stork wrote:
Stork replied to:
We should immediately re-deploy half of our troops to Kurdish held
areas of Iraq, and then send the other half of our troops back home to
the USA. After one year's time we bring all our troops home. This
simple plan that will protect the Kurds, save American lives, and gets
our troops out of the middle of an inevitable civil war.
I think we should bring our troops home from everywhere. I see no
reason that American soldiers should be stationed in Germany, Japan or
South Korea to fight their battles for them when they did not help us
fight ours at all in Iraq. Why should an American soldier be asked to
give his life to defend a country that was "too good" to join us in our
war in Iraq? I think it is a monumental and grotesque unfairness of
the world for us to be left alone to do the dirty work of the world in
the Middle East and to get nothing in return.
Borat! The Mouse Roared:
Well, that's a good point, and I have often tried to use it to
ask why our best and most expensive ally... ISRAEL
is not fighting with the U.S. led Coalition invasion of (both nations)
opponents Iraq and Iran, or even in the past U.S. invasions
of VietNam and Panama and Nicaragua and... :-\
But instead the U.S. Congress keeps on giving Israel, each year,
more aid
money than ALL the other NEEDY nations combined, because they are so...
helpless and NEEDY? (Over three billion US-dollars each year!),
(WITHOUT EVEN HAVING A DEBATE ABOUT IT)... for the last 20 Years?
The politicians in Washington are simply.... getting...
bribed!
Borat! The Ratter
.
|
