| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
17 Nov 2005 07:38:02 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Cheney Says GOP Senators Are Traitors |
You're a liar.....
Cheney is setting the record straight which pisses the left off because they
are used to punching but not getting punched back.
So what you're really saying is because the administration is finally
entering the national debate over the lies being told about the war on
terror, you prefer everyone else remain silent and just let the left tell
all the lies they want.
Sorry lib, cause "FREEDOM of SPEECH" rings for everyone and not just you &
your goons....
LN
"Bradley K. Sherman" <bks@panix.com> wrote in message
news:dlhtuk$4le$1@panix2.panix.com...
| ...
| WASHINGTON . Spurred by President Bush's slumping approval
| ratings, the Republican-controlled Senate - for the first
| time - is drawing lines in the sand over war, pushing the
| White House on issues ranging from treatment of detainees
| to strategy in Iraq.
|
| Last month, senators broke with the White House by voting
| to ban torture. Last week, they demanded accountability on
| secret overseas detention centers. This week, 76 senators
| voted to require the White House to deliver quarterly,
| unclassified reports on progress of the war in Iraq.
| ...
<http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1117/p01s01-uspo.html>
--bks
.
|
|
| User: "ouroboros rex" |
|
| Title: Re: Cheney Says GOP Senators Are Traitors |
17 Nov 2005 01:16:57 PM |
|
|
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:_I%ef.16391$7h7.9263@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
You're a liar.....
Cheney is setting the record straight which pisses the left off because
they are used to punching but not getting punched back.
So what you're really saying is because the administration is finally
entering the national debate over the lies being told about the war on
terror, you prefer everyone else remain silent and just let the left tell
all the lies they want.
lol Hilarious stuff.
from Page 31:
"...President Bush made 55 misleading statements about the threat posed by
Iraq in
27 separate public statements or appearances.
Of the 55 misleading statements by President Bush, 4 claimed that Iraq posed
an
urgent threat; 14 exaggerated Iraq's efforts to develop nuclear weapons; 18
overstated Iraq's chemical or biological weapons capacity; and 19
misrepresented
Iraq's links to al Qaeda...."
http://tinyurl.com/2pkah
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "robw" |
|
| Title: Re: Cheney Says GOP Senators Are Traitors |
17 Nov 2005 05:46:28 PM |
|
|
***** can say whatever he wants.
He's part of this failing administration.
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:_I%ef.16391$7h7.9263@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
You're a liar.....
Cheney is setting the record straight which pisses the left off because
they
are used to punching but not getting punched back.
So what you're really saying is because the administration is finally
entering the national debate over the lies being told about the war on
terror, you prefer everyone else remain silent and just let the left tell
all the lies they want.
Sorry lib, cause "FREEDOM of SPEECH" rings for everyone and not just you &
your goons....
LN
"Bradley K. Sherman" <bks@panix.com> wrote in message
news:dlhtuk$4le$1@panix2.panix.com...
| ...
| WASHINGTON . Spurred by President Bush's slumping approval
| ratings, the Republican-controlled Senate - for the first
| time - is drawing lines in the sand over war, pushing the
| White House on issues ranging from treatment of detainees
| to strategy in Iraq.
|
| Last month, senators broke with the White House by voting
| to ban torture. Last week, they demanded accountability on
| secret overseas detention centers. This week, 76 senators
| voted to require the White House to deliver quarterly,
| unclassified reports on progress of the war in Iraq.
| ...
<http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1117/p01s01-uspo.html>
--bks
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "john fernbach" |
|
| Title: Re: Cheney Says GOP Senators Are Traitors |
17 Nov 2005 06:04:04 PM |
|
|
Goons?
Why are Democrats who criticize Cheney and Bush "goons," as opposed to
"political dissenters"?
You're just ranting rather than reasoning when you use terms like this,
and the results are neither pretty nor convincing.
But I'm on a kick today against over-heated political language, no
matter if it's from the right, left or center.
I just criticized a war critic for exulting that Harry Reid had "*****
slapped" ***** Cheney on Iraq. And before that I made fun of some poor
conservative GOP kid who writes about "bludgeoning" Democrats with
facts, and being exposed to "scorched earth terror tactics" in
response.
I think all this talk about "goons," "*****-slapping," "bludgeoning"
and "terror tactics" is degrading to the English language. What's
worse, it serves to numb our brains when it comes to discussing real
political issues of importance.
I also think it leaves us badly prepared to respond when REAL violence
occurs in politics -- when one side really does emply goons,
*****-slapping, bludgeoning, terror tactics and other totalitarian
methods against its opposition. And it fits in all too perfectly with
what George Orwell wrote about the uses and abuses of political
language in "1984."
Let's face it: the Democrats and the Bush White House are expressing
some strong disagreements over Iraq.
But if either side starts to use "goons," "*****-slapping," "scorched
earth terror tactics" or any other kind of violence against the other
side, to win the damned political debate, it's time for the public to
start talking about the impeachment of our legislative leaders and/or
our president.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Cheney Says NEEDHAMLOON a "real good German" |
17 Nov 2005 09:04:20 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:38:02 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
So what you're really saying is because the administration is finally
entering the national debate over the lies being told about the war on
terror, you prefer everyone else remain silent and just let the left tell
all the lies they want.
You dumb *****, NEEDHAMLOON
The administration entered the "national debate" by claiming that it
was INCONTROVERTIBLE PROOF that Iraq had WMD
That was a lie
Joe Wilson had debunked the "yellow cake" ***** 7 months prior
The "aluminum tubes" were debunked by a GE engineer in the CIA
Han Blix was giving your lying sack of ***** reports that supported
what Scott Ritter, and other CIA analysts were believing--that Saddam
(for whatever reason) had no WMD since the end of Gulf War 1.
Your lying sack of ***** ignored it all, embellished any/all
intelligence that even remotely suggested Saddam was a "threat"
(including any lie that the British gave him)
There is NO way to argue that Dumbya knew Saddam was an "imminent
threat" when all the intelligence was telling him different
What they knew before 2003 has NO relevance because the contemporary
intelligence was telling them different.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
