It would be hard to forge headers for nukleus without forging librarian
posts since you are both the same person.
Don't get so upset. Your crybaby tantrums are getting old.
"nukleus" <nukleus@invalid.addr> wrote in message
news:bort44$6g$4@toster.Te.NeT.UA...
In article <cc47fb2521fe85a6c4c8d1ac91b56ef1@news.meganetnews.com>,
"librarian" <librarian@global.lib.reinforcement.authority> wrote:
Mike, perhaps I didn't make my point clearly enough. It is not because
it
is old that I proposed it's dissolution. The fact that it's old is the
reson that it will be sad if it needs to dissolve. :-)
The Masons you mentioned below that continue the conversations and
threads
still have a place on Usenet. soc.org.freemasonry is a strong newsgroup.
It already exists, and I would wager that every mason who posts here
either
posts there too or at least monitors the group.
Mr. double eagle, aka the head of phoenix,
what compels you to forge other people
usenet handles, eh?
I thought you are interested in Truth.
Then why do you need to forge the posts of librarian
and nukleus, eh?
Is THAT what you learned in your "make a good man better"
school, eh?
Well...
What to do.
Such is karma-marma-dharma.
"Mike Wells" <mgwblmtn@fgi.net> wrote in message
news:NKTrb.20381$Oo4.10545@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"Double Eagle" <nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fsPrb.81170$un.5472@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
I would like to open a discussion of the possibility of disolving
this
group
altogether. It is old. It has served it's purpose. It would be a
shame
to
disolve it. But perhaps it is a good idea.
For that matter, I am old and have served a purpose but I am not ready
to
be
terminated. IMO, because it is old and has, in one person's opinion,
served
its purpose indicates that further purposes are assured.
Further, if alt.freemasonry was dissolved some long-time Masons would
re-establish the free-for-all under another similar name. What, then,
would
be gained?
MW
.
