| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"The Prophet Bush" |
| Date: |
20 Aug 2004 12:46:00 AM |
| Object: |
Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
In article <vKfVc.34369$vc4.14941486@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>, "All Patriots" <All Patriots nospam@yahoo.com> says...
"AWOL Coward GW Chimpzilla" <patriot-for-cash@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Vq8Vc.47466$TI1.29029@attbi_s52...
Jan 2001 NOW
Dow
10,587.60 10,040.82
What was the Dow at the end of Clintons last budget?
8,847.56
NASDAQ
2,770.38 1,819.89
What was the NASDAQ at the end of Clintons last budget?
1,480.46
I looked that up not too long ago:
conservative
FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS
"Clinton's two terms in office (1993-2001) were marked by
strong numbers for gross domestic product (GDP) and employment
growth and especially for deficit reduction. His overall
ranking puts him first among the ten postwar presidents--ahead
of Lyndon B. Johnson, Kennedy and Reagan, who were tightly
grouped behind the 42nd president and recent autobiographer."
(Bush 43 is dead last)
http://www.forbes.com/commerce/2004/07/20/cx_da_0720presidents.html
Bush Inaugurated:
January 20, 2001 DJIA 10,587.60
NASDAQ 2,770.38
Today:
August 13, 2004 DJIA 9835.25 -7.1%
NASDAQ 1,757.22 -36.6%
NOT SO SWIFT GEORGE!
.
|
|
| User: "James Monroe" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
20 Aug 2004 01:30:24 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 05:46:00 GMT, The Prophet Bush
<god_speaks_thru_me@rnc.org> wrote:
In article <vKfVc.34369$vc4.14941486@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>, "All Patriots" <All Patriots nospam@yahoo.com> says...
"AWOL Coward GW Chimpzilla" <patriot-for-cash@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Vq8Vc.47466$TI1.29029@attbi_s52...
Jan 2001 NOW
Dow
10,587.60 10,040.82
What was the Dow at the end of Clintons last budget?
8,847.56
NASDAQ
2,770.38 1,819.89
What was the NASDAQ at the end of Clintons last budget?
1,480.46
I looked that up not too long ago:
conservative
FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS
"Clinton's two terms in office (1993-2001) were marked by
strong numbers for gross domestic product (GDP) and employment
growth and especially for deficit reduction. His overall
ranking puts him first among the ten postwar presidents--ahead
of Lyndon B. Johnson, Kennedy and Reagan, who were tightly
grouped behind the 42nd president and recent autobiographer."
(Bush 43 is dead last)
http://www.forbes.com/commerce/2004/07/20/cx_da_0720presidents.html
Bush Inaugurated:
January 20, 2001 DJIA 10,587.60
NASDAQ 2,770.38
Today:
August 13, 2004 DJIA 9835.25 -7.1%
NASDAQ 1,757.22 -36.6%
NOT SO SWIFT GEORGE!
Gee. AWOL bush dead last.
What a shock.
"MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!"
.
|
|
|
| User: "caquixote" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS Democrats Can't Read... That is George HW Bush...LOL |
20 Aug 2004 02:47:10 PM |
|
|
I dont think Bush Jr will get better numbers than his father?
There might have been a slight missunderstanding regarding Bush Sn & Bush Jr
ranking, but Bush Jr numbers are just as bad if not lower than his father.
So while you can read, I doubt you can comprehend or do you contend that
Bush Jr numbers would put him at the top of this list?
Read the list...
Deficit Reduction Rank;
Unemployment Rank;
Employment Rank;
Real Disposable Income Rank
LOL do you think Bush Jr is leading in these catagories?
"Scott in Florida" <NotInTheNextLifetime@nope.ucan't> wrote in message
news:d10ci0ts38noofu6l44kabgornak8at34k@4ax.com...
Gee. AWOL bush dead last.
What a shock.
"MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!"
Go read the article...
oh yes you libs have a big problem with reading don't ya?
ROFLMAO
It is George H. W. Bush that is dead last in the article.
Learn to read and comprehend...
Scott in Florida
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Prophet Bush" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
20 Aug 2004 08:46:40 AM |
|
|
In article <li6bi0linmapi38ialjrvd846ir48aj2cq@4ax.com>, says...
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 05:46:00 GMT, The Prophet Bush
<god_speaks_thru_me@rnc.org> wrote:
In article <vKfVc.34369$vc4.14941486@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>, "All Patriots" <All Patriots nospam@yahoo.com> says...
"AWOL Coward GW Chimpzilla" <patriot-for-cash@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Vq8Vc.47466$TI1.29029@attbi_s52...
Jan 2001 NOW
Dow
10,587.60 10,040.82
What was the Dow at the end of Clintons last budget?
8,847.56
NASDAQ
2,770.38 1,819.89
What was the NASDAQ at the end of Clintons last budget?
1,480.46
I looked that up not too long ago:
conservative
FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS
"Clinton's two terms in office (1993-2001) were marked by
strong numbers for gross domestic product (GDP) and employment
growth and especially for deficit reduction. His overall
ranking puts him first among the ten postwar presidents--ahead
of Lyndon B. Johnson, Kennedy and Reagan, who were tightly
grouped behind the 42nd president and recent autobiographer."
(Bush 43 is dead last)
http://www.forbes.com/commerce/2004/07/20/cx_da_0720presidents.html
Bush Inaugurated:
January 20, 2001 DJIA 10,587.60
NASDAQ 2,770.38
Today:
August 13, 2004 DJIA 9835.25 -7.1%
NASDAQ 1,757.22 -36.6%
NOT SO SWIFT GEORGE!
Gee. AWOL bush dead last.
What a shock.
"MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!"
Yup, that's why all they think they can do is try
to smear Kerry. They have nothing to run on.
Nothing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
17 Sep 2004 07:43:27 AM |
|
|
The Prophet Bush <god_speaks_thru_me@rnc.org> wrote in
news:MPG.1b8fa0a41cdbd991989b97@netnews.comcast.net:
In article <li6bi0linmapi38ialjrvd846ir48aj2cq@4ax.com>,
spamless@spamless.com says...
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 05:46:00 GMT, The Prophet Bush
<god_speaks_thru_me@rnc.org> wrote:
In article <vKfVc.34369$vc4.14941486@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>, "All
Patriots" <All Patriots nospam@yahoo.com> says...
"AWOL Coward GW Chimpzilla" <patriot-for-cash@hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:Vq8Vc.47466$TI1.29029@attbi_s52...
Jan 2001 NOW
Dow
10,587.60 10,040.82
What was the Dow at the end of Clintons last budget?
8,847.56
NASDAQ
2,770.38 1,819.89
What was the NASDAQ at the end of Clintons last budget?
1,480.46
I looked that up not too long ago:
conservative
FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS
"Clinton's two terms in office (1993-2001) were marked by
strong numbers for gross domestic product (GDP) and employment
growth and especially for deficit reduction. His overall
ranking puts him first among the ten postwar presidents--ahead
of Lyndon B. Johnson, Kennedy and Reagan, who were tightly
grouped behind the 42nd president and recent autobiographer."
(Bush 43 is dead last)
http://www.forbes.com/commerce/2004/07/20/cx_da_0720presidents.html
Bush Inaugurated:
January 20, 2001 DJIA 10,587.60
NASDAQ 2,770.38
Today:
August 13, 2004 DJIA 9835.25 -7.1%
NASDAQ 1,757.22 -36.6%
NOT SO SWIFT GEORGE!
Gee. AWOL bush dead last.
What a shock.
"MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!"
Yup, that's why all they think they can do is try
to smear Kerry. They have nothing to run on.
Nothing.
Ah the old liberal lies. Clinton balanced the budget. Hmm, perhaps you
liberals idiots would be so kind as to enlighten us as to what the
Clinton budget plan said in 1993????? He wanted to balace the budget in
2004, not 1996, and was going to do it with two more rounds of HUGE tax
increases. He never got CLOSE to the spending cutting targets of HIS
OWN BUDGET PLAN. It was the Republican Congress that balanced the
budget, not Clinton. The recession that you love to blame on Bush
started in 1999 and WHO was president???????? There's a reason your boy
Kerry is LOSING, but please, try to lie him out of it, it's fun to see
how far liberals will go and how big the whoppers will get.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Deficit Spender Bush Red Ink" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
17 Sep 2004 10:18:00 AM |
|
|
In article <PZA2d.69647$Np2.65811@bignews4.bellsouth.net>, says...
The Prophet Bush <god_speaks_thru_me@rnc.org> wrote in
news:MPG.1b8fa0a41cdbd991989b97@netnews.comcast.net:
In article <li6bi0linmapi38ialjrvd846ir48aj2cq@4ax.com>,
spamless@spamless.com says...
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 05:46:00 GMT, The Prophet Bush
<god_speaks_thru_me@rnc.org> wrote:
In article <vKfVc.34369$vc4.14941486@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>, "All
Patriots" <All Patriots nospam@yahoo.com> says...
"AWOL Coward GW Chimpzilla" <patriot-for-cash@hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:Vq8Vc.47466$TI1.29029@attbi_s52...
Jan 2001 NOW
Dow
10,587.60 10,040.82
What was the Dow at the end of Clintons last budget?
8,847.56
NASDAQ
2,770.38 1,819.89
What was the NASDAQ at the end of Clintons last budget?
1,480.46
I looked that up not too long ago:
conservative
FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS
"Clinton's two terms in office (1993-2001) were marked by
strong numbers for gross domestic product (GDP) and employment
growth and especially for deficit reduction. His overall
ranking puts him first among the ten postwar presidents--ahead
of Lyndon B. Johnson, Kennedy and Reagan, who were tightly
grouped behind the 42nd president and recent autobiographer."
(Bush 43 is dead last)
http://www.forbes.com/commerce/2004/07/20/cx_da_0720presidents.html
Bush Inaugurated:
January 20, 2001 DJIA 10,587.60
NASDAQ 2,770.38
Today:
August 13, 2004 DJIA 9835.25 -7.1%
NASDAQ 1,757.22 -36.6%
NOT SO SWIFT GEORGE!
Gee. AWOL bush dead last.
What a shock.
"MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!"
Yup, that's why all they think they can do is try
to smear Kerry. They have nothing to run on.
Nothing.
Ah the old liberal lies. Clinton balanced the budget. Hmm, perhaps you
liberals idiots would be so kind as to enlighten us as to what the
Clinton budget plan said in 1993????? He wanted to balace the budget in
2004, not 1996, and was going to do it with two more rounds of HUGE tax
increases. He never got CLOSE to the spending cutting targets of HIS
OWN BUDGET PLAN. It was the Republican Congress that balanced the
budget, not Clinton. The recession that you love to blame on Bush
started in 1999 and WHO was president???????? There's a reason your boy
Kerry is LOSING, but please, try to lie him out of it, it's fun to see
how far liberals will go and how big the whoppers will get.
Clinton's Deficit Reduction Act passed by one vote.
Republicans claimed it would cause a recession if
it passed. Every Republican voted against it. For the
next eight years, the economy boomed. Clinton balanced
the budget. Now Bush has squandered that surplus.
Republicans control all branches of the government,
the economy is anemic, the stock market stinks, the
budget deficit is soaring, millions more people are
now below the poverty level, oil prices are soaring.
What's your excuse?
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=economic_indicators&docid=32jy04.txt.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch Buckhead" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
17 Sep 2004 10:35:14 AM |
|
|
"Deficit Spender Bush" <Red Ink Bush@rnc.org> wrote in message
news:MPG.1bb4a00b78696124989c82@netnews.comcast.net...
In article <PZA2d.69647$Np2.65811@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
mrtamer@yahoo.com says...
The Prophet Bush <god_speaks_thru_me@rnc.org> wrote in
news:MPG.1b8fa0a41cdbd991989b97@netnews.comcast.net:
In article <li6bi0linmapi38ialjrvd846ir48aj2cq@4ax.com>,
spamless@spamless.com says...
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 05:46:00 GMT, The Prophet Bush
<god_speaks_thru_me@rnc.org> wrote:
In article <vKfVc.34369$vc4.14941486@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>, "All
Patriots" <All Patriots nospam@yahoo.com> says...
"AWOL Coward GW Chimpzilla" <patriot-for-cash@hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:Vq8Vc.47466$TI1.29029@attbi_s52...
Jan 2001 NOW
Dow
10,587.60 10,040.82
What was the Dow at the end of Clintons last budget?
8,847.56
NASDAQ
2,770.38 1,819.89
What was the NASDAQ at the end of Clintons last budget?
1,480.46
I looked that up not too long ago:
conservative
FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS
"Clinton's two terms in office (1993-2001) were marked by
strong numbers for gross domestic product (GDP) and employment
growth and especially for deficit reduction. His overall
ranking puts him first among the ten postwar presidents--ahead
of Lyndon B. Johnson, Kennedy and Reagan, who were tightly
grouped behind the 42nd president and recent autobiographer."
(Bush 43 is dead last)
http://www.forbes.com/commerce/2004/07/20/cx_da_0720presidents.html
Bush Inaugurated:
January 20, 2001 DJIA 10,587.60
NASDAQ 2,770.38
Today:
August 13, 2004 DJIA 9835.25 -7.1%
NASDAQ 1,757.22 -36.6%
NOT SO SWIFT GEORGE!
Gee. AWOL bush dead last.
What a shock.
"MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!"
Yup, that's why all they think they can do is try
to smear Kerry. They have nothing to run on.
Nothing.
Ah the old liberal lies. Clinton balanced the budget. Hmm, perhaps you
liberals idiots would be so kind as to enlighten us as to what the
Clinton budget plan said in 1993????? He wanted to balace the budget in
2004, not 1996, and was going to do it with two more rounds of HUGE tax
increases. He never got CLOSE to the spending cutting targets of HIS
OWN BUDGET PLAN. It was the Republican Congress that balanced the
budget, not Clinton. The recession that you love to blame on Bush
started in 1999 and WHO was president???????? There's a reason your boy
Kerry is LOSING, but please, try to lie him out of it, it's fun to see
how far liberals will go and how big the whoppers will get.
Clinton's Deficit Reduction Act passed by one vote.
Republicans claimed it would cause a recession if
it passed. Every Republican voted against it. For the
next eight years, the economy boomed. Clinton balanced
the budget. Now Bush has squandered that surplus.
Republicans control all branches of the government,
the economy is anemic, the stock market stinks, the
budget deficit is soaring, millions more people are
now below the poverty level, oil prices are soaring.
What's your excuse?
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=economic_indicators&docid=32jy04.txt.pdf
My net worth has increased dramatically the last 4 years, and I could care
less about anyone else. I think I'll take four more years.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thom" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
19 Sep 2004 07:05:07 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:35:14 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
"Deficit Spender Bush" <Red Ink Bush@rnc.org> wrote in message
news:MPG.1bb4a00b78696124989c82@netnews.comcast.net...
In article <PZA2d.69647$Np2.65811@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
mrtamer@yahoo.com says...
The Prophet Bush <god_speaks_thru_me@rnc.org> wrote in
news:MPG.1b8fa0a41cdbd991989b97@netnews.comcast.net:
In article <li6bi0linmapi38ialjrvd846ir48aj2cq@4ax.com>,
spamless@spamless.com says...
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 05:46:00 GMT, The Prophet Bush
<god_speaks_thru_me@rnc.org> wrote:
In article <vKfVc.34369$vc4.14941486@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>, "All
Patriots" <All Patriots nospam@yahoo.com> says...
"AWOL Coward GW Chimpzilla" <patriot-for-cash@hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:Vq8Vc.47466$TI1.29029@attbi_s52...
Jan 2001 NOW
Dow
10,587.60 10,040.82
What was the Dow at the end of Clintons last budget?
8,847.56
NASDAQ
2,770.38 1,819.89
What was the NASDAQ at the end of Clintons last budget?
1,480.46
I looked that up not too long ago:
conservative
FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS
"Clinton's two terms in office (1993-2001) were marked by
strong numbers for gross domestic product (GDP) and employment
growth and especially for deficit reduction. His overall
ranking puts him first among the ten postwar presidents--ahead
of Lyndon B. Johnson, Kennedy and Reagan, who were tightly
grouped behind the 42nd president and recent autobiographer."
(Bush 43 is dead last)
http://www.forbes.com/commerce/2004/07/20/cx_da_0720presidents.html
Bush Inaugurated:
January 20, 2001 DJIA 10,587.60
NASDAQ 2,770.38
Today:
August 13, 2004 DJIA 9835.25 -7.1%
NASDAQ 1,757.22 -36.6%
NOT SO SWIFT GEORGE!
Gee. AWOL bush dead last.
What a shock.
"MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!"
Yup, that's why all they think they can do is try
to smear Kerry. They have nothing to run on.
Nothing.
Ah the old liberal lies. Clinton balanced the budget. Hmm, perhaps you
liberals idiots would be so kind as to enlighten us as to what the
Clinton budget plan said in 1993????? He wanted to balace the budget in
2004, not 1996, and was going to do it with two more rounds of HUGE tax
increases. He never got CLOSE to the spending cutting targets of HIS
OWN BUDGET PLAN. It was the Republican Congress that balanced the
budget, not Clinton. The recession that you love to blame on Bush
started in 1999 and WHO was president???????? There's a reason your boy
Kerry is LOSING, but please, try to lie him out of it, it's fun to see
how far liberals will go and how big the whoppers will get.
Clinton's Deficit Reduction Act passed by one vote.
Republicans claimed it would cause a recession if
it passed. Every Republican voted against it. For the
next eight years, the economy boomed. Clinton balanced
the budget. Now Bush has squandered that surplus.
Republicans control all branches of the government,
the economy is anemic, the stock market stinks, the
budget deficit is soaring, millions more people are
now below the poverty level, oil prices are soaring.
What's your excuse?
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=economic_indicators&docid=32jy04.txt.pdf
My net worth has increased dramatically the last 4 years, and I could care
less about anyone else. I think I'll take four more years.
and the key word here is definately TAKE.
THOM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch Buckhead" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
20 Sep 2004 07:24:21 AM |
|
|
"Thom" <thomandpam@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:414e0f1f.1658560@news.melbpc.org.au...
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:35:14 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
"Deficit Spender Bush" <Red Ink Bush@rnc.org> wrote in message
news:MPG.1bb4a00b78696124989c82@netnews.comcast.net...
In article <PZA2d.69647$Np2.65811@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
mrtamer@yahoo.com says...
The Prophet Bush <god_speaks_thru_me@rnc.org> wrote in
news:MPG.1b8fa0a41cdbd991989b97@netnews.comcast.net:
In article <li6bi0linmapi38ialjrvd846ir48aj2cq@4ax.com>,
spamless@spamless.com says...
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 05:46:00 GMT, The Prophet Bush
<god_speaks_thru_me@rnc.org> wrote:
In article <vKfVc.34369$vc4.14941486@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>, "All
Patriots" <All Patriots nospam@yahoo.com> says...
"AWOL Coward GW Chimpzilla" <patriot-for-cash@hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:Vq8Vc.47466$TI1.29029@attbi_s52...
Jan 2001 NOW
Dow
10,587.60 10,040.82
What was the Dow at the end of Clintons last budget?
8,847.56
NASDAQ
2,770.38 1,819.89
What was the NASDAQ at the end of Clintons last budget?
1,480.46
I looked that up not too long ago:
conservative
FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS
"Clinton's two terms in office (1993-2001) were marked by
strong numbers for gross domestic product (GDP) and employment
growth and especially for deficit reduction. His overall
ranking puts him first among the ten postwar presidents--ahead
of Lyndon B. Johnson, Kennedy and Reagan, who were tightly
grouped behind the 42nd president and recent autobiographer."
(Bush 43 is dead last)
http://www.forbes.com/commerce/2004/07/20/cx_da_0720presidents.html
Bush Inaugurated:
January 20, 2001 DJIA 10,587.60
NASDAQ 2,770.38
Today:
August 13, 2004 DJIA 9835.25 -7.1%
NASDAQ 1,757.22 -36.6%
NOT SO SWIFT GEORGE!
Gee. AWOL bush dead last.
What a shock.
"MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!"
Yup, that's why all they think they can do is try
to smear Kerry. They have nothing to run on.
Nothing.
Ah the old liberal lies. Clinton balanced the budget. Hmm, perhaps you
liberals idiots would be so kind as to enlighten us as to what the
Clinton budget plan said in 1993????? He wanted to balace the budget
in
2004, not 1996, and was going to do it with two more rounds of HUGE tax
increases. He never got CLOSE to the spending cutting targets of HIS
OWN BUDGET PLAN. It was the Republican Congress that balanced the
budget, not Clinton. The recession that you love to blame on Bush
started in 1999 and WHO was president???????? There's a reason your
boy
Kerry is LOSING, but please, try to lie him out of it, it's fun to see
how far liberals will go and how big the whoppers will get.
Clinton's Deficit Reduction Act passed by one vote.
Republicans claimed it would cause a recession if
it passed. Every Republican voted against it. For the
next eight years, the economy boomed. Clinton balanced
the budget. Now Bush has squandered that surplus.
Republicans control all branches of the government,
the economy is anemic, the stock market stinks, the
budget deficit is soaring, millions more people are
now below the poverty level, oil prices are soaring.
What's your excuse?
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=economic_indicators&docid=32jy04.txt.pdf
My net worth has increased dramatically the last 4 years, and I could care
less about anyone else. I think I'll take four more years.
and the key word here is definately TAKE.
Yes, if that is what it "takes."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
17 Sep 2004 12:59:04 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:35:14 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
and I could care
less about anyone else.
Nuff said. Another GOP ***** head.
- - - -
Just another albino black sheep
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch Buckhead" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
17 Sep 2004 03:21:58 PM |
|
|
<retrogrouch@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:me9mk0lbrcjq3dl9qfcicvemvgp1b68hcn@4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:35:14 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
and I could care
less about anyone else.
Nuff said. Another GOP ***** head.
Typical Marxist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
17 Sep 2004 03:53:41 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:21:58 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
<retrogrouch@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:me9mk0lbrcjq3dl9qfcicvemvgp1b68hcn@4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:35:14 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
and I could care
less about anyone else.
Nuff said. Another GOP ***** head.
Typical Marxist.
No you're more of a Stalinist, ***** head.
- - - -
Just another albino black sheep
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch Buckhead" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
17 Sep 2004 04:04:24 PM |
|
|
<retrogrouch@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3mjmk01foaib2cqo3efcpcovecsdhq8rrh@4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:21:58 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
<retrogrouch@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:me9mk0lbrcjq3dl9qfcicvemvgp1b68hcn@4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:35:14 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
and I could care
less about anyone else.
Nuff said. Another GOP ***** head.
Typical Marxist.
No you're more of a Stalinist, ***** head.
I stand by my earlier statement. I don't care about losers like you or
anyone else. I only care about working hard to build up my net worth, even
if it is at your expense. Take your lumps like a man. Sorry.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
17 Sep 2004 04:33:40 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:04:24 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
<retrogrouch@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3mjmk01foaib2cqo3efcpcovecsdhq8rrh@4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:21:58 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
<retrogrouch@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:me9mk0lbrcjq3dl9qfcicvemvgp1b68hcn@4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:35:14 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
and I could care
less about anyone else.
Nuff said. Another GOP ***** head.
Typical Marxist.
No you're more of a Stalinist, ***** head.
I stand by my earlier statement. I don't care about losers like you or
anyone else. I only care about working hard to build up my net worth, even
if it is at your expense. Take your lumps like a man. Sorry.
I stand by my statement too, that your "I could care less about
anyone else" statement reflects a complete lack of humanity and
compassion. Here's hoping someday you develop some humanity.
- - - -
Just another albino black sheep
.
|
|
|
| User: "Deficit Spender Bush Red Ink" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
19 Sep 2004 06:23:54 PM |
|
|
In article <kvlmk0hpudhb27f0tlv0lu195d96q7dc10@4ax.com>, says...
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:04:24 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
< > wrote in message
news:3mjmk01foaib2cqo3efcpcovecsdhq8rrh@4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:21:58 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
< > wrote in message
news:me9mk0lbrcjq3dl9qfcicvemvgp1b68hcn@4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:35:14 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
and I could care
less about anyone else.
Nuff said. Another GOP ***** head.
Typical Marxist.
No you're more of a Stalinist, ***** head.
I stand by my earlier statement. I don't care about losers like you or
anyone else. I only care about working hard to build up my net worth, even
if it is at your expense. Take your lumps like a man. Sorry.
I stand by my statement too, that your "I could care less about
anyone else" statement reflects a complete lack of humanity and
compassion. Here's hoping someday you develop some humanity.
- - - -
Just another albino black sheep
I thought he was kidding. What an *****!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch Buckhead" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
20 Sep 2004 07:25:44 AM |
|
|
"Deficit Spender Bush" <Red Ink Bush@rnc.org> wrote in message
news:MPG.1bb7b4f69ebd36fd989c84@netnews.comcast.net...
In article <kvlmk0hpudhb27f0tlv0lu195d96q7dc10@4ax.com>,
retrogrouch@comcast.net says...
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:04:24 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
<retrogrouch@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3mjmk01foaib2cqo3efcpcovecsdhq8rrh@4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:21:58 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
<retrogrouch@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:me9mk0lbrcjq3dl9qfcicvemvgp1b68hcn@4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:35:14 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead"
<dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
and I could care
less about anyone else.
Nuff said. Another GOP ***** head.
Typical Marxist.
No you're more of a Stalinist, ***** head.
I stand by my earlier statement. I don't care about losers like you or
anyone else. I only care about working hard to build up my net worth,
even
if it is at your expense. Take your lumps like a man. Sorry.
I stand by my statement too, that your "I could care less about
anyone else" statement reflects a complete lack of humanity and
compassion. Here's hoping someday you develop some humanity.
- - - -
Just another albino black sheep
I thought he was kidding. What an *****!
Yes he is.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thom" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
17 Sep 2004 07:30:29 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:21:58 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
<retrogrouch@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:me9mk0lbrcjq3dl9qfcicvemvgp1b68hcn@4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:35:14 -0400, "Dutch Buckhead" <dutch@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
and I could care
less about anyone else.
Nuff said. Another GOP ***** head.
Typical Marxist.
Yah, how can you get on the corporate government tit when they are
balancing the budget!
THOM
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
20 Sep 2004 09:11:01 AM |
|
|
The growth in the economy and hence the deficit are largely out side of
presidential control. You would be shocked how much spending is non
discrectionary. Clinton and Bush are neither to credit nor blame. It's "the
economy stupid." (I don't mean to call you stupid, it's just a quote.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Deficit Spender Bush Red Ink" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
20 Sep 2004 11:46:02 AM |
|
|
In article <ftidnd8uzeVqedPcRVn-vg@speakeasy.net>, says...
The growth in the economy and hence the deficit are largely out side of
presidential control. You would be shocked how much spending is non
discrectionary. Clinton and Bush are neither to credit nor blame. It's "the
economy stupid." (I don't mean to call you stupid, it's just a quote.)
Bush's tax cuts to the wealthy were definately within
his control. The war in Iraq was a war of choice.
There's your deficit right there.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Marinus van der Lubbe" |
|
| Title: Re: FORBES MAGAZINE: BUSH WORST PRESIDENT IN 60 YEARS |
20 Sep 2004 07:23:25 AM |
|
|
Rich wrote:
The growth in the economy and hence the deficit are largely out side of
presidential control. You would be shocked how much spending is non
discretionary. Clinton and Bush are neither to credit nor blame. It's
"the economy stupid." (I don't mean to call you stupid, it's just a
quote.)
You are right that many people focus their attentions on the man in charge
(Carl Rove) instead of looking at the organization. But decisions were made
by the current regime that do have effects. The changing of the tax burden
from rich to poor and middle class, removing over-time for 6 million
Americans, Bush's guest worker program, the further destruction of the
environment--these all have financial consequences that accumulate in
something that I think of as the Guatelmalization of America.
Yes, we had a dot com boom in the 90's that made Clinton look good, but that
does not excuse this regime's unending war on the middle-classes. [Oh, and
there's that Central Asia occupation-thing going on. That can't be helping
the economy.]
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|