| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Dale Eastman" |
| Date: |
12 Jan 2005 10:33:03 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Foreign Commerce |
Richard Macdonald wrote:
<knews4u2chew@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1105460790.801945.115120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Past messages in this series:
The obvious questions are: 1) why do the regulations talk about
international trade, and; 2) why DON'T they talk about MY income (or
yours)? Could this be the answer to the question of what is
Constitutionally taxable? Could it be that only those engaged in
We are STILL waiting for the SPECIFIC Article, Section and Clause
along with any associated court decisions that cause this miracle to occur.
Of course if you CANNOT cite such, it does not happen as you assert.
--
Richard A. Macdonald, CPA/EA
Your ignorance, selective reading, and context snipping A.K.A. Thomas
are noted.
Your choice of ignoring the Constitutional Violations of the IRS' raid
on the home of Larken Rose is also noted by your failure to speak up
against this abomination of justice.
Dear Lurkers, in all the groups this message is crossposted to, Mr.
Macdonald puts blinders on. Here is what he condones and chooses to
ignore: Pages 1 & 2:
http://home.sprintmail.com/~dalereastman/861/IDX.html
--
"You take the BLUE PILL, you wake up in your own bed,
and you BELIEVE WHAT YOU WANT TO.
You take the RED PILL, you stay in WONDERLAND,
and I'll show you HOW DEEP THE RABBIT HOLE GOES." - Morpheus
red pill:
http://www.861.info/ <--- "They" don't want you to look here.
.
|
|
| User: "Richard Macdonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Foreign Commerce |
13 Jan 2005 02:47:41 AM |
|
|
"Dale Eastman" <dalereastman@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
news:3SmFd.6110$Ii4.1913@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Richard Macdonald wrote:
<knews4u2chew@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1105460790.801945.115120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Past messages in this series:
The obvious questions are: 1) why do the regulations talk about
international trade, and; 2) why DON'T they talk about MY income (or
yours)? Could this be the answer to the question of what is
Constitutionally taxable? Could it be that only those engaged in
We are STILL waiting for the SPECIFIC Article, Section and Clause
along with any associated court decisions that cause this miracle to
occur.
Of course if you CANNOT cite such, it does not happen as you assert.
--
Richard A. Macdonald, CPA/EA
Your ignorance, selective reading, and context snipping A.K.A. Thomas are
noted.
Your choice of ignoring the Constitutional Violations of the IRS' raid on
the home of Larken Rose is also noted by your failure to speak up against
this abomination of justice.
Dear Lurkers, in all the groups this message is crossposted to, Mr.
Macdonald puts blinders on. Here is what he condones and chooses to
ignore: Pages 1 & 2:
Translation: Dale CANNOT cite any specific Section, Article,
Clause, and associated judicial history to support his assertion
about the effect of the Constitution.
Come on Dale, WHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION? CITE PLEASE.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dale Eastman" |
|
| Title: Re: Foreign Commerce |
13 Jan 2005 03:54:48 AM |
|
|
Richard Macdonald wrote:
Dear Lurkers, in all the groups this message is crossposted to, Mr.
Macdonald puts blinders on. Here is what he condones and chooses to
ignore: Pages 1 & 2:
Replacing what Liar Macdonald snipped because he doesn't want you to
see what he condones:
http://home.sprintmail.com/~dalereastman/861/IDX.html
Translation: Dale CANNOT cite any specific Section, Article,
Clause, and associated judicial history to support his assertion
about the effect of the Constitution.
Come on Dale, WHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION? CITE PLEASE.
It's called LIBERTY you ignorant nazi.
--
"You take the BLUE PILL, you wake up in your own bed,
and you BELIEVE WHAT YOU WANT TO.
You take the RED PILL, you stay in WONDERLAND,
and I'll show you HOW DEEP THE RABBIT HOLE GOES." - Morpheus
red pill:
http://www.861.info/ <--- "They" don't want you to look here.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hale Westman" |
|
| Title: Re: Foreign Commerce |
13 Jan 2005 05:54:47 AM |
|
|
"Dale Eastman" <dalereastman@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
news:IzrFd.5620$pZ4.3953@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Richard Macdonald wrote:
Dear Lurkers, in all the groups this message is crossposted to, Mr.
Dale Eastman puts blinders on. Here is what he condones and chooses to
ignore: Pages 1 & 2:
Translation: Dale CANNOT cite any specific Section, Article,
Clause, and associated judicial history to support his assertion
about the effect of the Constitution.
Come on Dale, WHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION? CITE PLEASE.
It's called LIBERTY you ignorant nazi.
your tax scam "liberty" !!!
http://www.quatlosers.com
Larken Rose
When a scam gets rolling, all sorts of human cockroaches come out of the
woodwork to try to cash in. This is the perfect description of Larken Rose,
a scammer come lately to the world of tax protesting Not being smart enough
to come up with any unique theory of his own, Larken has simply latched on
to the "861" or "Income Can't Be Defined" arguments that end up with the
conclusion that only foreigners are required to pay income tax.
taxableincome.net 861.info
http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html
The claim is that the Internal Revenue Code does not apply to most of the
income of citizens of the United States because the only definitions of
"sources of income" apply only to nonresident aliens and foreign
corporations. (See I.R.C. section 861 and its regulations.) This argument is
completely contrary to the express language of the Internal Revenue Code and
its regulations.
http://www.fraudsandscams.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Macdonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Foreign Commerce |
13 Jan 2005 07:30:08 AM |
|
|
"Dale Eastman" <dalereastman@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
news:IzrFd.5620$pZ4.3953@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Richard Macdonald wrote:
Dear Lurkers, in all the groups this message is crossposted to, Mr.
Macdonald puts blinders on. Here is what he condones and chooses to
ignore: Pages 1 & 2:
Replacing what Liar Macdonald snipped because he doesn't want you to see
what he condones:
http://home.sprintmail.com/~dalereastman/861/IDX.html
Translation: Dale CANNOT cite any specific Section, Article,
Clause, and associated judicial history to support his assertion
about the effect of the Constitution.
Come on Dale, WHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION? CITE PLEASE.
It's called LIBERTY you ignorant nazi.
Your inability to cite such is noted, for your education and edification,
a link to the text of the US Constitution is below so you can search it
for your mythical exemption and then infoem us when you find it:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.table.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Macdonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Foreign Commerce |
13 Jan 2005 05:53:20 AM |
|
|
"Dale Eastman" <dalereastman@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
news:3SmFd.6110$Ii4.1913@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Richard Macdonald wrote:
<knews4u2chew@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1105460790.801945.115120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Past messages in this series:
The obvious questions are: 1) why do the regulations talk about
international trade, and; 2) why DON'T they talk about MY income (or
yours)? Could this be the answer to the question of what is
Constitutionally taxable? Could it be that only those engaged in
We are STILL waiting for the SPECIFIC Article, Section and Clause
along with any associated court decisions that cause this miracle to
occur.
Of course if you CANNOT cite such, it does not happen as you assert.
Your ignorance, selective reading, and context snipping A.K.A. Thomas are
noted.
Your choice of ignoring the Constitutional Violations of the IRS' raid on
the home of Larken Rose is also noted by your failure to speak up against
this abomination of justice.
Dale cannot cite ay part of the Constitution to support his assertion,
so he attempts to throw up a smoke screen and change the subject.
So, Dale, where DOES the Constitution do these marvelous acts
of exempting income from taxation, please cite section, article,
clause, and associated judicial history.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
