| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"jennifer mullins" |
| Date: |
11 Sep 2006 11:49:40 PM |
| Object: |
pentagon 911 |
'They' are saying there was a 16' hole blown through 3 walls each 3' thick
steel reinforced concrete. No way could it have been made by the airplane
which also conclusively crashed. But could have been made by a missle fired
from a fighter jet intended to take out the plane. It would be logical to
think they wouldn't want us to know if in fact that's the case, right?
.
|
|
| User: "John Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: pentagon 911 |
12 Sep 2006 01:37:16 AM |
|
|
"jennifer mullins" <jlmullins73@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:E%qNg.199$UG4.3@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
'They' are saying there was a 16' hole blown through 3 walls each 3' thick
steel reinforced concrete. No way could it have been made by the airplane
which also conclusively crashed. But could have been made by a missle
fired from a fighter jet intended to take out the plane. It would be
logical to think they wouldn't want us to know if in fact that's the case,
right?
Nobody barnstorms a 757 at a few foot altitude. There wasnt as much as char
mark from the engine on that grass. Its was no plane.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: $2.6 Trillion?: pentagon 911 |
12 Sep 2006 02:55:45 AM |
|
|
John Smith wrote:
"jennifer mullins" <jlmullins73@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:E%qNg.199$UG4.3@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
'They' are saying there was a 16' hole blown through 3 walls each 3'
thick steel reinforced concrete. No way could it have been made by the
airplane
which also conclusively crashed. But could have been made by a missle
fired from a fighter jet intended to take out the plane. It would be
logical to think they wouldn't want us to know if in fact that's the
case, right?
Nobody barnstorms a 757 at a few foot altitude. There wasnt as much as
char mark from the engine on that grass. Its was no plane.
I believe the terrorists did fly a Boeing 757 into the Pentagon using some
kind of automated guidance. It was aimed specifically at certain people
and offices. General Maude was a primary target.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html
--
Nil conscire sibi
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Orval Fairbairn" |
|
| Title: Re: pentagon 911 |
12 Sep 2006 03:02:16 PM |
|
|
In article <E%qNg.199$UG4.3@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
"jennifer mullins" <jlmullins73@earthlink.net> wrote:
'They' are saying there was a 16' hole blown through 3 walls each 3' thick
steel reinforced concrete. No way could it have been made by the airplane
which also conclusively crashed. But could have been made by a missle fired
from a fighter jet intended to take out the plane. It would be logical to
think they wouldn't want us to know if in fact that's the case, right?
You don't know much about kinetic energy, strength of materials or
material failure due to shock, do you?
Please explain how a penetrator munition can go through 20 feet of
reinforced concrete, or how water can take down a concrete wall.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
