PK wrote:

"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in message
news:KMKdnY2X58IN4S7bnZ2dnUVZ_v3inZ2d@speakeasy.net...

PK wrote:

"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in message
news:yp6dneLQN-7T9C7bnZ2dnUVZ_hisnZ2d@speakeasy.net...

PK wrote:

"JHR" <BadEnergyPolicy@USA.com> wrote in message
news:BcWdndoApMmuAzLbnZ2dnUVZ_q-jnZ2d@trueband.net...

"PK" <arse@arse.com> wrote in message
news:eXMri.5240$ZA.2288@newsb.telia.net...

"JHR" <BadEnergyPolicy@USA.com> wrote in message
news:gM2dnfguYZuCBzLbnZ2dnUVZ_h2pnZ2d@trueband.net...

"PK" <arse@arse.com> wrote in message
news:MCMri.5231$ZA.2250@newsb.telia.net...

"JHR" <BadEnergyPolicy@USA.com> wrote in message
news:L_idnQpx0c0YGjLbnZ2dnUVZ_tOtnZ2d@trueband.net...

"PK" <arse@arse.com> wrote in message
news:H8Kri.5209$ZA.2221@newsb.telia.net...

"JHR" <BadEnergyPolicy@USA.com> wrote in message
news:Gqudnfm-hK39-TLbnZ2dnUVZ_t2inZ2d@trueband.net...

"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in message
news:ReKdnS-yTImGdzPbnZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@speakeasy.net...

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3240519158739884416

--

Greg Palast is just a ***** with a book to sell.
He obviously hasn't seen the pictures, has an agenda, (or he's
in
denial) of the angle at which the 4" steel was cut by the
incendiary cutter charges.

Wow.. a lot of unfounded assertion there..

And how convenient was that to quickly ship the evidence (all
of the steel) to Asia to be melted down. The U.S. couldn't
have
melted
it down?

Presumably, whoever bought the scrap melted it down.

How about the explosions under ground level BEFORE the planes
hit.

What are you referring to here, I wonder?

The list goes on and on.

http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-6708190071483512003

http://www.ae911truth.org/

The core structures contained the building services such as
elevators, and plumbing and cabling shafts. It would have been
easy
for people who controlled building security to surreptitiously
install devices in hidden portions of the cores.

So you assert. Without evidence.

Recall that Marvin Bush was Director of a company that was
responsible for WTC complex Security until 2000.

You can see charges going off way below where the collapse is
occuring.
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/index.html#altering

Nothing in that link supports your assertion..

Remember, there has NEVER been a steel high-rise collapse due
to fire. NEVER.

There has never been a building that had a rather large
airliner
impact it either. Nor has there ever been a building that has
been
impacted by debris and the seismic effects of a nearby building
which has been hit by an airliner.

Independent

PK said:
"There has never been a building that had a rather large
airliner
impact it
either. Nor has there ever been a building that has been
impacted
by debris
and the seismic effects of a nearby building which has been hit
by an
airliner."

What kind of BS is that....."seismic effets of a nearby building
blah
blah blah?

YOu mean you haven't considered it?

The towers were designed for constant 140 mph hurricane winds.

So?

You must be fairly young (I won't hold that against you) and
don't recall the B-52 bomber hitting the Empire State Building
at
the 79th floor.

http://history1900s.about.com/od/1940s/a/empirecrash.htm

err... B25. Bit of a difference.

In the short time you took to respond with no intelligent
rebuttal or
explanations, you couldn't have read through the links I
provided. I suggest you turn off the radio (e.g. Rush Limbaugh
or
whoever), and
the television (nothing but junk on it anyway), and start
reading
instead of listening and watching garbage.

Lack of content noted

Please open your mind and stop listening to rhetoric.

I'm certainly not, I'm relying on facts

Independent

And what facts would those be?

Well, the expected temperature of an office-furnishing fuelled fire
and teh effect it would have on the strength of steel, for one
thing.

Well?

There is no evidence that any steel recovered from the fire-involved
areas and examined by NIST reached anywhere near the temperatures
necessary to compromise the structural integrity of the buildings.

Two questions, Hatto

1) What is the likely temperature of an office fire?
2) What effect does that temperature have on teh strength of steel?

Read the NIST report.

I want YOU to provide the numbers.. are you afraid?

Do your own damn homework. I'm not your shabbos goy.

Bear in mind that heat transfer and maximum fire temperature are
different concepets.

Show your workings..

See above.

(not to metion the fact it was a B25 and not a B52 which hit the
Empire State in 1940 ;-) )

I've showed you plenty of websites with information and evidence
suggesting that the official story is just that...a story.

Plenty of assertion, very little evidence

If you read through them, which I doubt you have already, then you
may come away with some new knowledge that the official story
doesn't
wash.

I have seen the same recycled kook claims for about 6 years now.

Well?

Doesn't explain in any way the collapse of the WTC. See the NIST
report for
details.

Too many credible people are not buying into the official story.
If
you
look through this evidence, I think you will agree with them.

Not if you understand it...

Independent

PK said:

err... B25. Bit of a difference."

Big deal. Look at the building. The Empire State Building wasn't
nearly
the technological marvel as the twin towers were.

..and a b52 is really rather a lot larger, heavier, and faster than a
B25.
Facts are important, you know.

It doesn't make a bit of difference.

Facts don't make a bit of difference? Why am I not surprised you think
that..

The Twin Towers were still oscillating with a healthy resonance after
being struck. They were not significantly
structurally compromised by the impacts.

Well, they didn't fall down immediately due to the impacts, no.

Do you even understand what I said?

Yes, do you`?

Yes. It means there was no significant compromise of the overall
structural
integrity of the buildings due to the impacts. IOW, the planes didn't
cause the buildings to collapse.

You provide nothing to add other than the official story.

And you provide nothing that contradicts it. Hell, as I said, yuo
haven't added anything to teh same old tired kook-claims that have
been circultaing for 6 years now.

The color and intensity of the glow from the molten metal flowing from
WTC 2
cannot be explained by the OCT.

Yet you claim to know what metal it was and that it was evidence of
thermite..

There is more than enough evidence to show it was produced by an
aluminothermic reaction.

Cite?

Provided repeatedly.

But that isn't even necessary in order to sustain

my argument. You cannot reproduce the observed phenomena in terms of
the
OCT.

--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis