"Rich" <home@home.com> wrote in message
news:zCuUc.377$423.4322@news.uswest.net...
"james dorfu" <dorf@edu.nospam.msu> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.08.17.21.15.14.870345@edu.nospam.msu...
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:53:40 -0500, Rich wrote:
"james dorfu" <dorf@edu.nospam.msu> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.08.17.20.51.35.672764@edu.nospam.msu...
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:45:03 -0500, Rich wrote:
"OK, fine. Let's examine the records - all the records,
which,
unlike
Bush and contrary to popular perception, Kerry has not
released..."
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/editorial/outlook/2740155
Look for Kerry's attack dogs over at MoveOn.org to start
attacking
the
Houston Chronicle now......
This article doesn't mention missing military records at all.
As your above statement prooves, you may be ignorant, but that
don't
mean
you ain't stupid too. Read the last paragraph of the "article".
What records are missing?
Those that have not been released. Release them all. Also release
all
financial records of Kerry's owner, the T-*****.
You need to be more specific, what records haven't been released.
Do you have trouble understanding the word "all"? Or are you claiming
that
all records of Kerry's military service have been released?
You're saying all of his records haven't been released and I am asking
which
ones haven't been released.
Are you claiming that all records of Kerry's military service have been
released?
No, you're [balance of irrelevent answer snipped]
Thank you. You are NOT claiming that all of Kerry's military service
records have been released. Neither are any of the rest of us. Not even
the liar Kerry is claiming that he has released all of his military service
records, in fact.
.
