| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"DemsLackGravitas" |
| Date: |
13 Dec 2003 07:46:28 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Rush Says Leftists' Halliburton Hypocrisy Exposed by Columnist |
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OBECb.38489$nq7.6800@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns944FCBAF3EB47ta2eenew@216.148.227.77...
Frog <FrogRemailer@bigfoot.com> wrote in news:7CNOHFPZ37968.0751736111
@Gilgamesh-frog.org:
Rush Limbaugh - December 12, 2003
http://tinyurl.com/z0sh
Rush says it, you believe it, and
that settles it, eh?
He's not too bright. He needs someone to tell him how to think.
Others look to the editorial writers over at the New York Times to tell them
how to think, or they listen to Dan Rather, or Peter Jennings, or Katie
Couric, or Tom Brokaw, or any other of a whole host of biased Lefties.
Remember - over 90% of the people who work in "news" rooms VOTE DEMOCRAT.
But of course none of THEM are biased like Rush is, right? Oh nooooooo, of
course not.......
.
|
|
| User: "Mitchell Holman" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Says Leftists' Halliburton Hypocrisy Exposed by Columnist |
13 Dec 2003 08:39:36 AM |
|
|
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in
news:UKECb.533723$Tr4.1460572@attbi_s03:
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OBECb.38489$nq7.6800@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns944FCBAF3EB47ta2eenew@216.148.227.77...
Frog <FrogRemailer@bigfoot.com> wrote in
news:7CNOHFPZ37968.0751736111 @Gilgamesh-frog.org:
Rush Limbaugh - December 12, 2003
http://tinyurl.com/z0sh
Rush says it, you believe it, and
that settles it, eh?
He's not too bright. He needs someone to tell him how to think.
Others look to the editorial writers over at the New York Times to tell
them how to think, or they listen to Dan Rather, or Peter Jennings, or
Katie Couric, or Tom Brokaw, or any other of a whole host of biased
Lefties.
Remember - over 90% of the people who work in "news" rooms VOTE
DEMOCRAT.
You got some proof of that, Babs?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rhinehold" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Says Leftists' Halliburton Hypocrisy Exposed by Columnist |
13 Dec 2003 12:00:10 PM |
|
|
http://secure.mediaresearch.org/news/MediaBiasBasics.html
81 percent of the journalists interviewed voted for the Democratic
presidential candidate in every election between 1964 and 1976.
In the Democratic landslide of 1964, 94 percent of the press surveyed
voted for President Lyndon Johnson (D) over Senator Barry Goldwater (R).
In 1968, 86 percent of the press surveyed voted for Democrat Senator
Hubert Humphrey.
In 1972, when 62 percent of the electorate chose President Richard
Nixon, 81 percent of the media elite voted for liberal Democratic
Senator George McGovern.
In 1976, the Democratic nominee, Jimmy Carter, captured the allegiance
of 81 percent of the reporters surveyed while a mere 19 percent cast
their ballots for President Gerald Ford.
Over the 16-year period, the Republican candidate always received less
than 20 percent of the media’s vote.
HTH
Rhinehold
---
Mitchell Holman wrote:
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in
news:UKECb.533723$Tr4.1460572@attbi_s03:
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OBECb.38489$nq7.6800@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns944FCBAF3EB47ta2eenew@216.148.227.77...
Frog <FrogRemailer@bigfoot.com> wrote in
news:7CNOHFPZ37968.0751736111 @Gilgamesh-frog.org:
Rush Limbaugh - December 12, 2003
http://tinyurl.com/z0sh
Rush says it, you believe it, and
that settles it, eh?
He's not too bright. He needs someone to tell him how to think.
Others look to the editorial writers over at the New York Times to tell
them how to think, or they listen to Dan Rather, or Peter Jennings, or
Katie Couric, or Tom Brokaw, or any other of a whole host of biased
Lefties.
Remember - over 90% of the people who work in "news" rooms VOTE
DEMOCRAT.
You got some proof of that, Babs?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "abracadabra" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Says Leftists' Halliburton Hypocrisy Exposed by Columnist |
13 Dec 2003 09:57:27 AM |
|
|
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:UKECb.533723$Tr4.1460572@attbi_s03...
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OBECb.38489$nq7.6800@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns944FCBAF3EB47ta2eenew@216.148.227.77...
Frog <FrogRemailer@bigfoot.com> wrote in news:7CNOHFPZ37968.0751736111
@Gilgamesh-frog.org:
Rush Limbaugh - December 12, 2003
http://tinyurl.com/z0sh
Rush says it, you believe it, and
that settles it, eh?
He's not too bright. He needs someone to tell him how to think.
Others look to the editorial writers over at the New York Times to tell
them
how to think, or they listen to Dan Rather, or Peter Jennings, or Katie
Couric, or Tom Brokaw, or any other of a whole host of biased Lefties.
Remember - over 90% of the people who work in "news" rooms VOTE DEMOCRAT.
That is a baseless statement. You got anything to back it up?
But of course none of THEM are biased like Rush is, right?
Rush is a junkie/Entertainer. He talks about things in a way so as to make
money. Oh, and he's a scumbag junkie.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Corey" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Says Leftists' Halliburton Hypocrisy Exposed by Columnist |
13 Dec 2003 11:43:10 AM |
|
|
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:HFGCb.111$sW5.97@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:UKECb.533723$Tr4.1460572@attbi_s03...
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OBECb.38489$nq7.6800@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns944FCBAF3EB47ta2eenew@216.148.227.77...
Frog <FrogRemailer@bigfoot.com> wrote in
news:7CNOHFPZ37968.0751736111
@Gilgamesh-frog.org:
Rush Limbaugh - December 12, 2003
http://tinyurl.com/z0sh
Rush says it, you believe it, and
that settles it, eh?
He's not too bright. He needs someone to tell him how to think.
Others look to the editorial writers over at the New York Times to tell
them
how to think, or they listen to Dan Rather, or Peter Jennings, or Katie
Couric, or Tom Brokaw, or any other of a whole host of biased Lefties.
Remember - over 90% of the people who work in "news" rooms VOTE
DEMOCRAT.
That is a baseless statement. You got anything to back it up?
But of course none of THEM are biased like Rush is, right?
Rush is a junkie/Entertainer. He talks about things in a way so as to make
money. Oh, and he's a scumbag junkie.
Corey Says-
Well actually Rush was addicted to prescription pain killers for his back
pain. Hardly the same as a "get high" junkie. So your statement above is
baseless and you have nothing to back it up. end.
.
|
|
|
| User: "abracadabra" |
|
| Title: Re: Corey says "it's OK to be a JUNKIE if you have an excuse" |
13 Dec 2003 02:27:29 PM |
|
|
"Corey" <upyoursvirusgeek@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:OcICb.70921$A77.65871@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:HFGCb.111$sW5.97@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:UKECb.533723$Tr4.1460572@attbi_s03...
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OBECb.38489$nq7.6800@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns944FCBAF3EB47ta2eenew@216.148.227.77...
Frog <FrogRemailer@bigfoot.com> wrote in
news:7CNOHFPZ37968.0751736111
@Gilgamesh-frog.org:
Rush Limbaugh - December 12, 2003
http://tinyurl.com/z0sh
Rush says it, you believe it, and
that settles it, eh?
He's not too bright. He needs someone to tell him how to think.
Others look to the editorial writers over at the New York Times to
tell
them
how to think, or they listen to Dan Rather, or Peter Jennings, or
Katie
Couric, or Tom Brokaw, or any other of a whole host of biased Lefties.
Remember - over 90% of the people who work in "news" rooms VOTE
DEMOCRAT.
That is a baseless statement. You got anything to back it up?
But of course none of THEM are biased like Rush is, right?
Rush is a junkie/Entertainer. He talks about things in a way so as to
make
money. Oh, and he's a scumbag junkie.
Corey Says-
Well actually Rush was addicted to prescription pain killers for his back
pain. Hardly the same as a "get high" junkie.
And you know this because.....the JUNKIE told you so!
Remember - Right Wing Hero DR. LAURA says you can never trust a drunk or a
druggie, and Rush is certainly a proven druggie.
So your statement above is
baseless and you have nothing to back it up
Your statement is baseless. I base mine on the decades our country has
engaged in a "WAR ON DRUGS". Illegal drugs are illegal drugs. The drugs
Rushbo has been swilling will get you AS HIGH AS THE SPACESHUTTLE. Sure -
one can SAY he used them for painkillers, but isn't that just an exuse - not
taking responsibility for one's own actions?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mitchell Holman" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Says Leftists' Halliburton Hypocrisy Exposed by Columnist |
13 Dec 2003 05:01:53 PM |
|
|
"Corey" <upyoursvirusgeek@sbcglobal.net> wrote in news:OcICb.70921
$A77.65871@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com:
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:HFGCb.111$sW5.97@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:UKECb.533723$Tr4.1460572@attbi_s03...
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OBECb.38489$nq7.6800@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns944FCBAF3EB47ta2eenew@216.148.227.77...
Frog <FrogRemailer@bigfoot.com> wrote in
news:7CNOHFPZ37968.0751736111
@Gilgamesh-frog.org:
Rush Limbaugh - December 12, 2003
http://tinyurl.com/z0sh
Rush says it, you believe it, and
that settles it, eh?
He's not too bright. He needs someone to tell him how to think.
Others look to the editorial writers over at the New York Times to
tell
them
how to think, or they listen to Dan Rather, or Peter Jennings, or
Katie
Couric, or Tom Brokaw, or any other of a whole host of biased Lefties.
Remember - over 90% of the people who work in "news" rooms VOTE
DEMOCRAT.
That is a baseless statement. You got anything to back it up?
But of course none of THEM are biased like Rush is, right?
Rush is a junkie/Entertainer. He talks about things in a way so as to
make
money. Oh, and he's a scumbag junkie.
Corey Says-
Well actually Rush was addicted to prescription pain killers for his back
pain.
Gee, that "back pain" sure didn't interfere with
his golf game. He was bragging about all the golf
tournements he was playing just last summer. Said
there was nothing wrong with him.
Got any other silly excuses for junkie Rush
and his illegal drug trades?
Hardly the same as a "get high" junkie. So your statement above is
baseless and you have nothing to back it up. end.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "loaferboss" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Says Leftists' Halliburton Hypocrisy Exposed by Columnist |
13 Dec 2003 08:33:02 AM |
|
|
in article UKECb.533723$Tr4.1460572@attbi_s03, DemsLackGravitas at
LiteWeightDems@RNC.net wrote on 12/13/03 8:46 AM:
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OBECb.38489$nq7.6800@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns944FCBAF3EB47ta2eenew@216.148.227.77...
Frog <FrogRemailer@bigfoot.com> wrote in news:7CNOHFPZ37968.0751736111
@Gilgamesh-frog.org:
Rush Limbaugh - December 12, 2003
http://tinyurl.com/z0sh
Rush says it, you believe it, and
that settles it, eh?
He's not too bright. He needs someone to tell him how to think.
Others look to the editorial writers over at the New York Times to tell them
how to think, or they listen to Dan Rather, or Peter Jennings, or Katie
Couric, or Tom Brokaw, or any other of a whole host of biased Lefties.
This goes to a fundamental problem you have, BW - most people don't need
anyone to tell them how to think. Just you guys, who take your cues from Ed
and Karl ... and that squirrelly Ralph Reed.
Remember - over 90% of the people who work in "news" rooms VOTE DEMOCRAT.
Cite?
But of course none of THEM are biased like Rush is, right? Oh nooooooo, of
course not.......
You obviously know nothing about journalism and less about how a newsroom
works - or you do and play upon that lack of perception in others. Which is
it? For anyone who KNOWS how a newsroom works, there's no time for personal
opinion and in political stories the bias is usually personal and not based
on political parties.
Also, journalists, as BushCo knows, are swayed by kindness - and a good
party will get better coverage than a cold coke and a pack of Nabs -
something BushCo did well in 2000.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Corey" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Says Leftists' Halliburton Hypocrisy Exposed by Columnist |
13 Dec 2003 08:49:44 AM |
|
|
"loaferboss" <loaferboss@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BC008D4E.FD2%loaferboss@comcast.net...
in article UKECb.533723$Tr4.1460572@attbi_s03, DemsLackGravitas at
LiteWeightDems@RNC.net wrote on 12/13/03 8:46 AM:
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OBECb.38489$nq7.6800@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns944FCBAF3EB47ta2eenew@216.148.227.77...
Frog <FrogRemailer@bigfoot.com> wrote in news:7CNOHFPZ37968.0751736111
@Gilgamesh-frog.org:
Rush Limbaugh - December 12, 2003
http://tinyurl.com/z0sh
Rush says it, you believe it, and
that settles it, eh?
He's not too bright. He needs someone to tell him how to think.
Others look to the editorial writers over at the New York Times to tell
them
how to think, or they listen to Dan Rather, or Peter Jennings, or Katie
Couric, or Tom Brokaw, or any other of a whole host of biased Lefties.
This goes to a fundamental problem you have, BW - most people don't need
anyone to tell them how to think. Just you guys, who take your cues from
Ed
and Karl ... and that squirrelly Ralph Reed.
Remember - over 90% of the people who work in "news" rooms VOTE
DEMOCRAT.
Cite?
But of course none of THEM are biased like Rush is, right? Oh
nooooooo, of
course not.......
You obviously know nothing about journalism and less about how a newsroom
works - or you do and play upon that lack of perception in others. Which
is
it? For anyone who KNOWS how a newsroom works, there's no time for
personal
opinion and in political stories the bias is usually personal and not
based
on political parties.
Corey Says-
Yeah. That means the allegations against Fox News are all lies of the
left. end.
Also, journalists, as BushCo knows, are swayed by kindness - and a good
party will get better coverage than a cold coke and a pack of Nabs -
something BushCo did well in 2000.
Corey Says-
I guess good means to slander the other party and tell the public they are
doing the wrong thing, no matter if they are or aren't?
If their is a possible unverified scandal, run the story as though they
actually have something until hopefully some day something will stick. So
far nothing has. end.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Keynes" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Says Leftists' Halliburton Hypocrisy Exposed by Columnist |
15 Dec 2003 01:22:08 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:33:02 -0500, loaferboss <loaferboss@comcast.net> wrote:
in article UKECb.533723$Tr4.1460572@attbi_s03, DemsLackGravitas at
LiteWeightDems@RNC.net wrote on 12/13/03 8:46 AM:
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OBECb.38489$nq7.6800@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns944FCBAF3EB47ta2eenew@216.148.227.77...
Frog <FrogRemailer@bigfoot.com> wrote in news:7CNOHFPZ37968.0751736111
@Gilgamesh-frog.org:
Rush Limbaugh - December 12, 2003
http://tinyurl.com/z0sh
Rush says it, you believe it, and
that settles it, eh?
He's not too bright. He needs someone to tell him how to think.
Others look to the editorial writers over at the New York Times to tell them
how to think, or they listen to Dan Rather, or Peter Jennings, or Katie
Couric, or Tom Brokaw, or any other of a whole host of biased Lefties.
This goes to a fundamental problem you have, BW - most people don't need
anyone to tell them how to think. Just you guys, who take your cues from Ed
and Karl ... and that squirrelly Ralph Reed.
Remember - over 90% of the people who work in "news" rooms VOTE DEMOCRAT.
Cite?
But of course none of THEM are biased like Rush is, right? Oh nooooooo, of
course not.......
You obviously know nothing about journalism and less about how a newsroom
works - or you do and play upon that lack of perception in others. Which is
it? For anyone who KNOWS how a newsroom works, there's no time for personal
opinion and in political stories the bias is usually personal and not based
on political parties.
Also, journalists, as BushCo knows, are swayed by kindness - and a good
party will get better coverage than a cold coke and a pack of Nabs -
something BushCo did well in 2000.
I'm pissed at the networks.
Ronald McReagan's staff was savy.
They gave the media a non-event a day,
photo ops in front of the flag. Bushco Inc
uses the same tool, and the freaking media
runs bogus whitehouse propaganda every
damn day, at no expense to Bushco Inc.
I'm sick of it. Damn the lazy media for
giving free time to this ***** Bushco Inc.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T.Carr" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Says Leftists' Halliburton Hypocrisy Exposed by Columnist |
15 Dec 2003 07:15:37 PM |
|
|
Keynes <Keynes@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<082stvs4uhhgpj3pdd72dr29qk81ia91i3@4ax.com>...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:33:02 -0500, loaferboss <loaferboss@comcast.net> wrote:
in article UKECb.533723$Tr4.1460572@attbi_s03, DemsLackGravitas at
LiteWeightDems@RNC.net wrote on 12/13/03 8:46 AM:
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OBECb.38489$nq7.6800@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns944FCBAF3EB47ta2eenew@216.148.227.77...
Frog <FrogRemailer@bigfoot.com> wrote in news:7CNOHFPZ37968.0751736111
@Gilgamesh-frog.org:
Rush Limbaugh - December 12, 2003
http://tinyurl.com/z0sh
Rush says it, you believe it, and
that settles it, eh?
He's not too bright. He needs someone to tell him how to think.
Others look to the editorial writers over at the New York Times to tell them
how to think, or they listen to Dan Rather, or Peter Jennings, or Katie
Couric, or Tom Brokaw, or any other of a whole host of biased Lefties.
This goes to a fundamental problem you have, BW - most people don't need
anyone to tell them how to think. Just you guys, who take your cues from Ed
and Karl ... and that squirrelly Ralph Reed.
Remember - over 90% of the people who work in "news" rooms VOTE DEMOCRAT.
Cite?
But of course none of THEM are biased like Rush is, right? Oh nooooooo, of
course not.......
You obviously know nothing about journalism and less about how a newsroom
works - or you do and play upon that lack of perception in others. Which is
it? For anyone who KNOWS how a newsroom works, there's no time for personal
opinion and in political stories the bias is usually personal and not based
on political parties.
Also, journalists, as BushCo knows, are swayed by kindness - and a good
party will get better coverage than a cold coke and a pack of Nabs -
something BushCo did well in 2000.
Keynes <Keynes@earthlink.net
I'm pissed at the networks.
Ronald McReagan's staff was savy.
They gave the media a non-event a day,
photo ops in front of the flag.
Reagan was a rookie compared to Clinton.
Bushco Inc
uses the same tool, and the freaking media
runs bogus whitehouse propaganda every
damn day, at no expense to Bushco Inc.
I'm sick of it. Damn the lazy media for
giving free time to this ***** Bushco Inc.
I somehow missed your concern about the lazy media giving free time
via the Clinton News Network (and affiliates) from 1992-2000
I guess it depends on who's Al is being Gored
T.Carr
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
