Politics > Politics-USA > Re: An Important Difference Between Liberals/Democrats And Bush Republicans
| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Barbara Walker" |
| Date: |
26 Aug 2003 08:34:02 AM |
| Object: |
Re: An Important Difference Between Liberals/Democrats And Bush Republicans |
"Tim" <nocomment@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:PUI2b.44241$_V.33813@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
Erik Trammel wrote:
With the Bush Republicans in power foreign Jihadists, Muslim
Fundamentalists, Mujahedeen and terrorists
are apparently streaming into Iraq to fight the infidels. If the
Democrats were in power these
same Muslim radicals would be flocking into the U.S. as they were before
9/11.
These "jihadists" only attacked America after the US threatened to bomb
Afghanistan for not signing a pipline deal ('either you accept our offer
of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs').
It should also be pointed out they only attacked America after Clinton was
in office for 8 years and did nothing to confront the growing Muslim
terrorist assaults upon our embassies, our buildings, and our Navy ships.
Clinton was too busy worrying about where his next ***** was coming from
to spend much time thinking about our nation's defense. Democrats have
their priorities. Sex is one of them, national defense is not.
.
|
|
| User: "Mark K" |
|
| Title: Re: An Important Difference Between Liberals/Democrats And Bush Republicans |
26 Aug 2003 10:36:19 AM |
|
|
"Barbara Walker" <barbara.walker4@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:elJ2b.265034$o%2.121171@sccrnsc02...
It should also be pointed out they only attacked America after Clinton was
in office for 8 years and did nothing to confront the growing Muslim
terrorist assaults upon our embassies, our buildings, and our Navy ships.
Clinton was too busy worrying about where his next ***** was coming from
to spend much time thinking about our nation's defense. Democrats have
their priorities. Sex is one of them, national defense is not.
All three of Clinton's (Jewish) national security advisors, Albright, Cohen
and Berger into sex? Well, that's not kosher. :-)
http://search.csmonitor.com/durable/1998/02/20/us/us.3.html
Three Musketeers of US Foreign Policy
Ann Scott Tyson, Special to The Christian Science Monitor
<Excerpts>
WASHINGTON -- At least one morning a week, usually Wednesday, Secretary of
State Madeleine Albright meets Defense Secretary William Cohen and National
Security Adviser Samuel "Sandy" Berger at the White House for breakfast.
It is a level of foreign-policy partnership that some experts consider
unprecedented. "Albright, Cohen, and Berger have achieved a degree of
cooperation and consensus that is unusual and unique," says Allan Goodman at
Georgetown University in Washington.
"This team has the uncanny ability to realize that foreign policy does not
depend on where you sit, but on the needs of the nation in a particular
crisis," says Professor Goodman, executive dean at Georgetown's School of
Foreign Service and a former colleague of Albright. Past team members, by
contrast, "have been the nation's chief rivals in making foreign policy."
Other experts are less glowing, however. They say the threat of war against
Iraq has led to a show of unity, overshadowing discord among the three over
other issues and day-to-day tactics.
"The potential for war has a way of concentrating the mind," notes Casimir
Yost, head of Georgetown's Institute for the Study of Diplomacy.
Still, most observers would concede that American foreign policy today
suffers far less from the vicious ideological struggles and political turf
battles that plagued it during much of the cold war. []
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
