Raymond Karczewski: A Theology Without Reason (De Omnis
Gloria.com)
Date: 11 Oct 2004 12:35:27 -0700
From: (Katie) wrote:
Raymond Karczewski (arkent3@earthlink.net) wrote;
jocok: The following article is being pasted from the website
listed below. I realize that many of you have read it before,
but it helped me understand how a person could call themself a
"Christ", yet perform such vindictive actions against me, my
husband and to so many others. On this day, 10-11-2004, I hope
Jay's words of wisdom can help others also. Katie
http://www.deoomnisgloria.com/mt/archives/000293.html
rk: First off, you are a disinformation agent posing as kathy
lynn dean of chicken fame. Why the pose?
rk: Secondly, you must dredge up an old post because you require
filler material as I am presently not posting regularly on the
internet. The old truism that a lie repeated soon becomes
regarded as Truth requires constant repetition by mind
controllers to keep the suggestion in the targeted minds of the
undiscriminating readers.
rk: Thirdly, the article you have dredged up is a perfect
example of what occurs when blind believers choke on the Truth --
for indeed the Truth is a tough pill to swallow by ignoramuses
and bigots alike. You'll find that Jay is one such religious
bigot who seeks to hold and bind Truth to the standards of the
same parochial religious books which hypnotized conditioned, and
bound him to his true god -- SATAN, the petty god of Intellect.
rk: Jay is so dumb and so proud of it that he ought to stand as
the christian poster boy for "BASSACKWARDS BELIEVERS" wherever
they present themselves. Yes, I meant that! No, I am not
exaggerating. The problem with one cursed to live a life of
BASSACKWARDS is that they are but one amongst the MANY WHO LIVE
AND WORSHIP THAT SATANIC thought and intellect -- thus deception,
ignorance, hatred, frustation and violence is considered NORMAL
in our world. Check the daily news for the results of such
behavior by the masses who live that way. you'll see what I
mean.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
De Omnis Gloria.com
Raymond Karczewski: A theology without reason
RK "Our consciousness is the One consciousness of all mankind,
past and present." - - Raymond Karczewski
j: > As many of you know, we've been plagued by an odd kind of
theologian on our site: one who has invented his own theology.
Based on energy, a general problem with authority, and a terrible
understanding of how the mind functions, Karczewski simply
invented a theology, which judging by his site hasn't been
accepted by many.
rk: As said before, "many are called, but few are chosen."
Tough for blind believing mind controlled ignoramuses to strive
so hard only to come face to face with the truth behind "almost
but no cigar."
j: > He has also unloaded a barrage of almost impenetrable
hogwash on several areas of this site. So, I decided to visit his
website in an attempt to see what Mr. Karczewski believes – he
could never articulate an actual belief in his posts on our site.
rk: Simple. I DO NOT articulate beliefs. I ARTICULATE TRUTH!
Your puzzle or articulation has been solved jay, has it not?
j: > Here's a sample of Mr. Karczewski's theological insight:
RK >> "In His speaking, Christ revealed the ways to the deeper,
nondualistic levels of the mind and beyond, the levels of
understanding and Love. One such quote pointing to the deeper,
nondualistic level of mind can be found in the statement "Except
that Ye come as little children, Ye shall not enter the Kingdom
of Heaven." This clearly points to the fact that children have
not yet been fully corrupted in their [sic] thinking (through
conditioning) and are still free, honest and unencumbered in
their perceptions and actions. Unfortunately, this state of grace
is soon lost as the child is inexorably drawn into the thought
structures of adult society."
j: > In my mind, this is the perfect example of someone who
developed a personal theology and then entered the Bible to find
it.
rk: You got it BASSACKWARDS jay. The bible has smatterings of
Truth, but it only a book. A book IS NOT TRUTH. When your words
are at one with your actions, you will not make such flimsy
judgements. Have you not heard, "Judge not lest Ye be judged."
j: > His mind is closed to what the Bible is actually saying,
rather he goes in seeking a specific "truth" and finds any verse
that might, in some obscure way, support his position.
rk: Truth does not concern itself with the panderings of
mumbling, bumbling, bible thumping, parroting, blind believers.
Truth stands alone, take it or leave it.
j: > The biggest problem with this modus operandi is the
blindness with which you must operate – Karczewski must ignore
most of the Bible if his theology is to be accepted.
rk: Jay, surely you see that you violate the first commandment
of your own religion. Does it not say -- I (Truth) am the Lord
thy God, Thou shalt not worship other gods before me. Fess up,
Jay, You, like many, worship a book. The bible is your "god."
Your just too damn dumb to know that Its author is the god of
THOUGHT, i.e., SATAN. Hell, wasn't that revelation, eh?
j: > The best summary of what Raymond teaches is "dualism." He
seems to teach that " truth" is found within each of our minds.
rk: As usual you got it BASSACKWARDS. Show me any statement made
by me (not a forgery in my name) wherein I made such a claim as
you profess. Do you understand how you parrotting yahoos trip all
over yourself when coming face to face with a simple man of
Truth, a Christ?
j: > But he'll attack you personally if you don't agree with
this odd philosophy.
rk: Odd philosophy? Been to any ritualistic conditioning MASSES
lately?
rk: I don't attack anyone. I expose ignorance and STUPIDITY!
Tis a sad commentary that there are SO MANY IGNORAMUSES operating
with abandon these days.
j: > He suggests the mind is limited and truth is external (his
philosophy is completely focused internally), but somehow if our
"energy" is right we can know truth, apparently:
rk: Lets face it jay, "apparently" even scares the hell out of
you!
rk: It is clear that you do not understand what TRUTH IS? Yet
you like many ignoramuses rattle on. Hell, isn't it?
RK "If your reality is based on information gained through
suggestion, words, and images which are impressed upon your
consciousness from outside sources, you are being hypnotized.
If, on the other hand, you listen or observe quietly (without
interpreting what is perceived) and allow the perceptions to tell
its story, you have stepped into the realm of understanding, of
truth."
j: > To be rational, if you think you can think, rationalize, or
even "observe quietly" "without interpreting" and without
allowing your mind to function, you're fooling yourself.
rk: I have written a great deal about thought and awareness. Can
you not see that a thought laden person can NEVER BE AWARE?
j: > Raymond ultimately believes we are all Pavlov's dog and
society, religion, and even our parents are Pavlov in a
collectivistic sense (without realizing their role, of course
since they also function as Pavlov's dog).
rk: Hot Damn!! I perceive YOU GOT IT!!
j: > But somehow, despite the obvious efficiency of the scheme,
Raymond has "uncorrupted" his "energy" and figured it all out. He
alone has understood this truth. Forgive me if I don't jump
onboard the paddywagon.
rk: SHEEPLE rarely do!!
j: > What I find most fascinating in Raymond's writings is that
he never seems to answer the basic questions.
rk: It is easy to ask questions, infants do it all the time.
Understanding, however, ought not to be confused with learning,
for learning is the acquisition of SATANIC knowledg which
promotes apparent truth via the symbols of words. Truth comes
only to those who are willing to put the spirit of the word to
the TEST.
j: > He meanders around a subject and then abruptly shifts. For
example, a chapter in Journey Beyond Thought is called "What is
God?" and Raymond never actually answers the question. He calls
himself a "Christ with Amnesia" perhaps this is why?
rk: The answer to that question is clearly there for those who
have "the eyes to see and the ears to hear." As to the IGNORANT,
your testimony will suffice.
j: > He does ultimately believe in the existence of God, despite
the fact that his belief structure would render this unknowable,
but he does not believe in the legitimacy of the Bible:
rk: The legitamacy has already been answered earlier in this
communication.
RK "Can it not be seen that all of these things are of the
unknown, made known only by the mind? This projected reality
exists in man's mind, to this day, by way of the mind's ability
to postulate. The word postulate as defined in Webster's
Dictionary means; "to assume without proof to be true, real, or
necessary." Go to your Bible and examine what is meant by the
"Word of God" when the phrase "IN OUR IMAGE" is used in
describing the creation of man. Is that use of the plural
merely a limitation of language, or is it the minds of men who
sought identification with an idea of something greater than they
for the sake of having power over others? Using simple logic, ask
yourself the question--is it more likely that man was created in
the image of God, or was the thought of what GOD is-- created and
defined in the image of man?"
j: > Which I find fascinating. Is it not possible that God
communed with man and passed along this information? I don't
think I've ever encountered a philosophy that adamantly demands
that no other being could have discovered the existence of the
proposed "truth" first. It is fascinating. But to take it
further, Raymond has no basis for which to proclaim his musings
are "truth" – he can't rely on an inspired book from God or a
church built by God or even a heavenly vision.
rk: Ah, the spectre of an "inspired book from god" or a building
built by god, or even a heavenly vision presents itself. Show me
the book written and the building built by god. Do you not see
the insanity of your projected arguments which only expose you in
your blind ignorance? That's the insanity I speak of almost
daily on the internet.
j: > Raymond simply invented a religion and believes it's so
compelling in a new age, spacy kind of way that you should
instantly be converted.
rk: I've invented NO RELIGION. I've not asked to be followed.
Thats for the rubes. There are plenty of them creating this
insane human world we live in.
j: > It is an amazing act of hubris on the scale of Nietzsche.
Why this isn't "satanic" (a favorite term of his despite his
apparent belief that Satan was an invention of our "dualistic
minds"), I'll never know.
Ultimately Raymond Karczewski is good at one thing: invention.
God bless,
Jay
rk: jay, I'll neither bless you nor damn you. You're on your
own!! By the way, jay, you fail to advise your fellow sheeple
that you barred me from communicating on your site while you
continue smearing another long after they are gone, not unlike
kathy lynn dean of sprecles chicken fame. Such bereftness of
spirit, courage, and integrity, is it not?
rk: If you want the Truth that you will never get from the
politician and the pulpit, look for my two CD-ROM set "The
Spiritual and the Profane" coming soon on my website,
http://www.arkenterprises.com
Raymond Ronald Karczewski© -- A Living Christ
*************************************************************
Resist Not Tyrannical Government
BOYCOTT IT!!
Raymond Karczewski http://www.arkenterprises.com
**************************************************************
.
|
