"Colin Murphy" <cmurphy39@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:MPG.1ed9bd257099bf6f989c6b@free.teranews.com...

Semper Liber <nopolicestates??@freedom4Ăll.xxx> wrote:

Are you qualified to explain the twisted physics of how an
aluminum

cabin

can cut through nine feet of steel reinforced concrete,
whereas heavy

4-ton

engines vanish on impact?

The engines did not "vanish on impact", *****. You're
lying.

So show us a picture of the front of the pentagon with the
engine(s) in plain view.

You would think that something as big as an engine would be
noticed by a reporter, wouldn't you?

CNN Reported No Plane Hit Pentagon

Here is a video clip from CNN coverage on the morning of 9/11.
CNN reporter Jamie McIntyre says he inspected the Pentagon
site and it is obvious no 757 crashed there. His exact words
are as follows below......

JAMIE MCINTYRE: From my close-up inspection, there's no
evidence of a
plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.

The only site, is the actual side of the building that's
crashed in. And
as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small
enough that you pick up in your hand. There are no large tail
sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere
around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into
the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.

Even though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon you
see that the
floors have all collapsed, that didn't happen immediately. It
wasn't until almost about 45 minutes later that the structure
was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed.

WATCH VIDEO>>> http://thewebfairy.com/911/pentagon/

Or here.....
http://www.fathers.ca/PDF%20files/27_1-mcintyre.swf