Pelosi:Weldon has outlived his usefulness...seeing ghosts and conspriacies



 Politics > Politics-USA > Pelosi:Weldon has outlived his usefulness...seeing ghosts and conspriacies

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Hatto von Aquitanien"
Date: 08 Feb 2007 02:37:51 AM
Object: Pelosi:Weldon has outlived his usefulness...seeing ghosts and conspriacies
"Curt Weldon has outlived his usefulness to the country, he's seeing ghosts
and conspiracies." - Nancy Pelosi.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6757267008400743688
In a letter recently addressed to senior member of the House and Senate, a
retired structural engineer with 4 decades of experience wrote the
following:
<quote>
Once one realizes that the impacting airplanes and the collapse of the
Towers were unlikely to have caused the collapse of WTC 7, the whole
official version of what happened on 9/11 begins to collapses. None of the
reports bolstering the official version of 9/11 events adequately explain
why WTC 7 collapsed. NIST is charged with providing this explanation.
However, in over five years it has not come up with one-time enough to
design and, now, nearly complete construction of a WTC 7 replacement.
To anybody who has looked at films of controlled demolitions of buildings it
is obvious that the collapse of WTC 7 looked exactly like a controlled
demolition. Even if the scattered, pretty much unexplained, fires observed
in WTC 7 had seriously compromised the structural integrity of the building
it probably would not have completely collapsed and it is very unlikely it
would have collapsed in the precipitous manner it did. I would also note
that, while the limited damage to WTC 7 from WTC 1 debris was on its south
side, the rubble pattern from its collapse fanned out to the north,
suggesting the north side of the building collapsed a little before the
south side. This leads me to the amazing, but compelling, conclusion that
the building was deliberately destroyed by conventional controlled
demolition. This is a process that takes considerable skill, planning,
time, and resources to accomplish. At the least, it would take many days to
prepare for the demolition of a build like WTC 7, not an afternoon. Thus,
implausible as it seems, given the observed mode of collapse of the
building it follows that demolition devices were already in place in WTC 7
on 9/11, ready to bring it down. From here it is a short step to the
logical conclusion that demolition devices were likely in place in the Twin
Towers when they were struck. Continuing, since the official version of
what happened on 9/11 at the World Trade Center falls apart with out a
credible explanation of what happened to WTC 7, the official versions of
what happened at the Pentagon and at Shanksville, Pennsylvania, become
highly suspect.
....
In my effort, just mentioned, to inform myself on what happened to Flight 93
at Shanksville I called a local news paper office-I do not recall which one
if there is more than one-and asked if there was anyone there that had
knowledge of what happened. The response I received was something to the
effect, "We don't have anybody. They wouldn't let anybody get close out
there." This restriction would have made sense if it were intended to
prevent compromising the evidence being collected. Unfortunately, this same
sort of access restriction was imposed at the World Trade Center while
evidence was being carted off and sold out of the country for junk, making
it impossible to examine the evidence for signs of controlled demolition.
Meanwhile, security camera records of the attack on the Pentagon were
withheld form the public for a very long time and when some images were
released they were only a few frames from what is believed to be a more
extensive record. Insofar as I know there never have been reports issued
showing the location and condition of the airplane parts, luggage, bodies,
or body parts recovered from the Shanksville or Pentagon sites. This
maintenance of secrecy and destruction of evidence, at least at the World
Trade Center, means that what actually happened on 9/11 is being hidden
from the public.
....
I am a Life Member of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Eight years
ago I retired from the Federal Highway Administration after having worked
for the agency for 40 years as a structural engineer. For the first quarter
of my career I worked in various field offices as a bridge engineer. The
remainder of my career was spent in the agency's headquarters, where most
of my efforts were directed to roadside safety; focusing on policies,
specifications, and designs for roadside hardware-guardrails, bridge
railings, median barriers, crash cushions, and breakaway sign and luminair
supports. For all of my career I was never far from the research community,
which gave me considerable insight into forensic analysis of the static and
dynamic performance of structures, including their destruction.
</quote>
--
Nil conscire sibi
.

User: "Server 13"

Title: Re: Pelosi:Weldon has outlived his usefulness...seeing ghosts and conspriacies 08 Feb 2007 11:46:02 AM
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in message
news:wu2dnQmKibD8fFfYnZ2dnUVZ_r2onZ2d@speakeasy.net...

"Curt Weldon has outlived his usefulness to the country, he's seeing
ghosts
and conspiracies." - Nancy Pelosi.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6757267008400743688

In a letter recently addressed to senior member of the House and Senate, a
retired structural engineer with 4 decades of experience wrote the
following:

<quote>
Once one realizes that the impacting airplanes and the collapse of the
Towers were unlikely to have caused the collapse of WTC 7, the whole
official version of what happened on 9/11 begins to collapses. None of the
reports bolstering the official version of 9/11 events adequately explain
why WTC 7 collapsed.

k00k-a-d00dle-d0000!
.

User: "Antiochus Epiphanes"

Title: Re: Pelosi:Weldon has outlived his usefulness...seeing ghosts and conspriacies 08 Feb 2007 10:56:55 AM
On Feb 8, 3:37 am, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:

"Curt Weldon has outlived his usefulness to the country, he's seeing ghosts
and conspiracies." - Nancy Pelosi.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6757267008400743688

In a letter recently addressed to senior member of the House and Senate, a
retired structural engineer with 4 decades of experience wrote the
following:

<quote>
Once one realizes that the impacting airplanes and the collapse of the
Towers were unlikely to have caused the collapse of WTC 7, the whole
official version of what happened on 9/11 begins to collapses. None of the
reports bolstering the official version of 9/11 events adequately explain
why WTC 7 collapsed. NIST is charged with providing this explanation.
However, in over five years it has not come up with one-time enough to
design and, now, nearly complete construction of a WTC 7 replacement.

To anybody who has looked at films of controlled demolitions of buildings it
is obvious that the collapse of WTC 7 looked exactly like a controlled
demolition. Even if the scattered, pretty much unexplained, fires observed
in WTC 7 had seriously compromised the structural integrity of the building
it probably would not have completely collapsed and it is very unlikely it
would have collapsed in the precipitous manner it did. I would also note
that, while the limited damage to WTC 7 from WTC 1 debris was on its south
side, the rubble pattern from its collapse fanned out to the north,
suggesting the north side of the building collapsed a little before the
south side. This leads me to the amazing, but compelling, conclusion that
the building was deliberately destroyed by conventional controlled
demolition. This is a process that takes considerable skill, planning,
time, and resources to accomplish. At the least, it would take many days to
prepare for the demolition of a build like WTC 7, not an afternoon. Thus,
implausible as it seems, given the observed mode of collapse of the
building it follows that demolition devices were already in place in WTC 7
on 9/11, ready to bring it down. From here it is a short step to the
logical conclusion that demolition devices were likely in place in the Twin
Towers when they were struck. Continuing, since the official version of
what happened on 9/11 at the World Trade Center falls apart with out a
credible explanation of what happened to WTC 7, the official versions of
what happened at the Pentagon and at Shanksville, Pennsylvania, become
highly suspect.

...

In my effort, just mentioned, to inform myself on what happened to Flight 93
at Shanksville I called a local news paper office-I do not recall which one
if there is more than one-and asked if there was anyone there that had
knowledge of what happened. The response I received was something to the
effect, "We don't have anybody. They wouldn't let anybody get close out
there." This restriction would have made sense if it were intended to
prevent compromising the evidence being collected. Unfortunately, this same
sort of access restriction was imposed at the World Trade Center while
evidence was being carted off and sold out of the country for junk, making
it impossible to examine the evidence for signs of controlled demolition.
Meanwhile, security camera records of the attack on the Pentagon were
withheld form the public for a very long time and when some images were
released they were only a few frames from what is believed to be a more
extensive record. Insofar as I know there never have been reports issued
showing the location and condition of the airplane parts, luggage, bodies,
or body parts recovered from the Shanksville or Pentagon sites. This
maintenance of secrecy and destruction of evidence, at least at the World
Trade Center, means that what actually happened on 9/11 is being hidden
from the public.

...

I am a Life Member of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Eight years
ago I retired from the Federal Highway Administration after having worked
for the agency for 40 years as a structural engineer. For the first quarter
of my career I worked in various field offices as a bridge engineer. The
remainder of my career was spent in the agency's headquarters, where most
of my efforts were directed to roadside safety; focusing on policies,
specifications, and designs for roadside hardware-guardrails, bridge
railings, median barriers, crash cushions, and breakaway sign and luminair
supports. For all of my career I was never far from the research community,
which gave me considerable insight into forensic analysis of the static and
dynamic performance of structures, including their destruction.
</quote>

--
Nil conscire sibi

It seems as if they don't get it. How can people be _so_ stupid?
SHEEPLE!
This might be a bit dry compared to www.wkjo.com but it nails a lot of
key points. The biggest problem with it is that it completely omits
the obvious role of Mossad.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-9081183141197207653
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Ghosts of 1973 still haunt Israel as its spies face Iraq probe, too
Those who vote for Bush will be watched in the polling booth by 3000 ghosts from 9/11
Nearly four years after Janet Napolitano pushed reforms at ChildProtective Services, the ghosts of murdered children haunt the agency.
Bush's war evokes ghosts of Vietnam.
Arizona-Nearly four years after governor Janet Napolitano pushedreforms at Child Protective Services, the ghosts of murdered children hauntthe agency.
The ghosts of Vietnam. Rebel war spirals out of control.
Ghosts of Abu Ghraib: American haunting
The Ghosts of Corruption Present
Re: bigot Pelosi wants to censor free speech
Re: Pelosi's bigotry runs deep
Pelosi calls Bush the TRAINING WHEEL PRESIDENT
(D) PELOSI BLOWS
Re: Demcorat House Leader, Nancy Pelosi, Aiding And Abetting US Adversaries
Democratic Leader Pelosi: 'Congress Must Fully Fund Veterans' Health Care Right Now'
IRAQ'S WMD: Let's Hear from Congresswoman Nacny Pelosi - 1998
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER