| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" |
| Date: |
23 Aug 2006 09:38:01 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Reasons LIEberman will lose. |
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:09:49 -0400, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
He won't lose and the democrats will cry into the same towel because
they share that towel knowing it would be unfair to have their own
towels. Sharing matters to liberals which is why all of them RENT and
do not own homes.
ALL liberals also let a homeless person sleep in their home because
that shows they care, oops I meant ALL liberals believe in higher
taxes so that it pretends to show they care.
I overheard a liberal in a bar once say, "I've never met or known a
problem that couldn't be cured by raising taxes on everyone."
I bet he believes that too.
I bet you, yeah the person reading this, I bet you believe it too.
$2.5 Trillion in the war on poverty, yep solved that problem didn't
we?
Maybe we should spend $100 Trillion and everyone could have a 10,000
Sq Ft home, 100 acres of land and 5 brand new Mercedes, and $10
Million in a savings account? Only a liberal would put $10 Million in
a savings account LOL!
You need to understand that BOTH parties are 100% corrupt.
.
|
|
| User: "Pedro Sanchez" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons LIEberman will lose. |
23 Aug 2006 11:06:00 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 02:38:01 GMT, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:09:49 -0400, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
He won't lose and the democrats will cry into the same towel because
they share that towel knowing it would be unfair to have their own
towels. Sharing matters to liberals which is why all of them RENT and
do not own homes.
ALL liberals also let a homeless person sleep in their home because
that shows they care, oops I meant ALL liberals believe in higher
taxes so that it pretends to show they care.
I overheard a liberal in a bar once say, "I've never met or known a
problem that couldn't be cured by raising taxes on everyone."
I bet he believes that too.
I bet you, yeah the person reading this, I bet you believe it too.
$2.5 Trillion in the war on poverty, yep solved that problem didn't
we?
Maybe we should spend $100 Trillion and everyone could have a 10,000
Sq Ft home, 100 acres of land and 5 brand new Mercedes, and $10
Million in a savings account? Only a liberal would put $10 Million in
a savings account LOL!
You need to understand that BOTH parties are 100% corrupt.
You need to understand that GOP and DNC are corrupt BUT liberals are
living in a fantasy world that writers on crack wouldn't put to paper.
.
|
|
|
| User: "PagCal" |
|
| Title: Re: Reasons LIEberman will lose. |
24 Aug 2006 03:54:35 AM |
|
|
Pedro Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 02:38:01 GMT, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:09:49 -0400, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
He won't lose and the democrats will cry into the same towel because
they share that towel knowing it would be unfair to have their own
towels. Sharing matters to liberals which is why all of them RENT and
do not own homes.
ALL liberals also let a homeless person sleep in their home because
that shows they care, oops I meant ALL liberals believe in higher
taxes so that it pretends to show they care.
I overheard a liberal in a bar once say, "I've never met or known a
problem that couldn't be cured by raising taxes on everyone."
I bet he believes that too.
I bet you, yeah the person reading this, I bet you believe it too.
$2.5 Trillion in the war on poverty, yep solved that problem didn't
we?
Maybe we should spend $100 Trillion and everyone could have a 10,000
Sq Ft home, 100 acres of land and 5 brand new Mercedes, and $10
Million in a savings account? Only a liberal would put $10 Million in
a savings account LOL!
You need to understand that BOTH parties are 100% corrupt.
You need to understand that GOP and DNC are corrupt BUT liberals are
living in a fantasy world that writers on crack wouldn't put to paper.
Ned Lamont's not corrupt, if for no other reason that he hasn't been to
'Washington' yet.
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|