Selected Usenet Article
Date: 5 Nov 2003 18:00:08 GMT
Category: Censored by Totalitarian Dictatorship
Article: 70
true
If you have an interesting article or a quote on:
NWO, Freemasonry, Skull and Bones, Illuminati,
post them on alt.illuminati or alt.conspiracy.new-world-order
In article <bmtd7v$neh$1@vcn.bc.ca>, (Jim Bennie) wrote:
In <Kg8kb.11784$cT6.569709@news20.bellglobal.com>, Peter Renzland
<phr0206@sympatico.ca> wrote:
However, I have frequently encountered an attitude (by those not
involved) that asserts that a Mason cannot contact a GL office (library,
or admin office) and request published information, such as
"Does this GL recognize xyz GL?" or "what do the Proceedings say about
which PHA GL's are recognized?"
I'd hope it wouldn't be difficult to contact your GL office or GL
library for information.
I still haven't seen any written protocol rules in constitutions that
say that a Mason is not as readily entitled to published information
as a non-mason.
That's because not every rule and every protocol is written down.
In fact, BC's Constitution refers to the "unwritten law".
Is it some kind of mafia organization?
In the REAL world, if law is not written down,
it isn't ANY kind of law, and following it,
you may be collaborating in conspiracy.
The unwritten "law" is basically a conspiracy
to bypass the REAL law.
I don't know about Ontario's.
The fact of the matter is, whether it's written down or not, a member
of my GL may only contact another GL through the Grand Secretary.
And that is how you are all entrapped and controlled.
Because you can not bypass the filtering process
and your information may NEVER see the light of day.
And
such is made abundantly clear on our GL web page. Them's the rules and
always have been. Writing them down in a Constitution wouldn't make
them any more valid.
As a non-Mason has no GL of his own to contact, it'd be a little silly
to have him go through "his" Grand Secretary.
Jim Bennie
PM/DC, No. 44, Vancouver
"There is no other way than to transfer the Arabs from here
to the neighboring countries, to transfer all of them;
not one village, not one tribe, should be left."
--- Joseph Weitz, the Jewish National Fund administrator
for Zionist colonization (1967),
from My Diary and Letters to the Children, Chapter III, p. 293.
"...Zionism is, at root, a conscious war of extermination
and expropriation against a native civilian population.
In the modern vernacular, Zionism is the theory and practice
of "ethnic cleansing," which the UN has defined as a war crime."
"Now, the Zionist Jews who founded Israel are another matter.
For the most part, they are not Semites, and their language
(Yiddish) is not semitic. These Ashkenazi ("German") Jews --
as opposed to the Sephardic ("Spanish") Jews -- have no
connection whatever to any of the aforementioned ancient
peoples or languages.
They are mostly East European Slavs descended from the Khazars,
a nomadic Turko-Finnic people that migrated out of the Caucasus
in the second century and came to settle, broadly speaking, in
what is now Southern Russia and Ukraine."
In A.D. 740, the khagan (ruler) of Khazaria, decided that paganism
wasn't good enough for his people and decided to adopt one of the
"heavenly" religions: Judaism, Christianity or Islam.
After a process of elimination he chose Judaism, and from that
point the Khazars adopted Judaism as the official state religion.
The history of the Khazars and their conversion is a documented,
undisputed part of Jewish history, but it is never publicly
discussed.
It is, as former U.S. State Department official Alfred M. Lilienthal
declared, "Israel's Achilles heel," for it proves that Zionists
have no claim to the land of the Biblical Hebrews."
--- Greg Felton,
Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism
.
|
