| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"DemsAngryBushHonoredMLK" |
| Date: |
16 Jan 2004 02:50:15 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Impertinent Question # 299 |
"Mark Gerard Miller" <mgm21@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:tuWNb.2833$%86.1705@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"Bill McCarty" <bmcc@XSPMsosbbs.com> wrote in message
news:bu8muv0249h@enews3.newsguy.com...
Now that it's clear to the president that he cannot appear in
public without being booed and shouted down, will he conduct his re-
election campaign by talking to the American public held behind wire
fences ten blocks away, in so called "Free Speech Zones" ?
He already is keeping protesters away, hundreds of yards away. His
supporters are allowed to exercise their First Amendment rights to free
speech and peacable assembly, but those who oppose him are not allowed to
do
so.
Sure they are. You just said so yourself! They are allowed to exercise
free speech and peaceable assembly, "hundreds of yards away". You got a
problem with that? The cameras can focus on their angry, bitter,
hate-filled Democrat faces just as easily "hundreds of yards away" as if
they were only 2 feet away, so you've got no beef. America is just tired
of listening to the Democrat Party hate speech and *****, that's all. So
the cameras don't bother filming those losers. They're spewing the same
crap and the same lies they have spewed for years. IOW, there's nothing
newsworthy about those Democrat ***** artists. So they get no face time
on the camera any longer.
Do NOT confuse a lack of face time on the camera with "denial of free speech
rights". That is a CLASSIC mistake the Ignorant Liberal frequently makes.
You do NOT have a right to camera face time. You DO have a right to speak,
but the news media also has a right to totally ignore you and to decide to
focus instead on what the President of the United States does and says.
.
|
|
| User: "Mark Gerard Miller" |
|
| Title: Re: Impertinent Question # 299 |
16 Jan 2004 03:14:39 PM |
|
|
"DemsAngryBushHonoredMLK" <BigotryRules@DNC.org> wrote in message
news:b8YNb.71527$5V2.74137@attbi_s53...
"Mark Gerard Miller" <mgm21@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:tuWNb.2833$%86.1705@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"Bill McCarty" <bmcc@XSPMsosbbs.com> wrote in message
news:bu8muv0249h@enews3.newsguy.com...
Now that it's clear to the president that he cannot appear in
public without being booed and shouted down, will he conduct his re-
election campaign by talking to the American public held behind wire
fences ten blocks away, in so called "Free Speech Zones" ?
He already is keeping protesters away, hundreds of yards away. His
supporters are allowed to exercise their First Amendment rights to free
speech and peacable assembly, but those who oppose him are not allowed
to
do
so.
Sure they are. You just said so yourself! They are allowed to exercise
free speech and peaceable assembly, "hundreds of yards away". You got a
problem with that?
Yes, I have a problem with that. Their rights to free speech and peacable
assembly are being abrogated if they may not speak and assemble where they
want to.
Mark
.
|
|
|
| User: "gaffo" |
|
| Title: Re: Impertinent Question # 299 |
16 Jan 2004 10:15:27 PM |
|
|
Mark Gerard Miller wrote:
"DemsAngryBushHonoredMLK" <BigotryRules@DNC.org> wrote in message
news:b8YNb.71527$5V2.74137@attbi_s53...
"Mark Gerard Miller" <mgm21@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:tuWNb.2833$%86.1705@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"Bill McCarty" <bmcc@XSPMsosbbs.com> wrote in message
news:bu8muv0249h@enews3.newsguy.com...
Now that it's clear to the president that he cannot appear in
public without being booed and shouted down, will he conduct his re-
election campaign by talking to the American public held behind wire
fences ten blocks away, in so called "Free Speech Zones" ?
He already is keeping protesters away, hundreds of yards away. His
supporters are allowed to exercise their First Amendment rights to free
speech and peacable assembly, but those who oppose him are not allowed
to
do
so.
Sure they are. You just said so yourself! They are allowed to exercise
free speech and peaceable assembly, "hundreds of yards away". You got a
problem with that?
Yes, I have a problem with that. Their rights to free speech and peacable
assembly are being abrogated if they may not speak and assemble where they
want to.
Mark
exactly!!!...........assuming within the territorial integrity of the US.
--
"I think in this case international law
stood in the way of doing the right thing (invading Iraq)."
- Richard Perle
"He (Saddam Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with
respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project
conventional power against his neighbours."
- Colin Powell February 24 2001
"We have been successful for the last ten years in keeping
him from developing those weapons and we will continue to be successful."
"He threatens not the United States."
"But I also thought that we had pretty
much removed his stings and frankly for ten years we really have."
'But what is interesting is that with the regime that has been in place
for the past ten years, I think a pretty good job has been done of
keeping him from breaking out and suddenly showing up one day and saying
"look what I got." He hasn't been able to do that.'
- Colin Powell February 26 2001
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "gaffo" |
|
| Title: Re: Impertinent Question # 299 |
16 Jan 2004 10:14:12 PM |
|
|
DemsAngryBushHonoredMLK wrote:
"Mark Gerard Miller" <mgm21@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:tuWNb.2833$%86.1705@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"Bill McCarty" <bmcc@XSPMsosbbs.com> wrote in message
news:bu8muv0249h@enews3.newsguy.com...
Now that it's clear to the president that he cannot appear in
public without being booed and shouted down, will he conduct his re-
election campaign by talking to the American public held behind wire
fences ten blocks away, in so called "Free Speech Zones" ?
He already is keeping protesters away, hundreds of yards away. His
supporters are allowed to exercise their First Amendment rights to free
speech and peacable assembly, but those who oppose him are not allowed to
do
so.
Sure they are. You just said so yourself! They are allowed to exercise
free speech and peaceable assembly, "hundreds of yards away". You got a
problem with that? The cameras can focus on their angry, bitter,
hate-filled Democrat faces just as easily "hundreds of yards away" as if
they were only 2 feet away, so you've got no beef. America is just tired
of listening to the Democrat Party hate speech and *****, that's all. So
the cameras don't bother filming those losers. They're spewing the same
crap and the same lies they have spewed for years. IOW, there's nothing
newsworthy about those Democrat ***** artists. So they get no face time
on the camera any longer.
Do NOT confuse a lack of face time on the camera with "denial of free speech
rights".
if the denial applies to land close to Bushler at the time he is near,
then the 1st is violated.
the 1st applies to all the the territories of the US, Bubba.
--
"I think in this case international law
stood in the way of doing the right thing (invading Iraq)."
- Richard Perle
"He (Saddam Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with
respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project
conventional power against his neighbours."
- Colin Powell February 24 2001
"We have been successful for the last ten years in keeping
him from developing those weapons and we will continue to be successful."
"He threatens not the United States."
"But I also thought that we had pretty
much removed his stings and frankly for ten years we really have."
'But what is interesting is that with the regime that has been in place
for the past ten years, I think a pretty good job has been done of
keeping him from breaking out and suddenly showing up one day and saying
"look what I got." He hasn't been able to do that.'
- Colin Powell February 26 2001
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
