In article <vjq232dgf81ca8vlgj0h9rcegcaqg4vih5@4ax.com>, jimpgh2002
<pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 09:20:06 -0400, Colonel Panic
<originalrecipe@nonononononononoooooooospam.no> wrote:

In article <8i4032dmjr43esbpmdv9ho2kva8aja8ipp@4ax.com>, jimpgh2002
<pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 10:45:16 -0400, Colonel Panic
<kernelpanic@originalrecipe.bsd> wrote:

In article <moqu225nhp2idcilvgn6h0u1qo7npmubr9@4ax.com>, jimpgh2002
<pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 01:07:00 GMT, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___>
wrote:

"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2q7u2216tas6bvfmt01d3fsus1l4a9l87t@4ax.com...

On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 23:10:51 GMT, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___>
wrote:

"David Hartung" <dhart1ng@quixnet.net> wrote in message
news:mVCXf.71046$9I5.2942@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...

laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:

Only it won't be called a third term. Instead it will be an
extension
of the second term and that's supposed to make it legal!!!

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/04/01/gwot_cha/

Bush preps historic Third Term - memo

By Thomas C Greene in Washington Published Saturday 1st April

2006

The
US
Department of Justice (DoJ) and the office of the White House
Counsel are preparing a draft document laying out the

President's

wartime authority to remain in office past 2008, The Register

has

learned.

You actually believe this garbage?

I would never have believed there could be a presidential
administration
as
corrupt to the core as the Bush cabal. So, normally, I'd write off
this
as
a funny April Fool's joke. But given the constant attacks on our
democracy
in the past 5 years, I'd say it's pretty close to what we might
expect.
It
would be just another day in BushWorld, another Constitutional
right
trampled into the dirt.

You again show yourself to be one of the stupidest posters on
this NG by believing tripe such as this.

LOL! A die-hard Bush fanatic attempts to call the intelligence of
others
into question. Now *that* is ironic.

You're so stupid that you think I'm a "die-hard Bush fanatic".

Can you name one time when you didn't support Bush's actions? Can you
prove it?

I've stated numerous times on this NG that I opposed invading
Iraq. Go search Google News, mate.

Yet I have seen you defend the US invasion of Iraq,

No you haven't.

and you continue to
support the self-proclaimed "war president".

Sometimes

It is kind of difficult
to separate support for Bush from support for the war when he has
marketed himself that way.

For you perhaps.

Supporting Bush while claiming to not support the war is kind of like
ordering and eating a rare steak while claiming to be against eating
red meat.

So what is it about Bush that you like anyway? The borrow and spend
deficit? The drop in average income? War based on "mistakes"?
Incompetence?