| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Strangle More Gay Priests" |
| Date: |
26 Aug 2003 06:16:41 PM |
| Object: |
Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
Laurence Doering <ljd@bcpl.net> wrote in
news:bighg8$8ue6n$1@ID-203109.news.uni-berlin.de:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:26:24 GMT, Strangle More Gay Priests
<spamspamspam@spam.spam> wrote:
No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots
http://www.bedoper.com
So what exactly was it that made that 100+ foot long hole full
of burning aircraft wreckage in the wall of the Pentagon
that's visible in the second picture on your web
page?
Definitely not a 757. What makes you think it was? The WeSaidSo
Corporation? Was it Fox News, or CNN?
Just as a friendly suggestion, I might point out that the
argument made by your web page would be a lot stronger
if you
a) had pictures that support your theory, instead of
tending to disprove it;
Like pictures of an immaculate lawn where a 757 supposedly just crashed?
b) bothered to mention what it was you think did hit
the Pentagon. Clearly something did -- if it wasn't
a 757, what was it?
If it wasn't a 757, what does it matter?
If you can explain these things, I will believe a 757 hit the Pentagon:
1. Lack of a right side engine - with conflicting stories
2. Lack of 757 in Security Camera Frames
3. Trail of White Smoke in Security Camera Frames
4. WRONG ANGLE OF APPROACH ON THE SECURITY CAMERA FRAMES
5. Smoke at the Pentagon 15 minutes too early for a 757.
6. Looping mystery plane over the White House
7. Conflicting eyewitnesses
http://www.bedoper.com/
But you can't, so you won't bother to try...
--
Can I borrow a feeling?
http://www.mp3.com/gortician
Bass for your *****:
http://www.mp3.com/manticore
http://www.mp3.com/meterversusyard
http://www.mp3.com/highc
http://www.mp3.com/measurerecords
"[The artwork of Andrew Penland] is REAL...what I mean by "real" is that it
made NEW THOUGHTS occur in my head, which would have never otherwise
occurred." --Full Force Frank
.
|
|
| User: "Laurence Doering" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
27 Aug 2003 12:24:23 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 23:16:41 GMT, Strangle More Gay Priests <spamspamspam@spam.spam> wrote:
Laurence Doering <ljd@bcpl.net> wrote in
news:bighg8$8ue6n$1@ID-203109.news.uni-berlin.de:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:26:24 GMT, Strangle More Gay Priests
<spamspamspam@spam.spam> wrote:
No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots
http://www.bedoper.com
So what exactly was it that made that 100+ foot long hole full
of burning aircraft wreckage in the wall of the Pentagon
that's visible in the second picture on your web
page?
Definitely not a 757. What makes you think it was? The WeSaidSo
Corporation? Was it Fox News, or CNN?
Did I say it was a 757?
Something smashed through the wall of the Pentagon on the
morning of September 11th, and all you seem to be willing
to say is that it wasn't a 757.
Why are you afraid to come out and say what you think
it was? It's not like jackbooted thugs are going to
come bust down your door and haul you away the moment
you stop pussyfooting around the question, is it?
Just as a friendly suggestion, I might point out that the
argument made by your web page would be a lot stronger
if you
a) had pictures that support your theory, instead of
tending to disprove it;
Like pictures of an immaculate lawn where a 757 supposedly just crashed?
Which pictures would those be? The ones I see on your web page
show a lawn with a lot of junk covered by firefighting foam near
the wall -- hardly immaculate.
b) bothered to mention what it was you think did hit
the Pentagon. Clearly something did -- if it wasn't
a 757, what was it?
If it wasn't a 757, what does it matter?
I was right -- your conspiracy theory does need help.
Here's a hint: you need to come up with some way the Pentagon
could have gotten damaged on the morning of September 11th.
I've already offered a suggestion that makes a lot more sense
than the F-16 story. Surely you can do better.
If you can explain these things, I will believe a 757 hit the Pentagon:
[7 questions deleted]
If you can just come out and say what you think it was that hit
the Pentagon, I'll believe you don't believe a 757 did it.
But you can't, so you won't bother to try...
I think you secretly do believe it was a 757 -- otherwise,
why won't you just come out and say what you think it was?
ljd
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Phantom Penis" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
28 Aug 2003 07:27:11 AM |
|
|
Strangle More Gay Priests <spamspamspam@spam.spam> wrote:
1. Lack of a right side engine
The right side engine most likely hit the solid reinforced concrete area
between floors at 400+ MPH and disintegrated. Pretty simple, eh?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ralph Nesbitt" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
28 Aug 2003 07:45:33 AM |
|
|
"The Phantom Penis" <Saeger@gay.*****> wrote in message
news:srsrkvkaob7qcnts2a690kp040ilm9mi96@4ax.com...
Strangle More Gay Priests <spamspamspam@spam.spam> wrote:
1. Lack of a right side engine
The right side engine most likely hit the solid reinforced concrete area
between floors at 400+ MPH and disintegrated. Pretty simple, eh?
Reasonable suggestion, but does not fit the facts.
The remains of 1 engine was located inside the bldg. The other engine was
found in/near the "Mall Parking Area".
Many times it has been explained to the poster you are responding to that
engines are designed to "Break Away" from wings at/on impact. The right
engine would have impacted something in the construction area prior
anything from the A/C impacting anything else.
The poster you are responding to continues to ignore the "facts".
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hit1Hard" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
28 Aug 2003 11:54:55 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:27:11 -0400, The Phantom Penis wrote:
Strangle More Gay Priests <spamspamspam@spam.spam> wrote:
1. Lack of a right side engine
The right side engine most likely hit the solid reinforced concrete area
between floors at 400+ MPH and disintegrated. Pretty simple, eh?
Pretty simple is that you have to use "most likely" in a statement you
see as a fact... Indicating that you are not really 100% sure that that
IS a fact?
Do you also have a "least likely" version?
--
Hit1Hard
An Osho Zen Tarot rated email
No-Thingness
Major Arcana V
http://www.osho.com/magazine/tarot/TarotCardNew.cfm?All=Yes&Nr=06
http://www.osho.com/magazine/tarot/picCards/zen006No-Thingness.jpg
Concern should drive us into action, not into a depression. --Karen Horney
<Spam Shredder Block>
0 TO THE BEST KEPT SECRET IN THE FINANCIAL MARKETS! 500 Secured Tax Cer
tificates Provide: 510 The highest guaranteed interest returns compared
<Spam Shredder Block>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ralph Nesbitt" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
28 Aug 2003 10:54:37 PM |
|
|
"Hit1Hard" <Hit.One.Hard@iaehv.nl> wrote in message
news:bikvou$4nqt$1@news3.infoave.net...
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:27:11 -0400, The Phantom Penis wrote:
Strangle More Gay Priests <spamspamspam@spam.spam> wrote:
1. Lack of a right side engine
The right side engine most likely hit the solid reinforced concrete area
between floors at 400+ MPH and disintegrated. Pretty simple, eh?
Pretty simple is that you have to use "most likely" in a statement you
see as a fact... Indicating that you are not really 100% sure that that
IS a fact?
Do you also have a "least likely" version?
--
Hit1Hard
The engine ? you are so fond of is really irevalent in the end. See:
http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Phantom Penis" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
28 Aug 2003 08:42:59 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:54:55 -0400 Hit1Hard <Hit.One.Hard@iaehv.nl> wrote
in Message id: <bikvou$4nqt$1@news3.infoave.net>:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:27:11 -0400, The Phantom Penis wrote:
Strangle More Gay Priests <spamspamspam@spam.spam> wrote:
1. Lack of a right side engine
The right side engine most likely hit the solid reinforced concrete area
between floors at 400+ MPH and disintegrated. Pretty simple, eh?
Pretty simple is that you have to use "most likely" in a statement you
see as a fact... Indicating that you are not really 100% sure that that
IS a fact?
I didn't say I was _sure_, did I? In fact, I spent 0 minutes researching
the impact and assumed that Jason was correct in that they never found the
right side engine. Fuckwit.
Do you also have a "least likely" version?
Sure. The least likely version is that there was no 757. A slightly more
likely scenario was that it bounced off your thick granite-like skull and
disintegrated.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ralph Nesbitt" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
28 Aug 2003 10:57:00 PM |
|
|
"The Phantom Penis" <Saeger@gay.*****> wrote in message
news:e51skvsm0t4vin5o58gh0fbpsagpgqa1sc@4ax.com...
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:54:55 -0400 Hit1Hard <Hit.One.Hard@iaehv.nl> wrote
in Message id: <bikvou$4nqt$1@news3.infoave.net>:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:27:11 -0400, The Phantom Penis wrote:
Strangle More Gay Priests <spamspamspam@spam.spam> wrote:
1. Lack of a right side engine
The right side engine most likely hit the solid reinforced concrete
area
between floors at 400+ MPH and disintegrated. Pretty simple, eh?
Pretty simple is that you have to use "most likely" in a statement you
see as a fact... Indicating that you are not really 100% sure that that
IS a fact?
I didn't say I was _sure_, did I? In fact, I spent 0 minutes researching
the impact and assumed that Jason was correct in that they never found the
right side engine. Fuckwit.
Do you also have a "least likely" version?
Sure. The least likely version is that there was no 757. A slightly more
likely scenario was that it bounced off your thick granite-like skull and
disintegrated.
For a reasonable explanation of what H1H, CT, & "Fellow Travelers are
supporting See:
http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
.
|
|
|
| User: "Coppertop Killer" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
28 Aug 2003 11:17:19 PM |
|
|
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:gaA3b.56$Vt7.40@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
For a reasonable explanation of what H1H, CT, & "Fellow Travelers are
supporting See:
http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
You don't know what you're talking about, drunken dwarf.
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ralph Nesbitt" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
29 Aug 2003 12:02:26 AM |
|
|
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:jtA3b.7502$yg.4048984@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:gaA3b.56$Vt7.40@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
For a reasonable explanation of what H1H, CT, & "Fellow Travelers are
supporting See:
http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
You don't know what you're talking about, drunken dwarf.
--
So you claim you are not supporting the Preposterous line of B/S the above
site refutes/makes a mockery of?
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
.
|
|
|
| User: "Coppertop Killer" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
29 Aug 2003 06:26:25 AM |
|
|
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:C7B3b.73$J32.34@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:jtA3b.7502$yg.4048984@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:gaA3b.56$Vt7.40@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
For a reasonable explanation of what H1H, CT, & "Fellow Travelers are
supporting See:
http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
You don't know what you're talking about, drunken dwarf.
--
So you claim you are not supporting the Preposterous line of B/S the above
site refutes/makes a mockery of?
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
Support, make a mockery of, ralphie nesbitt?
One last time for Usenet, perhaps it will sink into your damaged booze brain
this time. I do think there are some very valid questions raised by some
folks. This page above is one of them. Questions haven't been answered
although you and the "official line" supporters claim they have, they have
not. You and other supporters have tried to answer, mostly with speculation
and from what you remember reading or seeing on TV. Nevertheless, they are
still unanswered. If you have some facts to show this statement incorrect,
post the proof that it is.
Labeling me as a supporter of terrorists is a lie... you are a drunken liar,
ralphie nesbitt. I never cared much about details as what hit The Pentagon,
were the planes remote controlled, were there bombs in the WTC OR the
Pentagon because you don't need to foolishly delve into these topics to know
that the "official line" is ***** and was one of many moves by the US
government to insure the public was behind its foreign policy objectives
moving into the "peak of world oil production" which is a turning point for
your sons and daughters.
http://video.tu-clausthal.de/vortraege/peak-oil/peak-oil.ram
I wish I could state without reservation that America, this Oil embedded
administration, had mankind on its mind with their decision to start a "war
that will not end in our lifetime" over this peak oil scenario. The world
now uses up 4 barrels of oil for every 1 barrel that it finds. China's
economy is exploding and is in need of much more oil then ever before. At
the current rates of consumption world oil will be used up in 35 years. This
is one of those things nobody talks about because there are no answers.
America used to be a world leader which people looked up to and united with.
Now, America is loathed by the way things are being done... they too, have a
lot of unanswered questions.
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ralph Nesbitt" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
29 Aug 2003 08:42:40 AM |
|
|
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:BLG3b.9623$yg.5574148@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:C7B3b.73$J32.34@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:jtA3b.7502$yg.4048984@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:gaA3b.56$Vt7.40@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
For a reasonable explanation of what H1H, CT, & "Fellow Travelers
are
supporting See:
http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
You don't know what you're talking about, drunken dwarf.
--
So you claim you are not supporting the Preposterous line of B/S the
above
site refutes/makes a mockery of?
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
Support, make a mockery of, ralphie nesbitt?
One last time for Usenet, perhaps it will sink into your damaged booze
brain
this time. I do think there are some very valid questions raised by some
folks. This page above is one of them. Questions haven't been answered
although you and the "official line" supporters claim they have, they have
not. You and other supporters have tried to answer, mostly with
speculation
and from what you remember reading or seeing on TV. Nevertheless, they are
still unanswered. If you have some facts to show this statement incorrect,
post the proof that it is.
Prove I have a "Booze Damaged Brain.
At least our speculation is based on "Documented Facts", where yours/fellow
travelers is based on selected "Blurbs" to create a "Twisted/Preposterous
Line of B/S" without foundation.
Labeling me as a supporter of terrorists is a lie... you are a drunken
liar,
ralphie nesbitt. I never cared much about details as what hit The
Pentagon,
were the planes remote controlled, were there bombs in the WTC OR the
Pentagon because you don't need to foolishly delve into these topics to
know
that the "official line" is ***** and was one of many moves by the US
government to insure the public was behind its foreign policy objectives
moving into the "peak of world oil production" which is a turning point
for
your sons and daughters.
http://video.tu-clausthal.de/vortraege/peak-oil/peak-oil.ram
The "Bit Dog Whines" as it admits to haveing no basis in fact for the
"Twisted/Preposterous Line of B/S" you/other Dis-Info fellow travelers are
attempting to spread.
I wish I could state without reservation that America, this Oil embedded
administration, had mankind on its mind with their decision to start a
"war
that will not end in our lifetime" over this peak oil scenario. The world
now uses up 4 barrels of oil for every 1 barrel that it finds. China's
economy is exploding and is in need of much more oil then ever before. At
the current rates of consumption world oil will be used up in 35 years.
This
is one of those things nobody talks about because there are no answers.
What has this got to do with the "Twisted/Preposterous Line of B/S you/other
fellow travelers are useing to cloud your true agenda; a dis-info caimpaigne
designed to cloud issues associated with your/other fellow travelers
sympathies/support of "Terrorism/Terrorists & their Fellow Travelers".
America used to be a world leader which people looked up to and united
with.
Now, America is loathed by the way things are being done... they too, have
a
lot of unanswered questions.
--
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
.
|
|
|
| User: "Coppertop Killer" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
29 Aug 2003 03:30:16 PM |
|
|
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:kLI3b.968$415.933@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com...
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:BLG3b.9623$yg.5574148@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:C7B3b.73$J32.34@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:jtA3b.7502$yg.4048984@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:gaA3b.56$Vt7.40@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
For a reasonable explanation of what H1H, CT, & "Fellow Travelers
are
supporting See:
http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
You don't know what you're talking about, drunken dwarf.
--
So you claim you are not supporting the Preposterous line of B/S the
above
site refutes/makes a mockery of?
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
Support, make a mockery of, ralphie nesbitt?
One last time for Usenet, perhaps it will sink into your damaged booze
brain
this time. I do think there are some very valid questions raised by some
folks. This page above is one of them. Questions haven't been answered
although you and the "official line" supporters claim they have, they
have
not. You and other supporters have tried to answer, mostly with
speculation
and from what you remember reading or seeing on TV. Nevertheless, they
are
still unanswered. If you have some facts to show this statement
incorrect,
post the proof that it is.
Prove I have a "Booze Damaged Brain.
If you have some facts to show this statement incorrect post the proof that
it is.
At least our speculation is based on "Documented Facts", where
yours/fellow
travelers is based on selected "Blurbs" to create a "Twisted/Preposterous
Line of B/S" without foundation.
Documented facts? http://cooperativeresearch.org/
Labeling me as a supporter of terrorists is a lie... you are a drunken
liar,
ralphie nesbitt. I never cared much about details as what hit The
Pentagon,
were the planes remote controlled, were there bombs in the WTC OR the
Pentagon because you don't need to foolishly delve into these topics to
know
that the "official line" is ***** and was one of many moves by the US
government to insure the public was behind its foreign policy objectives
moving into the "peak of world oil production" which is a turning point
for
your sons and daughters.
http://video.tu-clausthal.de/vortraege/peak-oil/peak-oil.ram
The "Bit Dog Whines" as it admits to haveing no basis in fact for the
"Twisted/Preposterous Line of B/S" you/other Dis-Info fellow travelers are
attempting to spread.
I surprised you didn't mention pink Elephants, ralphie.
http://video.tu-clausthal.de/vortraege/peak-oil/peak-oil.ram
I wish I could state without reservation that America, this Oil embedded
administration, had mankind on its mind with their decision to start a
"war
that will not end in our lifetime" over this peak oil scenario. The
world
now uses up 4 barrels of oil for every 1 barrel that it finds. China's
economy is exploding and is in need of much more oil then ever before.
At
the current rates of consumption world oil will be used up in 35 years.
This
is one of those things nobody talks about because there are no answers.
What has this got to do with the "Twisted/Preposterous Line of B/S
you/other
fellow travelers are useing to cloud your true agenda; a dis-info
caimpaigne
designed to cloud issues associated with your/other fellow travelers
sympathies/support of "Terrorism/Terrorists & their Fellow Travelers".
Drunken dwarf says what?
America used to be a world leader which people looked up to and united
with.
Now, America is loathed by the way things are being done... they too,
have
a
lot of unanswered questions.
--
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
Drunken dwarf type...
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ralph Nesbitt" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
29 Aug 2003 05:28:03 PM |
|
|
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:sJO3b.20871$yg.7965553@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:kLI3b.968$415.933@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com...
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:BLG3b.9623$yg.5574148@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:C7B3b.73$J32.34@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:jtA3b.7502$yg.4048984@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:gaA3b.56$Vt7.40@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
For a reasonable explanation of what H1H, CT, & "Fellow
Travelers
are
supporting See:
http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
You don't know what you're talking about, drunken dwarf.
--
So you claim you are not supporting the Preposterous line of B/S the
above
site refutes/makes a mockery of?
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
Support, make a mockery of, ralphie nesbitt?
One last time for Usenet, perhaps it will sink into your damaged booze
brain
this time. I do think there are some very valid questions raised by
some
folks. This page above is one of them. Questions haven't been answered
although you and the "official line" supporters claim they have, they
have
not. You and other supporters have tried to answer, mostly with
speculation
and from what you remember reading or seeing on TV. Nevertheless, they
are
still unanswered. If you have some facts to show this statement
incorrect,
post the proof that it is.
Prove I have a "Booze Damaged Brain.
If you have some facts to show this statement incorrect post the proof
that
it is.
At least our speculation is based on "Documented Facts", where
yours/fellow
travelers is based on selected "Blurbs" to create a
"Twisted/Preposterous
Line of B/S" without foundation.
Documented facts? http://cooperativeresearch.org/
A Bagbad Bob" site sponsored by supporters/fellow travelers of those that
support Terrorists/Terrorism. Here you go again supporting
"Supporters/Fellow Travelers of those that support Terrorism/Terrorists".
Labeling me as a supporter of terrorists is a lie... you are a drunken
liar,
ralphie nesbitt. I never cared much about details as what hit The
Pentagon,
were the planes remote controlled, were there bombs in the WTC OR the
Pentagon because you don't need to foolishly delve into these topics
to
know
that the "official line" is ***** and was one of many moves by the
US
government to insure the public was behind its foreign policy
objectives
moving into the "peak of world oil production" which is a turning
point
for
your sons and daughters.
http://video.tu-clausthal.de/vortraege/peak-oil/peak-oil.ram
The "Bit Dog Whines" as it admits to haveing no basis in fact for the
"Twisted/Preposterous Line of B/S" you/other Dis-Info fellow travelers
are
attempting to spread.
I surprised you didn't mention pink Elephants, ralphie.
http://video.tu-clausthal.de/vortraege/peak-oil/peak-oil.ram
I wish I could state without reservation that America, this Oil
embedded
administration, had mankind on its mind with their decision to start a
"war
that will not end in our lifetime" over this peak oil scenario. The
world
now uses up 4 barrels of oil for every 1 barrel that it finds. China's
economy is exploding and is in need of much more oil then ever before.
At
the current rates of consumption world oil will be used up in 35
years.
This
is one of those things nobody talks about because there are no
answers.
What has this got to do with the "Twisted/Preposterous Line of B/S
you/other
fellow travelers are useing to cloud your true agenda; a dis-info
caimpaigne
designed to cloud issues associated with your/other fellow travelers
sympathies/support of "Terrorism/Terrorists & their Fellow Travelers".
Drunken dwarf says what?
Ok so you are a "Drunken Dwarf". Would your fellow travelers like that, or
do they care, so long as you support them.
America used to be a world leader which people looked up to and united
with.
Now, America is loathed by the way things are being done... they too,
have
a
lot of unanswered questions.
--
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
Drunken dwarf type...
Ok, so you admit to being a "Drunken Dwarf". Is that mentally, Physciall, or
Both?
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
.
|
|
|
| User: "Coppertop Killer" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
30 Aug 2003 07:30:13 AM |
|
|
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:TrQ3b.751$kN6.484@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com...
Prove I have a "Booze Damaged Brain.
It is very apparent, ralphie.
If you have some facts to show this statement incorrect post the proof
that
it is.
Where are your answers *****? You are a liar, ralphie.
At least our speculation is based on "Documented Facts", where
yours/fellow
travelers is based on selected "Blurbs" to create a
"Twisted/Preposterous
Line of B/S" without foundation.
You live your life by twisted, preposterous lines of B/S, ralphie.
Documented facts? http://cooperativeresearch.org/
A Bagbad Bob" site sponsored by supporters/fellow travelers of those that
support Terrorists/Terrorism. Here you go again supporting
"Supporters/Fellow Travelers of those that support Terrorism/Terrorists".
Here you go again supporting dis-information and lies all the while sticking
red, white and blue up your *****. Good job, ralphie nesbitt. Where are the
facts for your above statement, ralphie? Show them, specifically, ralphie
you drunken dwarf.
Labeling me as a supporter of terrorists is a lie... you are a
drunken
liar,
ralphie nesbitt. I never cared much about details as what hit The
Pentagon,
were the planes remote controlled, were there bombs in the WTC OR
the
Pentagon because you don't need to foolishly delve into these topics
to
know
that the "official line" is ***** and was one of many moves by
the
US
government to insure the public was behind its foreign policy
objectives
moving into the "peak of world oil production" which is a turning
point
for
your sons and daughters.
http://video.tu-clausthal.de/vortraege/peak-oil/peak-oil.ram
The "Bit Dog Whines" as it admits to haveing no basis in fact for the
"Twisted/Preposterous Line of B/S" you/other Dis-Info fellow travelers
are
attempting to spread.
I surprised you didn't mention pink Elephants, ralphie.
http://video.tu-clausthal.de/vortraege/peak-oil/peak-oil.ram
I wish I could state without reservation that America, this Oil
embedded
administration, had mankind on its mind with their decision to start
a
"war
that will not end in our lifetime" over this peak oil scenario. The
world
now uses up 4 barrels of oil for every 1 barrel that it finds.
China's
economy is exploding and is in need of much more oil then ever
before.
At
the current rates of consumption world oil will be used up in 35
years.
This
is one of those things nobody talks about because there are no
answers.
What has this got to do with the "Twisted/Preposterous Line of B/S
you/other
fellow travelers are useing to cloud your true agenda; a dis-info
caimpaigne
designed to cloud issues associated with your/other fellow travelers
sympathies/support of "Terrorism/Terrorists & their Fellow Travelers".
Drunken dwarf says what?
Cannot figure it out you foolish drunk?
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
Drunken dwarf type...
Ok, so you admit to being a "Drunken Dwarf". Is that mentally, Physciall,
or
Both?
Foolish dwarfboy, it was an addition to your sig.
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Coppertop Killer" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
29 Aug 2003 03:32:38 PM |
|
|
A filter would take care of this very easy.
http://video.tu-clausthal.de/vortraege/peak-oil/peak-oil.ram
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
"Don Freeman" <freeman.REMOVE@smrn.com> wrote in message
news:zFM3b.2826$P76.2358@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
Musta been a bunch of propeller-capped wearing, John Birch Society
members, flying a disguised SR-7 modified to look like an Oscar Meyer
Wiener.
Speaking of wieners, aren't you guys tired of this? I know the rest
of us are.
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:kLI3b.968$415.933@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com...
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:BLG3b.9623$yg.5574148@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:C7B3b.73$J32.34@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:jtA3b.7502$yg.4048984@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:gaA3b.56$Vt7.40@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
For a reasonable explanation of what H1H, CT, & "Fellow Travelers
are
supporting See:
http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
You don't know what you're talking about, drunken dwarf.
--
So you claim you are not supporting the Preposterous line of B/S the
above
site refutes/makes a mockery of?
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
Support, make a mockery of, ralphie nesbitt?
One last time for Usenet, perhaps it will sink into your damaged booze
brain
this time. I do think there are some very valid questions raised by some
folks. This page above is one of them. Questions haven't been answered
although you and the "official line" supporters claim they have, they
have
not. You and other supporters have tried to answer, mostly with
speculation
and from what you remember reading or seeing on TV. Nevertheless, they
are
still unanswered. If you have some facts to show this statement
incorrect,
post the proof that it is.
Prove I have a "Booze Damaged Brain.
At least our speculation is based on "Documented Facts", where
yours/fellow
travelers is based on selected "Blurbs" to create a "Twisted/Preposterous
Line of B/S" without foundation.
Labeling me as a supporter of terrorists is a lie... you are a drunken
liar,
ralphie nesbitt. I never cared much about details as what hit The
Pentagon,
were the planes remote controlled, were there bombs in the WTC OR the
Pentagon because you don't need to foolishly delve into these topics to
know
that the "official line" is ***** and was one of many moves by the US
government to insure the public was behind its foreign policy objectives
moving into the "peak of world oil production" which is a turning point
for
your sons and daughters.
http://video.tu-clausthal.de/vortraege/peak-oil/peak-oil.ram
The "Bit Dog Whines" as it admits to haveing no basis in fact for the
"Twisted/Preposterous Line of B/S" you/other Dis-Info fellow travelers are
attempting to spread.
I wish I could state without reservation that America, this Oil embedded
administration, had mankind on its mind with their decision to start a
"war
that will not end in our lifetime" over this peak oil scenario. The
world
now uses up 4 barrels of oil for every 1 barrel that it finds. China's
economy is exploding and is in need of much more oil then ever before.
At
the current rates of consumption world oil will be used up in 35 years.
This
is one of those things nobody talks about because there are no answers.
What has this got to do with the "Twisted/Preposterous Line of B/S
you/other
fellow travelers are useing to cloud your true agenda; a dis-info
caimpaigne
designed to cloud issues associated with your/other fellow travelers
sympathies/support of "Terrorism/Terrorists & their Fellow Travelers".
America used to be a world leader which people looked up to and united
with.
Now, America is loathed by the way things are being done... they too,
have
a
lot of unanswered questions.
--
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Freeman" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
29 Aug 2003 04:39:53 PM |
|
|
So would use of rational thought processes.
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:GLO3b.20905$yg.7978791@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
A filter would take care of this very easy.
"Don Freeman" <freeman.REMOVE@smrn.com> wrote in message
news:zFM3b.2826$P76.2358@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
Musta been a bunch of propeller-capped wearing, John Birch Society
members, flying a disguised SR-7 modified to look like an Oscar
Meyer
Wiener.
Speaking of wieners, aren't you guys tired of this? I know the
rest
of us are.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Coppertop Killer" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
30 Aug 2003 07:30:12 AM |
|
|
"Don Freeman" <freeman.REMOVE@smrn.com> wrote in message
news:JKP3b.1949$p%1.329@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
So would use of rational thought processes.
Tell that to Bush, dope.
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ralph Nesbitt" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
30 Aug 2003 09:54:36 AM |
|
|
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:ex24b.30617$yg.12998118@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:au24b.22$XH6.18@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com...
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:oN04b.30241$yg.12498864@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Don Freeman" <freeman.REMOVE@smrn.com> wrote in message
news:JKP3b.1949$p%1.329@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
So would use of rational thought processes.
Tell that to Bush, dope.
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't
care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
Can't you do better than respond like a "Whining Bit Dog"?
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
Drunk type added...
Can't you sober up, ralphie?
http://www.takebackthemedia.com/true911.html
Another example of your support for "Supporters/Fellow Travelers of those
that support Terrorists/Terrorism" IMHO. Do a look up to see where your site
is sponsored from.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
.
|
|
|
| User: "Coppertop Killer" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
30 Aug 2003 11:51:40 AM |
|
|
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:MU24b.335$_%2.231@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:ex24b.30617$yg.12998118@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:au24b.22$XH6.18@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com...
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:oN04b.30241$yg.12498864@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Don Freeman" <freeman.REMOVE@smrn.com> wrote in message
news:JKP3b.1949$p%1.329@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
So would use of rational thought processes.
Tell that to Bush, dope.
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't
care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
Can't you do better than respond like a "Whining Bit Dog"?
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
Drunk type added...
Can't you sober up, ralphie?
http://www.takebackthemedia.com/true911.html
Another example of your support for "Supporters/Fellow Travelers of those
that support Terrorists/Terrorism" IMHO. Do a look up to see where your
site
is sponsored from.
You want another examble, drunken dwarf?
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brooks Hagenow" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
03 Sep 2003 07:28:47 AM |
|
|
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:wC44b.31964$yg.13780180@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
Another example of your support for "Supporters/Fellow Travelers of
those
that support Terrorists/Terrorism" IMHO. Do a look up to see where your
site
is sponsored from.
You want another examble, drunken dwarf?
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
Yes, please. And make it one that matters. One that isn't run by kooks
that only Bush and the Republican party out of power. Single minded sites
are highly slanted and not very credible.
That site has absolutely nothing to do with "taking back the media" and has
everything to do with bashing the Bush administration and the Republican
party. Anybody who thinks a site like that has any merit is nuts. The only
credible information that site provides is that the person or people that
run it do not like republicans because every single article on that site is
either anti-Bush or anti-GOP and everything and everyone associated.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Coppertop Killer" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
03 Sep 2003 08:11:59 AM |
|
|
"Brooks Hagenow" <bhagenow@sbcglobal-nope.net> wrote in message
news:38l5b.18258$Ih1.7158609@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com...
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:wC44b.31964$yg.13780180@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
Another example of your support for "Supporters/Fellow Travelers of
those
that support Terrorists/Terrorism" IMHO. Do a look up to see where
your
site
is sponsored from.
You want another examble, drunken dwarf?
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't
care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
Yes, please. And make it one that matters. One that isn't run by kooks
that only Bush and the Republican party out of power. Single minded sites
are highly slanted and not very credible.
Bushes above quote does matter, dopey... and this opinion comes from a
Republican.
..
That site has absolutely nothing to do with "taking back the media" and
has
everything to do with bashing the Bush administration and the Republican
party. Anybody who thinks a site like that has any merit is nuts. The
only
credible information that site provides is that the person or people that
run it do not like republicans because every single article on that site
is
either anti-Bush or anti-GOP and everything and everyone associated.
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brooks Hagenow" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
08 Sep 2003 07:26:28 AM |
|
|
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:zMl5b.147328$yg.40540945@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Brooks Hagenow" <bhagenow@sbcglobal-nope.net> wrote in message
news:38l5b.18258$Ih1.7158609@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com...
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:wC44b.31964$yg.13780180@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
Another example of your support for "Supporters/Fellow Travelers of
those
that support Terrorists/Terrorism" IMHO. Do a look up to see where
your
site
is sponsored from.
You want another examble, drunken dwarf?
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't
care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
Yes, please. And make it one that matters. One that isn't run by kooks
that only Bush and the Republican party out of power. Single minded
sites
are highly slanted and not very credible.
Bushes above quote does matter, dopey... and this opinion comes from a
Republican.
The war on terrorism never was about getting Bin Laden. That is just a
"nice to have." Getting Bin Laden will not end terrorism any more than not
getting him will keep terrorism going. It is the media that put so much
importance on getting Bin Laden. You destroy the terrorist networks and the
leaders are less important. You kill the leaders and the terrorist
organizations just pick new leaders and try to avenge the old leaders.
Hunting down and killing Bin Laden will not make America safe. Dismantling
the terror network he played a big role in building will do a lot more.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Coppertop Killer" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
09 Sep 2003 05:21:31 PM |
|
|
"Brooks Hagenow" <bhagenow@sbcglobal-nope.net> wrote in message
news:Uz_6b.22844$Ih1.8464614@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com...
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:zMl5b.147328$yg.40540945@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"Brooks Hagenow" <bhagenow@sbcglobal-nope.net> wrote in message
news:38l5b.18258$Ih1.7158609@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com...
"Coppertop Killer" <coppertop@killer.net> wrote in message
news:wC44b.31964$yg.13780180@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
Another example of your support for "Supporters/Fellow Travelers
of
those
that support Terrorists/Terrorism" IMHO. Do a look up to see where
your
site
is sponsored from.
You want another examble, drunken dwarf?
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't
care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
Yes, please. And make it one that matters. One that isn't run by
kooks
that only Bush and the Republican party out of power. Single minded
sites
are highly slanted and not very credible.
Bushes above quote does matter, dopey... and this opinion comes from a
Republican.
The war on terrorism never was about getting Bin Laden. That is just a
"nice to have." Getting Bin Laden will not end terrorism any more than
not
getting him will keep terrorism going. It is the media that put so much
importance on getting Bin Laden. You destroy the terrorist networks and
the
leaders are less important. You kill the leaders and the terrorist
organizations just pick new leaders and try to avenge the old leaders.
Nonsense, this administration was pumping Bin Laden from the start, the
media didn't pull his name out of a hat. This "nice to have" was in effect
let go by the same administration @ Tora Bora when they let the Pakistanis'
take charge after allegedly pinning him down, now he runs up and down the
border of Pak. and Afghan. while having the terrorist conventions.
With your thought process they should have never incarcerated John Gotti
because the Mob would still exist. If the leaders are free to spread more
anti-US rhetoric then new followers will arrive.
Hunting down and killing Bin Laden will not make America safe.
Dismantling
the terror network he played a big role in building will do a lot more.
Getting both would do more good...who else has the type of following as UBL?
No one.
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Coppertop Killer" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
30 Aug 2003 01:37:01 PM |
|
|
--
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:xu54b.1129$F21.779@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Don Freeman" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
29 Aug 2003 01:09:35 PM |
|
|
Musta been a bunch of propeller-capped wearing, John Birch Society
members, flying a disguised SR-7 modified to look like an Oscar Meyer
Wiener.
Speaking of wieners, aren't you guys tired of this? I know the rest
of us are.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hit1Hard" |
|
| Title: Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiots |
03 Sep 2003 03:42:44 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:42:59 -0400, The Phantom Penis wrote:
Do you also have a "least likely" version?
Sure. The least likely version is that there was no 757.
You mean like on this webpage with a superimposed airplane over a picture
that is considered "proof"?
http://www.bedoper.com/pentagon/camera1.htm
--
Hit1Hard
An Osho Zen Tarot rated email :
The Burden
Minor Arcana - Suit of Clouds - 6 of Clouds
http://www.osho.com/magazine/tarot/TarotCardNew.cfm?All=Yes&Nr=64
http://www.osho.com/magazine/tarot/picCards/zen064TheBurden.jpg
I am become death, shatterer of worlds. --Robert J. Oppenheimer
(1904-1967) (citing from the Bhagavadgita, after witnessing the world's
first nuclear explosion)
<Spam Shredder Block>
mply click on Me Times New alt 249 206 Untitled Document Type 1 62% 100
% +3 Times New Times, Human Growth Hormone Therapy Lose weight while bu
<Spam Shredder Block>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
