Selected Usenet Article
Date: 1 Nov 2003 21:00:55 GMT
Category: Censored by Totalitarian Dictatorship
Article: 13
Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement,
that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them.
This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser.
I'm here to give you facts.
When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue,
you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite.
It is the only prayer for which you stand.
You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre.
In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty
that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next
twelve months shall be null and void.
The oath shall not be an oath;
the vow shall not be a vow;
the pledge shall not be a pledge.
They shall have no force or effect.
And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath,
vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer
that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted
from fulfilling them.
How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon
their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.
We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered,
and for the same reason.
--- Benjamin H. Freedman
[Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing
individuals of the 20th century. Born in 1890, he was a successful
Jewish businessman of New York City at one time principal owner
of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry
after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the
remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his
considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the
Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.]
If you have an interesting article or a quote on:
NWO, Freemasonry, Skull and Bones, Illuminati,
post them on alt.illuminati or alt.conspiracy.new-world-order
In article <s095bvssithk9e9cdrmbudeh4fgn6onl3s@4ax.com>, Bob Brenchley.
<Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2003 09:29:09 +0100, "The Todal"
<the_todalnospam@msn.com> wrote:
"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message
news:l0k2bvo388msa191aitmuqnma1lo4bgad3@4ax.com...
On Thu, 1 May 2003 13:16:44 +0100, "The Todal"
<the_todalnospam@msn.com> wrote:
Given that we
haven't yet found any WMDs, how can you assert so confidently that Iraq
hadn't complied with the UN resolutions?
Please read UNSC resolution 687
(http://www.caabu.org/press/documents/unscr-resolution-687.html) and
it is quite clear. If there is any part you don't understand then
please feel free to ask.
Okay. I ask you to explain why you refer to information compiled in 1991 as
evidence that Saddam had failed to disarm by 2003.
One more time: why does the evillest empire that ever was
noes not disarm?
Afterall, it is the BIGGEST problem in the world BY FAR.
IT is the BIGGEST threat in the world BY FAR.
It started more wars since the WWII than all
the countries in "civilized" world combined.
What is this cockroach farce?
Why are you hiding behind the UN resolutions
when you ***** them in the most profound ways
at the same time,
you conmen?
Have you read 687 yet? Because if you have I can't understand why you
are still asking that question.
I ask why you choose to
ignore Hans Blix's reports when he said that there had been gradual
progress.
It is amazing Blix went as far, as to directly insult
the evil empire. Usually, they deal with these kind of people
in the most drastic and profound ways.
Most likely, Blix will just cease,
at least from the pictures on your idiot box
as he had guts to raise his voice against
the agents of nothing less
than satan himself.
The most dire consequences in his life
are but MUST.
Because gradual progress was NOT acceptable,
To whom?
The satanic worshippers of the most profound evil?
WHO is the biggest terrorist in the entire history
of the planet Earth?
Well, the satanic empire,
who blatantly put at least 10 satanic symbols
on its own currency so that the commandment
of the beast would be fulfilled
"In the right hand of each man,
or on his forehead,
there is to be my symbol,
666".
THAT is what you are dealing with.
The BIGGEST threat to life on Earth
is not that "jackel" Saddam,
but the 3rd derivative Freemason Bush,
push, push in the bush,
who did not even inhale,
and even if he did,
it was such a long time ago,
it ain't even funny.
His own father, that slimiest CIA figure
in history, pronounced the dearly held Masonic
and Illuminati principle of "New World Order"
just before this sting of global domination
took place, starting with 1991.
Now, his gradfather, Prescott Bush,
was one of the most ferocious Freemasons around,
only on the par with that KKK creator,
Albert Pike, who was a war criminal,
who ran away from his own land
and was only allowed to return back
when Freemasons made a deal with masonic sponsoring
presitent, who forgave him his crimes.
THAT is your heritage.
1441 called for immediate
and full co-operation.
What does it mean, you ***** roach?
The evil empire pisses in the face of the entire world,
starts a PURELY agressive war despite the UN resolutions,
and that is all nice and kosher according to suckazoids
of your grade, right?
What does it trully mean "full cooperation"?
Do you mean the sovereign country has to fall on its
knees to facilitate the most profound evil that ever
was and make itself TOTALLY defenseless
so that masonic and bonesman criminals
could destroy it as easily as it gets,
you dirty smut?
Blix was not getting that and his reports said
so. Iraq was therefore in breach of 1441.
That means you can manipulate the very notioin
of United Nations to anihilate?
Now...
What do we have in Iraq at this junction?
Do you, slime, can even BEGIN to comprehend?
Not only Iraq, but what do we have in the whole world?
What IS it, suckazoid?
Enough of this slime.
You were forever a sucker of the beast's *****,
and so you will remain,
justifying the most horrendous and utterly meaningless
destruction, just to justify your satanic motivations.
THAT is where we are at.
No need to manipulate the UN with fear and guilt trip
just to justify your thirst for blood.
I think you are trying to mislead. It isn't a case of three
strikes and you get bombed. It's a case of assessing at any given time (and
particularly on the eve of a proposed war) whether the enemy remains a
threat, whether the criticisms that were made ten years earlier have ceased
to carry so much weight and whether you owe it to the innocent citizens of
Iraq to stay your hand and show humanity and compassion.
You misunderstand. Iraq started a war, when they lost there were a set
of conditions placed on the ceasefire. If those conditions are not net
- to the letter - then the ceasefire is meaningless and the war is
back on.
Look at it another way. You commit a crime. Your sentence is a ?1,000
fine payable in 6 months. You don't pay, after six months you are
threatened with jail. You agree to pay over the next 3 months. You pay
?200 in that time. You go to jail.
Now take the same idea and spread it over 12 years of trying to avoid
your sentence..... Now do you get the idea.
Where is the deterrent on other rogue states if the UN just goes on
letting a country like Iraq escape its punishment?
"On 2 July [2002], Air Marshal Sir John Walker,
the former chief of defence intelligence and deputy chair
of the Joint Intelligence Committee, wrote a confidential memo
to MPs to alert them that the
"commitment to war" was made a year ago.
"Thereafter," he wrote, "the whole process of reason, other reason,
yet other reason, humanitarian, morality, regime change, terrorism,
finally imminent WMD attack . . . was merely covering fire."
.
|
