| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"John \War Fraud\ Kerry" |
| Date: |
17 May 2004 12:36:10 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
"Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Pq6qc.3802$H_3.2077@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
I don't think you can really call a child molester heterosexual or
homosexual, deriving sexual satisfaction from children is a whole
seperate issue.
The rest of us think otherwise. We think you can really call a child
molester homosexual if he (or she) is attracted to a person of the same sex.
In fact, come to think of it, that's how the Gay Lobby defines
homosexuality - "attracted to a person of the same sex". So let's not have
you start calling the Gay Lobby a bunch of liars, just because all of a
sudden you find yourself cornered and defeated in this debate, as you now
have, Citizen.
And the thing that makes a homosexual a pedophile is that in addition to
being attracted to a person of the same sex, he (or she) is additionally
attracted to a very YOUNG person of the same sex. Hence the "homosexual
pedophile".
You've already lost this debate, Citizen. Trying to pretend the Gay Lobby
are liars for defining homosexual as they do only makes you look even MORE
foolish than you already do, Citizen.
.
|
|
| User: "America" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
17 May 2004 08:46:54 PM |
|
|
....Fraud...<Loser@bushkult.org> wrote:
... can really call a child
molester homosexual ...
Just because you're a homosexual who desires to molest children
doesn't mean it'd be your homosexuality that makes you a pedophile.
It's your failure to accept reality in an appropriate manner which does that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Crazy Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
18 May 2004 01:44:16 PM |
|
|
<America> wrote in message
news:v6nia0d4usaf78q0sqe1b85krv67d4342n@4ax.com...
...Fraud...<Loser@bushkult.org> wrote:
... can really call a child
molester homosexual ...
Just because you're a homosexual who desires to molest children
doesn't mean it'd be your homosexuality that makes you a pedophile.
No, it would be the pedophilia.
It's your failure to accept reality in an appropriate manner which does
that.
You need help.
.
|
|
|
| User: "America" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a bad thing |
19 May 2004 09:19:53 AM |
|
|
....Fraud...<Loser@bushkult.org> wrote:
... can really call a child
molester homosexual ...
Just because you're a homosexual who desires to molest children
doesn't mean it'd be your homosexuality that makes you a pedophile.
It's your failure to accept reality in an appropriate manner which does that.
If you were permitted to be comfortable with being gay, you might never
have developed a perverted interest in harming children.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Crazy Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a bad thing |
19 May 2004 11:30:33 AM |
|
|
<Enemy Of America> wrote in message
news:o6ska0d32fpjs176vcvk6e9js47gj6bmvt@4ax.com...
...Fraud...<Loser@bushkult.org> wrote:
... can really call a child
molester homosexual ...
Just because you're a homosexual who desires to molest children
doesn't mean it'd be your homosexuality that makes you a pedophile.
That was pure luck wasn't it? No way you actually "got" that....
It's your failure to accept reality in an appropriate manner which does
that.
I knew it. Actually a retard...
.
|
|
|
| User: "America" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a bad thing |
19 May 2004 01:49:21 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 May 2004 16:30:33 GMT, "Crazy *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
... Actually a retard...
You needn't restate what's already obvious about yourself.
It's your best excuse for your failure to reason.
....Fraud...<Loser@bushkult.org> wrote:
... can really call a child
molester homosexual ...
Just because you're a homosexual who desires to molest children
doesn't mean it'd be your homosexuality that makes you a pedophile.
It's your failure to accept reality in an appropriate manner which does that.
If you were permitted to be comfortable with being gay, you might never
have developed a perverted interest in harming children.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Crazy Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a bad thing |
19 May 2004 03:26:54 PM |
|
|
<Enemy Of America> wrote in message
news:3n9na01a4rftocr29bhgm9bdpodn5hffk6@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 May 2004 16:30:33 GMT, "Crazy *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com>
wrote:
... Actually a retard...
You needn't restate what's already obvious about yourself.
It's your best excuse for your failure to reason.
...Fraud...<Loser@bushkult.org> wrote:
... can really call a child
molester homosexual ...
Just because you're a homosexual who desires to molest children
doesn't mean it'd be your homosexuality that makes you a pedophile.
You REALLY haven't been paying attention have you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "America" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a bad thing |
19 May 2004 09:10:29 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 May 2004 20:26:54 GMT, "Crazy *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
... REALLY haven't been paying attention ...
If you did, you'd know better than to hate the people of the USA.
"Crazy *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
... Actually a retard...
You needn't restate what's already obvious about yourself.
It's your best excuse for your failure to reason.
....Fraud...<Loser@bushkult.org> wrote:
... can really call a child
molester homosexual ...
Just because you're a homosexual who desires to molest children
doesn't mean it'd be your homosexuality that makes you a pedophile.
It's your failure to accept reality in an appropriate manner which does that.
If you were permitted to be comfortable with being gay, you might never
have developed a perverted interest in harming children.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Crazy Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a bad thing |
20 May 2004 06:14:25 AM |
|
|
<Enemy Of America> wrote in message
news:vm4oa0t1ijnts39bfijjseepac8b1n8sgp@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 May 2004 20:26:54 GMT, "Crazy *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com>
wrote:
You're a teenager aren't you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "America" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a bad thing |
20 May 2004 09:17:26 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 20 May 2004 11:14:25 GMT, "Crazy *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
... a teenager ...
You're hoping to find a child to molest, aren't you, pedophile.
"Crazy *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
... REALLY haven't been paying attention ...
If you did, you'd know better than to hate the people of the USA.
"Crazy *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
... Actually a retard...
You needn't restate what's already obvious about yourself.
It's your best excuse for your failure to reason.
....Fraud...<Loser@bushkult.org> wrote:
... can really call a child
molester homosexual ...
Just because you're a homosexual who desires to molest children
doesn't mean it'd be your homosexuality that makes you a pedophile.
It's your failure to accept reality in an appropriate manner which does that.
If you were permitted to be comfortable with being gay, you might never
have developed a perverted interest in harming children.
.
|
|
|
| User: "America" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a bad thing |
21 May 2004 12:02:59 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 May 2004 15:43:49 GMT, "Crazy *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
Blah, blah, blah, blah...
You'd not have those problems, if only you could control yourself.
"Crazy *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> Enemy Of America wrote:
Go away...
If you weren't your own worst enemy as well as that of others,
including the USA, you'd support freedom of expression.
If you weren't an idiot, you'd be able to avoid reading things
that you can't handle.
One feels so very sorry for you, though you're a laughingstock.
"Crazy *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
... a teenager ...
You're hoping to find a child to molest, aren't you, pedophile.
"Crazy *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
... REALLY haven't been paying attention ...
If you did, you'd know better than to hate the people of the USA.
"Crazy *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
... Actually a retard...
You needn't restate what's already obvious about yourself.
It's your best excuse for your failure to reason.
....Fraud...<Loser@bushkult.org> wrote:
... can really call a child
molester homosexual ...
Just because you're a homosexual who desires to molest children
doesn't mean it'd be your homosexuality that makes you a pedophile.
It's your failure to accept reality in an appropriate manner which does that.
If you were permitted to be comfortable with being gay, you might never
have developed a perverted interest in harming children.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Citizen" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
19 May 2004 05:41:45 AM |
|
|
John "War Fraud" Kerry wrote:
"Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Pq6qc.3802$H_3.2077@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
I don't think you can really call a child molester heterosexual or
homosexual, deriving sexual satisfaction from children is a whole
seperate issue.
The rest of us think otherwise. We think you can really call a child
molester homosexual if he (or she) is attracted to a person of the same sex.
In fact, come to think of it, that's how the Gay Lobby defines
homosexuality - "attracted to a person of the same sex". So let's not have
you start calling the Gay Lobby a bunch of liars, just because all of a
sudden you find yourself cornered and defeated in this debate, as you now
have, Citizen.
And the thing that makes a homosexual a pedophile is that in addition to
being attracted to a person of the same sex, he (or she) is additionally
attracted to a very YOUNG person of the same sex. Hence the "homosexual
pedophile".
You've already lost this debate, Citizen. Trying to pretend the Gay Lobby
are liars for defining homosexual as they do only makes you look even MORE
foolish than you already do, Citizen.
-----------------------------
Nope. The doctored figures offered by a few evil organizations that
hide behind and pretend to be religious in nature - they are surely
agents evil considering the way they lie and distort facts - count
anyone who has ever had a homosexual experience as a homosexual. Or
anyone who has molested a child of the same sex.
Sick of answering this crap, but this claim really is loathsome and
vile, The fact is that almost half of the opulation admits to having
had a homosexual experience at some point in their lives.
Second fact - a man who molests his child, male or female, is sick,
period. As is a woman. As far as who they molest, it is usually more a
matter of convenience. A homosexual man is attracted to men. A
heterosexual man is attracted to women. Little boys and little girls,
well, they do not look like men or women. It's a seperate issue, a
disgusting one at that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jawn Frawd Kerree" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
19 May 2004 05:43:27 AM |
|
|
"Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JRGqc.2170$be.2037@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
John "War Fraud" Kerry wrote:
"Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Pq6qc.3802$H_3.2077@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
I don't think you can really call a child molester heterosexual or
homosexual, deriving sexual satisfaction from children is a whole
seperate issue.
The rest of us think otherwise. We think you can really call a child
molester homosexual if he (or she) is attracted to a person of the same
sex.
In fact, come to think of it, that's how the Gay Lobby defines
homosexuality - "attracted to a person of the same sex". So let's not
have
you start calling the Gay Lobby a bunch of liars, just because all of a
sudden you find yourself cornered and defeated in this debate, as you now
have, Citizen.
And the thing that makes a homosexual a pedophile is that in addition to
being attracted to a person of the same sex, he (or she) is additionally
attracted to a very YOUNG person of the same sex. Hence the "homosexual
pedophile".
You've already lost this debate, Citizen. Trying to pretend the Gay
Lobby
are liars for defining homosexual as they do only makes you look even
MORE
foolish than you already do, Citizen.
-----------------------------
Nope. The doctored figures offered by a few evil organizations that
hide behind and pretend to be religious in nature - they are surely
agents evil considering the way they lie and distort facts - count
anyone who has ever had a homosexual experience as a homosexual. Or
anyone who has molested a child of the same sex.
Prove it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Citizen" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
20 May 2004 12:48:18 AM |
|
|
Jawn Frawd Kerree wrote:
"Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JRGqc.2170$be.2037@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
John "War Fraud" Kerry wrote:
"Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Pq6qc.3802$H_3.2077@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
I don't think you can really call a child molester heterosexual or
homosexual, deriving sexual satisfaction from children is a whole
seperate issue.
The rest of us think otherwise. We think you can really call a child
molester homosexual if he (or she) is attracted to a person of the same
sex.
In fact, come to think of it, that's how the Gay Lobby defines
homosexuality - "attracted to a person of the same sex". So let's not
have
you start calling the Gay Lobby a bunch of liars, just because all of a
sudden you find yourself cornered and defeated in this debate, as you now
have, Citizen.
And the thing that makes a homosexual a pedophile is that in addition to
being attracted to a person of the same sex, he (or she) is additionally
attracted to a very YOUNG person of the same sex. Hence the "homosexual
pedophile".
You've already lost this debate, Citizen. Trying to pretend the Gay
Lobby
are liars for defining homosexual as they do only makes you look even
MORE
foolish than you already do, Citizen.
-----------------------------
Nope. The doctored figures offered by a few evil organizations that
hide behind and pretend to be religious in nature - they are surely
agents evil considering the way they lie and distort facts - count
anyone who has ever had a homosexual experience as a homosexual. Or
anyone who has molested a child of the same sex.
Prove it.
--------------
Ok, I will post the same stuff I have posted over and over.
I pasted in a previous post;
I didn't snip anything, here are two url's for independent organizations
which have done studies on incidence of child molestation in different
populations. (I am really tired of having to answer this claim but I
will one last time because it is a heinous statement - though it is
interesting to note that a few searches on the subject will show that
religious many religious organizations have shown themselves to be more
than willing to report erroneous data in order to scare people into
thinking homosexuals are evil. Homosexuals have always been a part of
our society, the only difference is that they are in the spotlight now
as our soceity seems to be slowly learning about the different kinds of
people that exist.)
A view from the right;
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/001046.html
An excerpt:
Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation
Members of disliked minority groups are often stereotyped as
representing a danger to the majority society’s most vulnerable members.
Historically, Black men in the United States were often falsely accused
of raping White women, and commonly lynched as a result. Jews in the
Middle Ages were accused of murdering Christian babies in ritual sacrifices.
In a similar fashion, gay people have often been portrayed as a threat
to children. When Anita Bryant campaigned successfully in 1977 to repeal
a Dade County (FL) ordinance prohibiting anti-gay discrimination, she
named her organization “Save Our Children,” and warned that “a
particularly deviant-minded [gay] teacher could sexually molest
children” (Bryant, 1977, p. 114). [Bibliographic references are on a
different web page]
In recent years, antigay activists have routinely asserted that gay
people are child molesters. This argument has often been raised in
debates about the Boy Scouts of America’s policy to exclude gay scouts
and scoutmasters. It has also been raised in connection with recent
scandals about the Catholic church’s attempts to cover up the abuse of
young males by priests. Indeed, the Vatican’s early response to the 2002
revelations of widespread Church cover-ups of sexual abuse by priests
was to declare that gay men should not be ordained.
This is a very detailed study from an independent organization without
affiliation to either religious or gay and lesbian groups:
http://www.stopchildmolestation.org/pages/study4.html
the 4th page invesitages adult sexual orientation and child molestation:
ADULT SEXUAL ORIENTATIONS OF MEN WHO MOLEST BOYS
While it is a commonly held belief that men who prefer men as adult sex
partners molest boys and men who prefer women as adult sex partners
molest girls, our study results suggest something different. (Note: Only
7 percent of child molesters show no sexual interest in adults.)
Alfred E. Kinsey, in his landmark study of male sexuality, divided adult
sexual interest into seven categories: three categories of
homosexuality, one category of bi-sexuality, and three categories of
heterosexuality. The Abel and Harlow study used this "Kinsey Scale" in
its questions about adult sexual preference.
The 1,038 men who molested boys reported a range of adult sexual
preferences. Contrary to popular belief, only 8 percent reported that
they were exclusively homosexual in their adult preferences. The
majority of the men who molested boys (51 percent) described themselves
as exclusively heterosexual in their adult partner preferences. An
additional 19 percent reported they were predominately heterosexual,
while yet another 9 percent said they were equally heterosexual and
homosexual in their adult sex life. As with other characteristics, the
group of 1,038 men who molest boys followed the general pattern of the
U.S. male population in regard to their adult sexual preferences. As
reported by Kinsey, the majority of U.S. adult males (76 percent)
described themselves as exclusively heterosexual and an additional 9
percent said they were predominantly heterosexual. In terms of their
homosexuality, Kinsey reports that those U.S. males who describe
themselves as exclusively homosexual are 6 percent and those that report
being predominantly homosexual an additional 4 percent. These findings
are in direct opposition to the generally accepted opinion that the
overwhelming majority of men who molest boys are homosexual. The
majority of men who molest boys (70 percent) are predominantly
heterosexual. In general, that large number parallels the number of men
in the U.S. population (85 percent) who have reported that they are
predominantly heterosexual.
This is the beginning of th excerpts:
http://www.stopchildmolestation.org/pages/study2.html
You can download the entire report - open it in acrobat read (it is pdf)
from here:
http://www.stopchildmolestation.org/pages/study.html
And here is one of those ridiculously unscientific reports which claim
that homosexuals have a higher than average per capita incidence of
child molestation:
http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet2.html
Notice that they include anyone who has had sex with a member of the
same sex, including in their teen years. People have sexual relations
with someone of the same sex for a variety of reasons. One reason is
that they are actually homosexuals - sexually attracted to members of
the same sex and romatnically love members of the same sex. People who
have sexual relations with members of the same sex for other reasons,
are not homosexuals. Just as a homosexual who has sex with a member of
the opposite sex is not therefore a heterosexual.
And if you visit the sites - religious affiliated - that claim to report
real statistics of higher rates of pedophilia among homosexuals, take a
look at the other articles:
"rocks fall from sky - demons blamed".
Not organizations which stoop to using scientific methods to do studies.
Studies not done correctly can be used to report all manner of farcicle
nonsense.
Another example, the catholic family association of america:
The Los Angeles Times (6) surveyed 2,628 adults across the U.S. in 1985.
27% of the women and 16% of the men claimed to have been sexually
molested. Since 7% of the molestations of girls and 93% of the
molestations of boys were by adults of the same sex, about 4 of every 10
molestations in this survey were homosexual.
They obviously assume, right there, than anyone male who molested a
child of the same sex is homosexual. Frankly a false statement.
Ctiizen
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Poster Boy" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
19 May 2004 10:07:05 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 May 2004 10:43:27 GMT, "Jawn Frawd Kerree"
<BandaidWarHero@dnc.com> wrote:
"Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JRGqc.2170$be.2037@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
John "War Fraud" Kerry wrote:
"Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Pq6qc.3802$H_3.2077@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
I don't think you can really call a child molester heterosexual or
homosexual, deriving sexual satisfaction from children is a whole
seperate issue.
The rest of us think otherwise. We think you can really call a child
molester homosexual if he (or she) is attracted to a person of the same
sex.
In fact, come to think of it, that's how the Gay Lobby defines
homosexuality - "attracted to a person of the same sex". So let's not
have
you start calling the Gay Lobby a bunch of liars, just because all of a
sudden you find yourself cornered and defeated in this debate, as you now
have, Citizen.
And the thing that makes a homosexual a pedophile is that in addition to
being attracted to a person of the same sex, he (or she) is additionally
attracted to a very YOUNG person of the same sex. Hence the "homosexual
pedophile".
You've already lost this debate, Citizen. Trying to pretend the Gay
Lobby
are liars for defining homosexual as they do only makes you look even
MORE
foolish than you already do, Citizen.
-----------------------------
Nope. The doctored figures offered by a few evil organizations that
hide behind and pretend to be religious in nature - they are surely
agents evil considering the way they lie and distort facts - count
anyone who has ever had a homosexual experience as a homosexual. Or
anyone who has molested a child of the same sex.
Prove it.
RESEARCHER CITED IN ANTI-GAY REPORT CRITICIZES THE 'STUDY' AS BIASED
AND MISLEADING
Letter to Family Research Council
A. Nicholas Groth, Ph.D.
June 10, 2002
Timothy J. Dailey, Ph.D.
FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL
801 G Street N.W.
Washington, DC 2001
Dear Dr. Dailey:
On the web site www.frc.org"http://www.frc.org" you reference my work
in your article on "Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse". I am
writing you to object to my name and research being associated in any
way, shape, or form to lend legitimacy to the views proposed in your
paper.
If you are, in fact, familiar with my research, you must realize that
my studies have indicated that homosexual males pose less risk of
sexual harm to children (both male and female) from both an absolute
and a percentage incidence rate than heterosexual males. Your
statement that "the evidence indicates that disproportionate numbers
of gay men seek adolescent males or boys as sexual partners" appears
to come from the assumption that if an adult male is attracted to a
male child, this adult male's sexual orientation is ipso facto
homosexual.
Since your report, in my view, misrepresents the facts of what we know
about this matter from scientific investigation, and does not indicate
that my studies on this topic reach conclusions diametrically opposed
to yours, I would appreciate your removing any reference to my work in
your paper lest it appear to the reader that my research supports your
views.
Yours truly,
A. Nicholas Groth, Ph.D.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Dr.+Timothy+J.+Dailey&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=23203-3E406628-636%40storefull-2353.public.lawson.webtv.net&rnum=1
Timothy Daley, Ph.D. has his degree in religion, not psychology or
psychiatry. But other such RRR "leaders" (with real psychology
degrees) have been repudiated and expelled from the professional
organizations because of their misrepresentations.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Crazy Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
19 May 2004 07:14:42 AM |
|
|
"Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JRGqc.2170$be.2037@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
John "War Fraud" Kerry wrote:
"Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Pq6qc.3802$H_3.2077@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
I don't think you can really call a child molester heterosexual or
homosexual, deriving sexual satisfaction from children is a whole
seperate issue.
The rest of us think otherwise. We think you can really call a child
molester homosexual if he (or she) is attracted to a person of the same
sex.
In fact, come to think of it, that's how the Gay Lobby defines
homosexuality - "attracted to a person of the same sex". So let's not
have
you start calling the Gay Lobby a bunch of liars, just because all of a
sudden you find yourself cornered and defeated in this debate, as you now
have, Citizen.
And the thing that makes a homosexual a pedophile is that in addition to
being attracted to a person of the same sex, he (or she) is additionally
attracted to a very YOUNG person of the same sex. Hence the "homosexual
pedophile".
You've already lost this debate, Citizen. Trying to pretend the Gay
Lobby
are liars for defining homosexual as they do only makes you look even
MORE
foolish than you already do, Citizen.
-----------------------------
Second fact - a man who molests his child, male or female, is sick,
period. As is a woman. As far as who they molest, it is usually more a
matter of convenience.
You know what the problem is here with you? You have a pro-homosexual
agenda, because you assume everybody else has an anti-homosexual agenda, and
that is preventing you from understanding...
It has NOTHING, LITERALLY NOTHING, to do with convenience.
A homosexual man is attracted to men. A
heterosexual man is attracted to women. Little boys and little girls,
well, they do not look like men or women. It's a seperate issue, a
disgusting one at that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Citizen" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
20 May 2004 01:01:42 AM |
|
|
Crazy ***** wrote:
"Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JRGqc.2170$be.2037@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
John "War Fraud" Kerry wrote:
"Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Pq6qc.3802$H_3.2077@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
I don't think you can really call a child molester heterosexual or
homosexual, deriving sexual satisfaction from children is a whole
seperate issue.
The rest of us think otherwise. We think you can really call a child
molester homosexual if he (or she) is attracted to a person of the same
sex.
In fact, come to think of it, that's how the Gay Lobby defines
homosexuality - "attracted to a person of the same sex". So let's not
have
you start calling the Gay Lobby a bunch of liars, just because all of a
sudden you find yourself cornered and defeated in this debate, as you now
have, Citizen.
And the thing that makes a homosexual a pedophile is that in addition to
being attracted to a person of the same sex, he (or she) is additionally
attracted to a very YOUNG person of the same sex. Hence the "homosexual
pedophile".
You've already lost this debate, Citizen. Trying to pretend the Gay
Lobby
are liars for defining homosexual as they do only makes you look even
MORE
foolish than you already do, Citizen.
-----------------------------
Second fact - a man who molests his child, male or female, is sick,
period. As is a woman. As far as who they molest, it is usually more a
matter of convenience.
You know what the problem is here with you? You have a pro-homosexual
agenda, because you assume everybody else has an anti-homosexual agenda, and
that is preventing you from understanding...
It has NOTHING, LITERALLY NOTHING, to do with convenience.
------------------------
I do not assume everyone else has an anti-homosexual agenda. If they
obviously doctor their figures to make homosexuals look bad, while
preaching the evil of homosexuality, then it is plain that they have an
anit-homosexual agenda.
If they present valid figures and they come to anti-homosexual
conclusions that are clearly false, then they also again appear to have
an anti-homosexual agenda.
If they present valid figures and present conclucions which are
arguable, then I assume that either they have pointed out a real problem
or issue, or look through their arguments to see why I do not agree.
Whether or not I think they are anti-homosexual would depend on their
language and tone.
It is really sad to see all the examples of people that judge me and who
and why I happen to be homosexual withou an understanding of the fact
that I just am and have been as long as I can remember.
If they present valid figures and valid arguments, then I really take
note and think about the issue they have presented. If their language
appears to be anti-homosexual in tone, as in, people are not validly
homosexuals,, well, there areprobably things they are not taking into
account. If they take a reasonable tone, then what can I say ? They
have just highlighted an issue.
The difference between seeing someone as presenting arguments that
support an anti-homosexual agenda and someone presenting valid facts and
arguments is whether or not they have started out dealing with facts and
interpreting those facts, or they started out attempting to prove that
gays are bad. That would be an agenda.
As for the child molesting stuff, when I read the claims here in usenet
I looked up the facts. I also looked at the sites which make the claims
that gays have a higher rate of child molestation. Those sites are
bogus and the facts are clearly being twisted around and interpreted to
support anti-gay feelings.
If the truth was the other way around, I would be doing research on why
homosexuals had a higher rate, which they do not.
Citizen
A homosexual man is attracted to men. A
heterosexual man is attracted to women. Little boys and little girls,
well, they do not look like men or women. It's a seperate issue, a
disgusting one at that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Crazy Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
20 May 2004 09:39:06 AM |
|
|
"Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:aRXqc.2240$Tn6.2194@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Crazy ***** wrote:
-----------------------------
Second fact - a man who molests his child, male or female, is sick,
period. As is a woman. As far as who they molest, it is usually more a
matter of convenience.
You know what the problem is here with you? You have a pro-homosexual
agenda, because you assume everybody else has an anti-homosexual agenda,
and
that is preventing you from understanding...
It has NOTHING, LITERALLY NOTHING, to do with convenience.
------------------------
I do not assume everyone else has an anti-homosexual agenda. If they
obviously doctor their figures to make homosexuals look bad, while
preaching the evil of homosexuality, then it is plain that they have an
anit-homosexual agenda.
Fine. Correct. We both know that's stupid. Let's move on...
Whether or not I think they are anti-homosexual would depend on their
language and tone.
Stick to the science of their work product... Who cares about language and
tone, you can't change that anyway.
It is really sad to see all the examples of people that judge me and who
and why I happen to be homosexual withou an understanding of the fact
that I just am and have been as long as I can remember.
Yeah, well, sorry! Sorry science took so long to figure it out...
The difference between seeing someone as presenting arguments that
support an anti-homosexual agenda and someone presenting valid facts and
arguments is whether or not they have started out dealing with facts and
interpreting those facts, or they started out attempting to prove that
gays are bad. That would be an agenda.
If you want to be on a crusade that's your business.
As for the child molesting stuff, when I read the claims here in usenet
I looked up the facts. I also looked at the sites which make the claims
that gays have a higher rate of child molestation. Those sites are
bogus and the facts are clearly being twisted around and interpreted to
support anti-gay feelings.
From your perspective, yes. From my perspective that data is so screwed up
its not even wrong.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff North" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
19 May 2004 10:04:57 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 May 2004 12:14:42 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "Crazy
*****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
| "Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
| news:JRGqc.2170$be.2037@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| > John "War Fraud" Kerry wrote:
| > >"Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
| > >news:Pq6qc.3802$H_3.2077@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| > >>I don't think you can really call a child molester heterosexual or
| > >>homosexual, deriving sexual satisfaction from children is a whole
| > >>seperate issue.
| > >The rest of us think otherwise. We think you can really call a child
| > >molester homosexual if he (or she) is attracted to a person of the same
| sex.
| > >In fact, come to think of it, that's how the Gay Lobby defines
| > >homosexuality - "attracted to a person of the same sex". So let's not
| have
| > >you start calling the Gay Lobby a bunch of liars, just because all of a
| > >sudden you find yourself cornered and defeated in this debate, as you now
| > >have, Citizen.
| > >And the thing that makes a homosexual a pedophile is that in addition to
| > >being attracted to a person of the same sex, he (or she) is additionally
| > >attracted to a very YOUNG person of the same sex. Hence the "homosexual
| > >pedophile".
| > >You've already lost this debate, Citizen. Trying to pretend the Gay
| Lobby
| > >are liars for defining homosexual as they do only makes you look even
| MORE
| > >foolish than you already do, Citizen.
| > -----------------------------
| > Second fact - a man who molests his child, male or female, is sick,
| > period. As is a woman. As far as who they molest, it is usually more a
| > matter of convenience.
|
| You know what the problem is here with you? You have a pro-homosexual
| agenda, because you assume everybody else has an anti-homosexual agenda, and
| that is preventing you from understanding...
|
| It has NOTHING, LITERALLY NOTHING, to do with convenience.
No!!! Who has the more access to children?
| > A homosexual man is attracted to men. A
| > heterosexual man is attracted to women. Little boys and little girls,
| > well, they do not look like men or women. It's a seperate issue, a
| > disgusting one at that.
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au : Remove your pants to reply
---------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Crazy Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
19 May 2004 11:35:18 AM |
|
|
"Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:untma0dkjaeqaomnmb543c406pu303s2pt@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 May 2004 12:14:42 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "Crazy
*****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
| > -----------------------------
| > Second fact - a man who molests his child, male or female, is sick,
| > period. As is a woman. As far as who they molest, it is usually
more a
| > matter of convenience.
| You know what the problem is here with you? You have a pro-homosexual
| agenda, because you assume everybody else has an anti-homosexual
agenda, and
| that is preventing you from understanding...
| It has NOTHING, LITERALLY NOTHING, to do with convenience.
No!!! Who has the more access to children?
Parents, teachers, bus drivers, etc.
That's like saying the snake ate the squirrel out of convenience (ignoring
that the snake spent 3 hours and a mile of slinking to manufacture the
moment of convienence).
.
|
|
|
| User: "curtsybear" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
19 May 2004 12:25:04 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 May 2004 16:35:18 GMT, Crazy ***** <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:untma0dkjaeqaomnmb543c406pu303s2pt@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 May 2004 12:14:42 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "Crazy
*****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
| It has NOTHING, LITERALLY NOTHING, to do with convenience.
No!!! Who has the more access to children?
Parents, teachers, bus drivers, etc.
That's like saying the snake ate the squirrel out of convenience (ignoring
that the snake spent 3 hours and a mile of slinking to manufacture the
moment of convienence).
So the squirrel WASN'T more convenient than the flying birdie?
(ignoring that the snake comes woefully unequipped with flappy
feathers which allow him to fly)
Likewise, the altarboys ARE more convenient, given that these
priests would sooner grow wings and fly before they could have
altargirls to play with and lord over.
--
"Faggotry is the cause of most of our problems in the world today,
including terrorism, government corruption, and the ongoing recession.
It was fags that crucified Jesus." -- Thurgood feels that homosexuals
aren't buying ENOUGH high-price pairs of jeans to make up for killing
his saviour.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff North" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
20 May 2004 06:02:43 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 May 2004 16:35:18 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "Crazy
*****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:untma0dkjaeqaomnmb543c406pu303s2pt@4ax.com...
| > On Wed, 19 May 2004 12:14:42 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "Crazy
| > *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
| > >| > -----------------------------
| > >| > Second fact - a man who molests his child, male or female, is sick,
| > >| > period. As is a woman. As far as who they molest, it is usually
| more a
| > >| > matter of convenience.
| > >| You know what the problem is here with you? You have a pro-homosexual
| > >| agenda, because you assume everybody else has an anti-homosexual
| agenda, and
| > >| that is preventing you from understanding...
| > >| It has NOTHING, LITERALLY NOTHING, to do with convenience.
| > No!!! Who has the more access to children?
|
| Parents, teachers, bus drivers, etc.
In the majority of the above cases, the sexual orientation of the
people would be?
| That's like saying the snake ate the squirrel out of convenience (ignoring
| that the snake spent 3 hours and a mile of slinking to manufacture the
| moment of convienence).
Are you arguing against your own statement of "It has NOTHING,
LITERALLY NOTHING, to do with convenience."?
---------------------------------------------------------------
jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au : Remove your pants to reply
---------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Crazy Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
20 May 2004 07:31:43 AM |
|
|
"Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:9p3pa0pmipgd3r8nao6i01md6neg9oppss@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 May 2004 16:35:18 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "Crazy
*****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:untma0dkjaeqaomnmb543c406pu303s2pt@4ax.com...
| > On Wed, 19 May 2004 12:14:42 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Crazy
| > *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
| > >| > -----------------------------
| > >| > Second fact - a man who molests his child, male or female, is
sick,
| > >| > period. As is a woman. As far as who they molest, it is
usually
| more a
| > >| > matter of convenience.
| > >| You know what the problem is here with you? You have a
pro-homosexual
| > >| agenda, because you assume everybody else has an anti-homosexual
| agenda, and
| > >| that is preventing you from understanding...
| > >| It has NOTHING, LITERALLY NOTHING, to do with convenience.
| > No!!! Who has the more access to children?
| Parents, teachers, bus drivers, etc.
In the majority of the above cases, the sexual orientation of the
people would be?
Who could know??? The sexual orientation (actually it is their genetic
sexual identity) is UNKNOWN to all but them until we know what they are up
to.
| That's like saying the snake ate the squirrel out of convenience
(ignoring
| that the snake spent 3 hours and a mile of slinking to manufacture the
| moment of convienence).
Are you arguing against your own statement of "It has NOTHING,
LITERALLY NOTHING, to do with convenience."?
No, not really.
You've got the two largest misconceptions of pedophilia (and the single
largest misconception of male homosexuality) in a single SHORT post. How'd
you manage that?
The notion that some guy is just by accident hanging around the ball field
and a child's ***** ends up in his mouth is ridiculous. Pedophiles HUNT
children, its very subtle and takes quite a bit of time. Calling it an act
of convenience is just ignorant.
Pedophiles come in both male and female form. Most pedophiles, well over
80%, have a distinct and singular sexual identity - they are pointed toward
male children almost exclusively or female children almost exclusively. So,
an adult male heterosexual pedophile will HUNT female children almost
exclusively. Get it? Need more examples?
Generally speaking the average person is completely oblivious to THE HUNT.
Secondly, a "classic" adult male homosexual is no more (or less) likely to
be a pedophile than anyone else in the population. And, really, that
previous sentence is crap. An adult male homosexual is an adult male
homosexual and by definition CANNOT be a male homosexual pedophile.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff North" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
20 May 2004 11:54:08 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 20 May 2004 12:31:43 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "Crazy
*****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:9p3pa0pmipgd3r8nao6i01md6neg9oppss@4ax.com...
| > On Wed, 19 May 2004 16:35:18 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "Crazy
| > *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
| > >| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| > >| news:untma0dkjaeqaomnmb543c406pu303s2pt@4ax.com...
| > >| > On Wed, 19 May 2004 12:14:42 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality
| "Crazy
| > >| > *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
| > >| > >| > -----------------------------
| > >| > >| > Second fact - a man who molests his child, male or female, is
| sick,
| > >| > >| > period. As is a woman. As far as who they molest, it is
| usually
| > >| more a
| > >| > >| > matter of convenience.
| > >| > >| You know what the problem is here with you? You have a
| pro-homosexual
| > >| > >| agenda, because you assume everybody else has an anti-homosexual
| > >| agenda, and
| > >| > >| that is preventing you from understanding...
| > >| > >| It has NOTHING, LITERALLY NOTHING, to do with convenience.
|
| > >| > No!!! Who has the more access to children?
|
| > >| Parents, teachers, bus drivers, etc.
| > In the majority of the above cases, the sexual orientation of the
| > people would be?
|
| Who could know??? The sexual orientation (actually it is their genetic
| sexual identity) is UNKNOWN to all but them until we know what they are up
| to.
Go on take a guess. You see a man and woman walking down the street
hand-in-hand. The woman is very pregnant, there is a very high
probability that her sexual orientation is .....?
| > >| That's like saying the snake ate the squirrel out of convenience
| (ignoring
| > >| that the snake spent 3 hours and a mile of slinking to manufacture the
| > >| moment of convienence).
| > Are you arguing against your own statement of "It has NOTHING,
| > LITERALLY NOTHING, to do with convenience."?
|
| No, not really.
|
| You've got the two largest misconceptions of pedophilia (and the single
| largest misconception of male homosexuality) in a single SHORT post. How'd
| you manage that?
Only to your small and narrow mind.
| The notion that some guy is just by accident hanging around the ball field
| and a child's ***** ends up in his mouth is ridiculous. Pedophiles HUNT
| children, its very subtle and takes quite a bit of time. Calling it an act
| of convenience is just ignorant.
Where do you come up with all these half-baked lies?
While it is true that most paedophiles take time in 'nurturing their
prey' there are also the opportunists. You know the ones that kidnap
children off the street!!!!
| Pedophiles come in both male and female form. Most pedophiles, well over
| 80%, have a distinct and singular sexual identity - they are pointed toward
| male children almost exclusively or female children almost exclusively. So,
| an adult male heterosexual pedophile will HUNT female children almost
| exclusively. Get it? Need more examples?
|
| Generally speaking the average person is completely oblivious to THE HUNT.
You don't say!!!
| Secondly, a "classic" adult male homosexual is no more (or less) likely to
| be a pedophile than anyone else in the population. And, really, that
| previous sentence is crap. An adult male homosexual is an adult male
| homosexual and by definition CANNOT be a male homosexual pedophile.
Do you ever proofread the crap you write?
---------------------------------------------------------------
jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au : Remove your pants to reply
---------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kerry the Boob" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
20 May 2004 11:57:32 AM |
|
|
"Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:grnpa0hohk6s165bfo09lpp5e67bmlnds3@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 May 2004 12:31:43 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "Crazy
*****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Who could know??? The sexual orientation (actually it is their genetic
| sexual identity) is UNKNOWN to all but them until we know what they are
up
| to.
Go on take a guess. You see a man and woman walking down the street
hand-in-hand. The woman is very pregnant, there is a very high
probability that her sexual orientation is .....?
Is your intellectual problem that you simply don't have a clue as to the
difference between "very high probability" and "knowing"??
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff North" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
21 May 2004 08:38:53 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 May 2004 15:25:36 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "Kerry
the Boob" <HerBreastsWontSaveHim@dnc.com> wrote:
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:aq3sa0pbt13i9jvnqham5batf2pl6at96f@4ax.com...
| > On Thu, 20 May 2004 16:57:32 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "Kerry
| > the Boob" <HerBreastsWontSaveHim@dnc.com> wrote:
| >
| > >| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| > >| news:grnpa0hohk6s165bfo09lpp5e67bmlnds3@4ax.com...
| > >| > On Thu, 20 May 2004 12:31:43 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality
| "Crazy
| > >| > *****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
| > >| > >| Who could know??? The sexual orientation (actually it is their
| genetic
| > >| > >| sexual identity) is UNKNOWN to all but them until we know what
| they are
| > >| up
| > >| > >| to.
| > >| >
| > >| > Go on take a guess. You see a man and woman walking down the street
| > >| > hand-in-hand. The woman is very pregnant, there is a very high
| > >| > probability that her sexual orientation is .....?
| > >|
| > >|
| > >| Is your intellectual problem that you simply don't have a clue as to
| the
| > >| difference between "very high probability" and "knowing"??
| >
| > Are you trying to tell us your gay?
|
| Are you looking for a homosexual "date"?
You should be asking your friend CB that question.
---------------------------------------------------------------
jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au : Remove your pants to reply
---------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Crazy Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
20 May 2004 01:23:00 PM |
|
|
"Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:grnpa0hohk6s165bfo09lpp5e67bmlnds3@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 May 2004 12:31:43 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "Crazy
*****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Who could know??? The sexual orientation (actually it is their genetic
| sexual identity) is UNKNOWN to all but them until we know what they are
up
| to.
Go on take a guess. You see a man and woman walking down the street
hand-in-hand. The woman is very pregnant, there is a very high
probability that her sexual orientation is .....?
What causes you to go 'soft' all the time? (I actually know the answer.)
You have a need to KNOW but lack the ability, or capability, but you don't
let that stop you.
Anybody can make any of several guesses, but NO ONE WILL KNOW.
Odds, and odds-makers are a part of that 'softness' that leads to
assumptions that leads to a dead end. If you want to KNOW something you go
FIND OUT.
| > >| That's like saying the snake ate the squirrel out of convenience
| (ignoring
| > >| that the snake spent 3 hours and a mile of slinking to manufacture
the
| > >| moment of convienence).
| > Are you arguing against your own statement of "It has NOTHING,
| > LITERALLY NOTHING, to do with convenience."?
| No, not really.
| You've got the two largest misconceptions of pedophilia (and the single
| largest misconception of male homosexuality) in a single SHORT post.
How'd
| you manage that?
Only to your small and narrow mind.
| The notion that some guy is just by accident hanging around the ball
field
| and a child's ***** ends up in his mouth is ridiculous. Pedophiles HUNT
| children, its very subtle and takes quite a bit of time. Calling it an
act
| of convenience is just ignorant.
Where do you come up with all these half-baked lies?
While it is true that most paedophiles take time in 'nurturing their
prey' there are also the opportunists. You know the ones that kidnap
children off the street!!!!
You're making the case for one tenth of one percent of pedophilia being
opportunist soley to argue what I just described as the 99.99% remainder....
Because why, because you didn't like my description?? What the ***** is
wrong with you? What is your point, just to argue with me???
| Pedophiles come in both male and female form. Most pedophiles, well
over
| 80%, have a distinct and singular sexual identity - they are pointed
toward
| male children almost exclusively or female children almost exclusively.
So,
| an adult male heterosexual pedophile will HUNT female children almost
| exclusively. Get it? Need more examples?
| Generally speaking the average person is completely oblivious to THE
HUNT.
You don't say!!!
You just want to argue, right?
Or, is this a little cat & mouse thing where I eventually type the right
words and we start talking about what really bothers you.........?
Why don't you save me some time and turn yourself in?
| Secondly, a "classic" adult male homosexual is no more (or less) likely
to
| be a pedophile than anyone else in the population. And, really, that
| previous sentence is crap. An adult male homosexual is an adult male
| homosexual and by definition CANNOT be a male homosexual pedophile.
Do you ever proofread the crap you write?
Yep.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff North" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
18 May 2004 12:40:13 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 17 May 2004 17:36:10 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "John
\"War Fraud\" Kerry" <PrimoDemLoser@dnc.org> wrote:
| "Citizen" <assimilation66@hotmail.com> wrote in message
| news:Pq6qc.3802$H_3.2077@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| > I don't think you can really call a child molester heterosexual or
| > homosexual, deriving sexual satisfaction from children is a whole
| > seperate issue.
|
| The rest of us think otherwise. We think you can really call a child
| molester homosexual if he (or she) is attracted to a person of the same sex.
| In fact, come to think of it, that's how the Gay Lobby defines
| homosexuality - "attracted to a person of the same sex". So let's not have
| you start calling the Gay Lobby a bunch of liars, just because all of a
| sudden you find yourself cornered and defeated in this debate, as you now
| have, Citizen.
|
| And the thing that makes a homosexual a pedophile is that in addition to
| being attracted to a person of the same sex, he (or she) is additionally
| attracted to a very YOUNG person of the same sex. Hence the "homosexual
| pedophile".
|
| You've already lost this debate, Citizen. Trying to pretend the Gay Lobby
| are liars for defining homosexual as they do only makes you look even MORE
| foolish than you already do, Citizen.
A "happily married heterosexual man" that molests his sons AND
daughters is what?
---------------------------------------------------------------
jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au : Remove your pants to reply
---------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Crazy Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
18 May 2004 01:46:06 PM |
|
|
"Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:q58ja0dm1ltjq9s0s5cqhmhubnn3seog9s@4ax.com...
On Mon, 17 May 2004 17:36:10 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "John
\"War Fraud\" Kerry" <PrimoDemLoser@dnc.org> wrote:
A "happily married heterosexual man" that molests his sons AND
daughters is what?
Is more likely to be a serial murderer THAN ANYTHING ELSE.
However, the ""happily married" part is not real. Its part of the
infiltration, the act, the hiding and playacting in a world nearly entirely
foreign to the pedophile.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff North" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
19 May 2004 03:18:45 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 May 2004 18:46:06 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "Crazy
*****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:q58ja0dm1ltjq9s0s5cqhmhubnn3seog9s@4ax.com...
| > On Mon, 17 May 2004 17:36:10 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "John
| > \"War Fraud\" Kerry" <PrimoDemLoser@dnc.org> wrote:
| > A "happily married heterosexual man" that molests his sons AND
| > daughters is what?
|
| Is more likely to be a serial murderer THAN ANYTHING ELSE.
On what grounds do you base that assumption?
| However, the ""happily married" part is not real. Its part of the
| infiltration, the act, the hiding and playacting in a world nearly entirely
| foreign to the pedophile.
It can take months of deception for the paedophile to "get their
victim".
---------------------------------------------------------------
jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au : Remove your pants to reply
---------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Crazy Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Homophobia is a good thing |
19 May 2004 06:36:06 AM |
|
|
"Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:8s5ma0dra2tpg3btcmb6ckjfj75lcstvli@4ax.com...
On Tue, 18 May 2004 18:46:06 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "Crazy
*****" <crazyodb@yahoo.com> wrote:
| "Jeff North" <jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
| news:q58ja0dm1ltjq9s0s5cqhmhubnn3seog9s@4ax.com...
| > On Mon, 17 May 2004 17:36:10 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality "John
| > \"War Fraud\" Kerry" <PrimoDemLoser@dnc.org> wrote:
| > A "happily married heterosexual man" that molests his sons AND
| > daughters is what?
| Is more likely to be a serial murderer THAN ANYTHING ELSE.
On what grounds do you base that assumption?
Latest research on pedophile behavior.
Pedophiles without a gender attraction tend not be interested in sex, tend
toward violence.
| However, the ""happily married" part is not real. Its part of the
| infiltration, the act, the hiding and playacting in a world nearly
entirely
| foreign to the pedophile.
It can take months of deception for the paedophile to "get their
victim".
Its true.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
