"Dale Eastman" <dalereastman@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
news:C_QYc.6103>
"Dale Eastman" <dalereastman@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
The courts have all said this statement is in error and a frivolous
argument.
So are you saying that all of the judges in these rulings are all a part
of
the same conspiracy?
it's all a giant "matrix" style conspiracy
There are tax scam promoters advising individuals that they can avoid their
income tax obligations because wages are not taxable under their
interpretation of federal law. Their argument is frequently referred to as
the "section 861" argument or the "zero adjusted gross income" argument.
Every court in the country that has written concerning that argument has
dismissed it as frivolous, See, United States v. Thurston P. Bell, 2003 WL
102610 (M.D. Pennsylvania, January 10, 2003); Takaba v. Commissioner of
Internal Revenue, 2002 WL 31818000 (U.S. Tax Ct., December 16, 2002); United
States v. Rosile, 2002 WL 1760861 (M.D. Fla,, June 10, 2002); United States
v. Bossett, 2002 WL 1058105 (M.D. Fla., March 26, 2002); Corcoran v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 2002 WL 71029 (U.S. Tax Ct., January 18,
2002); Loofbourrow v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 208 F. Supp.2d 698
(S.D. Texas, 2002); Williams v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 114 T.C.
136 (U.S. Tax Ct., March 1, 2000). Taxpayers and tax return preparers who
advance such arguments are subject to severe civil penalties and criminal
prosecution.
.
|
