'Presumption of Criminality' Kept Bush, Cheney From 9/11 Testimony
Back, and to the left ... back, and to the left ... back, and to the
left - WonketteCharlie Sheen is barking up the wrong
controlled-demolition tree. If you want the real dirt on 9/11, you just
need to watch a White House daily briefing. That crazy Tony Snow slips
in some strange stuff!
Remember how Bush and Cheney wouldn’t go under oath or even On the
Record for the 9/11 Commission? And how they would only talk together,
to keep their ***** story straight?
After the jump, thrill to the antics of the White House Press Corps as
they lure Snow into a trap he may never escape.
Q But do you agree that transparency is something that this
administration shuns?
MR. SNOW: No, I don’t agree.
Q Okay, when it was time for the Vice President to give up the list of
names of his energy council —
MR. SNOW: Well, as you recall, April, that was, in fact, a separation of
powers case that the Vice President —
Q I understand —
MR. SNOW: — won precisely because of the checks and balances you’ve
talked about.
Q But secrecy, secrecy —
MR. SNOW: Well, wait a minute. You can’t have it both ways. You’ve just
talked about constitutional prerogatives —
Q I’m saying how this White House seems to run from transparency.
MR. SNOW: No, we’re not running.
Q Then you had the 9/11 Commission, we’re having conversations, nothing
under oath. And now this.
MR. SNOW: Well, wait a minute. The 9/11 Commission, number one, was
authorized by Congress and signed by the President and supported by the
administration. What we were trying to do was, again, to avoid the kind
of precedent that we’re talking about now, which is to bring senior
aides up under oath. So what you ended up having were, in fact — I think
they were categorized as briefings. They used that particular — they
used that formulation for precisely the same reasons I’m talking about now.
So I don’t think this is a matter of transparency. This is a matter of
trying to have — what do you mean? Condoleezza Rice was on there and she
was facing tough questioning from Richard BenVeniste —
Q But certain people — the Vice President and the President would not
testify under oath. You had “conversations” at that time. And there’s a —
MR. SNOW: Yes. That’s perfectly appropriate.
Q You used the word “avoid.” There is an avoidance, it seems, of this
administration to sit down and talk on the record, under oath, about
critical issues.
MR. SNOW: What you’re saying is that every time somebody wants to try to
mount a charge you ought to be able to get hauled up and testify under
oath, with a presumption of criminality, rather than a presumption of
goodwill. I’m not going to buy that.
Q Was it criminal, 9/11 — was that criminal?
MR. SNOW: No. What I’m saying is that the 9/11 Commission, we
participated fully.
Press Briefing by Tony Snow [White House]
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/03/20070322-4.html
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
