| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Hatto von Aquitanien" |
| Date: |
04 Apr 2007 04:29:12 AM |
| Object: |
OKC was an inside job, just like 9/11 |
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4224779103128976372&q=OKC+Partin
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OKC was an inside job, just like 9/11 |
04 Apr 2007 07:30:48 AM |
|
|
On Apr 4, 4:29 am, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
Right wing conspiracy cause it happened under Clinton.
ERGO Rosie and her band of explosion experts will NOT be checking in
on it
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: OKC was an inside job, just like 9/11 |
04 Apr 2007 09:03:58 AM |
|
|
wrote:
On Apr 4, 4:29 am, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
Right wing conspiracy cause it happened under Clinton.
ERGO Rosie and her band of explosion experts will NOT be checking in
on it
If that's the case, then it only goes to show how truly inane the entire
Left-Right puppet show really is. It's quite obvious that the WTC was
taken down by CD, and there is no reason to believe "al Qaeda" had anything
to do with it. Furthermore, there is no reason to believe the aircraft
were hijacked by passengers. Slick and Poppy are the biggest drug kingpins
in US history. Liberal/Conservative is just a Mutt and Jeff shakedown.
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
| User: "me" |
|
| Title: Re: OKC was an inside job, just like 9/11 |
12 Apr 2007 07:44:59 AM |
|
|
On Apr 4, 10:03 am, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
truth_gi...@yahoo.com wrote:
[snip]
It's quite obvious that the WTC was
taken down by CD,
No, it is not. Especially if you know anything about
structural engineering.
and there is no reason to believe "al Qaeda" had anything
to do with it.
You mean other than they claimed responsibility of course.
Furthermore, there is no reason to believe the aircraft
were hijacked by passengers.
You mean other than the phone and radio conversations.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: OKC was an inside job, just like 9/11 |
12 Apr 2007 10:31:51 AM |
|
|
me wrote:
On Apr 4, 10:03 am, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
truth_gi...@yahoo.com wrote:
[snip]
It's quite obvious that the WTC was
taken down by CD,
No, it is not. Especially if you know anything about
structural engineering.
Sorry, I know a senior structural engineer with over 40 years in the field
who believes the buildings were destroyed by CD. Of course Congress
ignored his request that the 9/11 investigation be reopened.
and there is no reason to believe "al Qaeda" had anything
to do with it.
You mean other than they claimed responsibility of course.
Not to my knowledge. There is no evidence that "al Qaeda" (a database of
Mujahedeen operatives working with Western intelligence) perpetrated the
9/11 attacks. I assume you are talking about the two fraudulent video
tapes. They are just that, fraudulent.
Furthermore, there is no reason to believe the aircraft
were hijacked by passengers.
You mean other than the phone and radio conversations.
If you are talking about the cellphone calls from airplanes. They are more
evidence that the official story is a lie. Those calls were impossible.
All of the other alleged phone calls from the airplanes are also of dubious
authenticity. If people are relying on billing records, etc., to place the
alleged hijackers in the airports, be aware that the organization
associated with the 5 dancing Israelis had the ability to manipulate that
data:
<quote>
The story on Israeli spying inside the focused on three companies, Amdocs,
which provides billing and directory assistance for most American phone
companies, Comverse Infosys, which installs and mainstains telephone
tapping equipment for US law enforcement, and Odigo, which provides
services for the various "Instant Message" systems on your computer. All
three companies are owned by Israel and have strong ties to the Israeli
Defense Force.
Both Amdocs and Comverse Infosys were implicated in the sale of telephone
data which compromised US investigations into drug running, and Comverse
Infosys phone taps are suspected of being the means by which Bill Clinton's
phone sex sessions were recorded, as reported in the Ken Starr Report.
Odigo, which had offices near the World Trade Towers, is the company which
received a two hour advance warning of the attacks of 9-11.
</quote>
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
| User: "me" |
|
| Title: Re: OKC was an inside job, just like 9/11 |
12 Apr 2007 03:59:58 PM |
|
|
On Apr 12, 11:31 am, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
me wrote:
On Apr 4, 10:03 am, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
truth_gi...@yahoo.com wrote:
[snip]
It's quite obvious that the WTC was
taken down by CD,
No, it is not. Especially if you know anything about
structural engineering.
Sorry, I know a senior structural engineer with over 40 years in the field
who believes the buildings were destroyed by CD. Of course Congress
ignored his request that the 9/11 investigation be reopened.
Name please.
and there is no reason to believe "al Qaeda" had anything
to do with it.
You mean other than they claimed responsibility of course.
Not to my knowledge. There is no evidence that "al Qaeda" (a database of
Mujahedeen operatives working with Western intelligence) perpetrated the
9/11 attacks. I assume you are talking about the two fraudulent video
tapes. They are just that, fraudulent.
Which is different than "no reason". You suspect they are
fraudulent,
but you cannot prove it.
Furthermore, there is no reason to believe the aircraft
were hijacked by passengers.
You mean other than the phone and radio conversations.
If you are talking about the cellphone calls from airplanes.
Actually, calls in several forms including on board phone
systems and company communication channels.
They are more
evidence that the official story is a lie. Those calls were impossible.
No, they weren't. I wouldn't want to depend upon the technology,
but in many situations it will work. You can expect alot of
drops and loss of signal, but it will work. The other technologies
were designed to be used in flight so they were just fine.
All of the other alleged phone calls from the airplanes are also of dubious
authenticity.
Which is different than "no reason".
If people are relying on billing records, etc., to place the
alleged hijackers in the airports, be aware that the organization
associated with the 5 dancing Israelis had the ability to manipulate that
data:
So you have suspicions. That's a whole lot different than "no
reason".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: OKC was an inside job, just like 9/11 |
12 Apr 2007 04:43:04 PM |
|
|
me wrote:
On Apr 12, 11:31 am, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
me wrote:
On Apr 4, 10:03 am, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
truth_gi...@yahoo.com wrote:
[snip]
It's quite obvious that the WTC was
taken down by CD,
No, it is not. Especially if you know anything about
structural engineering.
Sorry, I know a senior structural engineer with over 40 years in the
field
who believes the buildings were destroyed by CD. Of course Congress
ignored his request that the 9/11 investigation be reopened.
Name please.
Call any of the offices of the House or Senate leadership and ask them if
they have been contacted by such a person.
and there is no reason to believe "al Qaeda" had anything
to do with it.
You mean other than they claimed responsibility of course.
Not to my knowledge. There is no evidence that "al Qaeda" (a database of
Mujahedeen operatives working with Western intelligence) perpetrated the
9/11 attacks. I assume you are talking about the two fraudulent video
tapes. They are just that, fraudulent.
Which is different than "no reason". You suspect they are
fraudulent, but you cannot prove it.
No. They are clearly fraudulent, the shape of the face is wrong in both
videos. The bad resolution and extremely muddled audio only add to the
proof of fraud.
Furthermore, there is no reason to believe the aircraft
were hijacked by passengers.
You mean other than the phone and radio conversations.
If you are talking about the cellphone calls from airplanes.
Actually, calls in several forms including on board phone
systems and company communication channels.
Enumerate all such phone calls. Then provide the evidence used to verify
their authenticity.
They are more
evidence that the official story is a lie. Those calls were impossible.
No, they weren't. I wouldn't want to depend upon the technology,
but in many situations it will work. You can expect alot of
drops and loss of signal, but it will work.
No. The calls were simply impossible.
The other technologies
were designed to be used in flight so they were just fine.
So now we get to hear about the whole BS about Barbara Olson borrowing
someone else's card to make here infamous phone call? Give it a break.
The evidence supporting the Kean-Hamilton fairy tale is nonexistent.
All of the other alleged phone calls from the airplanes are also of
dubious authenticity.
Which is different than "no reason".
They are completely unverifiable.
If people are relying on billing records, etc., to place the
alleged hijackers in the airports, be aware that the organization
associated with the 5 dancing Israelis had the ability to manipulate that
data:
So you have suspicions. That's a whole lot different than "no
reason".
They certainly weren't listed on any of the flight manifests. They were,
however listed on the passenger manifests for cruises on Abrimov's cruises
to nowhere. Atta was a drunk and a druggie. Hardly religious fanatic
material for suicide terrorist attacks.
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
| User: "Defendario" |
|
| Title: Re: OKC was an inside job, just like 9/11 |
12 Apr 2007 06:11:36 PM |
|
|
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
me wrote:
On Apr 12, 11:31 am, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
me wrote:
On Apr 4, 10:03 am, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
truth_gi...@yahoo.com wrote:
[snip]
It's quite obvious that the WTC was
taken down by CD,
No, it is not. Especially if you know anything about
structural engineering.
Sorry, I know a senior structural engineer with over 40 years in the
field
who believes the buildings were destroyed by CD. Of course Congress
ignored his request that the 9/11 investigation be reopened.
Name please.
Call any of the offices of the House or Senate leadership and ask them if
they have been contacted by such a person.
You are wise to not name the man. He ought to watch his back.
and there is no reason to believe "al Qaeda" had anything
to do with it.
You mean other than they claimed responsibility of course.
Not to my knowledge. There is no evidence that "al Qaeda" (a database of
Mujahedeen operatives working with Western intelligence) perpetrated the
9/11 attacks. I assume you are talking about the two fraudulent video
tapes. They are just that, fraudulent.
Which is different than "no reason". You suspect they are
fraudulent, but you cannot prove it.
No. They are clearly fraudulent, the shape of the face is wrong in both
videos. The bad resolution and extremely muddled audio only add to the
proof of fraud.
Unless you think that it was politic to frame a guilty man.
It's been known to happen.
Furthermore, there is no reason to believe the aircraft
were hijacked by passengers.
You mean other than the phone and radio conversations.
If you are talking about the cellphone calls from airplanes.
Actually, calls in several forms including on board phone
systems and company communication channels.
Enumerate all such phone calls. Then provide the evidence used to verify
their authenticity.
I'm given to understand that it is impossible. Another smoking gun.
They are more
evidence that the official story is a lie. Those calls were impossible.
No, they weren't. I wouldn't want to depend upon the technology,
but in many situations it will work. You can expect alot of
drops and loss of signal, but it will work.
No. The calls were simply impossible.
The other technologies
were designed to be used in flight so they were just fine.
So now we get to hear about the whole BS about Barbara Olson borrowing
someone else's card to make here infamous phone call? Give it a break.
The evidence supporting the Kean-Hamilton fairy tale is nonexistent.
It seems to have been a nice touch, but I'm curious to hear the
testimony of those who were called. Is it really true that a young man
identified himself (by last name) to his own mother?
All of the other alleged phone calls from the airplanes are also of
dubious authenticity.
Which is different than "no reason".
They are completely unverifiable.
Are they fraudulent? That fact needs examination.
If people are relying on billing records, etc., to place the
alleged hijackers in the airports, be aware that the organization
associated with the 5 dancing Israelis had the ability to manipulate that
data:
So you have suspicions. That's a whole lot different than "no
reason".
They certainly weren't listed on any of the flight manifests. They were,
however listed on the passenger manifests for cruises on Abrimov's cruises
to nowhere. Atta was a drunk and a druggie. Hardly religious fanatic
material for suicide terrorist attacks.
Curiouser and curiouser...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "me" |
|
| Title: Re: OKC was an inside job, just like 9/11 |
13 Apr 2007 06:56:11 AM |
|
|
On Apr 12, 5:43 pm, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
me wrote:
[snip]
Sorry, I know a senior structural engineer with over 40 years in the
field
who believes the buildings were destroyed by CD. Of course Congress
ignored his request that the 9/11 investigation be reopened.
Name please.
Call any of the offices of the House or Senate leadership and ask them if
they have been contacted by such a person.
I thought you knew them?
and there is no reason to believe "al Qaeda" had anything
to do with it.
You mean other than they claimed responsibility of course.
Not to my knowledge. There is no evidence that "al Qaeda" (a database of
Mujahedeen operatives working with Western intelligence) perpetrated the
9/11 attacks. I assume you are talking about the two fraudulent video
tapes. They are just that, fraudulent.
Which is different than "no reason". You suspect they are
fraudulent, but you cannot prove it.
No. They are clearly fraudulent, the shape of the face is wrong in both
videos. The bad resolution and extremely muddled audio only add to the
proof of fraud.
Bad resolution would make it hard to determine if the
shape of the face was "wrong" or not. Clearly you have basis for
your suspicions, but that's what they are, suspicions.
Furthermore, there is no reason to believe the aircraft
were hijacked by passengers.
You mean other than the phone and radio conversations.
If you are talking about the cellphone calls from airplanes.
Actually, calls in several forms including on board phone
systems and company communication channels.
Enumerate all such phone calls. Then provide the evidence used to verify
their authenticity.
They have been, in public records. Try the 9-11 commission
report.
They are more
evidence that the official story is a lie. Those calls were impossible.
No, they weren't. I wouldn't want to depend upon the technology,
but in many situations it will work. You can expect alot of
drops and loss of signal, but it will work.
No. The calls were simply impossible.
Nah, try it yourself some time. Don't try it over the open fields
of
Kansas. Try it in the Northeast corridor (ya know, where these planes
were).
You'll not only get a signal, it will transmitt. Like I said, don't
ever
rely upon it, but you can make connections.
The other technologies
were designed to be used in flight so they were just fine.
So now we get to hear about the whole BS about Barbara Olson borrowing
someone else's card to make here infamous phone call? Give it a break.
The evidence supporting the Kean-Hamilton fairy tale is nonexistent.
I was thinking more of the cockpit based transmission systems
that FA's could gain access to.
All of the other alleged phone calls from the airplanes are also of
dubious authenticity.
Which is different than "no reason".
They are completely unverifiable.
Which is different than "no reason".
If people are relying on billing records, etc., to place the
alleged hijackers in the airports, be aware that the organization
associated with the 5 dancing Israelis had the ability to manipulate that
data:
So you have suspicions. That's a whole lot different than "no
reason".
They certainly weren't listed on any of the flight manifests. They were,
however listed on the passenger manifests for cruises on Abrimov's cruises
to nowhere. Atta was a drunk and a druggie. Hardly religious fanatic
material for suicide terrorist attacks.
So you have your suspicions.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OKC was an inside job, just like 9/11 |
04 Apr 2007 10:43:29 AM |
|
|
On Apr 4, 9:03 am, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
If that's the case, then it only goes to show how truly inane the entire Left-Right puppet show really is.
Been thatta way since almost day one. Puppet show is a good
description. Trace it back far enough (IE follow the money) and
you'll see the same people pulling the strings on both sides.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: OKC was an inside job, just like 9/11 |
12 Apr 2007 02:16:22 AM |
|
|
wrote:
On Apr 4, 9:03 am, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
If that's the case, then it only goes to show how truly inane the entire
Left-Right puppet show really is.
Been thatta way since almost day one. Puppet show is a good
description. Trace it back far enough (IE follow the money) and
you'll see the same people pulling the strings on both sides.
In connection with Iran-Contra, take a look at the roles of Asa Hutchinson,
Jackson Stevens, BCCI, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, the Rose Law Firm,
Arkansas Finance Development Authority (AFDA), Vince Foster and George
Herbert Walker (Poppy) Bush.
Bear in mind that the ***** Monica gave Bill was the distraction which
drew Kenneth Starr's attention away from Clinton's criminal activities in
Arkansas. Asa Hutchinson was one of the leading proponents of Clinton's
impeachment - for a *****, not for drug running.
Then we should ask what role Bill Buford played in the above mentioned
crimes.
Finally we must ask where Heinz was when all of this was going on.
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OKC was an inside job, just like 9/11 |
17 Apr 2007 10:46:45 PM |
|
|
On Apr 12, 2:16=EF=BF=BDam, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrot=
e:
truth_gi...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Apr 4, 9:03 am, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
If that's the case, then it only goes to show how truly inane the enti=
re
Left-Right puppet show really is.
Been thatta way since almost day one. =A0Puppet show is a good
description. =A0Trace it back far enough (IE follow the money) and
you'll see the same people pulling the strings on both sides.
In connection with Iran-Contra, take a look at the roles of Asa Hutchinso=
n,
Jackson Stevens, BCCI, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, the Rose Law Firm,
Arkansas Finance Development Authority (AFDA), Vince Foster and George
Herbert Walker (Poppy) Bush.
Bear in mind that the ***** Monica gave Bill was the distraction which
drew Kenneth Starr's attention away from Clinton's criminal activities in
Arkansas. =A0Asa Hutchinson was one of the leading proponents of Clinton's
impeachment - for a *****, not for drug running.
Then we should ask what role Bill Buford played in the above mentioned
crimes. =A0
Finally we must ask where Heinz was when all of this was going on.
--http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-u..=
..http://911research.wtc7.nethttp://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
What does Bill Buford have to do with this? He played no role in the
"above-mentioned crimes"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
