'Pugs screw U.S. citizens once again



 Politics > Politics-USA > 'Pugs screw U.S. citizens once again

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "grinder"
Date: 23 Mar 2006 01:58:38 PM
Object: 'Pugs screw U.S. citizens once again
The feds want to "dumb down" the standards to the lowest
common denominator. Remember this vote at election time.
The voting results:
71 democrats voted yes, 212 republicans voted yes.
125 democrats voted no, 13 republicans voted no.
It passed.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/foodsafety/votes060302.cfm
WASHINGTON, Feb. 28 - The House is expected to vote Thursday on a bill that
would pre-empt all state food safety regulations that are more stringent
than federal standards.
The measure would require uniformity on warning labels and set standards
that would affect a wide variety of state regulations.
But critics of the measure - including state departments of agriculture,
state food and drug officials, the National Conference of State
Legislatures, the California attorney general and a long list of consumer
advocacy groups - say it would gut all state regulations, including food
safety investigations and sanitation standards for restaurants. In some
instances, they say, the bill would replace regulations with nothing because
there are no federal standards.
For example, the bill would pre-empt California's Proposition 65, a 1986
law that requires consumer notification about contaminants known to cause
cancer or birth defects.
.

User: "BUGGER -Ä$$ xoÃ-¥LxS£Æ§RÐ"

Title: Re: 'Pugs screw U.S. citizens once again 23 Mar 2006 03:42:24 PM
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:O5DUf.4469$HW2.4371@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...

The feds want to "dumb down" the standards to the lowest
common denominator. Remember this vote at election time.

The voting results:
71 democrats voted yes, 212 republicans voted yes.
125 democrats voted no, 13 republicans voted no.
It passed.


http://www.organicconsumers.org/foodsafety/votes060302.cfm

WASHINGTON, Feb. 28 - The House is expected to vote Thursday on a bill
that
would pre-empt all state food safety regulations that are more stringent
than federal standards.

The measure would require uniformity on warning labels and set standards
that would affect a wide variety of state regulations.

But critics of the measure - including state departments of agriculture,
state food and drug officials, the National Conference of State
Legislatures, the California attorney general and a long list of consumer
advocacy groups - say it would gut all state regulations, including food
safety investigations and sanitation standards for restaurants. In some
instances, they say, the bill would replace regulations with nothing
because
there are no federal standards.

For example, the bill would pre-empt California's Proposition 65, a 1986
law that requires consumer notification about contaminants known to cause
cancer or birth defects.

"Mexicans more moral and smarter than the GOP".
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: The Best Summary of Bu$h's Infamous Career Yet- Pugs Will Cry!!!!
Charley Reese - Dems and Pugs intend long-term military presence in Iraq - FYI- Iraq Is Not Our Country
Bush/Cheney Has Pugs Shaking In Their Shorts
NAGIN WINS, PUGS CRYING
How Many Movies Have Pugs Attacked?
Read the Law and Weep Pugs
Pugs Can't Steal This Election!!!!
New Orleans: Triumph of the 'Pugs
Joe LIEberman is now the official candidate of the Republican Party (supports Bush more than most Pugs these days) - November is Impeachment Referendum... do your part to save America
'Pugs contemplate killing NASA
New Poll: America Hates Bush - Pugs in Disarray
‘BRADYS ONCE AGAIN DANCING IN BLOOD,’ SAYS CITIZENS COMMITTEE
Re: still 54 percent US citizens believing Bush did not cheat ... haha what a people of naive redneck
Citizens' Indictment Indict Bush, Cheney, et al.
Re: How would you call a country whose citizens cannot travel where they want ?
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER