"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:DzqYc.13121$3j1.7506@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
"Phil Trevorrow" <philtrev@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gqpYc.2097$bD5.650@trnddc03...
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:128Yc.13389$9j2.9708@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
"sanjian" <sanjian@widomaker.com> wrote in message
news:TG6Yc.110192$Lj.73993@fed1read03...
Belmont wrote:
qwerty wrote:
The UN Inspectors had accounted for 95% of the WMD.
Whoa now! Where IS the other 5%?
More importantly, how do we know it was 95%? Because Saddam told
us?
Because of the work Blix and the inspectors performed. Nobody was
relying
on Saddam's explanations, but verifiable evidence that these WMD's had
been
destroyed. All evidence now shows that they were destroyed in the
90's!
Totally incorrect. Read his report.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/01/27/sprj.irq.transcript.blix/ He even says
flat
out Iraq says they destroyed them but has provided no proof.
That was BEFORE the War! All evidence AFTER the war indicates that they
were destroyed in the 90's. If Blix had been ALLOWED to complete his work
then this would have been know BEFORE Bush screwed the pooch with his
invasion of Iraq.
So you think Bush should have ignored Kerry's vote in favor of invading
Iraq, and should have waited, instead of doing what Kerry said we should do,
namely, invade Iraq??
.
