"Amelia M. Samples" <milla@georgebush.visi.com> wrote in message
news:SEVNb.86568$fq1.75471@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...

"DeanDownForTheCount?" <TheirSaviorDies@HopefulDemmies.com> wrote in

message

news:HxVNb.69053$sv6.146487@attbi_s52...

"Captain kozmic" <captusa@kozmik.com> wrote in message
news:captusa-1601040908320001@216-99-194-15.dial.spiritone.com...

Key board commandoes like you and your fantasy lover Rush limbaugh

crack

me up criticizing a real military man while you two are in your GI

outfits moving toy soldiers around while wacking off...

Your post is a good example of the current tactics so many of the

liberal

Democrats use when they encounter facts they find troubling - they

attack

the messenger, unable to deal with the message itself. Way to go,

"Captain

kozmic"....

You speaketh of yourself, my friend...

Only if I am the poster called "Frog", who wrote the material below that
your buddy "Captain kozmic" was replying to.

In article <5RYHAP7338002.7316203704@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>, Frog
<FrogRemailer@bigfoot.com> wrote:

Manchester Union Leader
http://tinyurl.com/25yhf

. .Dean told a telephone news conference he saw nothing new.
He said Clark "used to be in favor of the war and he has since
changed his mind. I don't think there's any big surprise there."

Rival Joe Lieberman said that Clark had "attacked me for
pointing out his multiple positions on the war in Iraq. It is no
longer credible for Wesley Clark to assert that he has always
had only one position on the war - being against it. His own
testimony before Congress shows otherwise.

"He may think it is 'old-style politics' to point this out, but
the only thing old here is a candidate not leveling with the
American people," Lieberman said. John Kerry spokesman Mark
Kornblau said, "I'm wondering if he changed his position on the
war before or after he changed his party affiliation from
Republican to Democrat.". . .