| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Muslim terrorists and their Leftist stooges SUCK" |
| Date: |
24 Jan 2005 10:54:21 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Rumsfeld Played A Major Role in Kicking Democrat Party ***** |
"Johnny Lately" <johnnylately@johnnylately.net> wrote in message
news:LK9Jd.13621$i41.4884@fe06.lga...
Rumsfeld's Dirty Little Secret
The Pentagon has secretly been operating a clandestine espionage branch
for
the past two years after reinterpreting U.S. law to place more power
directly in the hands of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. According
to
an explosive new article in yesterday's Washington Post, the group, called
the Strategic Support Branch, is "designed to operate without detection
and
under the defense secretary's direct control" in collecting human
intelligence (or HUMINT, in intelligence-speak).
Interesting assertions on your part. However, the response of the American
Electorate to your claims (hardly new ones by the Democrat Party - they're
pretty much stuck in the same rhetoric they have used for the past 4
presidential races, and have nothing new to offer America) was to
overwhelmingly elect President Bush, as well as hand the GOP an even BIGGER
margin of control in both the House and the Senate.
Clearly the overwhelming majority of American voters now recognize that the
Democrat Party has no viable solutions to offer, and instead that party
consists of nothing more than a ragtag collection of misfits, perverts,
whiners, moaners, bitchers, complainers, and perpetual losers.
In short, the Democrat Party has nothing useful to offer America.
.
|
|
| User: "John Starrett" |
|
| Title: Re: Rumsfeld Played A Major Role in Kicking Democrat Party ***** |
24 Jan 2005 03:41:28 PM |
|
|
Muslim terrorists and their Leftist stooges SUCK wrote:
"Johnny Lately" <johnnylately@johnnylately.net> wrote in message
news:LK9Jd.13621$i41.4884@fe06.lga...
Rumsfeld's Dirty Little Secret
The Pentagon has secretly been operating a clandestine espionage branch
for
the past two years after reinterpreting U.S. law to place more power
directly in the hands of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. According
to
an explosive new article in yesterday's Washington Post, the group, called
the Strategic Support Branch, is "designed to operate without detection
and
under the defense secretary's direct control" in collecting human
intelligence (or HUMINT, in intelligence-speak).
Interesting assertions on your part. However, the response of the American
Electorate to your claims (hardly new ones by the Democrat Party - they're
pretty much stuck in the same rhetoric they have used for the past 4
presidential races, and have nothing new to offer America) was to
overwhelmingly elect President Bush, as well as hand the GOP an even BIGGER
margin of control in both the House and the Senate.
The American electorate did not respond to these claims. Even if they
had, what does the opinion of the electorate have to do with whether or
not a new secret espionage branch exists?
Your reply makes no sense.
JS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Muslim terrorists and their Leftist stooges SUCK" |
|
| Title: Re: Rumsfeld Played A Major Role in Kicking Democrat Party ***** |
24 Jan 2005 06:51:43 PM |
|
|
"John Starrett" <jstarret@sdc.org> wrote in message
news:bs6dnc40Ur2K9mjcRVn-tA@nmt.edu...
Muslim terrorists and their Leftist stooges SUCK wrote:
"Johnny Lately" <johnnylately@johnnylately.net> wrote in message
news:LK9Jd.13621$i41.4884@fe06.lga...
Rumsfeld's Dirty Little Secret
The Pentagon has secretly been operating a clandestine espionage branch
for
the past two years after reinterpreting U.S. law to place more power
directly in the hands of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. According
to
an explosive new article in yesterday's Washington Post, the group,
called
the Strategic Support Branch, is "designed to operate without detection
and
under the defense secretary's direct control" in collecting human
intelligence (or HUMINT, in intelligence-speak).
Interesting assertions on your part. However, the response of the
American
Electorate to your claims (hardly new ones by the Democrat Party -
they're
pretty much stuck in the same rhetoric they have used for the past 4
presidential races, and have nothing new to offer America) was to
overwhelmingly elect President Bush, as well as hand the GOP an even
BIGGER
margin of control in both the House and the Senate.
The American electorate did not respond to these claims. Even if they had,
what does the opinion of the electorate have to do with whether or not a
new secret espionage branch exists?
Your reply makes no sense.
On the contrary John, the electorate did indeed reply to the REPEATED
claims, made by your Democrat Party, that this, that, and the other thing
was "wrong" with what President Bush and his Administration were doing.
Basically, John, your Democrat Party has cried wolf for so long now (years
and years, actually) that we Americans have grown immune to your Party's
lies and *****. In fact, what we voters are doing now is BACKLASHING
against you Democrats and your constant whining.
The really sweet part is that you Democrats STILL haven't learned your
lesson from your REPEATED election defeats handed to you by us voters.
Sweet.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Starrett" |
|
| Title: Re: Rumsfeld Played A Major Role in Kicking Democrat Party ***** |
25 Jan 2005 12:40:13 PM |
|
|
Muslim terrorists and their Leftist stooges SUCK wrote:
"John Starrett" <jstarret@sdc.org> wrote in message
news:bs6dnc40Ur2K9mjcRVn-tA@nmt.edu...
Muslim terrorists and their Leftist stooges SUCK wrote:
"Johnny Lately" <johnnylately@johnnylately.net> wrote in message
news:LK9Jd.13621$i41.4884@fe06.lga...
Rumsfeld's Dirty Little Secret
The Pentagon has secretly been operating a clandestine espionage branch
for
the past two years after reinterpreting U.S. law to place more power
directly in the hands of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. According
to
an explosive new article in yesterday's Washington Post, the group,
called
the Strategic Support Branch, is "designed to operate without detection
and
under the defense secretary's direct control" in collecting human
intelligence (or HUMINT, in intelligence-speak).
Interesting assertions on your part. However, the response of the
American
Electorate to your claims (hardly new ones by the Democrat Party -
they're
pretty much stuck in the same rhetoric they have used for the past 4
presidential races, and have nothing new to offer America) was to
overwhelmingly elect President Bush, as well as hand the GOP an even
BIGGER
margin of control in both the House and the Senate.
The American electorate did not respond to these claims. Even if they had,
what does the opinion of the electorate have to do with whether or not a
new secret espionage branch exists?
Your reply makes no sense.
On the contrary John, the electorate did indeed reply to the REPEATED
claims, made by your Democrat Party, that this, that, and the other thing
was "wrong" with what President Bush and his Administration were doing.
Basically, John, your Democrat Party has cried wolf for so long now (years
and years, actually) that we Americans have grown immune to your Party's
lies and *****. In fact, what we voters are doing now is BACKLASHING
against you Democrats and your constant whining.
The really sweet part is that you Democrats STILL haven't learned your
lesson from your REPEATED election defeats handed to you by us voters.
Sweet.
You are still not making sense. What does this have to do with whether
or not there is a new espionage agency?
JS
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Rumsfeld Played A Major Role in Kicking Democrat Party ***** |
24 Jan 2005 09:33:23 PM |
|
|
John Starrett wrote:
Muslim terrorists and their Leftist stooges SUCK wrote:
"Johnny Lately" <johnnylately@johnnylately.net> wrote in message
news:LK9Jd.13621$i41.4884@fe06.lga...
Rumsfeld's Dirty Little Secret
The Pentagon has secretly been operating a clandestine espionage
branch
for
the past two years after reinterpreting U.S. law to place more
power
directly in the hands of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.
According
to
an explosive new article in yesterday's Washington Post, the group,
called
the Strategic Support Branch, is "designed to operate without
detection
and
under the defense secretary's direct control" in collecting human
intelligence (or HUMINT, in intelligence-speak).
Interesting assertions on your part. However, the response of the
American
Electorate to your claims (hardly new ones by the Democrat Party -
they're
pretty much stuck in the same rhetoric they have used for the past
4
presidential races, and have nothing new to offer America) was to
overwhelmingly elect President Bush, as well as hand the GOP an
even BIGGER
margin of control in both the House and the Senate.
The American electorate did not respond to these claims. Even if they
had, what does the opinion of the electorate have to do with whether
or
not a new secret espionage branch exists?
Your reply makes no sense.
JS
He wrote the same thing word for word in another post.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
