| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Transition Zone" |
| Date: |
17 Aug 2003 10:42:46 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
"Barbara Walker" <barbara.walker4@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<vBo%a.155896$Ho3.18668@sccrnsc03>...
Where did you read "leftists flying planes into buildings" in his post, Mr.
Name-Calling Democrat??
Bush hasn't even found bin laden, makes you wonder who crashed the
planes in the first place.
"Robert" <wayne_s_noches@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:gso%a.2340$0_5.1660@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
Plese PP NBV, tell us, give us the names of all those leftish flying
planes
into buildings.
Idiot.
"Polish Prince (Not Bobby Vinton)" <wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
message
news:Rpk%a.102426$0v4.7083973@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
But the Leftists taking control of this country, are
much more Dangerous. Mr. and Mrs. Average Citizen,
have no comprehension of what is occurring in their
America. Except for a few of us, this society is
generally Lethargic and Unknowledgeable.
.
|
|
| User: "C Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
21 Aug 2003 04:46:19 PM |
|
|
"Transition Zone" <mogulah@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3f224cda.0308170742.5223f9c1@posting.google.com...
"Barbara Walker" <barbara.walker4@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:<vBo%a.155896$Ho3.18668@sccrnsc03>...
Where did you read "leftists flying planes into buildings" in his post,
Mr.
Name-Calling Democrat??
Bush hasn't even found bin laden, makes you wonder who crashed the
planes in the first place.
Thanks for the help. Posts like this only make you Dems appear to be
idiots. So what is your theory? Did Bush have the planes hijacked
using crew put on board by UFOs, or was it mind control of the pilots
from the flouride in the water? I'll probably get flamed for this post,
but the real target of the Dem ire should be "Transition Zone". He's
the one that damages any credibility you may have. Anyhow, once
again, thank you for the post.
Giz
"Robert" <wayne_s_noches@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:gso%a.2340$0_5.1660@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
Plese PP NBV, tell us, give us the names of all those leftish flying
planes
into buildings.
Idiot.
"Polish Prince (Not Bobby Vinton)" <wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> wrote
in
message
news:Rpk%a.102426$0v4.7083973@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
But the Leftists taking control of this country, are
much more Dangerous. Mr. and Mrs. Average Citizen,
have no comprehension of what is occurring in their
America. Except for a few of us, this society is
generally Lethargic and Unknowledgeable.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "James Hall" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
18 Aug 2003 10:21:09 PM |
|
|
then again so are nuts.
JHall.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Clave" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
18 Aug 2003 10:37:05 PM |
|
|
"James Hall" <jhall@cuic.ca> wrote in message
news:CIg0b.175$0h3.41322550@news.nnrp.ca...
then again so are nuts.
And pretzels.
Jim
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hawkster" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
19 Aug 2003 02:17:18 AM |
|
|
"Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote in
news:bhs60j01sqs@enews3.newsguy.com:
"James Hall" <jhall@cuic.ca> wrote in message
news:CIg0b.175$0h3.41322550@news.nnrp.ca...
then again so are nuts.
And pretzels.
Jim
And don't forget Elvis.
Hawkster
No connection -- just don't forget Him
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "dk" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
19 Aug 2003 11:45:05 AM |
|
|
"Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:bhs60j01sqs@enews3.newsguy.com...
"James Hall" <jhall@cuic.ca> wrote in message
news:CIg0b.175$0h3.41322550@news.nnrp.ca...
then again so are nuts.
And pretzels.
Jim
And chads.
Lord dk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde, one of many Fair and Balanced" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
19 Aug 2003 12:15:31 PM |
|
|
dk wrote:
"Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:bhs60j01sqs@enews3.newsguy.com...
"James Hall" <jhall@cuic.ca> wrote in message
news:CIg0b.175$0h3.41322550@news.nnrp.ca...
then again so are nuts.
And pretzels.
Jim
And chads.
And al Qaeda.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rico" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
19 Aug 2003 06:30:58 PM |
|
|
In article <3F425B33.7704A490@backpacker.com>, "Bill Bonde, one of many Fair and Balanced Conservatives,"
<stderr2@backpacker.com> wrote:
dk wrote:
"Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:bhs60j01sqs@enews3.newsguy.com...
"James Hall" <jhall@cuic.ca> wrote in message
news:CIg0b.175$0h3.41322550@news.nnrp.ca...
then again so are nuts.
And pretzels.
Jim
And chads.
And al Qaeda.
Nah they were whipped before the US invaded Iraq. Even Bush
wouldn't involve the US in a two front war.
.
|
|
|
| User: "J W" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
20 Aug 2003 07:24:14 AM |
|
|
(Rico) wrote in message news:<vk5cp8hdu1bb1@corp.supernews.com>...
In article <3F425B33.7704A490@backpacker.com>, "Bill Bonde, one of many Fair and Balanced Conservatives,"
<stderr2@backpacker.com> wrote:
dk wrote:
"Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:bhs60j01sqs@enews3.newsguy.com...
"James Hall" <jhall@cuic.ca> wrote in message
news:CIg0b.175$0h3.41322550@news.nnrp.ca...
then again so are nuts.
And pretzels.
Jim
And chads.
And al Qaeda.
Nah they were whipped before the US invaded Iraq. Even Bush
wouldn't involve the US in a two front war.
Al-Qaeda have been whipped? Defeated? Hey, great... all the emergency
measures can be lifted.
J W
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rico" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
20 Aug 2003 04:21:05 PM |
|
|
In article <50b1dd2b.0308200424.47427d23@posting.google.com>, (J W) wrote:
rico_001@hotmail.com (Rico) wrote in message
news:<vk5cp8hdu1bb1@corp.supernews.com>...
In article <3F425B33.7704A490@backpacker.com>, "Bill Bonde, one of many Fair
and Balanced Conservatives,"
<stderr2@backpacker.com> wrote:
dk wrote:
"Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:bhs60j01sqs@enews3.newsguy.com...
"James Hall" <jhall@cuic.ca> wrote in message
news:CIg0b.175$0h3.41322550@news.nnrp.ca...
then again so are nuts.
And pretzels.
Jim
And chads.
And al Qaeda.
Nah they were whipped before the US invaded Iraq. Even Bush
wouldn't involve the US in a two front war.
Al-Qaeda have been whipped? Defeated? Hey, great... all the emergency
measures can be lifted.
J W
Not until after November 2004. Got to scare people into electing him
first...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbara Walker" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
23 Aug 2003 07:46:24 PM |
|
|
"Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" <tim@somecallme.net> wrote in message
news:Xns93E0B42568F63timsomecallme@216.168.3.44...
On 22 Aug 2003, "C Lee" <giz45aw@tds.net> posted this about the "War
on Terrorism":
You're right, and while the conflict may remain perpetual to
some extent, we can lower the intensity of it by punishing the
worst of the offenders. To let them be allows them the luxury of
time. Time to plan, recruit, earn, organize, ect.
And Bush attacked Iraq instead.
Clinton also attacked Iraq. Yet none of us can recall YOU warning us about
the "dangers" of Clinton attacking Iraq, you Stupid Democrat *****.
A vote for Bush is a vote against our
national security.
Hardly. No, a vote for Bush is a vote AGAINST the stupid liberal Democrat
assholes.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "C Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
23 Aug 2003 08:57:38 PM |
|
|
"Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" <tim@somecallme.net> wrote in message
news:Xns93E0B42568F63timsomecallme@216.168.3.44...
On 22 Aug 2003, "C Lee" <giz45aw@tds.net> posted this about the "War
on Terrorism":
You're right, and while the conflict may remain perpetual to
some extent, we can lower the intensity of it by punishing the
worst of the offenders. To let them be allows them the luxury of
time. Time to plan, recruit, earn, organize, ect.
And Bush attacked Iraq instead. A vote for Bush is a vote against our
national security.
Instead? I know several people still flying over Afghanistan and doing some
work in the Phillipines. Try "too". BTW, know who signed the Executive
order calling for the removal of Saddam's regime? Guess its okay to make
token statements with no real intent of following through. Especially
dangerous for foreign policy.
Giz
--
Every effort to confine Americanism to a single
pattern, to constrain it to a single formula,
is disloyalty to everything that is valid in Americanism.
--"Henry Steele Commager"
Tim
"Fair and Balanced"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
23 Aug 2003 10:02:23 PM |
|
|
On 23 Aug 2003, "C Lee" <giz45aw@tds.net> posted this:
Instead? I know several people still flying over Afghanistan and
doing some work in the Phillipines. Try "too".
If you think it's possible to fight a full fledged war against
terrorism when the bulk of your resources are being used elsewhere
then you're not really giving it much thought.
BTW, know who
signed the Executive order calling for the removal of Saddam's
regime?
It takes time to build the apparatus needed to overthrow a government
covertly, and that's how it should have been done.
--
"The concept of military necessity is seductively broad, and
has a dangerous plasticity. Because they invariably have the
visage of overriding importance, there is always a temptation
to invoke security "necessities" to justify an encroachment
upon civil liberties. For that reason, the military-security
argument must be approached with a healthy skepticism."
--Justice William Brennan
Tim
"Fair and Balanced"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde, one of many Fair and Balanced" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
22 Aug 2003 10:30:03 PM |
|
|
Clave wrote:
"C Lee" <giz45aw@tds.net> wrote in message
news:Ead1b.1235$cQ1.163424@kent.svc.tds.net...
"Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:bi3gtu02gg4@enews2.newsguy.com...
<...>
Funny -- understanding why they want to destroy us doesn't seem to be on
your list.
Jim
Did you read it? It is a list of why's. Do I have to understand why they
believe that way? No.
You don't think that understanding what creates an al-Qaeda soldier is at all
important to keeping them from being created in the first place?
A lot of the problem is a large bit of confusion on the part of some
Muslims about what the United States is about. It appears that some feel
that the US wants to shove pork down their throats and stuff like that.
Or are you saying that you're content with the never-ending war your deliberate
ignorance fosters?
I'm not sure how to stop the war before the international terrorists
want to stop. Explain that to me, if you can.
I need to recognize that they have these beliefs/attitudes.
Could we appease everyone? Do you really ask that question?
Who said anything about appeasement?
I thought that you did. Tell me what you want to do.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Clave" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
22 Aug 2003 10:36:37 PM |
|
|
"Bill Bonde, one of many Fair and Balanced Conservatives,"
<stderr2@backpacker.com> wrote in message
news:3F46DFBB.9CB0A73E@backpacker.com...
Clave wrote:
<...>
You don't think that understanding what creates an al-Qaeda soldier is at
all
important to keeping them from being created in the first place?
A lot of the problem is a large bit of confusion on the part of some
Muslims about what the United States is about...
Another large part is people like you and Lee who don't think that understanding
the enemy is a valuable thing.
Jim
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Hall" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
24 Aug 2003 07:14:12 PM |
|
|
"Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:bi6ng50rkn@enews1.newsguy.com...
"Bill Bonde, one of many Fair and Balanced Conservatives,"
<stderr2@backpacker.com> wrote in message
news:3F46DFBB.9CB0A73E@backpacker.com...
Clave wrote:
<...>
You don't think that understanding what creates an al-Qaeda soldier is
at
all
important to keeping them from being created in the first place?
A lot of the problem is a large bit of confusion on the part of some
Muslims about what the United States is about...
Another large part is people like you and Lee who don't think that
understanding
the enemy is a valuable thing.
Jim
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "C Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
23 Aug 2003 09:16:02 AM |
|
|
"Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:bi6ng50rkn@enews1.newsguy.com...
"Bill Bonde, one of many Fair and Balanced Conservatives,"
<stderr2@backpacker.com> wrote in message
news:3F46DFBB.9CB0A73E@backpacker.com...
Clave wrote:
<...>
You don't think that understanding what creates an al-Qaeda soldier is
at
all
important to keeping them from being created in the first place?
A lot of the problem is a large bit of confusion on the part of some
Muslims about what the United States is about...
Another large part is people like you and Lee who don't think that
understanding
the enemy is a valuable thing.
Jim
I go by Giz. I've never said understanding the enemy isn't valuable. You
first wrote
that and have said often enough now that you seem to believe it. I said
that with
this enemy it isn't important. I say that because they will not, under any
circumstances
try to exist peacefully with us. That makes anything beyond locating and
destroying
them unnecessary. I've been a Naval Aircrewman for the past 20 years, and
studied
the Soviets ad nauseum during the Cold War. This is nothing like that.
Apparently,
you can't see that, but hey no big deal. I'll be hunting them down not you.
Giz
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde, one of many Fair and Balanced" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
23 Aug 2003 07:19:49 AM |
|
|
Clave wrote:
"Bill Bonde, one of many Fair and Balanced Conservatives,"
<stderr2@backpacker.com> wrote in message
news:3F46DFBB.9CB0A73E@backpacker.com...
Clave wrote:
<...>
You don't think that understanding what creates an al-Qaeda soldier is at
all
important to keeping them from being created in the first place?
A lot of the problem is a large bit of confusion on the part of some
Muslims about what the United States is about...
Another large part is people like you and Lee who don't think that understanding
the enemy is a valuable thing.
Gosh Clavicle, I'm here to get you all the time.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "James Hall" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
24 Aug 2003 07:15:51 PM |
|
|
No ***** sherl;ock, no *****. Then again so is your moronic,
fascist, semi-literate, *****-kissing, corporate bum boy - real
dangerous.
LOOK OUT ! What is that behind you ?
JHall.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "neptune3" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
23 Aug 2003 02:58:46 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 20:30:03 -0700, "Bill Bonde, one of many Fair and
Balanced Conservatives," <stderr2@backpacker.com> wrote:
A lot of the problem is a large bit of confusion on the part of some
Muslims about what the United States is about. It appears that some feel
that the US wants to shove pork down their throats and stuff like that.
America is ruled by the Jews and it is the enemy not only of the
Muslims but of the Whites also.
"I will quote to you from the most popular web site in all of Israel.
It is
called Gamla News and Views. It is a very extensive site in both
English and
Hebrew. You can check it out for yourself. It was instrumental in the
1996
elections in Israel, which brought the Likud and Netanyahu to power.
It has
articles in Hebrew and English. Usually, articles in all Hebrew
newspapers
are far more vehement against Gentiles than those they translate into
English. But, the following article appears on their site and is
written by
their most popular commentator Emanuel Winston, and it is in English.
You
can go to Gamla and read this entire article for yourself.
"Winston Mideast Analysis & Commentary: The Crack of the Whip", in
Gamla,
News & Views (www.gamla.org.il), September 16, 1998.
http://www.gamla.org.il/english/article/1998/sept/win3.htm
Here's what this popular Jewish supremacist has to say about Europeans
and
it should be made clear that the author makes clear that what he calls
Europeans are those of European descent, including Americans. Quote:
"As any prostitute can tell you, for a fee they will agree to do
anything
you want. The Europeans are really a low, immoral people who would
sell
their mother... and then deliver.
".How easily any sense of humanity of civilization slips away from
their
face, leaving only the beast. This beast has many faces and names.
Sometimes
they are called Germans, Poles, Croatians, Ukrainians... While at
other
times they became the Church, the Red Cross, or Prime Ministers,
Kings,
Fuhrer. Then, in a quick change, we see some Americans, French,
English and,
finally, there is the contaminated Jew called the Leftist. It doesn't
really
matter, this name or that. Underneath there is strand, a bond that
society
teaches children to hate the "other" - the different ones."
Here is this obscenely hateful Jew calling Europeans prostitutes and
beasts
and then in the height of hypocrisy saying that Europeans teach
children to
hate the "other", the different ones, which, of course, he means to be
Jews.
The truth is that the very core of Judaism teaches hatred of Gentiles.
Then Winston goes on to cheer the genocide of the European people.
Quote:
"These are people of ultimate evil as the beast stays just below the
surface, ready to savage, ready to kill the Jew. The planet would be
well
rid of the European predator. Perhaps we will be fortunate to live in
such
interesting times (an old Chinese curse), to see the decline and
disappearance of the graveyard called Europe. The Europeans, the
English and
the American Arabists once again come together and crack the whip over
the
Jews."
Now, again, let me repeat, this is the top web site in Israel,
supported by
major Jewish political figures such as Benjamin Netanyahu. He calls
for the
ridding of the planet of the European people. The article is nothing
less
than a call for genocide.
Imagine for a minute if any major person in American called Jews
prostitutes
and beasts and said, quote:
"The planet would be well rid of the Jewish predator. Perhaps we will
be
fortunate to live in such interesting times, to see the decline and
disappearance of the graveyard called the Jewish people and Israel."
Could you imagine the outcry if any Christian made such a statement
about
Jews? In most countries of Europe they would be placed in jail. Even
American activists who have simply criticized Jews much more mildly
have
been put in jail, when they have touched down on European soil, such
as in
Germany. Do you think Mr. Emanuel Winston faces that possibility?
Don't hold
your breath.
And, in this very article, this paranoid Jewish supremacist accuses
the very
same nations who have unconditionally supported Israel and all of its
evil,
as hating Jews! As he calls us beasts and prostitutes and wishes for
our
genocide, he then says that WE are the ones hateful.
That is 14-carat Jewish supremacist hypocrisy and the western world is
filled with it.
If you don't believe what you have just heard, please go to the Gamla
site
in Israel and read Winston's article for yourself!
Of course, Jewish supremacists such as Winston are already working for
the
demise of Europeans just as they have worked for the destruction of
the
Palestinians. Jewish supremacists in every nation of Europe and in
America
have relentlessly led the effort to open the borders and make
Europeans a
small minority in our own nations. This is at the same time they make
immigration to Israel dependent on race. They have consciously led the
effort to wipe out our heritage and culture and even existence. They
are the
ultimate racial supremacists, the ultimate haters and, of course, the
ultimate hypocrites.
And they have the Chutzpah to make the false claim that I am a White
supremacist. In truth, I don't want to be supreme over any other
people; I
am not a supremacist: I am really just a preservationist: I just want
my
heritage and traditions to continue in our own European and American
homelands. Whereas Jewish supremacists fulfill the true definition of
supremacism, that is to be supreme over other peoples. Jewish
Supremacists
want control over every land, every government, every media. They want
total
Supremacy. They are the real supremacists, and they are the real
haters, and
they are the ultimate hypocrites!
And we must, if we love freedom, if we love our heritage, oppose them
with
every ounce of our being, even with our very lives. The time is now.
This has been David Duke sharing my latest thoughts."
Listen online now at http://www.davidduke.com/radio
www.spearhead-uk.com http://www.natvan.com
http://www.altermedia.info/ www.nsm88.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "neptune3" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
24 Aug 2003 06:39:40 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 00:54:16 -0000, Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced
<tim@somecallme.net> wrote:
Neptune is quoting David Duke here. Isn't it funny how he fails to
mention that.
Dr Joseph Goebbels, Der Angriff, 21 January 1929.
The Jew
by Joseph Goebbels
Everything is discussed openly in Germany, and every German claims the
right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is Catholic,
the other Protestant, one an employee, the other an employer, a
capitalist, a socialist, a democrat, an aristocrat. There is nothing
dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question.
Discussions happen in public, and where matters are unclear or
confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is
one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate
even to mention: the Jewish question. It is taboo in our republic.
The Jew is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a
scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like
water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at
how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "I've
been found out."
One cannot defend himself against the Jew. He attacks with lightening
speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any
attempt at defense.
Quickly he turns the attacker's charges back on him, and the attacker
becomes the liar, the troublemaker, the terrorist. Nothing could be
more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the Jew wants.
He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the
result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he
has no time to do what the Jew really fears: to attack. The accused
has become the accuser, and loudly he shoves the accuser into the
dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought
the Jew. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully
aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the
following radical conclusions:
1. One cannot fight the Jew by positive means. He is a negative, and
this negative must be erased from the German system, or he will
forever corrupt it.
2. One cannot discuss the Jewish question with the Jews. One can
hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render him harmless.
3. One cannot allow the Jew the same means one would give an honest
opponent, for he is no honorable opponent. He will use generosity and
nobility only to trap his enemy.
4. The Jew has nothing to say about German questions. He is a
foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights
that he always abuses.
5. The so-called religious morality of the Jews is no morality at all,
rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to
protection from the state.
6. The Jew is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and
craftier. His system cannot be defeated economically-he follows
entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken
through political means.
7. A Jew cannot insult a German. Jewish slanders are but badges of
honor for a German opponent of the Jews.
8. The more a German person or a German movement opposes the Jew, the
more valuable it is. If someone is attacked by the Jews, that is a
sure sign of his virtue. He who is not persecuted by the Jews, or who
is praised by them, is useless and dangerous.
9. The Jew evaluates German questions from the Jewish standpoint. As a
result, the opposite of what he says must be true.
10. One must either affirm or reject anti-Semitism. He who defends the
Jews harms his own people. One can only be a Jewish lackey or a Jewish
opponent. Opposing the Jews is a matter of personal hygiene.
These principles give the anti-Jewish movement a chance of success.
Only such a movement will be taken seriously by the Jews, only such a
movement will be feared by them.
The fact that he shouts and complains about such a movement therefore
is only a sign that it is right. We are therefore delighted that we
are constantly attacked in the Jewish gazettes. They may shout about
terror. We answer with Mussolini's familiar words: "Terror? Never! It
is social hygiene. We take these individuals out of circulation just
as a doctor does to a bacterium.
BTW, the people running Gamla are basically Jewish David Dukes. They
are as represntative of the average Israeli as Duke is of the average
American.
Jews are both liars and enemies of the White race. This is what
Jews believe:
"One of the most astounding instances of Jewish hypocrisy was uttered
by
a Jew named Isi Leibler, who is no less than the chairman of the
governing board of the World Jewish Congress. Now Isi Leibler is
well-known as a powerful Jew in Australia, where he was for years the
official head of the Jewish community there. He now lives in Israel.
In
an interview with a Jerusalem newspaper, he stated about Israel "This
is
a country which was set up and created as a Jewish country for the
Jews." In an essay he wrote for the World Jewish Congress, he decried
intermarriage between Jews and non-Jews as a kind of racial suicide,
and
likened assimilation with non-Jews as a slow bleeding to death of the
Jewish people. He emphasized that focus of Israeli policy should be to
sharpen and intensify Jewish identity and that even giving up
territory
was acceptable if it meant getting rid of non-Jews and making Israel a
more nearly all-Jewish state. Leibler argues that post-Zionists
threaten
Israel when they publish textbooks that de-emphasize Jewish racial
interests and replace them with "universalist" history. In the
interview
mentioned, Leibler went so far as to say: "Multiculturalism has no
place
in Israel. Israel was created as a Jewish state for the Jews." That's
the Jew Isi Leibler talking about his own people's country, talking
about Israel. [Leibler, Isi: Is the Dream Ending? Post-Zionism and its
Discontents - A Threat to the Jewish Future, Institute of the World
Jewish Congress, Israel]
But what was Isi Leibler saying when he lived in Australia, a White
country, a non-Jewish country? What was Isi Leibler saying when he was
the head of Australia's powerful Jewish minority? Isi Leibler's advice
to Israel is to protect its racial and cultural heritage. Isi
Leibler's
advice to Jews is to avoid intermarriage. Isi Leibler thinks it's just
fine -- even necessary -- to separate non-Jews from Jews in Israel, to
get non-Jews on the other side of a well-defended border, to throw
them
out of Israel. But to Australians Isi Leibler played quite a different
tune. When Australian politician Pauline Hanson was galvanizing White
Australians in 1993 with her questioning of the wisdom of non-White
immigration to that country, Leibler warned that "extremists" were
threatening precious multiculturalism. He said: "There is a need to
sit
together and establish a way in which Australians can recapture that
spirit of multiculturalism which I think we are all proud being part
and
parcel of, and which is really under threat?" [Australian Herald-Sun,
September 27, 2000]
How much clearer does it have to be before you see it? Leibler and his
fellow powerful Jews want racial nationalism for their own people,
because racial nationalism makes them strong and ensures their
survival.
They want racial nationalism because they want their kind to survive
and
racial nationalism is the key to survival. They're not stupid. They
want
what is best for Jews.
But Leibler and his fellow powerful Jews don't want racial nationalism
for White people. In Australia and Europe and South Africa and the
United States -- wherever White people live -- Leibler and his kind in
Jewish organizations and in the Jewish-controlled media do everything
in
their power to destroy racial nationalism for White people, everything
in their power to keep us from having it, everything in their power to
make it disreputable and impossible and illegal. Just the other day,
Leibler said that one of the most important things in the world to him
was Israel's "right to exist as a sovereign Jewish state." [Israel
Insider, November 24, 2002] But Leibler and his co-racialists in the
Jewish ADL and other groups devote their lives and their billions to
preventing White people from claiming their right to sovereign White
states. Keeping Britain British, or keeping America American, or
keeping
France French, is anathema to them, it is the ultimate in evil and
they never let us forget that."
Kevin Alfred Strom
The National Alliance: <http://www.natvan.com>
<http://www.natall.com>
These anti-Semites are pitiful.
The Jews say it is fine to consider a country an enemy. People can
think
Iraq is their enemy and no one says that is outrageous. They may argue
whether Iraq is really an enemy or not, but they don't just dismiss
the idea of enemies out of hand.
Then the Jews say that it is not OK to be against a group that is
not
a country, such as the Jews. Jews say only countries can be enemies
and we
should never fight our real enemies, who are the Jews themselves.
A Jew said the French were "cheese eating surrender monkeys". Why
can't the
French howl "anti-French" like the Jews howl "anti-Semite"? Because
the French don't
control the media, Jews do.
This is what President Nixon said:
http://www.hnn.us/comments/15664.html
"There may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints
about my
policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in the U.S.
control
the entire information and propaganda machine, the large newspapers,
the
motion pictures, radio and television, and the big companies. And
there is a
force that we have to take into consideration."
www.spearhead-uk.com http://www.natvan.com
http://www.altermedia.info/ www.nsm88.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde, one of many Fair and Balanced" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
23 Aug 2003 03:42:33 PM |
|
|
neptune3 wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 20:30:03 -0700, "Bill Bonde, one of many Fair and
Balanced Conservatives," <stderr2@backpacker.com> wrote:
A lot of the problem is a large bit of confusion on the part of some
Muslims about what the United States is about. It appears that some feel
that the US wants to shove pork down their throats and stuff like that.
America is ruled by the Jews and it is the enemy not only of the
Muslims but of the Whites also.
I'm not a Jew. I would kill you if it were legal.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rico" |
|
| Title: Re: Al-Qaida is Dangerous |
25 Aug 2003 10:30:01 AM |
|
|
In article <2uc2b.111664$ac3.16260@news02.roc.ny>, "7th Angel" <7777@heaven.com> wrote:
"Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" <tim@somecallme.net> wrote in message
news:Xns93E0B42568F63timsomecallme@216.168.3.44...
On 22 Aug 2003, "C Lee" <giz45aw@tds.net> posted this about the "War
on Terrorism":
You're right, and while the conflict may remain perpetual to
some extent, we can lower the intensity of it by punishing the
worst of the offenders. To let them be allows them the luxury of
time. Time to plan, recruit, earn, organize, ect.
And Bush attacked Iraq instead. A vote for Bush is a vote against our
national security.
A vote for ANY demoncrat is a vote against our Constitution and our freedom.
The democrat party is MORE dangerous than Al Qaeda!
Yeah them darn Democrats, balance the budget, high employment rates,
booming economy, anymore harm and everyone might end up rich.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
