| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Native American" |
| Date: |
25 Jun 2005 02:04:37 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Dems Steady Decline Since 1992 |
"Chris Bellomy" <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in message
news:0T2amt19Ib5nN34@redshark.goodshow.net...
In dfw.politics wrote:
: Chris Bellomy wrote:
: > In the meantime, you probably should stop and consider
: > Bush's record low approval numbers -- and Congress' even
: > worse numbers. (Approval in the TEENS? Good gawd.)
:
: The only approval that counts is election day.
Ah, you sound like me in '93.
What an insulting thing to say to someone.....
Get ready. Your guys overplayed their hand on Schiavo, we're
losing the war thanks to your Dear Leader's ineptitude, and
the economy remains in the shitter.
I take it you feel that theory of yours explains why contributions from the
American People to the Republican Party, by The Little Guy (less than $200
contributions), are now FAR outpacing those being contributed to your
Democrat Party? You actually feel the Republicans have "overplayed their
hand on Schiavo", and that's why the contributions to the Democrat Party
have plummeted?
Gee, good thinking, Mr. Democrat Party Strategist.....
--
George Soros, Michael Moore, MoveOn and the hard left were wrong after 9/11,
just as it was wrong for Democrat leaders to stand by and remain silent
after ***** Durbin made his deplorable comments.
.
|
|
| User: "Docky Wocky" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems Steady Decline Since 1992 |
25 Jun 2005 10:37:40 PM |
|
|
The really important thing right now is to get a leg up on what disguise the
Democrats will use as they re-invent themselves for 2006?
Rabid leftists, or borne again religionists of some vent or other are
definite possibilities.
It is obvious the rabid leftists still dominate the mandarin ranks of the
Democrat party organization, but there could be one or two old-time
Democrats left out there pushed into menial jobs and biding their time.
It is not completely rediculous to imaging the party big shots ordering a
shift to the right that would be staggering.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Simpson" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems Steady Decline Since 1992 |
30 Jun 2005 03:28:14 PM |
|
|
Docky Wocky wrote:
The really important thing right now is to get a leg up on what disguise the
Democrats will use as they re-invent themselves for 2006?
I'm unsure. Probably something will be done, but these days, the
Dims look
worse than ever. Could this be too good to be true, that they lose
even more
badly in 2006?
Hillary Clinton probably points the way -- she's photographed an
awful lot
these days shaking hands with generals and such.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Native American" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems Steady Decline Since 1992 |
30 Jun 2005 03:33:26 PM |
|
|
"Dave Simpson" <david_l_simpson@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1120163294.385380.64340@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Docky Wocky wrote:
The really important thing right now is to get a leg up on what disguise
the
Democrats will use as they re-invent themselves for 2006?
I'm unsure. Probably something will be done, but these days, the
Dims look
worse than ever. Could this be too good to be true, that they lose
even more
badly in 2006?
Hillary Clinton probably points the way -- she's photographed an
awful lot
these days shaking hands with generals and such.
There's some interesting new polling data out, with some Good News for
Hillary - the percentage of people who think she will be the Democrat
Party's pick for its presidential candidate has been rising.
The Bad News for Hillary, from that same poll, is that the percentage of
people who said they will vote AGAINST her has risen from 36% to 39% in just
the last 2 weeks alone.
Like Dean was during HIS primary bid, Hillary's headed in the wrong
direction!
I do hope she wins her party's nomination......
--
The Democrats are pursuing the philosophy of the stop sign, the agenda of
the roadblock, and our country and our children deserve better.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
