"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49ea8jFoaqoeU1@individual.net...
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49dsneFo36atU2@individual.net...
REPOSTED
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49b6ccFnttisU1@individual.net...
Gerald "Brick" Brickwood wrote:
"Bert Hyman" < > wrote in message
news:Xns9799B5CCB1895VeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7...
In news:B5OdnUuURZwAoq3ZRVn-rQ@forethought.net Lady Liberty
<LadyLiberty@NOSPAMPlanetaryBillOfRights.org> wrote:
Bert Hyman < > wrote :
In news:PcKdnW1cRdIHqq3ZRVn-gw@forethought.net Lady Liberty
<LadyLiberty@NOSPAMPlanetaryBillOfRights.org> wrote:
They reported today that the Iranians have been testing an
underwater "missile" ( AKA a torpedo to us ) that they claim
can do 222 MPH under water. Huh?
http://www.periscope.ucg.com/mdb-smpl/weapons/minetorp/torpedo/
w0004768.shtml
VA-111 Shkval (Squall)
EQUIPMENT CATEGORY: Naval Mines/Torpedoes -- Torpedoes
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN: Russia
The solid-rocket propelled torpedo achieves a high velocity of
230 mph (386 kmh) ...
The weapon was deployed in the early 1990s,...
I had no idea. So now Iran says they have them.
If they do, it's most likely because the Russians have them.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN
More to the point, if they do it's because the Russians are SELLING
them to
Iran.
Russia can sell their weapons to whosoever they damned well please,
sir.
OTOH, it's possible that China or India passed the tech along to their
Iranian friends, since they have the Skvaal also.
And people wonder why Russia opposes Security Council sanctions?
I wonder why the US opposes any and all resolutions relating to the
shitty little country KNOWN to possess WMD in the middle east.
Your prejudices are showing.
I'm an America-Firster, and proud of it.
If they have the Skvall, who cares.
Well, I reckon a bunch of sailor-boys in Bahrain do.
It is a supercavitating, non guided, last ditch defense weapon for subs.
Your ignorance is breathtaking Jim-ee.
So educate me, what are the operating peramiters of the Skvall
(this should be funny)
What's funny is that you have evidently forgotten how to use your web
browser, since your reichtard pal Bert has kindly provided an excellent
link, which while broken, yields:
CHARACTERISTICS
DIMENSIONS:
Length 26 ft 11 in (8,200 mm)
Diameter 1 ft 9 in ( 533 mm)
Weight 5,953 lb (2,700 kg)
PERFORMANCE:
Speed
Maximum 230 mph (360 kmh; 100 m/sec; 200 kts)
Some reports say in excess of 300 mph (483
kmh)
Exit from tube 50 kts (93 kmh)
Range
80 percent Pkill 7,655 yd (7,000 m)
WARHEAD:
Explosive
Weight 463 lb (210 kg)
Type TNT
Fuze contact/proximity
HTH, Bozo.
Notice that there is no listing of a guidance package.
It is a one shot in the dark panic weapon.
Some think it is the reason for their most recent submarine loss with
all hands.
The Kursk? That is possible, but there are more ways to launch a Skvall
than from a submarine. Torpedoes have been the cause of many sub losses
historically, IIRC.
The launch of an unguided supercavitating solid fuel rocket into the
water from an aircraft may be less than the optimal employment technique.
There are several other options, which I posted in another thread several
weeks ago. The info came from an Indian military journal (in English) I
found via google. You do know about Google, don't you, Jim-ee?
;-)
As usual, the arab tendency for braggadocio when confronted with real
opposition to their insane goals is manifest.
It isn't the Arabs who are blustering insanely in the Gulf region,
Clueless One. The Iranians are not Arabs, btw.
;-)
I tend to generalize when there is no pertinent difference.
ragheads are ragheads.
Your benighted bigotry is an embarrassment. I am ashamed to be of the
same nationality, and likely the same race, as you.
I don't care.
Between this silly claim, and their announcement of MIRV ability, they
are looking more and more like the kid whistling by the graveyard.
They are looking more and more like the kid named David who put a fella
called Goliath on his *****, more like.
;D
So you must be a rag, full of braggadocio.
Wrong as usual, Jim-ee.
Empty threats are a historical hallmark of islamizoids.
The Iranian Republic has credible defenses. Only a fool would take them
lightly, and unfortunately, most NeoCons have shown themselves as fools.
They have no defense to a surgical strike to eliminate their nuke
facilities.
Jim E
.
|
|
| User: "Defendario" |
|
| Title: Re: 222 MPH??? |
04 Apr 2006 07:15:26 PM |
|
|
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49ea8jFoaqoeU1@individual.net...
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49dsneFo36atU2@individual.net...
REPOSTED
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49b6ccFnttisU1@individual.net...
Gerald "Brick" Brickwood wrote:
"Bert Hyman" < > wrote in message
news:Xns9799B5CCB1895VeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7...
In news:B5OdnUuURZwAoq3ZRVn-rQ@forethought.net Lady Liberty
<LadyLiberty@NOSPAMPlanetaryBillOfRights.org> wrote:
Bert Hyman < > wrote :
In news:PcKdnW1cRdIHqq3ZRVn-gw@forethought.net Lady Liberty
<LadyLiberty@NOSPAMPlanetaryBillOfRights.org> wrote:
They reported today that the Iranians have been testing an
underwater "missile" ( AKA a torpedo to us ) that they claim
can do 222 MPH under water. Huh?
http://www.periscope.ucg.com/mdb-smpl/weapons/minetorp/torpedo/
w0004768.shtml
VA-111 Shkval (Squall)
EQUIPMENT CATEGORY: Naval Mines/Torpedoes -- Torpedoes
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN: Russia
The solid-rocket propelled torpedo achieves a high velocity of
230 mph (386 kmh) ...
The weapon was deployed in the early 1990s,...
I had no idea. So now Iran says they have them.
If they do, it's most likely because the Russians have them.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN
More to the point, if they do it's because the Russians are SELLING
them to
Iran.
Russia can sell their weapons to whosoever they damned well please,
sir.
OTOH, it's possible that China or India passed the tech along to their
Iranian friends, since they have the Skvaal also.
And people wonder why Russia opposes Security Council sanctions?
I wonder why the US opposes any and all resolutions relating to the
shitty little country KNOWN to possess WMD in the middle east.
Your prejudices are showing.
I'm an America-Firster, and proud of it.
If they have the Skvall, who cares.
Well, I reckon a bunch of sailor-boys in Bahrain do.
It is a supercavitating, non guided, last ditch defense weapon for subs.
Your ignorance is breathtaking Jim-ee.
So educate me, what are the operating peramiters of the Skvall
(this should be funny)
What's funny is that you have evidently forgotten how to use your web
browser, since your reichtard pal Bert has kindly provided an excellent
link, which while broken, yields:
CHARACTERISTICS
DIMENSIONS:
Length 26 ft 11 in (8,200 mm)
Diameter 1 ft 9 in ( 533 mm)
Weight 5,953 lb (2,700 kg)
PERFORMANCE:
Speed
Maximum 230 mph (360 kmh; 100 m/sec; 200 kts)
Some reports say in excess of 300 mph (483
kmh)
Exit from tube 50 kts (93 kmh)
Range
80 percent Pkill 7,655 yd (7,000 m)
WARHEAD:
Explosive
Weight 463 lb (210 kg)
Type TNT
Fuze contact/proximity
HTH, Bozo.
Notice that there is no listing of a guidance package.
It is a one shot in the dark panic weapon.
If you could ever be bothered to *READ* the cites, you would have
learned that Russia developed a Skvall that slowed down and homed at a
preset range. But hey, just keep being an ignorant Reichtard.
Don't go changing a thing! :-)
Some think it is the reason for their most recent submarine loss with
all hands.
The Kursk? That is possible, but there are more ways to launch a Skvall
than from a submarine. Torpedoes have been the cause of many sub losses
historically, IIRC.
The launch of an unguided supercavitating solid fuel rocket into the
water from an aircraft may be less than the optimal employment technique.
There are several other options, which I posted in another thread several
weeks ago. The info came from an Indian military journal (in English) I
found via google. You do know about Google, don't you, Jim-ee?
;-)
As usual, the arab tendency for braggadocio when confronted with real
opposition to their insane goals is manifest.
It isn't the Arabs who are blustering insanely in the Gulf region,
Clueless One. The Iranians are not Arabs, btw.
;-)
I tend to generalize when there is no pertinent difference.
ragheads are ragheads.
Your benighted bigotry is an embarrassment. I am ashamed to be of the
same nationality, and likely the same race, as you.
I don't care.
Likewise, Reichtard. BTW, I thought you had me killfiled? What
possessed you to carry an argument with _moi_? You a glutton for
punishment?
:-D
Between this silly claim, and their announcement of MIRV ability, they
are looking more and more like the kid whistling by the graveyard.
They are looking more and more like the kid named David who put a fella
called Goliath on his *****, more like.
;D
So you must be a rag, full of braggadocio.
Wrong as usual, Jim-ee.
Empty threats are a historical hallmark of islamizoids.
The Iranian Republic has credible defenses. Only a fool would take them
lightly, and unfortunately, most NeoCons have shown themselves as fools.
They have no defense to a surgical strike to eliminate their nuke
facilities.
No defense, but the equally unavoidable consequenses will ensue. We
happen to have a CVN battlegroup sitting like ducks in Bahrain. Can you
say Pearl Harbor Redux? I knew you could!
Oh, and Iran has a good number of intermediate range missiles with which
to rain death on their cheif antagonists (the JOOZ)
How does a few dozen tons of Lewisite Mustard sound like a condiment for
your sacred cowburger, Jim-ee?
;D
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: 222 MPH??? |
04 Apr 2006 09:12:10 PM |
|
|
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49gginFof5uqU1@individual.net...
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49ea8jFoaqoeU1@individual.net...
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49dsneFo36atU2@individual.net...
REPOSTED
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49b6ccFnttisU1@individual.net...
Gerald "Brick" Brickwood wrote:
"Bert Hyman" < > wrote in message
news:Xns9799B5CCB1895VeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7...
In news:B5OdnUuURZwAoq3ZRVn-rQ@forethought.net Lady Liberty
<LadyLiberty@NOSPAMPlanetaryBillOfRights.org> wrote:
Bert Hyman < > wrote :
In news:PcKdnW1cRdIHqq3ZRVn-gw@forethought.net Lady Liberty
<LadyLiberty@NOSPAMPlanetaryBillOfRights.org> wrote:
They reported today that the Iranians have been testing an
underwater "missile" ( AKA a torpedo to us ) that they claim
can do 222 MPH under water. Huh?
http://www.periscope.ucg.com/mdb-smpl/weapons/minetorp/torpedo/
w0004768.shtml
VA-111 Shkval (Squall)
EQUIPMENT CATEGORY: Naval Mines/Torpedoes -- Torpedoes
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN: Russia
The solid-rocket propelled torpedo achieves a high velocity of
230 mph (386 kmh) ...
The weapon was deployed in the early 1990s,...
I had no idea. So now Iran says they have them.
If they do, it's most likely because the Russians have them.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN
More to the point, if they do it's because the Russians are SELLING
them to
Iran.
Russia can sell their weapons to whosoever they damned well please,
sir.
OTOH, it's possible that China or India passed the tech along to
their Iranian friends, since they have the Skvaal also.
And people wonder why Russia opposes Security Council sanctions?
I wonder why the US opposes any and all resolutions relating to the
shitty little country KNOWN to possess WMD in the middle east.
Your prejudices are showing.
I'm an America-Firster, and proud of it.
If they have the Skvall, who cares.
Well, I reckon a bunch of sailor-boys in Bahrain do.
It is a supercavitating, non guided, last ditch defense weapon for
subs.
Your ignorance is breathtaking Jim-ee.
So educate me, what are the operating peramiters of the Skvall
(this should be funny)
What's funny is that you have evidently forgotten how to use your web
browser, since your reichtard pal Bert has kindly provided an excellent
link, which while broken, yields:
CHARACTERISTICS
DIMENSIONS:
Length 26 ft 11 in (8,200 mm)
Diameter 1 ft 9 in ( 533 mm)
Weight 5,953 lb (2,700 kg)
PERFORMANCE:
Speed
Maximum 230 mph (360 kmh; 100 m/sec; 200 kts)
Some reports say in excess of 300 mph (483
kmh)
Exit from tube 50 kts (93 kmh)
Range
80 percent Pkill 7,655 yd (7,000 m)
WARHEAD:
Explosive
Weight 463 lb (210 kg)
Type TNT
Fuze contact/proximity
HTH, Bozo.
Notice that there is no listing of a guidance package.
It is a one shot in the dark panic weapon.
If you could ever be bothered to *READ* the cites, you would have learned
that Russia developed a Skvall that slowed down and homed at a preset
range. But hey, just keep being an ignorant Reichtard.
Don't go changing a thing! :-)
Some think it is the reason for their most recent submarine loss with
all hands.
The Kursk? That is possible, but there are more ways to launch a
Skvall
than from a submarine. Torpedoes have been the cause of many sub
losses
historically, IIRC.
The launch of an unguided supercavitating solid fuel rocket into the
water from an aircraft may be less than the optimal employment
technique.
There are several other options, which I posted in another thread several
weeks ago. The info came from an Indian military journal (in English) I
found via google. You do know about Google, don't you, Jim-ee?
;-)
As usual, the arab tendency for braggadocio when confronted with real
opposition to their insane goals is manifest.
It isn't the Arabs who are blustering insanely in the Gulf region,
Clueless One. The Iranians are not Arabs, btw.
;-)
I tend to generalize when there is no pertinent difference.
ragheads are ragheads.
Your benighted bigotry is an embarrassment. I am ashamed to be of the
same nationality, and likely the same race, as you.
I don't care.
Likewise, Reichtard. BTW, I thought you had me killfiled? What possessed
you to carry an argument with _moi_? You a glutton for punishment?
:-D
I just enjoy stomping through mushy brained libloons.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anonymous" |
|
| Title: Re: 222 MPH??? |
04 Apr 2006 09:33:28 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD653126@sea.edu> wrote :
Likewise, Reichtard. BTW, I thought you had me killfiled?
What possessed you to carry an argument with _moi_? You a
glutton for punishment?
:-D
I just enjoy stomping through mushy brained libloons.
Translation: He has no real life.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: 222 MPH??? |
04 Apr 2006 10:06:16 PM |
|
|
"Anonymous" <anon@anonymous.com> wrote in message
news:TN6dnVYBztzlsa7ZnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@forethought.net...
"Jim E" <YD653126@sea.edu> wrote :
Likewise, Reichtard. BTW, I thought you had me killfiled?
What possessed you to carry an argument with _moi_? You a
glutton for punishment?
:-D
I just enjoy stomping through mushy brained libloons.
Translation: He has no real life.
Not getting many translator jobs I see.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Defendario" |
|
| Title: Re: 222 MPH??? |
04 Apr 2006 09:21:33 PM |
|
|
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49gginFof5uqU1@individual.net...
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49ea8jFoaqoeU1@individual.net...
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49dsneFo36atU2@individual.net...
REPOSTED
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49b6ccFnttisU1@individual.net...
Gerald "Brick" Brickwood wrote:
"Bert Hyman" < > wrote in message
news:Xns9799B5CCB1895VeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7...
In news:B5OdnUuURZwAoq3ZRVn-rQ@forethought.net Lady Liberty
<LadyLiberty@NOSPAMPlanetaryBillOfRights.org> wrote:
Bert Hyman < > wrote :
In news:PcKdnW1cRdIHqq3ZRVn-gw@forethought.net Lady Liberty
<LadyLiberty@NOSPAMPlanetaryBillOfRights.org> wrote:
They reported today that the Iranians have been testing an
underwater "missile" ( AKA a torpedo to us ) that they claim
can do 222 MPH under water. Huh?
http://www.periscope.ucg.com/mdb-smpl/weapons/minetorp/torpedo/
w0004768.shtml
VA-111 Shkval (Squall)
EQUIPMENT CATEGORY: Naval Mines/Torpedoes -- Torpedoes
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN: Russia
The solid-rocket propelled torpedo achieves a high velocity of
230 mph (386 kmh) ...
The weapon was deployed in the early 1990s,...
I had no idea. So now Iran says they have them.
If they do, it's most likely because the Russians have them.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN
More to the point, if they do it's because the Russians are SELLING
them to
Iran.
Russia can sell their weapons to whosoever they damned well please,
sir.
OTOH, it's possible that China or India passed the tech along to
their Iranian friends, since they have the Skvaal also.
And people wonder why Russia opposes Security Council sanctions?
I wonder why the US opposes any and all resolutions relating to the
shitty little country KNOWN to possess WMD in the middle east.
Your prejudices are showing.
I'm an America-Firster, and proud of it.
If they have the Skvall, who cares.
Well, I reckon a bunch of sailor-boys in Bahrain do.
It is a supercavitating, non guided, last ditch defense weapon for
subs.
Your ignorance is breathtaking Jim-ee.
So educate me, what are the operating peramiters of the Skvall
(this should be funny)
What's funny is that you have evidently forgotten how to use your web
browser, since your reichtard pal Bert has kindly provided an excellent
link, which while broken, yields:
CHARACTERISTICS
DIMENSIONS:
Length 26 ft 11 in (8,200 mm)
Diameter 1 ft 9 in ( 533 mm)
Weight 5,953 lb (2,700 kg)
PERFORMANCE:
Speed
Maximum 230 mph (360 kmh; 100 m/sec; 200 kts)
Some reports say in excess of 300 mph (483
kmh)
Exit from tube 50 kts (93 kmh)
Range
80 percent Pkill 7,655 yd (7,000 m)
WARHEAD:
Explosive
Weight 463 lb (210 kg)
Type TNT
Fuze contact/proximity
HTH, Bozo.
Notice that there is no listing of a guidance package.
It is a one shot in the dark panic weapon.
If you could ever be bothered to *READ* the cites, you would have learned
that Russia developed a Skvall that slowed down and homed at a preset
range. But hey, just keep being an ignorant Reichtard.
Don't go changing a thing! :-)
Some think it is the reason for their most recent submarine loss with
all hands.
The Kursk? That is possible, but there are more ways to launch a
Skvall
than from a submarine. Torpedoes have been the cause of many sub
losses
historically, IIRC.
The launch of an unguided supercavitating solid fuel rocket into the
water from an aircraft may be less than the optimal employment
technique.
There are several other options, which I posted in another thread several
weeks ago. The info came from an Indian military journal (in English) I
found via google. You do know about Google, don't you, Jim-ee?
;-)
As usual, the arab tendency for braggadocio when confronted with real
opposition to their insane goals is manifest.
It isn't the Arabs who are blustering insanely in the Gulf region,
Clueless One. The Iranians are not Arabs, btw.
;-)
I tend to generalize when there is no pertinent difference.
ragheads are ragheads.
Your benighted bigotry is an embarrassment. I am ashamed to be of the
same nationality, and likely the same race, as you.
I don't care.
Likewise, Reichtard. BTW, I thought you had me killfiled? What possessed
you to carry an argument with _moi_? You a glutton for punishment?
:-D
I just enjoy stomping through mushy brained libloons.
You couldn't argue your way out of a wet paper sack, you bloviating
buffoon! LOL, you have earned a reprieve from *MY* killjail, for being
a hoot.
I note that you snipped away everything you couldn't handle, so I guess
that means you concede defeat. The US better keep her dirty hands off
Persia. You heard it here first.
;D
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: 222 MPH??? |
04 Apr 2006 10:05:22 PM |
|
|
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message new
I don't care.
Likewise, Reichtard. BTW, I thought you had me killfiled? What
possessed you to carry an argument with _moi_? You a glutton for
punishment?
:-D
I just enjoy stomping through mushy brained libloons.
You couldn't argue your way out of a wet paper sack, you bloviating
buffoon! LOL, you have earned a reprieve from *MY* killjail, for being a
hoot.
I note that you snipped away everything you couldn't handle, so I guess
that means you concede defeat. The US better keep her dirty hands off
Persia. You heard it here first.
No I snipped multitudinous lines of your pretending that the skvall is a
viable weapon.
Ant that turd world little fiefdom you call persia
(delusions of relevance) can be shut down cold with one little air strike.
And all they can do about it is *****.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Defendario" |
|
| Title: Re: 222 MPH??? |
04 Apr 2006 11:52:19 PM |
|
|
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message new
I don't care.
Likewise, Reichtard. BTW, I thought you had me killfiled? What
possessed you to carry an argument with _moi_? You a glutton for
punishment?
:-D
I just enjoy stomping through mushy brained libloons.
You couldn't argue your way out of a wet paper sack, you bloviating
buffoon! LOL, you have earned a reprieve from *MY* killjail, for being a
hoot.
I note that you snipped away everything you couldn't handle, so I guess
that means you concede defeat. The US better keep her dirty hands off
Persia. You heard it here first.
No I snipped multitudinous lines of your pretending that the skvall is a
viable weapon.
That was hardly all you snipped, assclown!
But in case you need reminded, Bert Hyman, your fellow-traveller,
provided a cite which said Skvaal had an 80% kill probability at ~7500m.
That's mighty effective in my book.
Ant that turd world little fiefdom you call persia
(delusions of relevance) can be shut down cold with one little air strike.
And all they can do about it is *****.
You are the delusional one, Jim-ee. How are those mustard-coated
charburgers (aka ZioNazi jooz) shaping up?
LOL!
;D
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: 222 MPH??? |
05 Apr 2006 04:37:28 PM |
|
|
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49h0q9FogmkuU1@individual.net...
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message new
I don't care.
Likewise, Reichtard. BTW, I thought you had me killfiled? What
possessed you to carry an argument with _moi_? You a glutton for
punishment?
:-D
I just enjoy stomping through mushy brained libloons.
You couldn't argue your way out of a wet paper sack, you bloviating
buffoon! LOL, you have earned a reprieve from *MY* killjail, for being a
hoot.
I note that you snipped away everything you couldn't handle, so I guess
that means you concede defeat. The US better keep her dirty hands off
Persia. You heard it here first.
No I snipped multitudinous lines of your pretending that the skvall is a
viable weapon.
That was hardly all you snipped, assclown!
But in case you need reminded, Bert Hyman, your fellow-traveller, provided
a cite which said Skvaal had an 80% kill probability at ~7500m.
That's mighty effective in my book.
Ant that turd world little fiefdom you call persia
(delusions of relevance) can be shut down cold with one little air
strike. And all they can do about it is *****.
You are the delusional one, Jim-ee. How are those mustard-coated
charburgers (aka ZioNazi jooz) shaping up?
LOL!
;D
The only question remaining is what nations markings will be on the planes
that bring an abrupt end to iran's nuclear dreams.
Care to start a pool?
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Defendario" |
|
| Title: Re: 222 MPH??? |
05 Apr 2006 07:11:51 PM |
|
|
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:49h0q9FogmkuU1@individual.net...
Jim E wrote:
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message new
I don't care.
Likewise, Reichtard. BTW, I thought you had me killfiled? What
possessed you to carry an argument with _moi_? You a glutton for
punishment?
:-D
I just enjoy stomping through mushy brained libloons.
You couldn't argue your way out of a wet paper sack, you bloviating
buffoon! LOL, you have earned a reprieve from *MY* killjail, for being a
hoot.
I note that you snipped away everything you couldn't handle, so I guess
that means you concede defeat. The US better keep her dirty hands off
Persia. You heard it here first.
No I snipped multitudinous lines of your pretending that the skvall is a
viable weapon.
That was hardly all you snipped, assclown!
But in case you need reminded, Bert Hyman, your fellow-traveller, provided
a cite which said Skvaal had an 80% kill probability at ~7500m.
That's mighty effective in my book.
Ant that turd world little fiefdom you call persia
(delusions of relevance) can be shut down cold with one little air
strike. And all they can do about it is *****.
You are the delusional one, Jim-ee. How are those mustard-coated
charburgers (aka ZioNazi jooz) shaping up?
LOL!
;D
The only question remaining is what nations markings will be on the planes
that bring an abrupt end to iran's nuclear dreams.
Care to start a pool?
Care to start a pool predicting the number of IsRaEELee casualties, (in
hundreds of thousands) in the counterstrike?
:->
Read this: http://www.joevialls.co.uk/myahudi/sunburn2.html
It's dated, and I don't agree with everything he says, but old Joe does
have a few things right. Thousands of Russian techs work in the Iranian
nuke plant under construction, Jimm-ee.
It's not nice to fool with Mother Russia.
;D
Jim E
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
