Added to the file, it proves the point that bigots don't change they
just
change the group they hate. All you have to do is change the words
negro and whites to gays and the below reads just like what is said
today.

"If Negroes can marry whites we might have living in Tennessee the
father living with daughter, the son with the mother, the brother with
his sister, in lawful wedlock, because they had formed such relations
in a state or country where they were not prohibited. The Turk or the
Mohammedan, with his numerous wives, may establish his harem at
the doors of the capital, and we are without remedy. Yet none of
these are more revolting, more to be avoided, or more unnatural than
the case before us." Of Negroes marrying whites. (A Tennessee judge in
1872, ruling against a racially mixed couple who had moved to the
state.)


Sen. Byrd (D) on DOMA (Senate - September 09, 1996)

However, in no case, has anyone suggested that these
relationships deserve the special recognition or the designation
commonly understood as 'marriage .' The suggestion that
relationships between members of the same gender should ever
be accorded the status or the designation of marriage flies
in the face of the thousands of years of experience about the
societal stability that traditional marriage has afforded human
civilization. To insist that male-male or female-female
relationships must have the same status as the marriage
relationship is more than unwise, it is patently absurd.

Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967)
Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and
red, and he placed them on separate continents. And, but for
the interference with his arrangement, there would be no cause
for such marriage. The fact that he separated the races shows
that he did not intend for the races to mix.