On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Mark Fox wrote:
From: Mark Fox <
>
Subject: Re: Impeach Bush for Treason
Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa, soc.culture.iraq, rec.org.mensa, alt.bible
top2@cox.net (bnichols) wrote in message
news:<12974278.0403240709.6161260f@posting.google.com>...
Truth wrote in message news:<j68060d2t9mtlbucbg0e1vk5kbalm18dip@4ax.com>...
On 22 Mar 2004 16:22:57 -0800,
(Mark Fox) wrote:
The Congress
declared war ...
No it didn't.
Yes it did!
Here is the declaration of war on Japan:
http://www.law.ou.edu/hist/japwar.html
Congrats, you found a declaration of war.
and here are the three separate declarations of war on Iraq:
http://www.broadbandc-span.org/downloads/hjres114.pdf
http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/iraq/libact103198.pdf
http://www.uiowa.edu/~c030162/Common/Handouts/War/PersianGulf.htm
Who or what makes you think that those are declarations of war? Because
of the War Powers Resolution?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declarations_of_war_in_the_United_States
What other falsehoods are you trying to push like bad drugs?
Learn to read. Learn the law. Learn the difference between lied and
mislead. Learn to use your brain once in a while.
Are you lying now, or just misleading? Perhaps someone mislead you into
thinking that the US declared war on Iraq? Whom? You honestly seem to
believe that the US declared war on Iraq, so let's call you mistaken, and
not a liar.
To coin a paraphrase, Mark's understanding of history, politics, law,
ethics, etc. are something of "a singular point of view." <chuckle>
So you would be more impressed if my "point of view" flip flopped day
after day just like John Kerry? LOL! To quote my good buddy, John
Kerry: "I voted for it just before I voted against it". LOL! You
guys are a hoot!
I, for one, would me more impressed with your singular point of view if
you offered a single source to back up your claim.
You have to give him points for consistency, though, even though
it's errant. Most people would have at least paused the fogma [sic,
naturally }:)] long enough to legitimately consider P'sOV other
than their own after having facts placed before them.
Thus is the problem. You have not facts. You only have ambiguous
allegations by anonymous authors. My "singular point of view" is that
you simply have no facts whatsoever. My "point of view" will not
change until you show some actual facts.
Fortunately,
ideological servants aren't thus encumbered & therefore don't have
to worry about inconveniences caused by the differences between
reality & fantasy. <eg>
Now that's the first coherent thing you have posted!!! LOL! Well
done!
B
"my original contention is that the President must stop waging war after
60 days unless the Congress approves. There is nothing proving my
contention false. You are just too stupid to read. "
Subject: Re: Bush Turns Veterans Day Into a scolding for the liberal liars
in the Congress
Date: 20 Jan 2006 17:16:18 -0800
Message-ID: <1137806178.260293.61300@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
No, your original contention was that the US declared war against Iraq.
Apparently, you believe that after sixty days the War Powers Resolution
requires a declaration of war, therefore, from that premise, after sixty
days of conflict a declaration of war must be issued from the House. Your
premise, if I've inferred it correctly, is false. They're not
declarations of war, they're authorizations for the use of force. The
House *could* issue declarations of war, but hasn't done so since 1945,
preferring authorizations for the use of force most recently.
-Thufir
.
