Politics > Politics-USA > PERSECUTION OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE BY ARROGANT CHRISTIAN ASSHOLES GOING ON FOR MILLENIA WILL NOT GO UNNOTICED
| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"the 2nd coming of christ" |
| Date: |
13 Jul 2007 05:24:26 AM |
| Object: |
PERSECUTION OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE BY ARROGANT CHRISTIAN ASSHOLES GOING ON FOR MILLENIA WILL NOT GO UNNOTICED |
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:36:30 -0400, dh@. wrote:
Then just say whether you suck up to the beast or you deny
his existence.
I'll suck up to the Beast any day before I suck up to any false
Christ-image manufactured for the purpose of manipulating the
masses.
i don't know what beast you are referring to here. i only believe
in myself and the beast within myself, not in any cartoon
character fabricated by the christians.
At this point my impression is that the concept of Lucifer (or
what/who ever) is included in the Old Testament, and that is
what/who is Satan. That means the idea was around long
before Christianity.
One has to question the validity of any Christian interpretation
as portrayed in an English translation of the Old Testament. The
Hebrew language is very complex and where the word Satan appears
in a Christian bible, there more than likely are a number of
possible meanings associated with the actual Hebrew word in
question that are not being properly understood. One cannot go to
a Christian translation of Hebrew writing and expect that it is
going to be a valid representation of what those Hebrew authors
were trying to convey.
Christ changed things, and unless you accept what he
changed there will be things you could never understand.
Of course even if you accept them you'll never be able to
understand everything, but you would still be a lot better off
than you are now if it's all for real. If it's all just ***** then
it makes no difference what anyone thinks.
To me Christ is just a myth. When a myth is brought from the realm
of the allegorical into the realm of the literal it loses its
significance and true import. Everything that is known as
Christianity today is absolute ***** and has no
transformational value for humans per say. Humans may accept the
historical (false) Christ and achieve some seeming transformation
but this is due to their desire to change in the first place, and
not from any external influence associated with belief in a
literal Christ. If those people applied the same amount of effort
into trying to understand the mythical (true) Christ, any
spiritual advancement would be magnified for it would no longer be
an internal process but an actual external phenomena being
triggered by meditation upon the true meaning of said myth.
Judaism and Christianity are totally different
religions with different philosophical outlooks on life and the
world. Most importantly, the Jews do not accept Christ as the
Messiah, so according to Christians, that stance is itself
Satanic.
We have no reason to believe the Jews are right.
We have every reason to listen to and trust in what any Jew says
of his own religion and own ancient writings much more than what a
Christian thinks of those same Hebrew writings. If a Jew says that
Christ is not the messiah, then that should be a settled issue and
there is absolutely no point in trying to tell a Jew what his
religion should be or shouldn't. The arrogance of Christians to
take a religion and turn it on its head is of a magnitude that
cannot be measured and has contributed more to the persecution of
Jews than anything else in the last two millennia. The True God
(if there is such a thing) will one day avenge the inhumane
persecution of the Jewish people by arrogant and ignorant
Christians who persist in misinterpreting Holy Scripture and
mythological teachings.
The persecution etc they must bear as a people is evidence of
where they are on that, if it's all for real.
It shows that ignorance and evil knows no bounds.
The only Jew I
discussed it with in person doesn't believe in any afterlife,
God bless him.
or in Satan. When I asked why bother praying and all that
then, he acted like it was for this life only. However, the
OT does mention resurrection:
Nor you nor any other Christian knows more than a Jew about his
own ancient writings or about his own religion.
[***** biblical quotations snipped]
any brand of satanism will be better than the
worst brand of christianity.
Can you provide examples?
Satanists don't go around distorting other people's religions and
persecuting said people for millennia based on lies and hatred;
thus by default the worst Satanist will be more respectful and
humane than even the best Christian with the seeming best of
intentions.
octinomos
--
``Could it be that ... political theater is being staged, very much like the wrestling matches on TV, with the so-called neoconservatives and their so-called enemies, such as Pat Buchanan, loudly making public statements intended to convince the opponents of US foreign policy actions that these actions are the fault of 'the Jews'?'' --Jared Israel/Emperor's Clothes
.
|
|
| User: "Economics" |
|
| Title: Re: PERSECUTION OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE BY ARROGANT CHRISTIAN ASSHOLES GOING ON FOR MILLENIA WILL NOT GO UNNOTICED |
14 Jul 2007 04:57:49 AM |
|
|
"the 2nd coming of christ" <jesucristo2@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:46974fee.315671388@news.sysmatrix.net...
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:36:30 -0400, dh@. wrote:
Then just say whether you suck up to the beast or you deny
his existence.
I'll suck up to the Beast any day before I suck up to any false
Christ-image manufactured for the purpose of manipulating the
masses.
i don't know what beast you are referring to here. i only believe
in myself and the beast within myself, not in any cartoon
character fabricated by the christians.
At this point my impression is that the concept of Lucifer (or
what/who ever) is included in the Old Testament, and that is
what/who is Satan. That means the idea was around long
before Christianity.
One has to question the validity of any Christian interpretation
as portrayed in an English translation of the Old Testament. The
Hebrew language is very complex and where the word Satan appears
in a Christian bible, there more than likely are a number of
possible meanings associated with the actual Hebrew word in
question that are not being properly understood. One cannot go to
a Christian translation of Hebrew writing and expect that it is
going to be a valid representation of what those Hebrew authors
were trying to convey.
Christ changed things, and unless you accept what he
changed there will be things you could never understand.
Of course even if you accept them you'll never be able to
understand everything, but you would still be a lot better off
than you are now if it's all for real. If it's all just ***** then
it makes no difference what anyone thinks.
To me Christ is just a myth. When a myth is brought from the realm
Well, if you write the year 2007 on your checks, that is how many years
since Christ was born.
In ancient times, the reign of a king or pharaoh was noted by how many years
he reigned. For example, in Ancient Egypt it might be the 3rd year of
Ramesses III. That means the earth revolved around the sun three times since
Ramesses III became king. When Ramesses III died, the date would then become
the first year of the new pharaoh, Ramesses VI.
http://www.touregypt.net/kings.htm
In pagan Roman times the same sort of king calendar was kept. When one
emperor
Many of the pagan Roman kings (emperor) were terrible tyrants. Jews and
Christians back then often called the pagan emperors beasts, but they had to
do so quietly for fear of being killed by Roman guards. But the pagan
emperors would kill Jews and Christians anyway, even if they didnt do
anything.
In fact, when the Book of Revelation was written, specific mention of Nero
Caesar being a beast was made when it spoke of Nero Caesar as the 666 beast
using the old Hebrew number-letter writing style. Since that time, the
number 666 is sometimes seen as bad luck, but it actually is not. It just
happened to be the number-letters for Nero's name. 666 is the Hebrew number
style for the specific person Nero Caesar who committed all kinds of violent
beast like acts that only wild animals engaged in. Most of what Nero did was
forbidden by Judeo-Christianity. The murders, the rapes, the stealing, the
child molestations, etc are all banned under the Ten Commandments. These
things were legal though, in the pagan Roman empire.
By understanding the number 666 was used to denote a specific beast-like
person who was Nero Caesar, we can see the Book of Revelation was actually
promoting no superstition at all. It merely described Nero Caesar, without
using his name, who was violent and murderous "like a beast".
See the website "The Bible's Book of Revelation applied to 2,000 years ago,
not today"
http://fortresscastles.bravepages.com/sup/rev.html
of the allegorical into the realm of the literal it loses its
significance and true import. Everything that is known as
Christianity today is absolute ***** and has no
transformational value for humans per say. Humans may accept the
historical (false) Christ and achieve some seeming transformation
but this is due to their desire to change in the first place, and
not from any external influence associated with belief in a
literal Christ. If those people applied the same amount of effort
into trying to understand the mythical (true) Christ, any
spiritual advancement would be magnified for it would no longer be
an internal process but an actual external phenomena being
triggered by meditation upon the true meaning of said myth.
Judaism and Christianity are totally different
religions with different philosophical outlooks on life and the
world. Most importantly, the Jews do not accept Christ as the
Messiah, so according to Christians, that stance is itself
Satanic.
We have no reason to believe the Jews are right.
We have every reason to listen to and trust in what any Jew says
of his own religion and own ancient writings much more than what a
Christian thinks of those same Hebrew writings. If a Jew says that
Christ is not the messiah, then that should be a settled issue and
there is absolutely no point in trying to tell a Jew what his
religion should be or shouldn't. The arrogance of Christians to
take a religion and turn it on its head is of a magnitude that
cannot be measured and has contributed more to the persecution of
Jews than anything else in the last two millennia. The True God
(if there is such a thing) will one day avenge the inhumane
persecution of the Jewish people by arrogant and ignorant
Christians who persist in misinterpreting Holy Scripture and
mythological teachings.
The persecution etc they must bear as a people is evidence of
where they are on that, if it's all for real.
It shows that ignorance and evil knows no bounds.
The only Jew I
discussed it with in person doesn't believe in any afterlife,
God bless him.
or in Satan. When I asked why bother praying and all that
then, he acted like it was for this life only. However, the
OT does mention resurrection:
Nor you nor any other Christian knows more than a Jew about his
own ancient writings or about his own religion.
[***** biblical quotations snipped]
any brand of satanism will be better than the
worst brand of christianity.
Can you provide examples?
Satanists don't go around distorting other people's religions and
persecuting said people for millennia based on lies and hatred;
thus by default the worst Satanist will be more respectful and
humane than even the best Christian with the seeming best of
intentions.
octinomos
--
``Could it be that ... political theater is being staged, very much like
the wrestling matches on TV, with the so-called neoconservatives and their
so-called enemies, such as Pat Buchanan, loudly making public statements
intended to convince the opponents of US foreign policy actions that these
actions are the fault of 'the Jews'?'' --Jared Israel/Emperor's Clothes
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: PERSECUTION OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE BY ARROGANT CHRISTIAN ASSHOLES GOING ON FOR MILLENIA WILL NOT GO UNNOTICED |
14 Jul 2007 05:37:04 AM |
|
|
In researching Jewish history, the investigator discovers a wide
variance of written material. Work by authors expressly critical of
Jews (and they include a surprising number of Jewish commentators,
mostly "apostates" of one kind or another) is invariably labeled by
today's political conventions to be "anti-Semitic" in nature. There is
a large body of such material extending throughout history, written by
critics wherever Jews were to be found. Observations about Jewish
life by non-Jews is startlingly consistent over two thousand years.
Consistently credible Gentile themes in attacks against Jews include
Jewish elitism, their insularity and clannishness, their disdain for
non-Jews, their exploitive and deceptive behavior towards those not
their own, the suspicion of Jewish national loyalties and allegiance
to the lands they lived in, excessive Jewish proclivity for money and
economic domination, and an economic "parasitism" (the concentration
of Jews in lucrative non-productive fields of finance-usury, money
lending, etc.-at the expense of non-Jewish communities).
"Hatred for the Jews," Abram Leon writes, "does not date solely from
the birth of Christianity. Seneca treated the Jews as a criminal race.
Juvenal believed that the Jews only existed to cause evil for other
peoples. Quintilian said that Jews were a curse for other people"
(Leon, 71).
In 59 BC the Roman statesman Cicero criticized Jewish "clannishness"
and "influence in the assemblies." In the second century AD Celsus,
one of Rome's great medical writers, wrote that Jews "pride themselves
in possessing superior wisdom and disdain for the company of other
men." Philostratus, an ancient Greek author, believed that Jews "have
long since risen against humanity itself. They are men who have
devised a misanthropic life, who share neither food nor drink with
others." (Cf. Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice, I, iii, 29-32.) The
great Roman historian Tacitus (A.D. 56-120) declared that "the Jews
are extremely loyal toward one another, and are always ready to show
compassion [for their fellow Jews], but toward other people they feel
only hate and enmity" (Morais, 46).
Centuries later Voltaire's criticism of Jews, in his Essai sur le
Moeurs, repeated many of the same charges: "The Jewish nation dares to
display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts
against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the
well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous-cringing in misfortune
and insolent in prosperity."
"However uncomfortable it is to recognize," says Albert Lindemann,
"not all those whom historians have classified as anti-Semites were
narrow bigots, irrational, or otherwise incapable of acts of altruism
and moral courage. They represented a bewildering range of opinion and
personality types" (Lindemann, 13). And why is this "uncomfortable
[for Jews] to recognize?" Because, by even a child's exercise of logic
and common sense, the common denominator of all such disparate people
can only be the enduring truths about Jews as each observer
experienced them in varying historical and cultural circumstances.
The French Jewish intellectual (and eventual Zionist), Bernard Lazare,
among many others in history, noted this obvious fact in 1894, long
before the Nazi persecutions of Jews and resultant institutionalized
Jewish efforts to deny, or obfuscate, crucial-and central- aspects of
their history:
Wherever the Jews settled one observes the development of
anti-Semitism, or rather anti-Judaism ... If this hostility, this
repugnance had been shown towards the Jews at one time or in one
country only, it would be easy to account for the local cause of this
sentiment. But this race has been the object of hatred with all
nations amidst whom it settled.
Inasmuch as the enemies of Jews belonged to diverse races, as
they dwelled far apart from one another, were ruled by
different laws and governed by opposite principles; as they had
not the same customs and differed in spirit from one another,
so that they could not possibly judge alike of any subject, it
must needs be that the general causes of anti-Semitism have always
resided in [the people of] Israel itself, and not in those who
antagonized it (Lazare, 8).
Excerpts from from When Victims Rule, online at Jewish Tribal Review.
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/wvr.htm
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "the 2nd coming of christ" |
|
| Title: Re: PERSECUTION OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE BY ARROGANT CHRISTIAN ASSHOLES GOING ON FOR MILLENIA WILL NOT GO UNNOTICED |
14 Jul 2007 09:18:28 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 05:57:49 -0400, "Economics"
<economy@nospam.net> wrote:
"the 2nd coming of christ" <jesucristo2@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:46974fee.315671388@news.sysmatrix.net...
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:36:30 -0400, dh@. wrote:
Then just say whether you suck up to the beast or you deny
his existence.
I'll suck up to the Beast any day before I suck up to any false
Christ-image manufactured for the purpose of manipulating the
masses.
i don't know what beast you are referring to here. i only believe
in myself and the beast within myself, not in any cartoon
character fabricated by the christians.
At this point my impression is that the concept of Lucifer (or
what/who ever) is included in the Old Testament, and that is
what/who is Satan. That means the idea was around long
before Christianity.
One has to question the validity of any Christian interpretation
as portrayed in an English translation of the Old Testament. The
Hebrew language is very complex and where the word Satan appears
in a Christian bible, there more than likely are a number of
possible meanings associated with the actual Hebrew word in
question that are not being properly understood. One cannot go to
a Christian translation of Hebrew writing and expect that it is
going to be a valid representation of what those Hebrew authors
were trying to convey.
Christ changed things, and unless you accept what he
changed there will be things you could never understand.
Of course even if you accept them you'll never be able to
understand everything, but you would still be a lot better off
than you are now if it's all for real. If it's all just ***** then
it makes no difference what anyone thinks.
To me Christ is just a myth.
Well, if you write the year 2007 on your checks, that is how many years
since Christ was born.
``Not even scholar's appreciate the fact that our calendar does
not count from the first year of Jesus, which is unknown, but from
the last year of Herod, which is known. Thus the entire AD/BC
system is based on the reign of the last great Jewish king!''
http://users.zoominternet.net/~matto/Java/ce_and_bce.htm
--
``Could it be that ... political theater is being staged, very much like the wrestling matches on TV, with the so-called neoconservatives and their so-called enemies, such as Pat Buchanan, loudly making public statements intended to convince the opponents of US foreign policy actions that these actions are the fault of 'the Jews'?'' --Jared Israel/Emperor's Clothes
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: PERSECUTION OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE BY ARROGANT CHRISTIAN ASSHOLES GOING ON FOR MILLENIA WILL NOT GO UNNOTICED |
14 Jul 2007 11:20:12 AM |
|
|
by Kevin MacDonald
The current situation in the United States is really an awesome
display of Jewish power and influence. People who are very strongly
identified as Jews maintain close ties to Israeli politicians and
military figures and to Jewish activist organizations and pro-Israeli
lobbying groups while occupying influential policy-making positions in
the defense and foreign policy establishment. These same people, as
well as a chorus of other prominent Jews, have routine access to the
most prestigious media outlets in the United States. People who
criticize Israel are routinely vilified and subjected to professional
abuse.
Perhaps the most telling feature of this entire state of affairs is
the surreal fact that in this entire discourse Jewish identity is not
mentioned. When Charles Krauthammer, Bill Kristol, Michael Rubin,
William Safire, Robert Satloff, or the legions of other prominent
media figures write their reflexively pro-Israel pieces in the New
York Times, the Wall Street Journal, or the Los Angeles Times, or
opine on the Fox News Network, there is never any mention that they
are Jewish Americans who have an intense ethnic interest in Israel.
When Richard Perle authors a report for an Israeli think tank; is on
the board of directors of an Israeli newspaper; maintains close
personal ties with prominent Israelis, especially those associated
with the Likud Party; has worked for an Israeli defense company; and,
according to credible reports, was discovered by the FBI passing
classified information to Israel - when, despite all of this, he is a
central figure in the network of those pushing for wars to rearrange
the entire politics of the Middle East in Israel's favor, and with
nary a soul having the courage to mention the obvious overriding
Jewish loyalty apparent in Perle's actions, that is indeed a
breathtaking display of power.
One must contemplate the fact that American Jews have managed to
maintain unquestioned support for Israel over the last thirty-seven
years, despite Israel's seizing land and engaging in a brutal
suppression of the Palestinians in the occupied territories - an
occupation that will most likely end with expulsion or complete
subjugation, degradation, and apartheid. During the same period Jewish
organizations in America have been a principal force - in my view the
main force - for transforming America into a state dedicated to
suppressing ethnic identification among Europeans, for encouraging
massive multiethnic immigration into the U.S., and for erecting a
legal system and cultural ideology that is obsessively sensitive to
the complaints and interests of non-European ethnic minorities - the
culture of the Holocaust. All this is done without a whisper of
double standards in the aboveground media...
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tani Jantsang ©" |
|
| Title: Re: PERSECUTION OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE BY ARROGANT CHRISTIAN ASSHOLES GOING ON FOR MILLENIA WILL NOT GO UNNOTICED |
14 Jul 2007 07:41:49 PM |
|
|
Oh, it gets better. The idiots are targeting Jews to be "evangelized."
Evangelist - it's an anagram for Evil Agent. HA. Of all the insane things
to do - they feel that they just MUST go ringing doorbells and otherwise
being pains in the asses to "let Jews KNOW" about Jesus. Like - WHO THE
***** doesn't know about Jesus? Someone from Mars? I mean, of all the
cockamaimie *****. It's unbelievable. No wonder the Jews HATE the damned
Christians enough to band together as elites and utterly ***** up European or
American non-Jewish people.
See inside.
"the 2nd coming of christ" <jesucristo2@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:46974fee.315671388@news.sysmatrix.net...
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:36:30 -0400, dh@. wrote:
Then just say whether you suck up to the beast or you deny
his existence.
I'll suck up to the Beast any day before I suck up to any false
Christ-image manufactured for the purpose of manipulating the
masses.
oooo, bestiality? LMAO.
i don't know what beast you are referring to here. i only believe
in myself and the beast within myself, not in any cartoon
character fabricated by the christians.
At this point my impression is that the concept of Lucifer (or
what/who ever) is included in the Old Testament, and that is
what/who is Satan. That means the idea was around long
before Christianity.
Dualism started in Persia. There is a scholarly article about that here:
http://www.geocities.com/go_darkness/god-persian-dualism.html
THAT is where the moronic idea of some "evil anti creator" started, among
STUPID people in Persia. And to top that off, they DEMONIZED MY freaking
race, the Turanians. God damned morons.
One has to question the validity of any Christian interpretation
as portrayed in an English translation of the Old Testament. The
Hebrew language is very complex and where the word Satan appears
in a Christian bible, there more than likely are a number of
possible meanings associated with the actual Hebrew word in
question that are not being properly understood. One cannot go to
a Christian translation of Hebrew writing and expect that it is
going to be a valid representation of what those Hebrew authors
were trying to convey.
Not only that, but it's written on 4 levels of understanding - NONE of which
is LITERAL. Learned Rabbis that read the language and know how to read it
TELL people this, and it's the truth.
Christ changed things, and unless you accept what he
changed there will be things you could never understand.
Of course even if you accept them you'll never be able to
understand everything, but you would still be a lot better off
than you are now if it's all for real. If it's all just ***** then
it makes no difference what anyone thinks.
WRONG. The first early followers of Jesus THE MAN, were the group with
James, his own brother. Much later, Pauline Christianity took root, and
that's a combination of Zoroastrianism (ha, Peraisn dualism idiocy) and
paganism. They turned Jesus into a GOD-man, very much like Hercules (son of
Zeus and a mortal woman). Same idea. Paul's crowd did that. Jesus himself
and his original real followers with James NEVER did that. Nor did they
EVER have a concept of any kind of Trinity. Jews never had that. PAGANS
DID.
To me Christ is just a myth. When a myth is brought from the realm
of the allegorical into the realm of the literal it loses its
significance and true import. Everything that is known as
Christianity today is absolute ***** and has no
transformational value for humans per say. Humans may accept the
historical (false) Christ and achieve some seeming transformation
but this is due to their desire to change in the first place, and
not from any external influence associated with belief in a
literal Christ. If those people applied the same amount of effort
into trying to understand the mythical (true) Christ, any
spiritual advancement would be magnified for it would no longer be
an internal process but an actual external phenomena being
triggered by meditation upon the true meaning of said myth.
It all boils down to the brainwasher and the brainwashed. And of course,
POLITICS.
Judaism and Christianity are totally different
religions with different philosophical outlooks on life and the
world. Most importantly, the Jews do not accept Christ as the
Messiah, so according to Christians, that stance is itself
Satanic.
You might not know this, but the heh, UN PC version of Kaballa also has a
few satanic races out there that are partial beings, like broken people -
and they are the types that can NOT grasp what Judaism is saying. So they
demonized people too. All the peoples related to Canaan, for instance, are
born stupid and violent - they can never change and to mix and mate with
them - your offspring will NEVER see God if that happens. This is part of
what Jews believe, if they obey the LAWS and the CONVENANT.
We have no reason to believe the Jews are right.
HA - that's funny. We have every reason to believe a learned RABBI is right
about his own book - and the fact of the matter is, they DO NOT share what
they know with others. Even a CASUAL glance at their actual doctrine - one
can see that it is most definitely a doctrine of elitism - they are CHOSEN,
the ELITE - and the rest out there are COWS - or worse - souless klippoth.
Aside from that, the Pope and the evangelical fanatic Rev. Haggee believe
that the original covenant is all Jews need. They are WITH God - they don't
need to go through anyone else. Lemme say this. A learned Rabbi is a
person that has studied SO MUCH that it's more than 10 doctors study in one
lifetime. Catholic Priests also study, they can read Greek and Latin. The
rest of the stupid bohunks are just that - STUPID BOHUNKS. They are the
morons that think they know what "YOM" means - when the learned Rabbis
probably explained it once and then ignored them from then on.
We have every reason to listen to and trust in what any Jew says
of his own religion and own ancient writings much more than what a
Christian thinks of those same Hebrew writings. If a Jew says that
Christ is not the messiah, then that should be a settled issue and
there is absolutely no point in trying to tell a Jew what his
religion should be or shouldn't. The arrogance of Christians to
take a religion and turn it on its head is of a magnitude that
cannot be measured and has contributed more to the persecution of
Jews than anything else in the last two millennia.
EXACTLY, yes, that is 100% TRUE.
The True God
(if there is such a thing) will one day avenge the inhumane
persecution of the Jewish people by arrogant and ignorant
Christians who persist in misinterpreting Holy Scripture and
mythological teachings.
Ahem, the Jewish elites did that their own selves - heh, Boas school,
Frankfurt school and all that. If you knew what all that was (I gave you a
book title) - then you'd know that they DID GET EVEN - and MacDonald makes
it perfectly clear that this is WHY they did it, to get even AND out of fear
of these Christians.
The persecution etc they must bear as a people is evidence of
where they are on that, if it's all for real.
Basically, the real deal about the persecution was over resource
competition - the Jews being SMARTER and getting ahead all the time. Only
quite recently in world events, did Jews GET EVEN to some extent.
It shows that ignorance and evil knows no bounds.
The only Jew I
discussed it with in person doesn't believe in any afterlife,
God bless him.
or in Satan. When I asked why bother praying and all that
then, he acted like it was for this life only. However, the
OT does mention resurrection:
Lemme tell you a truth you might not believe. JEWS WILL NOT discuss their
real beliefs with people that are known to be from Christian backgrounds.
I'm not from a Xian background - Notkin, a learned Rabbi, DID tell me that
the philosophy of my people is identical to Kaballa, perhaps more straight
forward. He explained it all - and yes, it's very similar. He also told me
that the Hebrews GOT this teaching while in Ur (Sumeria) from other people.
The only other people that were there at that time were 1. Turanians (my
people) and 2. Dravidians - and BOTH these groups have the same basic
philosophy - and yes, it's very much like the Kaballa. It's a doctrine of
emanation, first of all.
Nor you nor any other Christian knows more than a Jew about his
own ancient writings or about his own religion.
[***** biblical quotations snipped]
any brand of satanism will be better than the
worst brand of christianity.
Can you provide examples?
Satanists don't go around distorting other people's religions and
persecuting said people for millennia based on lies and hatred;
thus by default the worst Satanist will be more respectful and
humane than even the best Christian with the seeming best of
intentions.
Um, my experience with a certain type of Satanist is that they are IDENTICAL
to the most offensive pestering fundies out there - and as intolerant and
persecutory. I would imagine that is the case because they were all FROM
some kind of Protestant ***** - raised in it, born into it - BRED into it.
Yeah, I see them as a race - so please DON'T get me started on that.
octinomos
--
``Could it be that ... political theater is being staged, very much like
the wrestling matches on TV, with the so-called neoconservatives and their
so-called enemies, such as Pat Buchanan, loudly making public statements
intended to convince the opponents of US foreign policy actions that these
actions are the fault of 'the Jews'?'' --Jared Israel/Emperor's Clothes
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: PERSECUTION OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE BY ARROGANT CHRISTIAN ASSHOLES GOING ON FOR MILLENIA WILL NOT GO UNNOTICED |
15 Jul 2007 03:30:33 AM |
|
|
by VNN Staff
revised December 2005
Introduction
The text below shows that Jews may well have influenced Western
culture more than any other ethnic group, particularly over the last
few hundred years. It is important to note that our writers allege no
'conspiracy' by Jews. Rather, the examples cited point to an inborn
tendency of Jews to engage in behavior they believe will ensure their
group's safety, no matter its effect on the gentiles they live among.
To be sure, the Jews -- a race and also a religion -- have a long
history. But we will focus here on the past 200 years. We begin their
saga with the rise of the Rothschild banking family in Europe.
The Rise of the Rothschilds and International Banking
Of significance in Jewish history is how important the Rothschilds --
and other Jewish bankers -- were to the solidification of Jewish power
in the West. A large percentage of banks in the West was originally
founded by Jews, e.g. the Rothschilds, Jacob Schiff, and Paul and Max
Warburg. In fact, Meyer Amschel Rothschild and his sons virtually
invented modernized banking and finance. Not only did the powerful
Rothschilds control banking in Europe from approximately 1815 onward,
but they also purchased European news outlets -- including the Reuters
news agency -- giving them the power to influence the opinions of
millions of gentiles. Furthermore, political and social-reform actions
naturally require money; since they were far wealthier than even royal
families -- who were in fact indebted to them -- the Rothschilds were
in a unique position to be able to transform aspects of European
society to benefit the Jewish community.
Two features remain key to the power of the international bankers.
First, many bankers are related by marriage. By the end of the 1800s
many Rothschild cousins had married. Second, many top politicians in
the West have been indebted to the international bankers for providing
them with loans at critical times, such as when a Rothschild loaned
fellow Jew and Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli millions of pounds so
he could buy shares of stock for control of the Suez Canal area to
benefit England.
Perhaps nowhere have Jewish international bankers had a bigger impact
than in funding wars. For example, they funded the Japanese in the
Japan/Russia war of the early 20th century, which has been described
as the first war in which non-Whites defeated White men. Many Western
political observers assert that wars are waged for economic reasons,
and if that is true, then Jews, by their domination of international
banking, have been vital but unseen players in modern warfare.
The Founding of Communism
The ideology that would murder and enslave more people than any other
idea in human history was crafted in the 1840s by a German Jew named
Karl Marx. Like many Jews who wanted to hide within gentile society,
Marx's family converted to Christianity. Marx's ideology was called
communism, a social and economic system in which the government
controlled all forms of property and wealth. Marx based his communism
on the historic kahal, a Jewish communal living system. The kahal was
essentially an early form of communism, with community needs such as
food, living arrangements, and vocations allocated in a collective
manner.
Furthermore, the Soviet Union - which spread communism across the
earth - would likely have never been created if the part-Jewish
leftist V. I. Lenin (see elsewhere) had not been heavily influenced by
Marx's book Das Kapital. In fact, Das Kapital can be credited as
having transformed the young Lenin into a full-blown revolutionary -
another Jewish root of communism.
It should be noted by the reader that communism is, as an ideology,
more severe than Nazism, its sworn enemy. As an example, in Nazi
Germany a citizen could own a gun with a permit. But no citizen could,
or can, own a gun in any communist country. Nazism wasn't
totalitarian. It was politically authoritarian. But communism is
totalitarian in that every aspect of a citizen's life is rigidly
controlled. The number of people murdered by communism worldwide since
1917 approaches 100 million people - 20 million in Russia alone, by
conservative estimate. That number does not include the other millions
of people who were imprisoned, tortured or forced to flee their homes
due to communist aggression in Eastern Europe.
The Rise of Zionism
In the late 1880s, Jews began looking for a permanent place to evade
gentiles irritated by their behavior. The place they envisioned for
their exile was Palestine, portions of which Jews claimed they had
occupied over 2,000 years ago. Jews began a global campaign to
convince the world that they were entitled to 'return' to Palestine.
The leader of this so-called Zionist movement was Theodor Herzl.
Zionism provided the motive for a number of Jewish actions over the
course of the twentieth century, including the manipulations leading
up to the Balfour Declaration (covered below) and the exaggeration of
the severity of the so-called Holocaust. The state of Israel was
brought into being by Jewish terrorism, characterized by such acts as
the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1946 and the Deir Yassin
massacre in 1948.
To date, Zionism -- which the UN described as a form of racism in its
1975 Resolution 3379 -- has caused much trouble in the world, through
continual violence in the so-called Middle East involving Israel.
American (read: gentile) tax dollars fund the state of Israel to the
tune of billions a year, which is one of the chief causes of Arab
anger towards the U.S.
The Creation of the Federal Reserve Corporation
In 1913, the U.S. Congress authorized the creation of the Federal
Reserve banking system, which is also known as the Federal Reserve
Corporation. This private, non-governmental entity issues America's
money. The Federal Reserve pays the U.S. Treasury a small fee to print
'Federal Reserve Note' currency, which is later loaned to the U.S.
government.
The Federal Reserve system was created largely by the actions of
Jewish banker Paul M. Warburg. It is debt money because when the U.S.
government needs money -- i.e., more money than the U.S. treasury
receives from taxes -- it borrows the cash from the Federal Reserve
(such borrowing is now routine). The government then agrees to pay
back the money that it borrowed from the corporation with added
interest paid on the collateral for the loan (the collateral being
interest-bearing government bonds). That interest -- minus smaller
government debts such as foreign aid -- is the national, or federal,
debt, or, what America owes the Federal Reserve Corporation.
The Federal Reserve also controls interest rates and the amount of
money that circulates within America, giving it enormous power over
the U.S. economy.
As the debt money system continues to be used, America's national debt
climbs, leading to the American citizen being progressively over-taxed
through the silent theft of inflation.
Of significance is that the leadership of the Federal Reserve and the
key owners of the corporation's stock -- i.e., banks -- have been
disproportionately Jewish. Even today, a Jew named Alan Greenspan
heads that corporation. (How ironic that the same year that America
gave up control of its money to private bankers, Canada did as well
under the Bank Act of 1913. In fact, private banks control the money
of almost all Western countries, and yes, those banks are very often
owned or controlled by Jews).
WWI
Fact: America became involved in WWI due to Jewish intervention.
England was in danger of losing the war when Jews secretly approached
the British government with an unusual offer: the Jews, using their
powerful influence within American President Woodrow Wilson's inner
circle, would persuade Wilson to enter America into the war if the
British government would declare its support for the creation of a
Jewish homeland in Palestine. As a result of that offer, Wilson's
close Jewish advisors, such as Louis Brandeis, Bernard Baruch and
Rabbi Stephen Wise, urged Wilson to aid the British war effort by
committing American troops to enter WWI. Another Jew, Chaim Weizmann,
was the key player on the British side of the plan to inject America
into WWI. That the vast majority of the American people wanted nothing
to do with the European war, and that Wilson had campaigned on the
specific promise to keep America out of the war, turned out not to
matter. The will of the people was abandoned for the will of the Jews.
The British government pledged its support for the creation of a
Jewish state in a document that became known as the Balfour
Declaration. That declaration was issued after America had entered
WWI. The Balfour Declaration was written by one Jew, Leopold Amery,
and edited by another Jew, Louis Brandeis, who was the first Jewish
justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. The reader should be aware of the
fact that WWI led directly to WWII. In fact, many people feel that
WWII was merely a continuation of WWI.
'Russian' Revolution/Comintern Founded
Probably the most important event in recent history, aside from WWII,
was the so-called 'Russian' Revolution, which occurred in late 1917.
In that revolution, communists gained control of Russia, murdering and
enslaving millions of its citizens, most of whom were gentiles. Nearly
all of the top communists in Russia -- first called 'Bolsheviks' but
later 'Soviets' -- were Jewish and not from Russian stock. Their
leader, V.I. Lenin, was, as we mentioned previously, part-Jewish.
After Lenin's death, Joseph Stalin led the Soviet communists. Stalin
was not Jewish but he was married to a Jew (in his third, common-law
marriage). The Russian Revolution was financed by the Jewish banker
Jacob Schiff, who furnished the communists with millions of dollars.
After gaining control of Russia, the Soviets spread communism
worldwide through an organ of the Soviet government called the
Comintern. The Comintern sent agents around the globe to foment
revolutions which, it hoped, eventually would result in the
installation of communist regimes in every nation. The Comintern was
run by a Jew named Grigory Zinoviev. Because of the Comintern's
actions many countries around the world were later enslaved under
communist dictatorships, e.g. North Korea and Cuba. China was also
communized by Jewish/Soviet emissaries, e.g. Adolf Abramovitch Joffe
(aka Yoffe) and Mikhail Markovich Borodin.
It should be recognized that the mass murder that occurred in Russia
from 1917 onward was carried out almost exclusively by Jews, including
Lazar Kaganovich, Leon Trotsky, Yakov Sverdlov, Yakov Yurovsky and
Genrikh Yagoda. The few top Soviet officials who were not Jewish were
married to Jews, for example Rykov, Molotov, Dzherzhinsky and Bukharin
(not counting the previously-mentioned Stalin). Soviet communism had
racially-Jewish roots until Stalin became frustrated with their
domination of the government and purged a significant number of Jews
including Kamenev, Zinoviev, Radek, and Yagoda.
Of interest regarding the 'Russian' Revolution is that British leader
Winston Churchill wrote a newspaper article in 1920 titled "Zionism
versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People," in
which he echoed the coming Nazis in pointing out that that the
'Russian' revolution was led mostly by Jews. Churchill's
never-mentioned article is available on the web.
The Creation of the Versailles Treaty
Critically important to modern history was the Versailles Treaty of
1919, which carved Germany into pieces as the conclusion of WWI.
European states wanted to punish Germany for her role in the war, and
the way they did so was through that treaty. (It should be recognized
that WWI was not started by Germany, as is often claimed, but by
Austria-Hungary, which declared war upon Serbia in July 1914). Under
the questionable Versailles Treaty, parts of Germany were given to
various European countries including France, Poland, Denmark and
Belgium.
Most important about the Versailles Treaty, however, was the fact that
Jews were key advisors to most if not all of the top government
officials who attended the peace conference that produced it. The Jew
Bernard Baruch advised U.S. President Wilson at the conference, while
British Prime Minister Lloyd George was advised by the Jew Phil
Sassoon. And French leader Georges Clemenceau was advised by his
Jewish Interior Minister Georges Mandel aka Louis Rothschild.
Furthermore, Jewish leader Rabbi Stephen Wise advised U.S. president
Wilson about matters surrounding the impending treaty before Wilson
left America to attend the peace conference. The Versailles Treaty
caused WWII to occur by default, culminating in Hitler attempting to
unravel the Versailles Treaty by invading Poland in 1939. The treaty
was unjust and several Western leaders admitted that it was, including
British Prime Minister A. Neville Chamberlain.
The Impact of Jewish Marxists/Socialists in pre-Hitler Germany
From just after WWI until the early 1930s Germany was in severe
turmoil. Among the worst of her troubles were communist
revolutionaries starting riots in German cities lasting as long as
five days. The riots were intended to destabilize Germany as a first
step towards communization of the country. Also among Germany's
troubles was incredible monetary inflation.
Most of Germany's troublemaking revolutionaries were Jewish. Karl
Radek, Kurt Eisner, and Rosa Luxemburg, for example. In fact, those
three people attempted coups in several European locations.
Furthermore, pre-Hitler -- aka Weimar -- Germany was run by a
government containing many Jews, such as Foreign Minister Walter
Rathenau. The Weimar constitution was even written by a Jew, Hugo
Preuss. Jews drove the leftist and Marxist movements in Germany, which
influenced, for example, such matters as art and architecture and even
sexual behavior. Weimar Germany's media were also largely in Jewish
hands, as were her financial institutions -- not surprising since Jews
tend to dominate these vocations in most Western countries.
Hitler Comes to Power, and the Frankfurt School Leaves for America
When Adolf Hitler assumed power in Germany in 1933, he set about
correcting the problems Germany faced. Among his actions were
imprisoning Jewish revolutionaries and strengthening the German
economy by the ingenious use of 'Mefo' bonds, which in a short time
transformed Germany's economy into the most powerful in Europe.
Indeed, Germany achieved full employment in four years under Hitler's
rule. (It is important to contrast Hitler's quick and successful
transformation of Germany's economy to American president F. D.
Roosevelt's failed attempts to rescue America's economy from a severe
depression. FDR's economic programs were largely 'artificial' in that
the government, not private business, created jobs via large projects
funded by U.S. tax dollars. In other words, tax dollars were used to
pay taxpayers).
Coinciding with the rise of Nazism, an influential group of Jewish
intellectuals fled Germany and came to America. This group, known as
the Frankfurt School, injected Marxist ideas into American life via
major U.S. universities. The Frankfurt School -- including such Jews
as Theodor Adorno, Wilhelm Reich, Erich Fromm and Max Horkheimer --
profoundly changed America's social fabric. Indeed, much of the social
turmoil of the 1960s can be traced to the prior influence of these
Frankfurt Jews.
The Beginnings of WWII and the Role of FDR's Jewish Cabal
In the early 1930s, certain Jews began to set the stage for WWII. In
both Britain and America, Jews in important positions of power
maneuvered to get the British and American governments to actively
oppose Hitler's Germany. Furthermore, Jews themselves declared
financial 'war' on Germany just after Hitler took power. Such a 'war'
declaration occurred before Hitler had imprisoned the Jews or
curtailed Jewish legal rights. In other words, Jews struck the first
blow in their battle against Hitler's new regime.
It is important for the reader to understand that long before Hitler
had imprisoned the Jews or invaded any country, American president
Franklin D. Roosevelt officially recognized Germany's enemy, the
communist Soviet Union (in November 1933), That the president of a
free country would recognize a brutal communist state that had already
murdered millions of people -- a fact likely known to Roosevelt -- is
significant, and offers insight into Roosevelt's administration. Some
of the people surrounding Roosevelt were communists, for example U.S.
Treasury official Harry Dexter White. Other Roosevelt staffers were,
if not actual communists, then sympathetic towards communism, e.g.
FDR's vice-president Henry Wallace. Roosevelt himself told Congressman
Martin Dies that "several of the best friends I have got" were
communists (noted in the Congressional Record, Sept. 22, 1950, page
A6832).
The Jews in Roosevelt's inner circle persuaded him to treat both
Germany and Japan as dangerous enemies of America, which Roosevelt
did. Concerning Britain, powerful Jews such as Bernard Baruch worked
to push top officials in the same direction. (Of note regarding
England vis-a-vis Germany is that when Winston Churchill was in severe
debt due to gambling losses, he became indebted to Baruch since Baruch
helped rescue him from bankruptcy[2]; the world will likely never know
to what lengths Churchill was willing to go to return Baruch's favor.
Furthermore, Churchill deeply disliked Germany, and possibly envied
Hitler's success).
When President Roosevelt suggested in a speech in 1937 that America
might have to wage war in the near future, watchful Americans knew
that war with the future Axis powers -- Germany, Japan and Italy --
was imminent. Such an early suggestion of war, years before WWII
began, gave good insight into Roosevelt's intentions.
Roosevelt knew that war with Japan would provide a back door through
which America could enter WWII. That entry would allow America to help
defeat Hitler for the benefit of both world Jewry and England. FDR
knew that if he punished Japan - an ally of Germany - past a certain
point, the Japanese would attack America in retaliation. In fact, as
historian Harry Elmer Barnes pointed out in his 1953 book "Perpetual
War For Perpetual Peace," FDR began to antagonize Japan soon after
becoming president in 1933. In the end, FDR and world Jewry got
exactly what they wanted: the defeat of Nazi Germany, the biggest
threat to ever face world Jewry and international leftism. It must be
clearly understood: WWII was all about Germany and the Jews. Japan was
but a secondary issue, despite outward appearances to the contrary.
Before WWII began, Jew-dominated Hollywood played a crucial role in
persuading American citizens that Hitler and the Germans were
dangerous to America's safety. For example, Hollywood produced movies
that portrayed the Germans as wanting to take over either America or
the entire world. One such film was "Confessions of a Nazi Spy,"
starring Jewish actor Edward G. Robinson.
Jews were also key players in silencing people who opposed the growing
anti-Germany movement in America. Prominent citizens who questioned
the dangerousness of Germany to America were labeled "isolationists"
and fiercely criticized. Those isolationists, such as famed aviator
Charles Lindbergh, were unofficially blacklisted in America, their
voices silenced by a concerted campaign funded largely by Jewish
money. Jews funneled money into many anti-Germany organizations, such
as the Fight For Freedom Committee, which received some winking
support from Roosevelt's administration.
Also of note concerning the beginnings of WWII was Hitler's unique
economy. Among other features, the German economy had a barter system
that cut out the international Jewish bankers. For example, Germany
traded trucks to Argentina in exchange for grain. Instead of both
Germany and Argentina approaching international bankers for loans at
high interest rates, both countries simply bypassed the lenders via
barter. Such exchanges angered the Jew-dominated global financiers. As
a result, economic warfare was directed against Germany by Jew-led
factions fearful that other nations might copy her example.
The event that officially started WWII, Hitler's invasion of Poland,
can be explained by the fact that Hitler was attempting to reverse the
unfairness of the Versailles Treaty and reclaim traditionally German
territory. Hitler asked Poland at least twice to return the city of
Danzig and the Polish Corridor to Germany before invading in 1939.
Poland refused. Also of significance is that after Hitler invaded
Poland, he offered to pull his troops out of that country if he could
keep Danzig and the Corridor. Britain and France refused Hitler's
offer. (Did they prefer war instead?)
Of further importance concerning WWII is the fact that Hitler probably
did not realize how influential Jews were in shaping the policies of
the British government in 1939. Hitler likely thought that he was
opposing only gentiles in England. What he probably did not realize
about Britain was that, like most European governments, Britain was
beholden to powerful Jews. Those Jews not only aided the British
government financially, they also traveled in the highest social
circles, having been named 'barons' and 'lords' long before. The Jews
received those lofty titles not for their heritage but instead for
their important financial services to the British government. In fact,
ever since Oliver Cromwell allowed the Jews to return to England in
the 1650s (they had been expelled by King Edward the First, known as
"Longshanks," in 1290), Jews had exercised significant influence on
political and social events in England.
The popular idea that Britain and France had to guarantee Poland's
borders by declaring war on Germany after Germany invaded Poland is
wrong. Days after Germany invaded Poland, the Soviets invaded as well,
from the opposite side. Britain and France did not then declare war on
the Soviet Union. Why did England and France allow the Soviets to
invade Poland but not Germany? The 1939 Anglo-Polish treaty which led
to WWII, and not the secret protocols of it, did not specify which
countries Britain would defend Poland against. Additionally, that
treaty -- the Agreement of Mutual Assistance -- was not properly
ratified since it did not 'sit' for 21 days under the Ponsonby Rule,
as was normally required under British policy. Translation: Britain's
guaranteeing of Poland's borders was unlawful.
Most important of all, however, about WWII is that there is now clear
evidence that certain powerful men had planned to remove Hitler from
power long before he invaded Poland. As outlined in the book Which Way
Western Man? by William G. Simpson, both Winston Churchill and various
powerful Jews began making plans to topple Hitler as early as 1935, by
any means necessary. For example, U.S. General Robert E. Wood told a
U.S. Congressional committee that Churchill told him in 1936 that
England must "smash" Germany. That such a comment came 3 years before
WWII began is of critical historical importance.
The Defeat of Germany and the Creation of the Morgenthau Plan
The defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945 was not simply a military victory
for the allies. It amounted to the revenge of world Jewry. The biggest
racial threat to the Jews in recent history -- Nazi Germany -- had not
merely been defeated in war but had been virtually wiped off the map.
Entire cities such as Dresden were burnt to the ground. Millions of
innocent German citizens were either killed, injured or left homeless.
All traces of the former German culture were destroyed. People having
no official role in the Nazi government were executed by the allies,
such as Julius Streicher and Alfred Rosenberg. Other former Nazi
officials were tried and hanged by the allies at Nuremberg using ex
post facto laws, hearsay evidence, and confessions gained under
torture administered by interrogators - who were often Jewish. Of
significance is the fact that as early as December 1942 the allied
powers had decided to prosecute German military personnel for war
crimes committed during WWII.
Roosevelt's August 1944 comment that the entire German people -- not
simply former Nazis -- should be "castrated" to prevent them from
reproducing reveals the Roosevelt administration's attitude towards
Germany in general. U.S. General Dwight Eisenhower said that the top
German officials should be punished beyond the death penalty, whatever
that might have meant. Of possible interest regarding 'Ike's' comment
is that Eisenhower's nickname at West Point military academy was 'The
Swedish Jew.' Also, no castration suggestions were offered by allied
leaders concerning the Japanese people, even though the Japanese
attack on Pearl Harbor caused America to enter WWII in the first
place. Also of importance is the fact that two Jews -- Henry
Morgenthau, Jr. and the communist Harry Dexter White -- wrote the U.S.
government's Morgenthau Plan, which restructured post-war Germany to
Jewish benefit. A greater example of a conflict of interest would be
hard to find.
Also regarding the matter of post-war Germany, after the war the
director general of the organization in charge of providing food and
housing for homeless Germans (the United Nations Relief and
Rehabilitation Administration, or UNRRA) was a Jew, Herbert Lehman.
UNRRA's chief advisor was also a Jew, David Weintraub.
Jews also played key roles in the prosecution of German military
personnel for war crimes committed during WWII. For example, in the
Malmedy massacre trial (U.S. vs. Valentin Bersin, et al.), the chief
interrogator of the accused German soldiers was a Jew, William Perl.
The chief prosecutor, Burton Ellis, was also a Jew. The chief
assistant prosecutor was a Jew as well, Raphael Schumaker.
Jews were also key players in the U.S. Office of War Information
(OWI), which created anti-Axis films, posters and photos for
propaganda purposes. That propaganda was used to influence the
attitudes of Western citizens towards Germany and Japan. Among the
Jews who worked for OWI were James Paul Warburg, Bernard M. Baruch,
Herbert Marcuse and Leo Rosten. Jews also helped 'de-Nazify' German
military personnel and the German public after WWII, and conflicts of
interests often occurred when that happened. For example, Jewish
Marxist Herbert Marcuse a) advised the allies about how to portray
German fascism to the Western public via mass media; and b) wrote a
handbook for the allies concerning de-Nazification. The
de-Nazification of Germany is so complete today that a German citizen
risks a stiff jail sentence if he merely utters a pro-Nazi comment in
public.
The Founding of the UN
Not only was the 'architect' of the United Nations, Leo Pasvolsky,
Jewish, but among the most important people involved in the founding
of the UN in 1945 were Jewish communists, such as Victor Perlo, Harry
Dexter White and Solomon Adler. The UN is a global entity of
considerable power which has influenced the cultures of many Western
countries. For example, in the late 1940s America adopted at least
some educational ideas that were created by a UN department called
UNESCO (i.e., those found in their Towards World Understanding
report). Those ideas concerned the content of textbooks in American
schools. President Truman's Commission on Higher Education endorsed
the ideas, which included teaching children about the benefits of
"international government" (aka 'surrendering much of your country's
autonomy to a global body').
The controversial 1951 UN/UNESCO 'Statement on the Nature of Race and
Race Differences,' which denied human racial differences and altered
peoples' attitudes about race, was largely the invention of infamous
Jewish anthropologist Ashley Montagu. That statement seemed to further
highlight the ongoing Jewish agenda on race. Another example of that
agenda: as far back as 1935, Franz Boas -- the Jewish godfather of
race-denial who inspired Montagu's efforts -- approached two top
scientists and asked them to create an anti-racism/race-denial
statement, which would be signed by many other scientists and then
publicized. Both of the scientists that Boas approached,
anthropologist and psychologist Livingston Farrand and biologist
Raymond Pearl, turned Boas down. Not one to give up easily, Boas then
approached yet another race expert, anthropologist Earnest Hooton.
Hooton agreed to create such a race statement (he sent it to seven top
scientists but only one signed it).
Amazingly, the UNESCO race statement claimed that Jews are not a race
or ethnic group, even though Jews contract 'Jewish diseases,' such as
Tay-Sachs disease.
Other top experts who created race-denying/race-downplaying material
for the UN or UNESCO were also Jewish, including Melville Herskovits,
Otto Klineberg and Harry Shapiro. In fact, Jews pioneered the
false-but-ubiquitous 'official' theory that racial differences between
Whites and non-Whites do not really exist. The teachings of the Jews
mentioned above were used to drastically alter Western culture, e.g.
in arguing for the enactment of civil-rights legislation.
Despite the usual UN stance on Israel/Palestine, the UN has been good
for Jews, i.e. the UN's social leveling programs and equality-for-all
ideology have drastically lessened 'anti-Semitism' worldwide.
The Control of Eastern Europe After WWII
Not only was Russia controlled by Jews for many years, but countries
in post-war Eastern Europe were as well. For example, communist Poland
was run by Jewish figures including Jacob Berman, Boleslaw Bierut and
Colonel Jozef Rozanski. Communist Romania was run by people such as
Ana Pauker, Avram Bunaciu and Valter Roman. Hungary's communist
government was also heavily Jewish, for example Mathias Rakosi, Ernest
Gero and Michael Farkas. Under the leadership of those Jews, hundreds
of thousands of people -- most of them gentiles -- were murdered,
tortured or imprisoned throughout Eastern Europe.
The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) Investigations
In 1947 the U.S. Congress, via the House Un-American Activities
Committee (HUAC), began investigating the Hollywood film industry due
to charges that Hollywood had been infiltrated by communism (it had
been). A large number of actors, directors and screenwriters were
members of the Communist Party and as such were getting marching
orders from the Soviet Union. During that period, a group of people
known as the Hollywood Ten refused to answer questions before the HUAC
committee. They were then charged with contempt of Congress. A
disproportionate number of the Hollywood Ten were Jews, including
Herbert Biberman, Samuel Ornitz, Ring Lardner, Jr. and Albert Maltz,
as were the people who were 'blacklisted' during that era. (A
blacklisting meant that a person could not work in Hollywood due to
his political activities.)
Of important note concerning HUAC was how that committee -- and the
similar McCarthy committee later on -- was portrayed by the media and
Hollywood. HUAC's mission - identifying people who were attempting to
communize America on behalf of the Soviet Union -- was described as an
un-American 'witch hunt.' Declassified U.S. and Soviet government
reports, such as the Venona Intercepts, show that those 'witch
hunters' were correct: communists had infiltrated many areas of
American society.
Significantly, the majority of American communist leaders have been
Jews, including Herbert Aptheker, Victor Perlo, Jay Lovestone and
Benjamin Gitlow.
The Founding of Israel
Immense and concerted pressure was placed upon U.S. President Harry
Truman so that he would endorse the idea of creating a Jewish state in
Palestine. Naturally, most of that pressure came from Jews. Indeed, at
one point Jewish Congressman Emanuel Celler led a group of Jews to the
White House. There, during a conversation with Truman, Celler pounded
on the president's desk and said that if Truman did not give his
blessing for a Jewish nation, "we'll run you out of town." In fact,
Truman said that "extreme Zionists" had threatened him. Also of note
is the fact that Truman's Jewish friend Eddie Jacobson contacted
Truman to urge him to support a Jewish state. But before Jacobson
contacted Truman, Jacobson was briefed on Palestinian matters by Dewey
Stone, a Zionist leader (which might make one wonder how Jacobson came
to contact Truman and on whose behalf he might have been acting).
The creation of the state of Israel was extremely important to the
Jews. Most of all, it gave them legitimacy. They were no longer seen
as a small tribe of 'troublemakers' who moved from country to country
getting evicted nearly every time. Now they were a people with their
own country and the trappings that go with it: ambassadors, a large
army and nuclear weapons. The Jews had finally arrived on the world
stage.
It should be understood that Israel was literally founded on
terrorism: Jewish revolutionaries, such as Menachem Begin, shot and
blew-up British soldiers, foreign diplomats and scores of Arabs in a
violent effort to reclaim 'their' land. (Ironically, Israel now
condemns and fights terrorism).
Today, the Zionist lobby in Washington, D.C. wields enormous power
over Congress. As a result, Congressmen dare not criticize Israel in
public; those who do are usually not re-elected. Another result of
Zionist power in Washington is the ever-increasing funding of the
state of Israel by U.S. taxpayers.
Arabs and Muslims throughout the world hate America and most other
White countries because they see those countries as partners and
protectors of Israel, which they are - especially America.
The Cold War
The 'cold' war between America and the Soviet Union, which began just
after WWII and which was centered around both countries' nuclear
arsenals, became more sophisticated and more expensive as America
entered the 1950s. Billions of U.S. tax dollars were spent on atomic
weapons and various security features both inside and outside of the
U.S.
Of importance is the fact that the Cold War would never have occurred
in the first place if Jews hadn't created the Soviet Union.
Ironically, Jews a) were prime figures in creating America's first
atomic weapons program, called 'The Manhattan Project'; and b) were
also key players in networks which secretly provided U.S. atomic
weapons technology to the Soviet Union, e.g. the Rosenbergs, Harry
Gold and Robert Soblen. (For more information on the transfer of
atomic secrets to the Soviet Union, see the Fuchs-Gold or the
Rosenberg spy ring cases in American historical documents).
The Increased Use of the Word "Democracy" in America
As the Jewish foothold in the American publishing world became more
solid, there appeared an increased use of the term "democracy" within
books, newspapers and magazines to describe America.
The U.S. constitution contains no mention of "democracy," nor did
America's founders use that word. America was created instead as a
White republic in which only White males could vote or hold public
office, and the Jews are very aware of that fact.
The U.S. Civil-Rights Movement
The history of the 1950s-1960s civil-rights movement might go
unnoticed by many White citizens if it were not for the fact that that
movement was created and steered by Jews, not by Blacks. Indeed, the
NAACP was founded by and run for many years by Jews, such as the
Spingarn brothers. Other important Jews in the NAACP included Henry
Moskowitz, Lillian Wald, Jack Greenberg and Kivie Kaplan.
The groundbreaking Brown v. Board of Education court ruling in 1954
resulted almost entirely from the work of Jewish lawyers and activists
connected with the NAACP, for example Jack Greenberg. Indeed, the
legal brief for Brown was signed almost exclusively by Jews. Jewish
activist Esther Swirk Brown was also a prime player in the Brown case.
In fact, Swirk Brown actually launched the Brown case herself.[3]
It could be said that, within the U.S. Congress at least,
Representative Celler (see elsewhere in this essay) launched the Black
civil-rights movement in America via his House bill H.R.6127, which
when signed into law became the first civil-rights law created since
the 1800s: the Civil Rights Act of 1957.
Furthermore, the constitutionally questionable U.S. Civil Rights Act
of 1964 came from a Jew, i.e. Congressman Celler's House bill H.R.
7152. That act created, among other things, affirmative action. It
ended the practice of business owners deciding for themselves whom to
hire and fire. In fact, the destruction of White rights in America was
caused largely by the Jew-created and Jew-led civil-rights movement.
(Of possible interest to the reader is that the Civil Rights Act of
1964 created the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC), which is responsible for ensuring that private employers obey
the racial mandates of Title VII of the Act. Perhaps not surprisingly,
two Jews, Alfred and Ruth Blumrosen, were key players in the
construction of the EEOC, and Alfred was also the commission's first
compliance chief (and is also referred to as its conciliations chief).
Mr. Blumrosen shaped the racial quota guidelines that the EEOC would
follow for decades to come. In fact, Blumrosen could be considered to
be the godfather of racial quotas in America - at least as far as
federal enforcement of racial quotas in employment is concerned.[4]
Furthermore, Sonia Pressman, a Jewish EEOC attorney, was a prime
figure in the movement to extend the EEOC's reach to include
gender-discrimination-in-employment into its legal jurisdiction.
Pressman worked with NOW, a feminist group containing many Jews, in an
attempt to force the EEOC to become more involved with gender bias
matters).
The civil-rights movement also transformed the attitudes of American
Blacks: before the civil-rights movement Blacks were largely
respectful of Whites. Today Blacks openly denigrate White culture and
challenge White authority. They demand that 'whitey' now show them
respect which they may or may not have earned.
The Vatican's 1965 'Nostra Aetate' Declaration
As Look magazine noted in January 1966, in an article titled "How The
Jews Changed Catholic Thinking," a Jew named Jules Isaac approached
the Vatican about a possible Catholic condemnation of 'anti-Semitism.'
His action resulted in the famous, official Vatican ruling that the
Jews were not responsible for Jesus Christ's death. The ruling was a
very significant victory for all Jews worldwide. Of importance is that
after the Vatican statement was issued, Jews did not then issue a
similar declaration admitting to and condemning Judaism's historic and
harsh anti-gentile attitudes - attitudes which pre-date Christianity.
U.S. Immigration Law Altered
Jews have also led the movement in the U.S. Congress to open America
to non-European immigration. The best example of that is the 1965
Immigration Act, aka the Hart-Celler Act, which resulted in a
revolutionary change in U.S. immigration rules. Congressman Celler was
the point man for that law, even though he is listed second, after
Hart, in the title 'Hart-Celler.' Indeed, President Johnson mentioned
Celler twice at the signing of the bill, H.R. 2580, into law on Oct.
3, 1965, but did not mention Hart. Other Jews in Congress such as
Jacob Javits and Herbert Lehman also spearheaded the movement to allow
more non-Europeans into America. An influential Jew and immigration
lawyer named Edward Dubroff regularly advised Congressman Celler about
immigration issues.
Additionally, powerful Jewish organizations carried out intense,
ongoing campaigns in order to pressure individual Congressmen to vote
for the loosening of U.S. immigration laws. At nearly every step of
the campaign to alter U.S. immigration rules, Jews were at the
forefront.
The Rise of American Leftism and Counterculture
Not surprisingly, the American political Left was built largely by
Jews as well. For example, Frankfurt School icon Herbert Marcuse laid
the foundation for the American 'hippie' counterculture via his
popular book One-Dimensional Man (1964). Other famous Jews who led the
1960s hippie movement included Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin and Paul
Krassner. Lesser Jews drove the counterculture movement from behind
the scenes by publishing, writing for, or editing leftist newspapers
and magazines. And anti-war/college activism groups were
disproportionately filled with Jews, too, e.g. Students for a
Democratic Society (SDS), the top leaders of which were Jews, for
example Todd Gitlin, Mike Spiegel, Al Haber, and Mike Klonsky.
Similarly, most of the leaders of the feminist movement have been
Jews, for example Betty Friedan, Letty Cottin Pogrebin, Lucy Komisar
and Gloria Steinem. Most of the leaders of the homosexual-rights
movement have been Jews, such as Larry Kramer, Alan Klein and Arnie
Kantrowitz. Gun control in the U.S. Congress has been dominated by
Jews such as Charles Schumer, Diane Feinstein and Howard Metzenbaum.
Indeed, Jews created two landmark anti-gun laws in the 1990s: the
Brady law, which came from Howard Metzenbaum and Charles Schumer, and
the assault-rifle ban, which came from Dianne Feinstein and Schumer.
In fact, America's first significant anti-gun legislation, the Gun
Control Act of 1968, came from Congressman Celler's House bill H.R.
17735. Probably the most disturbing anti-gun legislation in recent
years - for gun owners and constitutional-rights advocates alike -
came from Jewish Senator Frank Lautenberg, whose domestic confiscation
provision became law in 1996. That law prevents someone convicted of a
certain misdemeanor crime from owning a gun. In other words, a
misdemeanor conviction abolishes a constitutional right that our
gentile Founders gave us.
Even the famous 1969 Woodstock rock-and-roll concert was created by
Jews: Michael Lang, Artie Kornfeld, Joel Rosenman and John Roberts.
Furthermore, a Jewish man named Elliot Tiber persuaded yet another
Jew, Max Yasgur, to allow the Woodstock concert to be held on Yasgur's
farmland.
Jews guided almost every step of the American counterculture movement.
The Growth of Hollywood and the U.S. Media
Of tremendous importance to America's culture is that the Hollywood
film community, and the American media as well, is dominated by Jews.
In fact, Jews founded the major Hollywood movie studios, e.g. Carl
Laemmle (Universal Pictures), William Fox (Fox Film Corp.), Louis B.
Mayer (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer) and Adolph Zukor (Paramount Pictures).
Some of the more well-known Jews in modern Hollywood and the media
include film directors Steven Spielberg and Woody Allen, the Disney
Co.'s Michael Eisner, actors Dustin Hoffman and Kirk Douglas,
comedians Milton Berle and Don Rickles and news journalists Mike
Wallace, Barbara Walters and Ted Koppel (more information about Jews,
Hollywood and the media can be found in the essay "Who Rules America?"
by National Vanguard Books, available on the web or in their book
catalogue).
Indeed, as the 1960s hippie revolution was occurring, another
revolution of sorts was happening in Hollywood. Jewish network
executives began to churn out movies and TV shows featuring Black
actors in leading roles. Hollywood also produced a notorious movie
that featured an interracial relationship, which was still taboo at
the time. It is apparent that the Jews in Hollywood, believing that
the pro-White attitudes of America's Founders would never return,
became much bolder during the 1960s. (Regarding the Founders'
attitudes about race, a law created in the Founders' era, 'Act of
March 26, 1790 (1 Stat 103-104),' stated that only Whites could become
American citizens. In fact, non-Whites had no significant rights in
America until the XV Amendment was created in 1870).
As America entered the 1970s it became common for White Americans to
see Blacks, Jews and even Asians in prominent vocations on TV shows
and in movies. Those minorities were seen portraying judges, police
detectives and attorneys on screens big and small all over the U.S.
Non-Hollywood media also flourished in America from the 1960s onward.
The news departments at most broadcasting companies were run by, or
heavily staffed by, Jews. Major U.S. newspapers also came under Jewish
control as small newspapers were bought out by big media conglomerates
which were dominated by Jews. Furthermore, as American culture was
being socially 'Jewified,' so were the cultures of other Western
countries being similarly Jewified via American movies and TV shows,
which became popular in many countries. America served as a base of
sorts for the exporting of Jew-created movies and TV shows which
featured leftist and politically-correct messages, which served
various Jewish social objectives.
The Rise of Big Capitalism
Big capitalism drives corner grocers out of business and outsources
jobs to third-world countries. It encourages materialism. And it leads
to the importing of inexpensive goods in massive quantities, which
also causes American jobs to vanish.
Even though Jews are known for their leftist behavior, they
nonetheless pioneered giant capitalism and corporatism. Jews
especially pioneered conglomerates, in which one large company owns a
dozen smaller companies.
The Rise of Neoconservatism
Beginning in the 1980s, the conservative or "right-wing" political
movement in America was slowly overtaken by what is known as the
"neoconservative" movement. The neoconservative ideology is not really
conservative but is instead politically moderate, and is even liberal
regarding certain issues like civil rights. The neoconservative
movement was launched by formerly-liberal Jews and its current leaders
are mostly Jews. The neoconservative movement's main focus is on how
to use America to protect the interests of Israel.
Neoconservatism has resulted in America being alienated from many
former allied countries in the world, e.g. France.
Neoconservatism has now almost completely replaced traditional
conservatism in America, with genuine conservatives now consigned to
the margins of politics and often referred to as "racists" or
"bigots."
The Bombing of the U.S. Marine Barracks
In October 1983, 220 U.S. Marine Corp soldiers were killed in a
suicide bombing of their barracks in Beirut, Lebanon. The Marines were
stationed in Beirut due to Israel's actions - most especially because
of Israel's role in the 1982 massacre of hundreds of Palestinians at
the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Beirut.
Today, the barracks bombing is but a distant memory, and few people
connect the event with Israel.
Holocaust Remembrance Emerges as a Growth and Guilt Industry
Since the 1970s, the Jewish memorializing of the Holocaust has become
an industry of enormous and ever-increasing size. So powerful and
industrialized is Holocaust-remembrance-mania that some American
states require, by law, the teaching of Holocaust education in public
schools. Law-enforcement training academies often mandate Holocaust
studies as well.
The Sept. 11, 2001 attack on America/the 2003 Iraq War
The terrorist attack(s) upon the United States on Sept. 11, 2001
transformed not only America but also the rest of the West. It caused
all of the White Western countries to reexamine, and then rebuild,
their security apparatuses, at significant financial expense. More
than that, it changed how those countries viewed the Arab world, since
the attack appeared to have been planned and carried out by Arab
extremists.
As a result of the 2001 attack, the U.S. Congress passed a
heavy-handed law called the "USA PATRIOT Act." That law canceled or
curbed many of the rights that Americans had traditionally enjoyed -
rights that the Founders had included into the Bill of Rights.
It is no longer a secret that the reason the United States was
attacked by terrorists in Sept. 2001 was because of America's vigorous
support of Israel. Put another way, Jews caused the Sept. 11, 2001
attack, albeit indirectly, for if it wasn't for powerful Zionist
political influence in Washington, D.C., the United States would not
have been so staunchly supportive of Israel. (In fact, America didn't
vigorously support Israel until the 1973 Middle East war. Shortly
after that war, a Jewish-American diplomat, Henry Kissinger, created a
strong, lasting partnership between America and Israel by engineering
a document called the "Memorandum of Understanding." That document
created, for all practical purposes, the so-called "special"
relationship that now exists between the two countries).
The 2001 terrorist attack upon the U.S. also led to America's
involvement in the 2003-present Iraq War, since the former event was
used in a vague, roundabout way as an excuse for American soldiers to
invade and occupy Iraq.
Of significance regarding America's involvement in the Iraq War was a
committee within America's Pentagon called the Office of Special Plans
(OSP). The OSP was designed to funnel information about Iraq directly
to the White House, thereby bypassing the usual filters that such
information would normally travel through, i.e. other governmental
intelligence agencies. According to news sources, shortly before the
Iraq War, the OSP provided President George W. Bush with certain
information about Iraqi weapons programs. That information was
incorrect, but nonetheless it was later used by the White House as a
reason for American soldiers to invade Iraq - an invasion carried out
for Israel's benefit [5].
The OSP was staffed by a number of Jews, such as Harold Rhode, Douglas
Feith and OSP director Abram Shulsky. Feith, and various other
so-called "neoconservatives," had a history of suggesting an attack
upon Saddam Hussein's Iraq dating back to the 1990s, e.g. they were
involved in the creation of a 1996 policy paper that mentioned
"removing Saddam Hussein from power" [6]. That such a removal idea
emerged years before the pre-war "discovery" of Saddam's "weapons of
mass destruction" is significant. Furthermore, under OSP's watch,
Israeli officials came and went at the Pentagon in the days prior to
the Iraq War (apparently to aid American war efforts) while observing
few of the standard security procedures intended for visitors [7].
Also, the OSP itself was conceived by a Jew, Paul Wolfowitz, and
further, it worked closely with an anti-Iraq committee located within
the Israeli government, a committee which was similar to OSP in its
anti-Iraq aims [8].
It should be noted that the major claims of OSP regarding Iraq - that
Saddam had ties to the terrorist group Al Qaeda and that he possessed
"weapons of mass destruction" - proved to be false.
It is probable that without the actions of Jews, the Sept. 11, 2001
terrorist attack upon America and the 2003 Iraq War would not have
occurred, nor would America be such a vigorous supporter of Israel. In
fact, it is easy to conclude that America would have no significant
"Arab problem" if not for Jews.
The Creation of the U.S. Anti-Semitism-Monitoring Office
In 2004, an office was created within the U.S. State Department to
"monitor" anti-Semitism worldwide, despite the fact that 1) that
department insisted that it did not want such an office to be created;
and 2) America is not a Jewish country.
The legislation which created the anti-Semitism-monitoring office,
called the Global Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, came from Jewish
congressman Tom Lantos as bill H.R. 4230.
It was a big victory for the Jews. That office gave world Jewry a
powerful, 'official' weapon with which to combat people who oppose
Jewish supremacism and/or Zionism. (One might wonder how it's the
business of the U.S. government if, for example, anti-Semitic acts are
committed in Thailand. One might also wonder why there are no U.S.
government offices designed to monitor anti-White, anti-Black or
anti-Christian behavior worldwide).
Like the previously-mentioned OSI and the neoconservative movement, we
again see the Jews using the U.S. government as a tool with which to
further their racial agenda.
Summary
The information above shows that the impact that Jews have had upon
the world -- and especially upon the West -- during the past 200 years
is remarkable. Important questions arise from the impact of the Jews:
without their actions, would WWII have occurred? Would America have
had a 50-year Cold War with the Soviet Union? Would the Soviet Union
even have existed in the first place? Would the Vietnam War have
occurred? Would America be as politically liberal as it is today?
Would America have been involved in wars in the Middle East? Those are
questions for Westerners to ponder at length.
Even more remarkable is how the Western public never hears about the
influence of the Jews upon their cultures. Words such as 'leftist' or
'socialist' are used to describe Jewish social activists in the West
but never the word 'Jew.' We suggest that that lack of mention of the
Jews in Western societies is itself mute testimony to their tremendous
power. By using a) frequent mentions of the Holocaust; b) the media;
c) Hollywood; d) large amounts of money; and e) significant political
influence, Jews have rebuilt the West to their ends. Gentiles who
complain about that Jewish rebuilding -- and their own dispossession
as a result of it -- are labeled 'anti-Semitic' and marginalized into
ineffectiveness. Such Jewish behavior as outlined above is, again, not
a plot by Jews but is instead inborn, proactive behavior by them,
which supposedly helps to offset the chance that Jews will be
oppressed yet again, or, will be again expelled from Western countries
(Jews have been expelled from most Western countries at one time or
another).
Also curious, and telling, is the fact that even though the religion
of Judaism is based upon bigotry, that fact is rarely mentioned by
modern Christians. Their silence about Judaism's hatred is both
widespread and quite noticeable, as if Christians are constantly
checking themselves to ensure that they aren't uttering "anti-Semitic"
words or phrases. In other words, the power of the Jews is so great
that it actually produces self-censorship within the world's Christian
communities.
Finally, it is interesting to note how quickly Jews accomplished the
rebuilding of America, the Western powerbase of the Jews: in roughly
50 years. Before President Roosevelt took office in 1933 Jews had
little influence upon American culture on the whole. But by 1983 Jews
dominated American culture via television, movies, newspapers,
magazines and other cultural organs. That a people constituting just
2.5% of the U.S. population could significantly alter the culture of
the most powerful country in the world in such a short time is very
significant. Also significant is that there is not a single
educational institution anywhere in the United States in which you
will see the facts about Jews and their interests assembled and
presented in logical connection as we have here.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|