| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Werner Hetzner" |
| Date: |
23 Jan 2004 07:32:25 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Bush's deficit economy: A disaster in the making. |
NotBush2004 wrote:
Werner Hetzner wrote:
NotBush2004 wrote:
http://www.cbo.gov/
The Economic Effects of Growing Federal Debt
The budget scenarios described above do not incorporate the economic
effects of the various spending and tax policies underlying them. The
remainder of this chapter analyzes those effects and draws the following
conclusions:
A budget policy that resulted in rising federal debt could seriously harm
the economy.
...
When the Democrats do it they call it Keynsean economics and assure us
it's all for the common good.
Clinton = Surplus | Bush = Deficit. Nuff said.
Not so fast. check out
http://www.treas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/fed-debt.html
If there was a surplus, why is the debt always higher each year?
.
|
|
| User: "InsuranceBroker" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's deficit economy: A disaster in the making. |
23 Jan 2004 09:15:14 AM |
|
|
Subject: Re: Bush's deficit economy: A disaster in the making.
From: Werner Hetzner
Date: 1/23/2004 8:32 AM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: <4011226A.1000904@mac.com>
NotBush2004 wrote:
Werner Hetzner wrote:
NotBush2004 wrote:
http://www.cbo.gov/
The Economic Effects of Growing Federal Debt
The budget scenarios described above do not incorporate the economic
effects of the various spending and tax policies underlying them. The
remainder of this chapter analyzes those effects and draws the following
conclusions:
A budget policy that resulted in rising federal debt could seriously harm
the economy.
...
When the Democrats do it they call it Keynsean economics and assure us
it's all for the common good.
Clinton = Surplus | Bush = Deficit. Nuff said.
Not so fast. check out
http://www.treas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/fed-debt.html
If there was a surplus, why is the debt always higher each year?
During the Clinton years the national debt increase only 1 trillion dollars.
The money was mostly taken from Social Secuirty trust accounts.
Few people actually accpet Clintons claim of a balanced budget. Bush's budget
is a complete disaster. Today the Federal government will need to borrow just
under 2,000,000,000 just to pay the bills. The national debt is now over 7
trillion dollars.
Alan Greenspan has just stopped paying interest and the United states actually
has a negative rate of return on the national debt. That is why the dollar is
dropping like a rock.
Doing Insurance business in the Garden State
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rico" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's deficit economy: A disaster in the making. |
23 Jan 2004 06:16:43 PM |
|
|
In article <4011226A.1000904@mac.com>, Werner Hetzner <whetzner@mac.com> wrote:
NotBush2004 wrote:
Werner Hetzner wrote:
NotBush2004 wrote:
http://www.cbo.gov/
The Economic Effects of Growing Federal Debt
The budget scenarios described above do not incorporate the economic
effects of the various spending and tax policies underlying them. The
remainder of this chapter analyzes those effects and draws the following
conclusions:
A budget policy that resulted in rising federal debt could seriously harm
the economy.
...
When the Democrats do it they call it Keynsean economics and assure us
it's all for the common good.
Clinton = Surplus | Bush = Deficit. Nuff said.
Not so fast. check out
http://www.treas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/fed-debt.html
If there was a surplus, why is the debt always higher each year?
Too easy, can't beleive you walked into this:
"My plan returns about one of every four dollars of
the surplus to the American taxpayers, who created
the surplus in the first place"
George Bush, Feb 21, 2001
So you tell me, was Bush lieing?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werner Hetzner" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's deficit economy: A disaster in the making. |
25 Jan 2004 07:17:26 AM |
|
|
Rico wrote:
In article <4011226A.1000904@mac.com>, Werner Hetzner <whetzner@mac.com> wrote:
NotBush2004 wrote:
Werner Hetzner wrote:
NotBush2004 wrote:
http://www.cbo.gov/
The Economic Effects of Growing Federal Debt
The budget scenarios described above do not incorporate the economic
effects of the various spending and tax policies underlying them. The
remainder of this chapter analyzes those effects and draws the following
conclusions:
A budget policy that resulted in rising federal debt could seriously harm
the economy.
...
When the Democrats do it they call it Keynsean economics and assure us
it's all for the common good.
Clinton = Surplus | Bush = Deficit. Nuff said.
Not so fast. check out
http://www.treas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/fed-debt.html
If there was a surplus, why is the debt always higher each year?
Too easy, can't beleive you walked into this:
"My plan returns about one of every four dollars of
the surplus to the American taxpayers, who created
the surplus in the first place"
George Bush, Feb 21, 2001
So you tell me, was Bush lieing?
So you tell me, based on that government fact-sheet, where is that
surplus politicians talk about? Where is that Clinton surplus? Are they
not all lying?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rico" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's deficit economy: A disaster in the making. |
25 Jan 2004 05:40:10 PM |
|
|
In article <4013C1E6.7090707@mac.com>, Werner Hetzner <whetzner@mac.com> wrote:
Rico wrote:
In article <4011226A.1000904@mac.com>, Werner Hetzner <whetzner@mac.com>
wrote:
NotBush2004 wrote:
Werner Hetzner wrote:
NotBush2004 wrote:
http://www.cbo.gov/
The Economic Effects of Growing Federal Debt
The budget scenarios described above do not incorporate the economic
effects of the various spending and tax policies underlying them. The
remainder of this chapter analyzes those effects and draws the following
conclusions:
A budget policy that resulted in rising federal debt could seriously harm
the economy.
...
When the Democrats do it they call it Keynsean economics and assure us
it's all for the common good.
Clinton = Surplus | Bush = Deficit. Nuff said.
Not so fast. check out
http://www.treas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/fed-debt.html
If there was a surplus, why is the debt always higher each year?
Too easy, can't beleive you walked into this:
"My plan returns about one of every four dollars of
the surplus to the American taxpayers, who created
the surplus in the first place"
George Bush, Feb 21, 2001
So you tell me, was Bush lieing?
So you tell me, based on that government fact-sheet, where is that
surplus politicians talk about? Where is that Clinton surplus? Are they
not all lying?
Nice dodge, but I asked you a direct question, are you saying Bush lied,
yes or no?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
