on cartoons spreads"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/02/03/cartoon.wrap.reut
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam."
Feb 4: "Cartoon row: Danish embassy ablaze"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/02/04/syria.cartoon.ap
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam."
Feb 5: "Protesters burn consulate over cartoons"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/02/05/cartoon.protests
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam."
Feb 6: "Cartoon protests turn deadly"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/02/06/cartoon.protests"
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam."
Feb 6: "Danes feel threatened in cartoon row"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/02/06/denmark.cartoons
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam."
Feb 6: "London protest: Calls for arrests"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/02/06/london.cartoon.protests
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam."
Feb 7: "EU warns Iran on Danish boycott"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/02/07/cartoon.denmarktrade
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam."
Cartoon artwork here:
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/sarticle.php?id=12146
http://www.zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/
.
|
|
| User: "Weber" |
|
| Title: Re: NY Times: 'We're Afraid of Muslims Too' |
11 Feb 2006 10:00:02 PM |
|
|
In other words, Farley again prints lies, in this case he invents a
quote from the New York Times.
People who can argue their case argue their case.
People who can back up their assertions do so.
People, like Farley, who can't do either, simply lie.
Like the Nazis before him, Farley simply lies and lies and lies on the
same theme and the same topic.
But it is of psychological interest that Farley takes a simple refusal
of a newspaper to engage in hate propaganda and sees it as cowardice.
The cowardice isn't from the NY Times editorial board. It must
therefor be from Farley.
On 7 Feb 2006 16:06:24 -0800, "Charles Farley"
<CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote:
The New York Times
February 7, 2006
Those Danish Cartoons
By THE EDITORS
Cartoons making fun of the Prophet Muhammad that were published in a
Danish newspaper last September are suddenly one of the hottest issues
in international politics. Muslims in Europe and across the Middle East
have been holding protests with growing levels of violence and now loss
of life.
...
The New York Times and much of the rest of the nation's news media have
reported on the cartoons but refrained from showing them. That seems a
reasonable choice for news organizations that usually refrain from
gratuitous assaults on religious symbols, especially since the cartoons
are so easy to describe in words.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/07/opinion/07tue2.html
See also CNN, the Coward News Network:
Feb 2: "Storm grows over Mohammad cartoons"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/02/02/cartoons.wrap
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons in respect for Islam."
Feb 3: "Muslim anger on cartoons spreads"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/02/03/cartoon.wrap.reut
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam."
Feb 4: "Cartoon row: Danish embassy ablaze"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/02/04/syria.cartoon.ap
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam."
Feb 5: "Protesters burn consulate over cartoons"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/02/05/cartoon.protests
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam."
Feb 6: "Cartoon protests turn deadly"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/02/06/cartoon.protests"
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam."
Feb 6: "Danes feel threatened in cartoon row"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/02/06/denmark.cartoons
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam."
Feb 6: "London protest: Calls for arrests"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/02/06/london.cartoon.protests
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam."
Feb 7: "EU warns Iran on Danish boycott"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/02/07/cartoon.denmarktrade
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam."
Cartoon artwork here:
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/sarticle.php?id=12146
http://www.zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" |
|
| Title: Re: NY Times: 'We're Afraid of Muslims Too' |
07 Feb 2006 06:15:58 PM |
|
|
yea, don't want to offend the muslim piles of *****, they are such peaceful
people after all.
I thought we weren't supposed to give in to terrorists ????
why is bush being such a ***** (as usual) over this one?
put me in charge, I'll nuke the muslim piles of trash like we should have
done on 9/11/2001
death to islam
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles Farley" |
|
| Title: Re: NY Times: 'We're Afraid of Muslims Too' |
08 Feb 2006 09:13:08 PM |
|
|
What a difference a day makes. The coward Editors at
the NY Times wrote yesterday:
"The New York Times and much of the rest of the
nation's news media have reported on the cartoons
but refrained from showing them. That seems a
reasonable choice for news organizations that
usually refrain from gratuitous assaults on religious
symbols, especially since the cartoons are so easy
to describe in words."
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/07/opinion/07tue2.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Short version: "we're afraid to offend muslims."
And today, the cowards at the NY Times publish this piece,
complete with a full-color photo of the Virgin Mary rendered
in dung:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/08/arts/design/08imag.html
For the cowards at the NY Times, the journalism standard is
obviously not to "refrain from gratuitous assaults on religious
symbols" but instead to "refrain from gratuitous assaults on
MUSLIM religious symbols."
Hypocritical, loathsome cowards.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: NY Times: 'We're Afraid of Muslims Too' |
09 Feb 2006 07:58:16 AM |
|
|
"Charles Farley" <CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1139454788.653244.168720@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
What a difference a day makes. The coward Editors at
the NY Times wrote yesterday:
"The New York Times and much of the rest of the
nation's news media have reported on the cartoons
but refrained from showing them. That seems a
reasonable choice for news organizations that
usually refrain from gratuitous assaults on religious
symbols, especially since the cartoons are so easy
to describe in words."
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/07/opinion/07tue2.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Short version: "we're afraid to offend muslims."
And today, the cowards at the NY Times publish this piece,
complete with a full-color photo of the Virgin Mary rendered
in dung:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/08/arts/design/08imag.html
For the cowards at the NY Times, the journalism standard is
obviously not to "refrain from gratuitous assaults on religious
symbols" but instead to "refrain from gratuitous assaults on
MUSLIM religious symbols."
Hypocritical, loathsome cowards.
It's sad to see a once great news organization
losing so much of its credibility. Similar to what
has happened to the BBC.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Weber" |
|
| Title: Re: NY Times: 'We're Afraid of Muslims Too' |
11 Feb 2006 10:00:02 PM |
|
|
In other words, Farley again prints lies, in this case he invents a
quote from the New York Times.
People who can argue their case argue their case.
People who can back up their assertions do so.
People, like Farley, who can't do either, simply lie.
Like the Nazis before him, Farley simply lies and lies and lies on the
same theme and the same topic.
But it is of psychological interest that Farley takes a simple refusal
of a newspaper to engage in hate propaganda and sees it as cowardice.
The cowardice isn't from the NY Times editorial board. It must
therefor be from Farley.
On 8 Feb 2006 19:13:08 -0800, "Charles Farley"
<CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote:
What a difference a day makes. The coward Editors at
the NY Times wrote yesterday:
"The New York Times and much of the rest of the
nation's news media have reported on the cartoons
but refrained from showing them. That seems a
reasonable choice for news organizations that
usually refrain from gratuitous assaults on religious
symbols, especially since the cartoons are so easy
to describe in words."
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/07/opinion/07tue2.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Short version: "we're afraid to offend muslims."
And today, the cowards at the NY Times publish this piece,
complete with a full-color photo of the Virgin Mary rendered
in dung:
Is Fox News too "cowardly" to print it? Is Farley?
Come'on Farley. Show you've got "balls." Show us you're not a
"coward." Why not put the pic on a website and show the world?
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/08/arts/design/08imag.html
For the cowards at the NY Times, the journalism standard is
obviously not to "refrain from gratuitous assaults on religious
symbols" but instead to "refrain from gratuitous assaults on
MUSLIM religious symbols."
Hypocritical, loathsome cowards.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: NY Times: 'We're Afraid of Muslims Too' |
10 Feb 2006 08:12:54 PM |
|
|
by Kevin MacDonald
The current situation in the United States is really an awesome
display of Jewish power and influence. People who are very strongly
identified as Jews maintain close ties to Israeli politicians and
military figures and to Jewish activist organizations and pro-Israeli
lobbying groups while occupying influential policy-making positions in
the defense and foreign policy establishment. These same people, as
well as a chorus of other prominent Jews, have routine access to the
most prestigious media outlets in the United States. People who
criticize Israel are routinely vilified and subjected to professional
abuse.
Perhaps the most telling feature of this entire state of affairs is
the surreal fact that in this entire discourse Jewish identity is not
mentioned. When Charles Krauthammer, Bill Kristol, Michael Rubin,
William Safire, Robert Satloff, or the legions of other prominent
media figures write their reflexively pro-Israel pieces in the New
York Times, the Wall Street Journal, or the Los Angeles Times, or
opine on the Fox News Network, there is never any mention that they
are Jewish Americans who have an intense ethnic interest in Israel.
When Richard Perle authors a report for an Israeli think tank; is on
the board of directors of an Israeli newspaper; maintains close
personal ties with prominent Israelis, especially those associated
with the Likud Party; has worked for an Israeli defense company; and,
according to credible reports, was discovered by the FBI passing
classified information to Israel - when, despite all of this, he is a
central figure in the network of those pushing for wars to rearrange
the entire politics of the Middle East in Israel's favor, and with
nary a soul having the courage to mention the obvious overriding
Jewish loyalty apparent in Perle's actions, that is indeed a
breathtaking display of power.
One must contemplate the fact that American Jews have managed to
maintain unquestioned support for Israel over the last thirty-seven
years, despite Israel's seizing land and engaging in a brutal
suppression of the Palestinians in the occupied territories - an
occupation that will most likely end with expulsion or complete
subjugation, degradation, and apartheid. During the same period Jewish
organizations in America have been a principal force - in my view the
main force - for transforming America into a state dedicated to
suppressing ethnic identification among Europeans, for encouraging
massive multiethnic immigration into the U.S., and for erecting a
legal system and cultural ideology that is obsessively sensitive to
the complaints and interests of non-European ethnic minorities - the
culture of the Holocaust. All this is done without a whisper of
double standards in the aboveground media...
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
