Re: All of Nukleus The Librarian's Posts In a Single Summation



 Politics > Politics-USA > Re: All of Nukleus The Librarian's Posts In a Single Summation

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "librarian"
Date: 16 May 2004 09:28:46 AM
Object: Re: All of Nukleus The Librarian's Posts In a Single Summation
Category: Censored by Totalitarian Dictatorship of NWO.
[Zionism, zion, Israel, NWO, Illuminati, terror, genocide]
Subject: Americans have fooled themselves
19 September 2003
How Americans have fooled themselves about the war in Iraq,
and why they've had to.
A sturdy-looking American matron in the audience at the
American University of Paris grew redder by the second.
She was listening to a panel talking about the Iraq war
and its effect on U.S.-French relations, and she kept
nodding her head like a pump building emotional pressure.
FINALLY SHE exploded : "Surely these can't be the only
reasons we invaded Iraq! " the woman thundered, half scolding,
but also half pleading. "Surely not ! "
What first upset her was my suggestion that, looking back,
the French were right. They tried to stop the United States
and Britain from rushing headlong into this mess. Don't we
wish they'd succeeded ?
(Readers, please address hate mail to shadowland@newsweek.com)
Then she listened as another panelist and I went through the
now-familiar recitation of Washington's claims before the war,
and the too-familiar realities since : the failure to find weapons
of mass destruction and the inevitable conclusion that Saddam
Hussein was not the threat he was cracked up to be, the fantasy
that this war could be waged on the cheap rather than the
$ 1 billion per week American taxpayers are now spending, the
claim that occupation - called "liberation" - would be short and
sweet, when in fact American men and women continue to be
shot and blown up every day with no end in sight.
As we went down the list, I could see the Nodding Woman's
problem was not that she didn't believe us, it was that she did.
She just desperately wanted other reasons, better reasons, some
she could consider valid reasons for the price that Americans are
paying in blood and treasure.
It's not the first time I've come across this reaction. I just spent
a month in the States and met a lot of angry people.
A few claim the press is not reporting "the good things in Iraq",
although it's very hard to see what's good for Americans there.
Many more say, "Why didn't the press warn us ?"
We did, of course. Many of us who cover the region - along with
the CIA and the State Department and the uniformed military - have
been warning for at least a year that occupying Iraq would be a dirty,
costly, long and dangerous job.
The problem is not really that the public was misinformed by the
press before the war, or somehow denied the truth afterward.
The problem is that Americans just can't believe their eyes.
They cannot fathom the combination of cynicism, naiveté, arrogance
and ignorance that dragged us into this quagmire, and they're in a
deep state of denial about it.
Again and again, you hear people offering their own "real" reasons
for invading Iraq - conspiracy theories spun not to condemn, but to
condone the administration's actions.
Thus the "real" reason for taking out Saddam Hussein, some say,
was to eliminate this man who rewarded the families of suicide
bombers and posed as an implacable enemy of Israel.
(Yet the bombings go on there, and surely the chaos in Iraq does
nothing for the long-term security of the Jewish state.)
Or the "real" reason for invading Iraq was to intimidate Syria and Iran.
Yet Tehran, if anything, has grown more aggressive, and may actually
have stepped up its nuclear weapons program to deter the United States.
(After all, that strategy worked for North Korea.)
Or the "real" reason was to secure America's long-term supply
of oil, but the destabilization of the region, again, may make that
more tenuous, not less.
But the real problem with such "real" explanations is that they
were not the ones cited by President George W. Bush and British
Prime Minister Tony Blair as the compelling reasons to rush to war
last March. Then, they talked about weapons of mass destruction,
and the fight against terrorists.
Which brings us to the grandest illusion of all : the link between
Saddam Hussein and September 11.
A Washington Post poll published earlier this month concluded
that 69 percent of Americans thought it "at least likely" that the
former Iraqi leader was personally involved in the attacks on the
World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
There's nothing to back this up. So puzzled political scientist and
pollsters, with evident disdain for the public, suggested the connection
is just the result of fuzzy thinking : Al Qaeda is evil, Saddam is evil,
the attacks on 9/11 were evil and folks just draw dumb conclusions.
Other analysts pointed the finger at the administration, which spins
harder and faster than Hurricane Isabel to convince us the war in
Iraq is part of the war on terror begun on September 11, without
quite explaining where it fits in.
Yet just this week President Bush himself (and Donald Rumsfeld, too !)
admitted that information to substantiate this popular fantasy just
doesn't exist. "We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was
involved with September 11", Bush said flatly, almost matter-of-factly,
on Wednesday.
Is the president taking a chance here ? Will the public recoil in horror,
claiming he's somehow lied to them ?
More :
http://www.msnbc.com/news/969219.asp?cp1=1
In article <a922cc0efb36b8495e0077e428093ef0@news.meganetnews.com>, "Nukleus"
<nukleus@invalid.addr> wrote:


You are a liar. I did not forge anything you double tongued SUCKAZOID!!!
You forged me. Stop lying.

You see, you lil speck of dust,
you do not understand how it woiks.
I will produce evidence
of YOU, perverted idiot and a degenerate,
did in fact forge the articles.
Furthermore, if I see one more of those forges,
I'll do my best to shred your sorry tootoo to dust,
if I have enough interest in the suckazoids of your grade
and kind.
Enough.
Get lost,
and quickly at that.
Just take a break.
Go do some bum fucking.
Suck some "high" mason's *****,
or otherwise enjoy yourself as you can.
See what I mean?
Enough.

You think I forged something he? Show us your proof eh? Ever hear eh? I
love watching you cry like a baby.

"nukleus" <nukleus@invalid.addr> wrote in message
news:bou1gm$bv2$4@toster.Te.NeT.UA...

In article <f6632fc2498943df85a63ea8aa549deb@news.meganetnews.com>,

"Nukleus

The Librarian" <nukleus@invalid.addr> wrote:

You sleazy double horned 'eagle",
why do you forge the posts,
you criminally minded pervert?

Cry Cry Cry, whine whine whine, eh

Ever heard, eh

Prove it!!!! eh

You're a liar. eh

You're all suckazoids. eh

Prove it, Prove it, Prove it. eh eh eh

I'm jealous and *****. eh

Oh yes, I forgot to say "prove it" one more time.

I think I summed up all of his posts in a single post. I couldn't bring
myself to misspell everything though.




[Freemasonry, occult, Kabbalah, Lucifer, satan, 666]
Quotes by Madam Blavatsky 32° mason:
"It is Satan who is the God of our planet and
the only God." pages 215, 216,
220, 245, 255, 533, (VI)
"The Celestial Virgin which thus becomes the
Mother of Gods and Devils at one and the same
time; for she is the ever-loving beneficent
Deity...but in antiquity and reality Lucifer
or Luciferius is the name. Lucifer is divine and
terrestial Light, 'the Holy Ghost' and 'Satan'
at one and the same time."
page 539
'The Secret Doctrine'
by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Re: All of Nukleus The Librarian's Posts In a Single Summation
Re: All of Nukleus The Librarian's Posts In a Single Summation
Re: All of Nukleus The Librarian's Posts In a Single Summation
Re: All of Nukleus The Librarian's Posts In a Single Summation
Re: All of Nukleus The Librarian's Posts In a Single Summation
Re: All of Nukleus The Librarian's Posts In a Single Summation
Re: All of Nukleus The Librarian's Posts In a Single Summation
Re: All of Nukleus The Librarian's Posts In a Single Summation
Re: All of Nukleus The Librarian's Posts In a Single Summation
Re: NUKLEUS AKA LIBRARIAN'S HOMOEROTIC COMPULSIVE DISORDER
Re: NUKLEUS AKA LIBRARIAN'S HOMOEROTIC COMPULSIVE DISORDER
Librarian tells FBI to shove their warrantless search. FBI backs down.
Re: NUKLEUS AKA LIBRARIAN'S HOMOEROTIC COMPULSIVE DISORDER
Compared to your local librarian, Asscroft is a pipsqueak, a flyweight.
Librarian speaks out against fascist Republican administration
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER