"miles" <nope@nopers.com> wrote in message
news:Z7nNg.3315$AP2.2508@fed1read10...
Angry Young Man! wrote:
"miles" <nope@nopers.com> wrote in message
news:ZF2Ng.3271$AP2.2131@fed1read10...
Angry Young Man! wrote:
Tell me, why did Bush not get Osama?
Tell me why Clinton didn't when he had the chance? At least Bush
didn't
tell the troops to not even try.
Clinton isn't President. Bush is and Bush gave up. He surrendered.
Ah yes, that old over used liberal line. Tell me. When Bush is out of
office in 2008 will the liberals stop ranting and blaming Bush for
anything and everything? No, you'll continue to blame him for all sorts
of ill effects. A presidents decisions or lack of them do indeed cause
repercussions for years to follow. Your excuse for Clintons actions and
inactions is absurd. Lets see how your rants about Bush die off after
he's out of office. Then and only then will your whining have any
credibility.
Funny how the same Lefty Liberals who blame Bush 100.000% for an event that
happened less than 8 months after he was office, made excuses for their
buddy Slick Willie, blaming unemployment and poverty on a man (Reagan) who
left office 4 YEARS before Clinton showed up. For a more extreme example,
look how the same leftiod kooks can't admit that their hero Fidel Castro
just MIGHT be responsible for the starvation, repression, poverty, and total
absence of human rights in a country where he has ruled with an iron fist
since 1959! Liberalism is INDEED a mental disorder... :O(
.
