Re: Expose all intelligence about the war on Terror, but keep Clinton's body parts secret



 Politics > Politics-USA > Re: Expose all intelligence about the war on Terror, but keep Clinton's body parts secret

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Ashland Henderson"
Date: 02 Jan 2004 06:46:05 PM
Object: Re: Expose all intelligence about the war on Terror, but keep Clinton's body parts secret
(John S. Dyson) wrote in message news:<bt4h01$hfi$8@news.iquest.net>...


"DemsHaveNoFriends" <DemLosers@dnc.com> wrote in message
news:dvfJb.99241$VB2.224930@attbi_s51...


"George Leroy Tyrebiter Jr." <gltjr@cmhs.edu> wrote in message
news:sluavv8r1ukp79r24e4q1g348drcjl37h0@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 12:01:42 GMT, "DemsHaveNoFriends"
<DemLosers@dnc.com> wrote:


"Tlalocelotl Tlatoani" <redkrewe@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FF53F6C.472BA444@sprintmail.com...

"John S. Dyson" wrote:


In article <224b4a15.0401011126.68e7422e@posting.google.com>,
sstevelp@aol.com (Steve) writes:

(John S. Dyson) wrote in message

news:<bsvnc1$25ca$15@news.iquest.net>...

In article <224b4a15.0312311430.553ea192@posting.google.com>,
sstevelp@aol.com (Steve) writes:

"HOD" <sh@att.net> wrote in message

news:<vv6akpir73mp42@corp.supernews.com>...


George Bush never liked New York much anyway.
After all he let the hijackers in on 911.

Stevel


Prove it, Whizbang! :-))


I think, if you look hard enough, you will see a gap in the NY

skyline.


Everytime that you make the claim that Bush was somehow

complicit

in the WTCII attacks (as planned during the Clinton

administration),

you lose credibility with the non-leftists. Too bad that
our ALL IMPORTANT human intelligence capabilities that leave
us without enough ability to analyse intelligence were severely
damaged during the Clinton era.

John


I will believe that Bush may have clean hands on the day that he
allows a full and unrestricted enquiry into the events of 911.

Executive privilege MUST be maintained as a matter of precedent.


Executive privelage does not allow the White House to go around
congressional inquiry, period.

Don't like it? Tough.



It sounds like you Lefties just spelled out the means by which America

can

FINALLY get a look at Clinton's medical records! Thanks!


We have a right to know what happened Sept 11, and it is not in the
public interest for President Bush to hide the truth from us.



Executive privelage does not allow Clinton to go around congressional
inquiry, PERIOD.


Another example of wise judgment!!! It is important to
defer release of strategic and tactical material until the
situation is not critical. There were NUMEROUS problems
caused by Clintoons damage to the intelligence gathering abilities.
Democrats giving away our secrets might cause even more loss of life.



What happened on 9/11 is important to Americans.

When the war is over, and traitorous congressional leaks wont' affect
us, then it will make sense to release some information. Note that
those who security clearances already can get much information. You
traitorous creeps just arent' to be trusted with American lives.

I'd agree that traitorous creeps just aren't to be trusted with any lives.
As to who the tratorous creeps really are now, that's a different issue.
I say this as one who served in the military and had a top secret clearance.
Can you say the same.
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Re: Expose all intelligence about the war on Terror, but keep Clinton's body parts secret
U.S. Soldier in Iraq Shaking Hands With Senator Hillary Clinton--But Not Willingly
REPUBLICANS HAVE NOTHING BUT THEIR INSANE HATRED FOR CLINTON!!
But it aint sex, right Mr. Clinton?
I don't agree with Bush's recess appointment of Pickering but didn't Clinton get in a few of his own?
Re: Bird-killer Kerry: Flu Shot OK for Clinton, But Not Cheney
Re: Clinton Legacy nothing but Lies and Deceit
Re: Bush Won't Testify Alone, But Neither Did Clinton
Kerry: Flu Shot for Clinton OK, But Not Cheney
Re: Bush Won't Testify Alone, But Neither Did Clinton
Re: Bush Won't Testify Alone, But Neither Did Clinton
But Clinton got a ***** so what's the big deal?
"But, Bill Clinton got a *****".
Things are tough all over, but Mrs. Clinton is no Iron Lady.
Re: "Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri, who has endorsed Obama, is one who has said a Clinton nomination would hurt Democrats. Others in the party agree. "It is not fair," said Missouri State Auditor Susan Montee. "But the fact is ... she is actually
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER