| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
10 Nov 2005 10:03:42 PM |
| Object: |
Pat Buchanan Bashes Bush on Illegal Immigration and the Iraq War |
Link to article:
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=10210
Bush Leaves GOP in Crisis
by Patrick J. Buchanan
Posted Nov 10, 2005
With the rout of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's initiatives, Democratic
victories in New Jersey and Virginia, and President Bush's free fall
in national polls on job performance, credibility and character, the
Republican Party is in imminent peril of losing the country.
Indeed, since 9/11, the party has indulged in a willful self-delusion
that it has become America's Party. The Bush triumph in 2004, talking
heads brayed, settled the matter: Red State America has triumphed over
Blue State America. The future belongs to us.
This was always hyperbole. Where Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan rolled
up 49-state landslides in re-election runs, Bush won 31 states, losing
every state north of the Potomac and east of Ohio, two of the three
great industrial states of the Midwest, Michigan and Illinois, and he
was skunked on the Pacific rim. Had Kerry hammered him on trade and
lost jobs in Ohio, Bush would be a one-term president.
What killed the first Bush presidency and is ruining the second is the
abandonment of Reaganism and his embrace of the twin heresies of
neoconservatism and Big Government Conservatism, as preached by the
resident ideologues at The Weekly Standard and Wall Street Journal.
Under Bush I, taxes were raised, funding for HUD and Education
exploded, and a quota bill was signed under which small businesses,
accused of racial discrimination, were made to prove their innocence,
or be punished, in true Soviet fashion.
Under Bush II, social spending has exploded to levels LBJ might envy,
foreign aid has been doubled, pork-at-every-meal has become the GOP
diet of choice, surpluses have vanished, and the deficit is soaring
back toward 5% of GDP. Bill Clinton is starting to look like Barry
Goldwater.
Both Bushes abandoned the economic patriotism that had put America and
Americans first-for free-trade globalism. Result: the most massive
trade deficits in U.S. history, the gutting of our industrial base, the
loss of millions of manufacturing jobs, and the largest wealth transfer
of all time with technology, factories, high-tech and high-skilled jobs
pouring out of America into Asia.
Working America and the middle class have been sacrificed on the high
altar of the Republican Moloch of Free Trade. And how have our Chinese
brothers reciprocated our magnanimity?
Both Bushes embraced the "open borders" immigration policy the Wall
Street Journal has trumpeted for two decades. Result: We have 10-15
million illegal aliens in our country, among whom gangs like the
murderous Mara Salvatrucha are proliferating. Native-born California
taxpayers are fleeing the Golden State, as Third World tax consumers
pour in. So great is the crisis on the Mexican border even the liberal
Democratic governors of New Mexico and Arizona have declared states of
emergency. Meanwhile 35,000 U.S. troops stand guard-on the border of
South Korea.
The late editorial editor of the Journal, Robert Bartley, once said,
"I believe the nation-state is finished." He and his progeny have
surely done their level best to bring that about.
As the country we grew up in becomes unrecognizable, we still hear the
Journal, that good and faithful servant of the U.S. Business
Roundtable, warning us not to oppose open borders. Meanwhile, our very
own Dr. Pangloss, Ben Wattenberg, warbles on about our being the
"first universal nation" and, in echo of M. Dominic de Villepin,
burbles, "Isn't diversity wonderful!"
In foreign policy, Bush I was an internationalist out to build a "New
World Order" after the Cold War. However, post-9/11, Bush II
converted to a neoconservatism that calls for unilateral American
intervention in the Middle East and the Islamic world, to bring down
dictators and establish democracy.
Thus, in March, 2003, Bush, in perhaps the greatest strategic blunder
in U.S. history, invaded an Arab nation that had not attacked us, did
not want war with us, and did not threaten us-to strip it of weapons
we now know it did not have.
Result: Shia and Kurds have been liberated from Saddam, but Iran has a
new ally in southern Iraq, Osama has a new base camp in the Sunni
Triangle, the Arab and Islamic world have been radicalized against the
United States, and copy-cat killers of Al Qaida have been targeting our
remaining allies in Europe and the Middle East: Spain, Britain, Egypt
and Jordan. And, lest we forget, 2055 Americans are dead and Walter
Reed is filling up.
True to the neoconservative creed, Bush launched a global crusade for
democracy that is now bringing ever closer to power Hamas in Gaza and
the West Bank, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt
and Syria, and Shia fundamentalists in Baghdad and Basra.
Democratic imperialism is still imperialism. To Arab and Islamic
peoples, whether the Crusaders come in the name of God or in the name
of democracy, they are still Crusaders.
When Ronald Reagan went home to California, his heirs said, "Goodbye
to all that," and embraced Big Government conservatism, then
neoconservatism. If they do not find their way home soon, to the
principles of Taft, Goldwater and Reagan, they will perish in the
wilderness into which they have led us all.
.
|
|
| User: "?T=N=T***T`N`T***T=N=T?" |
|
| Title: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
10 Nov 2005 10:14:17 PM |
|
|
So what's up with you left-wing squealing buttboys quoting one of his
articles??? He's NOT to be believed according to you buttboys.
.
|
|
|
| User: "MikeC" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
10 Nov 2005 11:20:50 PM |
|
|
"<?>T=N=T***T`N`T***T=N=T<?>" <DoD@USG.net> wrote in message
news:rUUcf.281465$uo2.237400@fe04.news.easynews.com...
So what's up with you left-wing squealing buttboys quoting one of his
articles??? He's NOT to be believed according to you buttboys.
It's fun watching rightwingers beat up on each other.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
10 Nov 2005 11:48:19 PM |
|
|
Pat Buchanan is a REAL right winger; a true American. Bush is a
liberal.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Saving Pfc. America" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
11 Nov 2005 02:00:27 AM |
|
|
<bjackson445@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131688099.480464.85910@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Pat Buchanan is a REAL right winger; a true American. Bush is a
liberal.
Bush is a Lame duck. Quack.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alcibiades" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
11 Nov 2005 03:26:31 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:00:27 GMT, "Saving Pfc. America" <pfc@army.net>
wrote:
<bjackson445@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131688099.480464.85910@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Pat Buchanan is a REAL right winger; a true American. Bush is a
liberal.
Bush is a Lame duck. Quack.
Great. He can't do Conservatives any more damage by blocking them.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Saving Pfc. America" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
11 Nov 2005 04:52:03 AM |
|
|
"Alcibiades" <was-scipio@lacedæmon.net> wrote in message
news:1jo8n1d3s7i75nggsruln9j6jt5hdm0bn4@4ax.com...
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:00:27 GMT, "Saving Pfc. America" <pfc@army.net>
wrote:
<bjackson445@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131688099.480464.85910@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Pat Buchanan is a REAL right winger; a true American. Bush is a
liberal.
Bush is a Lame duck. Quack.
Great. He can't do Conservatives any more damage by blocking them.
And Congress is realizing that.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kyle Daulton" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
11 Nov 2005 09:42:47 AM |
|
|
"Alcibiades" <was-scipio@lacedæmon.net> wrote in message
news:1jo8n1d3s7i75nggsruln9j6jt5hdm0bn4@4ax.com...
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:00:27 GMT, "Saving Pfc. America" <pfc@army.net>
wrote:
<bjackson445@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131688099.480464.85910@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Pat Buchanan is a REAL right winger; a true American. Bush is a
liberal.
Bush is a Lame duck. Quack.
Great. He can't do Conservatives any more damage by blocking them.
LMFAO! The rats are jumping ship! Don't pretend Bush isn't one of yours,
Alice! We know better!
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
12 Nov 2005 06:40:02 PM |
|
|
Alcibiades wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:42:47 GMT, "Kyle Daulton" <KylDltn@yahoo.com>
wrote:
"Alcibiades" <was-scipio@laced=E6mon.net> wrote in message
news:1jo8n1d3s7i75nggsruln9j6jt5hdm0bn4@4ax.com...
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:00:27 GMT, "Saving Pfc. America" <pfc@army.net>
wrote:
<bjackson445@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131688099.480464.85910@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Pat Buchanan is a REAL right winger; a true American. Bush is a
liberal.
Bush is a Lame duck. Quack.
Great. He can't do Conservatives any more damage by blocking them.
LMFAO! The rats are jumping ship! Don't pretend Bush isn't one of yours,
Alice! We know better!
hehe. Yeah, I guess was fishing for a Dem partybot.
I ain't pretending it, I'm saying it. It's something that people on
the Right know painfully well, it's been fought about since before the
last election.
<snip>
Really? Then perhaps you could point me to some of your other
scintillating writing posted here in Usenet where you've expressed
those views? But it really doesn't matter -- there's no way you
conservatives aren't going to get sprayed with the Bush/neocon fecal
matter! You were with him before you were against him. flip-flopper!
Bwahahahah!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alcibiades" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
13 Nov 2005 03:23:40 AM |
|
|
On 12 Nov 2005 16:40:02 -0800, wrote:
Alcibiades wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:42:47 GMT, "Kyle Daulton" <KylDltn@yahoo.com>
wrote:
"Alcibiades" <was-scipio@lacedæmon.net> wrote in message
news:1jo8n1d3s7i75nggsruln9j6jt5hdm0bn4@4ax.com...
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:00:27 GMT, "Saving Pfc. America" <pfc@army.net>
wrote:
<bjackson445@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131688099.480464.85910@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Pat Buchanan is a REAL right winger; a true American. Bush is a
liberal.
Bush is a Lame duck. Quack.
Great. He can't do Conservatives any more damage by blocking them.
LMFAO! The rats are jumping ship! Don't pretend Bush isn't one of yours,
Alice! We know better!
hehe. Yeah, I guess was fishing for a Dem partybot.
I ain't pretending it, I'm saying it. It's something that people on
the Right know painfully well, it's been fought about since before the
last election.
<snip>
Really? Then perhaps you could point me to some of your other
scintillating writing posted here in Usenet where you've expressed
those views? But it really doesn't matter -- there's no way you
conservatives aren't going to get sprayed with the Bush/neocon fecal
matter! You were with him before you were against him. flip-flopper!
Bwahahahah!
My scintillating writing? This is my half-***** writing. I used up all
my scintillation sintering silicon dioxide powder into Space Shuttle
heat tiles with beams from my eyes.
As I said in the original post, which is the real point of the post:
You are dimwit liberal partybots, you seldom even know what it is
that's being discussed. You're more like dogs that detect the possible
presence of a butt (that would be Bush's exposed one in this case) to
put your noses into. He's a Lib, just like you, you both reek for the
same reason. It isn't as if people even more liberal than him are an
option for anyone other than libs.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
13 Nov 2005 07:30:41 AM |
|
|
Alcibiades wrote:
On 12 Nov 2005 16:40:02 -0800, wrote:
Alcibiades wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:42:47 GMT, "Kyle Daulton" <KylDltn@yahoo.com>
wrote:
"Alcibiades" <was-scipio@laced=E6mon.net> wrote in message
news:1jo8n1d3s7i75nggsruln9j6jt5hdm0bn4@4ax.com...
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:00:27 GMT, "Saving Pfc. America" <pfc@army.n=
et>
wrote:
<bjackson445@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131688099.480464.85910@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Pat Buchanan is a REAL right winger; a true American. Bush is a
liberal.
Bush is a Lame duck. Quack.
Great. He can't do Conservatives any more damage by blocking them.
LMFAO! The rats are jumping ship! Don't pretend Bush isn't one of you=
rs,
Alice! We know better!
hehe. Yeah, I guess was fishing for a Dem partybot.
I ain't pretending it, I'm saying it. It's something that people on
the Right know painfully well, it's been fought about since before the
last election.
<snip>
Really? Then perhaps you could point me to some of your other
scintillating writing posted here in Usenet where you've expressed
those views? But it really doesn't matter -- there's no way you
conservatives aren't going to get sprayed with the Bush/neocon fecal
matter! You were with him before you were against him. flip-flopper!
Bwahahahah!
My scintillating writing? This is my half-***** writing. I used up all
my scintillation sintering silicon dioxide powder into Space Shuttle
heat tiles with beams from my eyes.
Cute.
As I said in the original post, which is the real point of the post:
You are dimwit liberal partybots, you seldom even know what it is
that's being discussed.
Oh, I know what is being discussed. I know it well enough to know it's
complete B.S.
You're more like dogs that detect the possible
presence of a butt (that would be Bush's exposed one in this case) to
put your noses into. He's a Lib, just like you, you both reek for the
same reason. It isn't as if people even more liberal than him are an
option for anyone other than libs.
In other words, you have nothing to back up your ridiculous claim that
you have not been squarely behind Bush until now. It was a fairly
simple request, Alice. Why don't you just admit that you're lying and
we'll move on, m'kay?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alcibiades" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
13 Nov 2005 02:52:31 PM |
|
|
On 13 Nov 2005 05:30:41 -0800, wrote:
Alcibiades wrote:
On 12 Nov 2005 16:40:02 -0800, wrote:
Alcibiades wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:42:47 GMT, "Kyle Daulton" <KylDltn@yahoo.com>
wrote:
"Alcibiades" <was-scipio@lacedæmon.net> wrote in message
news:1jo8n1d3s7i75nggsruln9j6jt5hdm0bn4@4ax.com...
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:00:27 GMT, "Saving Pfc. America" <pfc@army.net>
wrote:
<bjackson445@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131688099.480464.85910@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Pat Buchanan is a REAL right winger; a true American. Bush is a
liberal.
Bush is a Lame duck. Quack.
Great. He can't do Conservatives any more damage by blocking them.
LMFAO! The rats are jumping ship! Don't pretend Bush isn't one of yours,
Alice! We know better!
hehe. Yeah, I guess was fishing for a Dem partybot.
I ain't pretending it, I'm saying it. It's something that people on
the Right know painfully well, it's been fought about since before the
last election.
<snip>
Really? Then perhaps you could point me to some of your other
scintillating writing posted here in Usenet where you've expressed
those views? But it really doesn't matter -- there's no way you
conservatives aren't going to get sprayed with the Bush/neocon fecal
matter! You were with him before you were against him. flip-flopper!
Bwahahahah!
My scintillating writing? This is my half-***** writing. I used up all
my scintillation sintering silicon dioxide powder into Space Shuttle
heat tiles with beams from my eyes.
Cute.
As I said in the original post, which is the real point of the post:
You are dimwit liberal partybots, you seldom even know what it is
that's being discussed.
Oh, I know what is being discussed. I know it well enough to know it's
complete B.S.
You do? uhhhh... Prove it!
Wait, I want to sound like a usenet moron here so I can me you at eye
level... Cites! Give me Cites.
You're more like dogs that detect the possible
presence of a butt (that would be Bush's exposed one in this case) to
put your noses into. He's a Lib, just like you, you both reek for the
same reason. It isn't as if people even more liberal than him are an
option for anyone other than libs.
In other words, you have nothing to back up your ridiculous claim that
you have not been squarely behind Bush until now. It was a fairly
simple request, Alice. Why don't you just admit that you're lying and
we'll move on, m'kay?
A simple request. Sure sweetcheeks, if you're really interested in my
attitude about Bush going back over the months and years, go to google
groups and type in my handle. I've gone by "Alcidiades" and "Scipio".
Then you'll know!
Any else you feel need to make a fool of yourself on?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
13 Nov 2005 04:16:05 PM |
|
|
Alcibiades wrote:
On 13 Nov 2005 05:30:41 -0800, wrote:
Alcibiades wrote:
On 12 Nov 2005 16:40:02 -0800, wrote:
Alcibiades wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:42:47 GMT, "Kyle Daulton" <KylDltn@yahoo.com>
wrote:
"Alcibiades" <was-scipio@laced=E6mon.net> wrote in message
news:1jo8n1d3s7i75nggsruln9j6jt5hdm0bn4@4ax.com...
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:00:27 GMT, "Saving Pfc. America" <pfc@arm=
y=2Enet>
wrote:
<bjackson445@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131688099.480464.85910@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Pat Buchanan is a REAL right winger; a true American. Bush is=
a
liberal.
Bush is a Lame duck. Quack.
Great. He can't do Conservatives any more damage by blocking the=
m=2E
LMFAO! The rats are jumping ship! Don't pretend Bush isn't one of =
yours,
Alice! We know better!
hehe. Yeah, I guess was fishing for a Dem partybot.
I ain't pretending it, I'm saying it. It's something that people on
the Right know painfully well, it's been fought about since before =
the
last election.
<snip>
Really? Then perhaps you could point me to some of your other
scintillating writing posted here in Usenet where you've expressed
those views? But it really doesn't matter -- there's no way you
conservatives aren't going to get sprayed with the Bush/neocon fecal
matter! You were with him before you were against him. flip-flopper!
Bwahahahah!
My scintillating writing? This is my half-***** writing. I used up all
my scintillation sintering silicon dioxide powder into Space Shuttle
heat tiles with beams from my eyes.
Cute.
As I said in the original post, which is the real point of the post:
You are dimwit liberal partybots, you seldom even know what it is
that's being discussed.
Oh, I know what is being discussed. I know it well enough to know it's
complete B.S.
You do? uhhhh... Prove it!
The proof is this thread and your inability to provide anything to back
your original claim up, Alice. I don't have to prove it since you've
done such a thorough job of it yourself.
Wait, I want to sound like a usenet moron here so I can me you at eye
level... Cites! Give me Cites.
It's a reasonable request and usually only met with such rancor when
requested of a liar (that's where you come in, Alice).
You're more like dogs that detect the possible
presence of a butt (that would be Bush's exposed one in this case) to
put your noses into. He's a Lib, just like you, you both reek for the
same reason. It isn't as if people even more liberal than him are an
option for anyone other than libs.
In other words, you have nothing to back up your ridiculous claim that
you have not been squarely behind Bush until now. It was a fairly
simple request, Alice. Why don't you just admit that you're lying and
we'll move on, m'kay?
A simple request. Sure sweetcheeks, if you're really interested in my
attitude about Bush going back over the months and years, go to google
groups and type in my handle. I've gone by "Alcidiades" and "Scipio".
Then you'll know!
Then you should have no problem supplying a couple of thread IDs,
Alice. I have neither the stomach nor the time to play seek and find
with your idiotic ramblings.
Any else you feel need to make a fool of yourself on?
"Anything else"? LOL!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tiny Human Ferret" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
13 Nov 2005 05:31:01 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Alcibiades wrote:
On 13 Nov 2005 05:30:41 -0800, wrote:
Alcibiades wrote:
On 12 Nov 2005 16:40:02 -0800, wrote:
<CHOMP>
In other words, you have nothing to back up your ridiculous claim that
you have not been squarely behind Bush until now. It was a fairly
simple request, Alice. Why don't you just admit that you're lying and
we'll move on, m'kay?
A simple request. Sure sweetcheeks, if you're really interested in my
attitude about Bush going back over the months and years, go to google
groups and type in my handle. I've gone by "Alcidiades" and "Scipio".
Then you'll know!
Then you should have no problem supplying a couple of thread IDs,
Alice. I have neither the stomach nor the time to play seek and find
with your idiotic ramblings.
Try http://groups.google.com/advanced_search
Key in "traitor" and "bush" in the "require all these words" field and
either "Alcidiades" or "Scipio" in the "author" field. Or simply search
under those names for "RINO" (Republican In Name Only) and you will get
a lot of results.
Trust me on this: he is NOT a Bush fan.
Any else you feel need to make a fool of yourself on?
"Anything else"? LOL!
Do the search, and be prepared to blush. You _should_ be embarassed;
it's like calling Ken Starr a "clintonista". It's like calling me a
"mojado lover". I can only guess that you haven't the slightest clue to
whom you responded with this genuinely bizarre accusation.
--
The incapacity of a weak and distracted government may
often assume the appearance, and produce the effects,
of a treasonable correspondence with the public enemy.
--Gibbon, "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alcibiades" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
13 Nov 2005 07:00:53 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:31:01 -0500, Tiny Human Ferret
<ixnayamspay_klaatu@earthops.net> wrote:
Do the search, and be prepared to blush. You _should_ be embarassed;
it's like calling Ken Starr a "clintonista". It's like calling me a
"mojado lover". I can only guess that you haven't the slightest clue to
whom you responded with this genuinely bizarre accusation.
You are lending them too many points if you expect these slackjaws to
blush about anything.
It's not important, I'm just making a little point publically about
the ignorance of these DemBots as individuals. Take the worst 15% of
the GOP-Bots, so far as willful ignorance is concerned... Nearly all
of the left-wing posters are that ignorant. They almost never know
what they are talking about when they challenge people, not even the
basics. They don't want to know, knowlege isn't the point for such
hambones.
They are that dog sniffing something in the rear, in that _all they
know_ is that they heard of a serious problem Reps are having with
Bush. What that problem actually is, why the majority of Americans are
a) right of center, and b) hostile to Bush, they have no idea. For
these scholars, those two facts together create cognitive dissonance.
i.e. the American People must want them, because we dont want the
Globalist Social-Liberal Bush.
It ain't exactly news that the Left attracts this calibre of people
disproportionately, but it's good to tape it back on the wall once in
a while that readers out there are reminded. The values of the old
pre-LBJ Democratic Party, the working-class party, were a good thing.
These people today who call themselves Democrats care nothing for
those values, they _don't even know what those values are_. The Short
Yellow Bus of the electorate, that's all these people are now.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
15 Nov 2005 07:04:28 AM |
|
|
Alcibiades wrote:
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:31:01 -0500, Tiny Human Ferret
<ixnayamspay_klaatu@earthops.net> wrote:
Do the search, and be prepared to blush. You _should_ be embarassed;
it's like calling Ken Starr a "clintonista". It's like calling me a
"mojado lover". I can only guess that you haven't the slightest clue to
whom you responded with this genuinely bizarre accusation.
You are lending them too many points if you expect these slackjaws to
blush about anything.
<bunch of self-important drivel snipped>
Tell me, Aclice, is Timothy McVeigh one of your heros?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alcibiades" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
13 Nov 2005 05:30:12 PM |
|
|
On 13 Nov 2005 14:16:05 -0800, wrote:
Alcibiades wrote:
On 13 Nov 2005 05:30:41 -0800, wrote:
Alcibiades wrote:
On 12 Nov 2005 16:40:02 -0800, wrote:
Alcibiades wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:42:47 GMT, "Kyle Daulton" <KylDltn@yahoo.com>
wrote:
"Alcibiades" <was-scipio@lacedæmon.net> wrote in message
news:1jo8n1d3s7i75nggsruln9j6jt5hdm0bn4@4ax.com...
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:00:27 GMT, "Saving Pfc. America" <pfc@army.net>
wrote:
<bjackson445@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131688099.480464.85910@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Pat Buchanan is a REAL right winger; a true American. Bush is a
liberal.
Bush is a Lame duck. Quack.
Great. He can't do Conservatives any more damage by blocking them.
LMFAO! The rats are jumping ship! Don't pretend Bush isn't one of yours,
Alice! We know better!
hehe. Yeah, I guess was fishing for a Dem partybot.
I ain't pretending it, I'm saying it. It's something that people on
the Right know painfully well, it's been fought about since before the
last election.
<snip>
Really? Then perhaps you could point me to some of your other
scintillating writing posted here in Usenet where you've expressed
those views? But it really doesn't matter -- there's no way you
conservatives aren't going to get sprayed with the Bush/neocon fecal
matter! You were with him before you were against him. flip-flopper!
Bwahahahah!
My scintillating writing? This is my half-***** writing. I used up all
my scintillation sintering silicon dioxide powder into Space Shuttle
heat tiles with beams from my eyes.
Cute.
As I said in the original post, which is the real point of the post:
You are dimwit liberal partybots, you seldom even know what it is
that's being discussed.
Oh, I know what is being discussed. I know it well enough to know it's
complete B.S.
You do? uhhhh... Prove it!
The proof is this thread and your inability to provide anything to back
your original claim up, Alice. I don't have to prove it since you've
done such a thorough job of it yourself.
Wait, I want to sound like a usenet moron here so I can me you at eye
level... Cites! Give me Cites.
It's a reasonable request and usually only met with such rancor when
requested of a liar (that's where you come in, Alice).
You're more like dogs that detect the possible
presence of a butt (that would be Bush's exposed one in this case) to
put your noses into. He's a Lib, just like you, you both reek for the
same reason. It isn't as if people even more liberal than him are an
option for anyone other than libs.
In other words, you have nothing to back up your ridiculous claim that
you have not been squarely behind Bush until now. It was a fairly
simple request, Alice. Why don't you just admit that you're lying and
we'll move on, m'kay?
A simple request. Sure sweetcheeks, if you're really interested in my
attitude about Bush going back over the months and years, go to google
groups and type in my handle. I've gone by "Alcidiades" and "Scipio".
Then you'll know!
Then you should have no problem supplying a couple of thread IDs,
Alice. I have neither the stomach nor the time to play seek and find
with your idiotic ramblings.
Any else you feel need to make a fool of yourself on?
"Anything else"? LOL!
Here's what's happening, dooder.
You have a snarky, superior attitude with other posters, so I'm giving
you an opportunity to justify it. That is an act of generosity on the
part of someone like me, as I don't actually like childish people, I
don't normally play in a sandbox. Everything you've typed in so far is
puerile, and the rhetoric (if we can even call it that) doesn't come
up to the bottom rung. If you are as superior as your attitude seems
to presume, here's your chance to prove it for the readers:
Your request that I type in message IDs to prove a negative is
imbecilic. Obviously, only you can prove your assertion that I'm a
former supporter of Bush who flip-flopped.
Google Groups is easy to use: Find any post of mine going back over
the years that is supportive of Bush. Post it here and I will eat my
words.
Or leave it proven that you and your libs are what I said you are to
begin with ;)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "plonk" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
11 Nov 2005 11:03:01 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:20:42 -0800, Alcibiades
<was-scipio@lacedæmon.net> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:42:47 GMT, "Kyle Daulton" <KylDltn@yahoo.com>
wrote:
"Alcibiades" <was-scipio@lacedæmon.net> wrote in message
news:1jo8n1d3s7i75nggsruln9j6jt5hdm0bn4@4ax.com...
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:00:27 GMT, "Saving Pfc. America" <pfc@army.net>
wrote:
<bjackson445@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131688099.480464.85910@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Pat Buchanan is a REAL right winger; a true American. Bush is a
liberal.
Bush is a Lame duck. Quack.
Great. He can't do Conservatives any more damage by blocking them.
LMFAO! The rats are jumping ship! Don't pretend Bush isn't one of yours,
Alice! We know better!
hehe. Yeah, I guess was fishing for a Dem partybot.
I ain't pretending it, I'm saying it. It's something that people on
the Right know painfully well, it's been fought about since before the
last election. What gets my attention lately is reading Democrats now
who suddenly notice this infighting, and have no idea what it's really
about or how long it's been going on. It's only now that Conservatives
are getting so loud and well-known Republican commentators are writing
about it that the MSM must report it.
Hell the big fight between Buchanan and neocons was going on
throughout the '90s. I've paid attention to neocons since the
first gulf war whenever they clashed with Sr. over West Bank
settlements.
Amazing how these Republicans today think the word "neocon"
is leftist lingo.....either kids or idiots that weren't paying
attention to the infighting going on then.
Some of your friends seem to think, or are at least telling
themselves, that this is a little move to the Left and presents an
opportunity for them to get the White House and so on. It certainly
won't hurt them, but the American People are no more into the liberal
agenda than they ever were. The last election should have proved that.
Bush is obviously incompetant, a willful, dangerous idiot, yet your
man still couldn't beat him. His first act was to break the rule of
"not getting us into another Vietnam", yet you still couldn't show him
the door! That win had absolutely nothing to do with Bush, it was in
spite of him. He only won because the alternative was you.
Kerry = a guy who voted for and supported the war and tried to
rely on his 70s antiwar panderings in order to pander to the old
antiwar left. How ***** uninspiring.......all too typical.
A "Security" Democrat's Democrat to be sure.
The revolt against Bush is about him not being and doing what a
Republican is supposed to. Conservatives don't accept growing big-gov
spending. They don't accept Illegal Immigration. They don't accept
racial coalition politics, Political Correctness and AA and all that
vile crap. All those things are anathema to Conservatives. And they
are what Bush is all about, he is FAR WORSE on all those things that
any Democrat Prez has ever been, nevermind a Republican.
Neocons liked Jack Kemp who was critical of any attempts to
stall Illegal Immigration by any means. Kristol used to call Buchanan
"divisive" on the issue. Kemp also liked Big Government schemes not
unlike "Great Society" giveaways that the Johnson administration used
to sponsor. They were all for pandering to minorities with
socialist-like schemes like some of the stuff I've heard about Jr.
"Compassionate Conservatism" sounds suspicious to any real
Conservative anyway.....need I know more?
I finally split with the party in '96. I could see how things were
going to go then when all of the talkradio windbags seemed
to be gearing up for a war with Muslims even then.
At least I don't have to share the Libertarian party with idiots
that are spoiling for someone else's fight out of boredom.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
12 Nov 2005 06:44:38 PM |
|
|
tooly wrote:
"Alcibiades" <was-scipio@laced=E6mon.net> wrote in message
news:ugl9n110lfjrhiroo3hf1q3tr53go8s6sq@4ax.com...
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:42:47 GMT, "Kyle Daulton" <KylDltn@yahoo.com>
wrote:
"Alcibiades" <was-scipio@laced=E6mon.net> wrote in message
news:1jo8n1d3s7i75nggsruln9j6jt5hdm0bn4@4ax.com...
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:00:27 GMT, "Saving Pfc. America" <pfc@army.net>
wrote:
<bjackson445@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131688099.480464.85910@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Pat Buchanan is a REAL right winger; a true American. Bush is a
liberal.
Bush is a Lame duck. Quack.
Great. He can't do Conservatives any more damage by blocking them.
LMFAO! The rats are jumping ship! Don't pretend Bush isn't one of yours,
Alice! We know better!
hehe. Yeah, I guess was fishing for a Dem partybot.
I ain't pretending it, I'm saying it. It's something that people on
the Right know painfully well, it's been fought about since before the
last election. What gets my attention lately is reading Democrats now
who suddenly notice this infighting, and have no idea what it's really
about or how long it's been going on. It's only now that Conservatives
are getting so loud and well-known Republican commentators are writing
about it that the MSM must report it.
Some of your friends seem to think, or are at least telling
themselves, that this is a little move to the Left and presents an
opportunity for them to get the White House and so on. It certainly
won't hurt them, but the American People are no more into the liberal
agenda than they ever were. The last election should have proved that.
Bush is obviously incompetant, a willful, dangerous idiot, yet your
man still couldn't beat him. His first act was to break the rule of
"not getting us into another Vietnam", yet you still couldn't show him
the door! That win had absolutely nothing to do with Bush, it was in
spite of him. He only won because the alternative was you.
The revolt against Bush is about him not being and doing what a
Republican is supposed to. Conservatives don't accept growing big-gov
spending. They don't accept Illegal Immigration. They don't accept
racial coalition politics, Political Correctness and AA and all that
vile crap. All those things are anathema to Conservatives. And they
are what Bush is all about, he is FAR WORSE on all those things that
any Democrat Prez has ever been, nevermind a Republican.
Touche' Alcibiades. And I don't see any, ha...'Buttboys'...(hehe, as
someone put it, I like that term for dems) replying. These leftist idiots
don't have a clue as to the volcano they sit upon as a counter movement to
their crap...woe betide if it ever erupts.
Excuse me, <cough> tooly, but it's kind of difficult to feel threatened
by someone using phrases like "woe betide"! But please, go ahead an
erupt it makes you feel better, tool.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roger" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
11 Nov 2005 07:15:51 AM |
|
|
Love those butts, eh?
"<?>T=N=T***T`N`T***T=N=T<?>" <DoD@USG.net> wrote in message
news:rUUcf.281465$uo2.237400@fe04.news.easynews.com...
So what's up with you left-wing squealing buttboys quoting one of his
articles??? He's NOT to be believed according to you buttboys.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
10 Nov 2005 11:08:19 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 04:14:17 GMT, "<?>T=N=T***T`N`T***T=N=T<?>"
<DoD@USG.net> wrote:
So what's up with you left-wing squealing buttboys quoting one of his
articles??? He's NOT to be believed according to you buttboys.
No more than any other rightwing Nazi.
.
|
|
|
| User: "H. Reader" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
11 Nov 2005 01:14:27 AM |
|
|
<Knickkkers@Hang-up.com> wrote in message news:jp98n1pigvkejne86ufe8rnn91ktr5a2q5@4ax.com...
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 04:14:17 GMT, "<?>T=N=T***T`N`T***T=N=T<?>"
<DoD@USG.net> wrote:
So what's up with you left-wing squealing buttboys quoting one of his
articles??? He's NOT to be believed according to you buttboys.
No more than any other rightwing Nazi.
Two imbeciles agree. How special.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Saving Pfc. America" |
|
| Title: Re: Butt...Butt...Butt...You Buttboys HATE Pat Buchanan.... |
11 Nov 2005 01:59:54 AM |
|
|
"H. Reader" <historyreader@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:nxXcf.31636$ip6.11932@trnddc07...
<Knickkkers@Hang-up.com> wrote in message
news:jp98n1pigvkejne86ufe8rnn91ktr5a2q5@4ax.com...
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 04:14:17 GMT, "<?>T=N=T***T`N`T***T=N=T<?>"
<DoD@USG.net> wrote:
So what's up with you left-wing squealing buttboys quoting one of his
articles??? He's NOT to be believed according to you buttboys.
No more than any other rightwing Nazi.
Two imbeciles agree. How special.
Seems you are another Pug who can't address the Subject matter much less
follow a thread.
By the way, Bush is through. Lame Duck.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
