Re: Dems Whine About Deficit But Are Unwilling To Cut Spending



 Politics > Politics-USA > Re: Dems Whine About Deficit But Are Unwilling To Cut Spending

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "InsuranceBroker"
Date: 05 Feb 2004 10:18:53 AM
Object: Re: Dems Whine About Deficit But Are Unwilling To Cut Spending

Subject: Re: Dems Whine About Deficit But Are Unwilling To Cut Spending
From: "Johnny Botox"


Date: 2/5/2004 10:54 AM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: <1HtUb.228933$xy6.1162804@attbi_s02>


<ahall@no-spam-panix.com> wrote in message
news:kpgu125czht.fsf@panix2.panix.com...

Johnny \"Big Bucks\" Heinz writes:


Johnny> Good. President Bush, unlike the Democrats, is a fiscal

conservative, and

Johnny> recognizes that federal spending needs to be cut in many, many

areas.


Then it is odd that he has supported increases in all
areas of Federal spending. From farm welfare, education,
pork, military programs Rumsfeld tried to kill....

The list highlights the effect of President Bush's budget on a

variety

of popular programs in education, health, housing and even law
enforcement.


Johnny> Not even one lone Democrat in either the House nor the Senate

has had the

Johnny> fiscal courage to call for federal spending cuts.

Johnny> Bush has that courage.

When do you think he will show the slightest sign of fiscal
conservatism?



He's already done that. He recently announced several areas of government
spending that he proposes be cut back.

The guy just has proposed a defense budget of over 400 billion dollars. The
entire Federal government ran on less than 400 billion prior to Reagan. Now we
have deficits 200 billion more than than the entire budget then.


It's a safe bet the Liberals and Democrats will begin howling their
complaints about "hurting" this, that, or the other special interest group
with those spending cutbacks, and those Liberals and Democrats will
momentarily suspend their childish rhetoric about "the deficit" in order to
begin issuing those new howls, mews, and whines that we have all come to
expect from today's Democrat Party.








Doing Insurance business in the Garden State
.

User: "Johnny Botox"

Title: Re: Dems Whine About Deficit But Are Unwilling To Cut Spending 05 Feb 2004 01:13:20 PM
"InsuranceBroker" <insurancenj@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040205111853.18989.00001589@mb-m28.aol.com...

Subject: Re: Dems Whine About Deficit But Are Unwilling To Cut Spending
From: "Johnny Botox"


Date: 2/5/2004 10:54 AM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: <1HtUb.228933$xy6.1162804@attbi_s02>


<ahall@no-spam-panix.com> wrote in message
news:kpgu125czht.fsf@panix2.panix.com...

Johnny \"Big Bucks\" Heinz writes:


Johnny> Good. President Bush, unlike the Democrats, is a fiscal

conservative, and

Johnny> recognizes that federal spending needs to be cut in many,

many

areas.


Then it is odd that he has supported increases in all
areas of Federal spending. From farm welfare, education,
pork, military programs Rumsfeld tried to kill....

The list highlights the effect of President Bush's budget on a

variety

of popular programs in education, health, housing and even law
enforcement.


Johnny> Not even one lone Democrat in either the House nor the

Senate

has had the

Johnny> fiscal courage to call for federal spending cuts.

Johnny> Bush has that courage.

When do you think he will show the slightest sign of fiscal
conservatism?



He's already done that. He recently announced several areas of

government

spending that he proposes be cut back.


The guy just has proposed a defense budget of over 400 billion dollars.

Yes, national defense is our first priority.
Or do you Democrats dispute that fact also?
The

entire Federal government ran on less than 400 billion prior to Reagan.

So?
Also, you make yourself look foolish when you fail to factor inflation in,
to say nothing of the MASSIVE increase in "social spending" since the
1980's. That's where the real problem lies - social spending. But you
just watch and see, when spending cuts on social spending are proposed, the
Democrats will howl like stuck pigs, and will all of a sudden drop their
phony rhetoric about how "concerned" they are with "the deficit".
Now we

have deficits 200 billion more than than the entire budget then.

See above.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Dems Whine About Deficit But Are Unwilling To Cut Spending
The Oil Nazis Are Spending 100 Million/Day of US Taxpayer's $$$ On Genocide to Make a Handful of Oil CEOs Richer, but Let's Talk About the 'Dixie Chicks'
Bush Warns He'll Veto Runaway Spending, But Not His Own.
Another Bush agency boondoggle: Lotsa spending, nothing but pork.
The USA is "No. 1" in nothing but weaponry, consumer spending, debt, and delusion.
Only One Problem But It Is A BIG BIG One.
Re: Sad.........but we must support the lesser of evils here.........
U.S.A. CAN DETROY THE ENTIRE WORLD, BUT CANNOT CONTROL IT
What? No WMD? b..b..b..b..but, Georgie, you said that................................
Re: Al Gore took pictures (had personal guards), but Bush flew planes with no guards
Bush Promises the Moon, But Where are the Jobs?
Bin Laden Offers Truce to Europe, But Not U$-Israel-UK
Re: WMD exists in Iraq but only small quantities have been found so far
Re: W for war but eager to avoid it, prof recalls
Castro Has Fallen..., But Not Politically
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER