"Don Gabacho" <jpastore@nettaxi.com> wrote in message
news:1194760817.675004.31270@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 10, 11:16 pm, "Iconoclast" <Iconocl...@ecoweb.co.zw> wrote:
"Mike" <mgcul...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194746272.198933.59060@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 10, 11:40 am, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
<xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The fact that spitzer is even considering giving them licenses is
proof
that he has been bought off by the corporations that make a fortune
off
the
cheap labor of illegals. ILLEGALS HAVE NO RIGHTS.!!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21721382/
N.Y. governor sticks by license plan - for now
But Spitzer may yet rescind controversial measure amid bipartisan
pressure
updated 4:57 a.m. MT, Sat., Nov. 10, 2007
NEW YORK - Facing growing pressure from his own party, Gov. Eliot
Spitzer
indicated he had not ruled out rescinding a heavily criticized plan to
issue driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, according to published
reports.
Spitzer's proposal has generated a politically charged debate that has
reverberated in the presidential campaign. He said Friday he was
standing
by the plan for now, but he suggested he might consider backing off if
he
could not build enthusiasm for it, the reports said.
The Democratic governor has weathered intense criticism since he
announced
the license plan in September. He said giving driving credentials to
people
now "living in the shadows" would make traffic safer, shrink auto
insurance
premiums by insuring more drivers and boost security by identifying
more
immigrants.
But opponents in Albany and around the country have countered that
there
are security risks in giving government identification to as many as 1
million illegal immigrants in New York State. Some have also said the
plan
will encourage illegal immigration to the state.
(snip)
It was a tremendous miscalculation on his part. First of all, the
autocratic way in which he announced that NY illegals were going to be
given drivers licenses like it was a done deal, then the way he
continued to fight back against the overwhelming opposition. His
gargantuan rich kid's ego worked against his better interests as he
continued to hold out when every one else could see he was completely
done for on this issue.
One good thing that came out of it was drawing Hillary out to show the
world what a waffling phony she is. She's already sucked up to La
Raza big time. Now she's in a bind. As long as she was making the
circuit amongst the eastern elitests, she could get away with that
crap. But now she's going to have to start facing voters in the real
world, and it just doesn't look good for her at all.
If she tries to back pedal on amnesty, La Raza is going to sink its
fangs into her -- just look at how quickly they turned on Spitzer. If
she doesn't back off from amnesty and do it convincingly for the U.S.
voters at large, it's going to be a very long, bad year for her.
I hope you're right.
I've never seen a race that has misread the electorate as this one
has.
I'm sure that the media's favorite candidate's have fallen for the
contrived surveys essentially paid for by Bush's (Hispanic-stipulated)
educatational grants to the Business School Departments of the U.S.'s
Universities---all in bed with the Mexican Consulates.
Ah, yes. With the Pew Hispanic Trust Center cheerleading for the illegal
invaders. I'm surprised they haven't painted one of those old
thermometer-like signs (used by the Red Cross and United Way to show
progress toward a fund raising goal) on the side of the White House to
measure progress in the White House's goal to make mestizos, Muslim
terrorists and asylum seekers from Darfur the majority demographic in the
United States. After all, a mestizo "immigrant" cleaning toilets is equal
in the eyes of the neocons to a Tesla, Einstein, or Werner Von Braun. Mel
Martinez and the likes of Alberto Gonzales are the new face of the
Republican "party."
The idea was to form a phony consensus on the so-called "immigration"
and the resulting, and imposed, NAU.
More and more the race is not going to be about what Clinton and Obama
do or don't do but what Kucinich, Romney and even Dodd, Tancredo and
Paul do.
.