Opps, if kimmey had really knew the facts, he wouldn't have to lie claiming
the Morning After Pill hazards are bogus claims.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/19/opinion/19harrison.html
.....Three Americans have died after taking the pill since it was
approved.....

http://www.all.org/article.php?id=10172

First of all, under the Clinton/Gore administration, there has been a
renewal of commitment to abortion on demand, for any reason whatsoever, and
through the ninth month of pregnancy. This is clearly reflected in the
Clinton endorsement of the "Freedom of Choice [to kill babies] Act," RU-486
and so many other deadly policies.

a.. RU-486 has also been combined with other chemicals, like sulprostone,
in order to make the death of the preborn child more certain. However, it
has been reported that when sulprostone is used, the incidence of babies
born with malformations (babies who survive the abortion attempt) and the
incidence of women dying does increase.[7]

b.. An account of an RU-486 abortion done on one American girl, 17 years
of age, who traveled to England suggests that there are many "unpleasant
side effects, including nausea, vomiting and diarrhea." The young woman,
Aimee, told the reporter, "I felt like I was dying...it hurt so much. I had
contractions coming so fast, and I was sick to my stomach and dry heaving. I
couldn't stop trembling and I felt so hot."[8]

c.. Bernard N. Nathanson, M.D., has commented, regarding the
administration of RU-486 plus a prostaglandin backup: "These new drugs are a
frightening throwback to barbarism and an ominous harbinger of the
deterioration of the health of women and children worldwide. They represent
perhaps the greatest threat yet to life, liberty and the family in this
generation."[9]

d.. In a letter dated April 12, 1990, a group of French health
professionals warned of the hazards that RU-486, in combination with the use
of other chemicals, posed to women who use it.

e.. Dr. Raymond Godefroid, R.Ph., wrote, "Menstrual periods that last an
average of 12 days, hemorrhage severe enough to require blood transfusion,
and pain in 10% of the patients severe enough to require administration of
parenteral narcotics should not be given the 'safe' label...The fact that
premeditated pregnancy termination [abortion] is an unnatural and traumatic
event, no matter what the modus operandi, makes this antiprogesterone
steroid just another abortifacient..."[10]

f.. Five cases of congenital malformation were reported in the December
21-28, 1991, edition of The Lancet, a British medical journal.

g.. The April 30, 1991, Washington Post (p. 5) reported that the French
government banned the use of RU-486 by smokers and women over the age of 35
due to serious complications and the death of one woman.

h.. According to a letter by Karen Masulis, R.N., in the May 27, 1991,
edition of Nurseweek, most women who use RU-486 "bleed heavily and continue
to bleed heavily for 10 days"; "one in 1,000 women bleeds so heavily she
requires a transfusion"; "nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea are
common side effects" as well.[11]

i.. In a June 19, 1991, letter, Dr. Carl Peck of the United States
Department of Health and Human Services wrote: "[The] FDA continues to
believe that the RU-486 regimen poses an unreasonable safety risk which
makes it inappropriate for release under our personal importation policy."

You liars are morons. I never said those links listed were corroborating
that claim. kimmey had called me on my claim that this "morning after
abortion pill" was NOT controversial. My links prove otherwise, but do go on
as though you got something to chew on you inbred sycophant liberal moron!

"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:jhoZi.3351$TR5.1548@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com...

Ever thought about going to another pharmacist kimmey, one who maybe has

no

conscience?

When time is of the essence and there isn't another nearby pharmacy? Your
glib answers show YOU to be the one with "no conscience."

And yes this morning after pill is yet controversial on the basis of more
than just religious convictions. Young girls have bled to death from

taking

it kimmey, something you obviously don't care about....

Reputable cite for this claim?

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

MioMyo wrote:

Once again, you're running away from the point of the argument which I
slapped around you sycophant liberal moron butt bud, typical.

"Here's but one you freaking retard" "And another"

You posted two links to illustrate your "point" and they both turned out
to have
nothing to do with what your claim "Young girls have bled to death from
taking it"

Basically, you slapped your own moron butt.

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

MioMyo wrote:

Here's but one you freaking retard:

http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/health/2007/08/23/2007-08-23_sex_and_plan_b-1.html

And another.

http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/sep/06090701.html

There is no mention in either of these two links about "young girls"
having "bled to
death" from this pill.

"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message

"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:jhoZi.3351$TR5.1548@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com...

Ever thought about going to another pharmacist kimmey, one who
maybe
has

no

conscience?

When time is of the essence and there isn't another nearby pharmacy?
Your
glib answers show YOU to be the one with "no conscience."

And yes this morning after pill is yet controversial on the basis
of
more
than just religious convictions. Young girls have bled to death
from

taking

it kimmey, something you obviously don't care about....

Reputable cite for this claim?