| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"fx" |
| Date: |
29 Nov 2007 06:34:10 PM |
| Object: |
Oregon Human Services: Today's Gestapo? |
Oregon Human Services: Today's Gestapo?
Commentary by Neal Feldman Salem-News.com
Is it in a child's best interests to always be placed in a family that
is more affluent?
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/november172007/neal_dhs_111707.php
constitutionallyright.com
(SALEM, Ore.) - No wonder Gestapo CPS continues to get away with the
attacks on families that it constantly perpetrates. There is clearly a
very vocal contingent in this country to whom the concept of family and
blood relations are meaningless.
This is the "Best Interests of the Child" crowd ... but of course what
is REALLY in a given child's best interests are entirely up for debate.
Is it in a child's best interests to always be placed in a family that
is more affluent? If so then all children of families on welfare or in
the lower income brackets are up for grabs to any parents who want to
adopt them if these adoptive parents are more affluent than the family
the child is currently with. That would be an extremely perilous road to
start down.
The current case celeb in the news is that of 2-year old Gabriel Allred,
born in Oregon to a drug addict mother and sexual predator father. DHS
in this case rightly terminated the parental rights in one of the rare
cases that the parents were actually abusive and harmful to the child.
And again in one of the rare instances DHS is uniting the child with its
blood family, in this case a grandmother in Mexico.
But the foster parents, Steve and Angela Brandt of Toledo, Oregon,
southwest of Salem near the coastal town of Newport, who have admitted
they became foster parents for Gabriel in the hopes of adopting him, are
fighting this every step of the way, and they have no small number of
supporters.
To put no dull point on it these are kidnappers. They are holding this
child hostage to their needs and wants. They could not care less what is
'in the best interests of the child'.
Far too many people become foster parents not to provide safe temporary
homes for the kids placed in their charge but in a deranged form of meat
market as they seek kids to steal for themselves.
Such fosters routinely undermine reunification and drag separation out
as long as they can so that they can claim to have 'bonded' with the
kids and to put forth this claim as justification to terminate the
rights of the real parents so that the fosters can then adopt.
This is why I favor a law barring any foster parent from ever adopting a
child that was placed in their care. It would eliminate the meat market
aspect entirely.
If a kid's parents lose custody and the kid goes up for adoption so be
it... to anyone but those they were in foster care with. It is far too
great a temptation for fosters who wish to adopt their charges to
undermine reunification to their own benefit. And this happens with far
more regularity than most would comfortably like to believe.
They argue that they are the only family he knows. In the case of little
Gabriel, it is quite true since he is only 2-years old and they have
gone to great lengths to make sure this was the case. But just because
some kidnapper snatches an infant and holds them for a couple years we
do not let them keep the kid 'because they have bonded'. Gabriel is
2-years old. He will bond to the grandmother too.
Supporters of the Brandts have accused the grandmother of only wanting
the $375 per month taxpayer provided stipend, but it is interesting to
note that the grandmother was entirely unaware of this stipend when she
sought custody of the boy the moment she learned of his situation. And
yes he was several months old when she finally learned of it because she
is not a mindreader and to my knowledge has never claimed to be. And why
are the Brandts not accused of 'just being in it for the check'? It
seems quite the one sided argument.
But as the saying goes... those who refuse to learn from the lessons of
history are doomed to repeat them.
We seem to have learned nothing from the media circus that was Elian
Gonzalez.
He, too, had blood relatives, in this case his Cuban father wanted his
son back. and after years of orchestrated BS on the part of the would be
kidnappers of Elian he was, eventually, at gunpoint, returned to his father.
Will we need to send in SWAT teams to get Gabriel too?
And we have Senator Gordon Smith and Governor Ted Kulongoski, proving
that neither political party respects the concept of family rights,
trying to force DHS to do that which its own rules preclude it doing -
placing the child in a family other than blood relations if an
acceptable blood relation is willing to take in the child.
Government officials doing their able best to interfere in private
family matters and in the process trampling their entire concept of
family rights.
Does the name Terri Schiavo not still ring in peoples' ears? Another
case where government officials, and others, sought to step into
personal private family matters where they had no legitimate business
doing so. That case was in Florida. This case is in Oregon.
Different stage, different players, same old anti-family song and dance.
Gabriel is a US citizen by birth, with dual citizenship (he is also a
Mexican citizen) If placed with the grandmother when he is an adult he
will have every right, if he so chooses to exercise it, to re-enter the US.
But as a 2-year old child he belongs with his family. And in this case
his family is his grandmother in Mexico. It most certainly is not the
babysnatching Toledo couple Steve and Angela Brandt.
In one of the rare instances Gestapo CPS actually has it right and
should be allowed to do what its own rules state it must do without
politically postured interference from outsiders who seek only to turn
this case into another media circus.
If Steve and Angela Brandt want a kid why don't they have one the old
fashioned way instead of trying to steal a child from another family?
Much is made of the mother and father of Gabriel supporting the Brandts.
Hmmmm... a crack ***** and a predatory sexual deviant deemed unfit to be
parents and stripped of all rights regarding Gabriel. Why should anyone
care a whit what they think? If they had even half a clue the entire
situation would not exist.
Send Gabriel to the grandmother. If she has any sense she will get a
restraining order against the Brandts keeping them from having any
contact with Gabriel ever again. In 2 years Gabriel will have entirely
forgotten them as he bonds with his real family.
As it should be.
CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A
DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NSA / CIA
WIRETAPPING PROGRAM....
CPS Does not protect children...
It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even
killed at the hands of Child Protective Services.
every parent should read this .pdf from
connecticut dcf watch...
http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf
http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com
Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US
These numbers come from The National Center on
Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN)
Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS
*Perpetrators of Maltreatment*
Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59
Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13
Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241
Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12
Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5
Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that
are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per
100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse
and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the
citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold
parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY
government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and
death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more
human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which
they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that
they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when
children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a
bunch of social workers.
CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, HAPPILY DESTROYING THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT
FAMILIES YEARLY NATIONWIDE AND COMING TO YOU'RE HOME SOON...
BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF
REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES
TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY
ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION...
.
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Oregon Human Services: Today's Gestapo? |
29 Nov 2007 08:54:18 PM |
|
|
Here is part of a speech by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, delivered in
Nuernberg on September 13th, 1935 at the Seventh National-Socialist
Party Congress:
"Almost without exception, the intellectual leaders of Marxist atheism
in Germany were Jews, among them being Erich Weinert, Felix Abraham,
Dr. Levy-Lenz and others. At regular meetings, held in the presence of
a notary public, members were requested to register their declaration
of withdrawal from their church for a fee of 2 Marks. And this the
fight for atheism was carried on. Between 1918 and 1933 the
withdrawals from the German Evangelical Churches alone amounted to
two-and-a-half million persons in Germany. The programme which these
atheistic societies laid down in regard to sexual matters is amply
charcterized in the following demands publicly expressed at meetings
and distributed in leaflet form:
1) The complete abrogation of the paragraphs of the law dealing with
the crime of abortion, and the right to have abortion procured free of
charge in State Hospitals.
2) Non-interference with prostitution.
3) The abrogation of all bourgeois-capitalistic regulations in regard
to marriage and divorce.
4) Official registration to be optional and the children to be
educated by the community.
5) Abrogation of all penalties for sexual perversities and amnesty to
be granted to all persons condemned as 'sexual criminals'.
"Truly a case of methodical insanity, which has for its aim the
wilful destruction of the nations and their civilization and the
substitute of barbarism as a fundamental principle of public life.
"Where are the men behind the scenes of this virulent world
movement? Who are the inventors of all this madness? Who transplanted
this ensemble into Russia and is today making the attempt to have it
prevail in other countries? The answer to these question discloses the
actual secret of our anti-Jewish policy and our uncomromising fight
against Jewry; for the Bolshevic International is in reality nothing
less than a Jewish International."
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
