Politics > Politics-USA > Pro-family groups are asking Congress to expand the FFC's authority to control indecency on broadcast television.
| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"J Baker" |
| Date: |
06 Feb 2008 12:21:27 AM |
| Object: |
Pro-family groups are asking Congress to expand the FFC's authority to control indecency on broadcast television. |
Lord knows that this country could use some decency.
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=66397
Congressional bill would allow FCC to fine 'fleeting occurrences'
Jeff Johnson - OneNewsNow - 2/5/2008 11:00:00 AM
Pro-family groups are asking Congress to expand the Federal Communications
Commission's authority to control indecency on broadcast television.
Lawyers for the major broadcast television networks may be the only ones who
are familiar with the phrase "fleeting occurrences." Those networks say they
should be allowed to air brief full nudity and individual obscene words,
even during the so-called "family hour."
But Shari Rendall with Concerned Women for America hopes a bill currently
before the Senate will clear up any confusion in the courts over the
agency's authority. "S. 1780 is a bill that would allow the FCC to find a
single word or image ... considered indecent," she explains.
All three broadcast networks are currently fighting fines imposed by the
FCC, claiming the agency has no right to limit "fleeting occurrences" of
profanity or nudity. She contends broadcasters are trying to "cripple the
FCC's ability to control indecent programming when children are in the
viewing audience."
However, the networks argue the FCC has never fined fleeting occurrences
before and should not hold them to a different standard now -- especially
for live broadcasts. But pro-family groups like Rendall's argue that
technology has changed and most live broadcasts -- like ABC's Good Morning
America, which recently aired the "f-word" -- are not really live anymore.
"That [broadcast] is on delay," argues Rendall. "There is no reason that
[expletives] can't be bleeped out."
Bill S. 1780, known as the Protecting Children from Indecent Programming
Act, has nine bi-partisan co-sponsors.
--
LC ~ confessed killer of his own sister
.
|
|
| User: "J Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Pro-family groups are asking Congress to expand the FCC's authority to control indecency on broadcast television. |
06 Feb 2008 12:24:25 AM |
|
|
"J Baker" <bigf@*****.hole> wrote in message
news:1k89ek.2mr.19.1@news.alt.net...
Lord knows that this country could use some decency.
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=66397
Congressional bill would allow FCC to fine 'fleeting occurrences'
Jeff Johnson - OneNewsNow - 2/5/2008 11:00:00 AM
Pro-family groups are asking Congress to expand the Federal Communications
Commission's authority to control indecency on broadcast television.
Lawyers for the major broadcast television networks may be the only ones
who are familiar with the phrase "fleeting occurrences." Those networks
say they should be allowed to air brief full nudity and individual obscene
words, even during the so-called "family hour."
But Shari Rendall with Concerned Women for America hopes a bill currently
before the Senate will clear up any confusion in the courts over the
agency's authority. "S. 1780 is a bill that would allow the FCC to find a
single word or image ... considered indecent," she explains.
All three broadcast networks are currently fighting fines imposed by the
FCC, claiming the agency has no right to limit "fleeting occurrences" of
profanity or nudity. She contends broadcasters are trying to "cripple the
FCC's ability to control indecent programming when children are in the
viewing audience."
However, the networks argue the FCC has never fined fleeting occurrences
before and should not hold them to a different standard now -- especially
for live broadcasts. But pro-family groups like Rendall's argue that
technology has changed and most live broadcasts -- like ABC's Good Morning
America, which recently aired the "f-word" -- are not really live anymore.
"That [broadcast] is on delay," argues Rendall. "There is no reason that
[expletives] can't be bleeped out."
Bill S. 1780, known as the Protecting Children from Indecent Programming
Act, has nine bi-partisan co-sponsors.
--
LC ~ confessed killer of his own sister
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Pro-family groups are asking Congress to expand the FFC'sauthority to control indecency on broadcast television. |
06 Feb 2008 12:48:00 AM |
|
|
On 6 f=E9v, 07:21, "J Baker" <b...@*****.hole> wrote:
Lord knows that this country could use some decency.
Say, J Young, aren't you tired of sending the same nonsense?
If I remember well, you're a well-known racist, homophobe, antisemite,
bigot, intolerant and hypocrite. So what do you know about "decency"?
Oh, and if you want to be taken seriously, you should use something
else than "onenewsnow" as sources.
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|