| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Frank Arthur" |
| Date: |
04 Jun 2006 03:37:43 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Shocking 9/11 Documentary Is Making Waves In The Mainstream Media |
There is no "Shocking Documentary".
There are idiots who like to believe in conspiracies!
"StopSept11Terrorists" <gestapo_hunter@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1149436920.636188.204900@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
Shocking 9/11 Documentary Is Making Waves In The Mainstream Media
September 11th Revisited: Were Explosives Used to Bring Down the
Buildings?
Tucson, AZ (PRWEB) May 27, 2006 -- Since the premiere of September 11th
Revisited (www.911revisited.com) earlier this year, the buzz on the
internet has been nothing short of amazing. Screenings for this
critically acclaimed independent film are currently being held at
military bases, colleges, churches, and other venues across the
country.
The interest stems from the growing number of serious questions
surrounding 9/11 being asked by family members, victims, respectable
scholars, and government officials that have gone unmentioned by the
mainstream media for the last 4+ years.
September 11th Revisited is perhaps the most riveting film ever made
about the destruction of the World Trade Center. This is a powerful
documentary which features eyewitness accounts and archived news
footage that was shot on September 11, 2001 but never replayed on
television. This film provides stunning evidence that explosives were
used in the complete demolition of the WTC Twin Towers and WTC Building
7.
"It is time to ask questions and demand answers," says Dustin
Mugford, producer and director of September 11th Revisited.
A recent Zogby International poll shows that 45% of Americans want a
new independent investigation of 9/11, with 42% believing the 9/11
Commission was a cover-up which refused to investigate critical
evidence of the attacks. The same poll shows that 43% of Americans were
not aware that World Trade Center Building 7 totally collapsed on 9/11,
with 38% saying that they were aware of the collapse and think it
should have been investigated by the 9/11 Commission.
Synopsis:
September 11th Revisited is an extensive collection of archived news
footage covering the fall of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and
Building 7 on 9/11. It features interviews with eyewitnesses &
firefighters along with expert analysis by Steven E. Jones, David Ray
Griffin, Jeffrey King, James H. Fetzer, and others. Were explosives
used to bring down the buildings? Watch the video and judge for
yourself.
The September 11th Revisited film is available for free viewing at:
www.911revisited.com
.
|
|
| User: "effty" |
|
| Title: Re: Shocking 9/11 Documentary Is Making Waves In The Mainstream Media |
04 Jun 2006 06:05:38 PM |
|
|
"Frank Arthur" <Art@Arthurian.com> wrote in message
news:owHgg.11818$EX2.6137@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
There is no "Shocking Documentary".
There are idiots who like to believe in conspiracies!
Frank, I'm shocked! You didn't watch the movie did you?
If conspiracies did not exist we would have no use for the word
"conspiracy." We would have no need for laws regarding conspiracy.
I can think of more than one politician who'd like to do away with those
nagging conspiracy charges.
Yep! Down with conspiracies!
Henceforth, crimes are only allowed to be committed by one person.
No more group crimes.
Reality has no room for groups of criminals.
~e.
"StopSept11Terrorists" <gestapo_hunter@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1149436920.636188.204900@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
Shocking 9/11 Documentary Is Making Waves In The Mainstream Media
September 11th Revisited: Were Explosives Used to Bring Down the
Buildings?
Tucson, AZ (PRWEB) May 27, 2006 -- Since the premiere of September 11th
Revisited (www.911revisited.com) earlier this year, the buzz on the
internet has been nothing short of amazing. Screenings for this
critically acclaimed independent film are currently being held at
military bases, colleges, churches, and other venues across the
country.
The interest stems from the growing number of serious questions
surrounding 9/11 being asked by family members, victims, respectable
scholars, and government officials that have gone unmentioned by the
mainstream media for the last 4+ years.
September 11th Revisited is perhaps the most riveting film ever made
about the destruction of the World Trade Center. This is a powerful
documentary which features eyewitness accounts and archived news
footage that was shot on September 11, 2001 but never replayed on
television. This film provides stunning evidence that explosives were
used in the complete demolition of the WTC Twin Towers and WTC Building
7.
"It is time to ask questions and demand answers," says Dustin
Mugford, producer and director of September 11th Revisited.
A recent Zogby International poll shows that 45% of Americans want a
new independent investigation of 9/11, with 42% believing the 9/11
Commission was a cover-up which refused to investigate critical
evidence of the attacks. The same poll shows that 43% of Americans were
not aware that World Trade Center Building 7 totally collapsed on 9/11,
with 38% saying that they were aware of the collapse and think it
should have been investigated by the 9/11 Commission.
Synopsis:
September 11th Revisited is an extensive collection of archived news
footage covering the fall of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and
Building 7 on 9/11. It features interviews with eyewitnesses &
firefighters along with expert analysis by Steven E. Jones, David Ray
Griffin, Jeffrey King, James H. Fetzer, and others. Were explosives
used to bring down the buildings? Watch the video and judge for
yourself.
The September 11th Revisited film is available for free viewing at:
www.911revisited.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mabon Dane" |
|
| Title: Re: Shocking 9/11 Documentary Is Making Waves In The Mainstream Media |
04 Jun 2006 06:27:15 PM |
|
|
Media ... newspapers and news are so old hat... if the bloggers get
excited about something then it is news.
.
|
|
|
| User: "effty" |
|
| Title: Re: Shocking 9/11 Documentary Is Making Waves In The Mainstream Media |
06 Jun 2006 06:18:57 AM |
|
|
"Mabon Dane" <haverhill@h2009.com> wrote in message
news:1149463635.567867.136340@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
Media ... newspapers and news are so old hat... if the bloggers get
excited about something then it is news.
I agree. Ever wonder why the media message always seems so consistent?
Even when the message is wrong?
http://www.corporations.org/media/
Could have something to do with the 5 or 6 corporations that own
everything.
Thank goodness for those bloggers!
~e.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wings of a Dove" |
|
| Title: Re: Shocking 9/11 Documentary Is Making Waves In The Mainstream Media |
04 Jun 2006 09:32:23 PM |
|
|
EXPERTS CLAIM OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY IS A HOAX
Scholars for 9/11 Truth call for verification and publication by an
international consortium.
Duluth, MN (PRWEB) January 30, 2006 -- A group of distinguished experts
and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Wayne
Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow, have
concluded that senior government officials have covered up crucial
facts about what really happened on 9/11.
They have joined with others in common cause as members of "Scholars
for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T), because they are convinced, based on their
own research, that the administration has been deceiving the nation
about critical events in New York and Washington, D.C.
These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by
elements within the administration to manipulate Americans into
supporting policies at home and abroad they would never have condoned
absent "another Pearl Harbor."
They believe that this White House is incapable of investigating itself
and hope the possibility that Congress might hold an unaccountable
administration accountable is not merely naive or wishful thinking.
They are encouraging news services around the world to secure
scientific advice by taking advantage of university resources to verify
or to falsify their discoveries. Extraordinary situations, they
believe, require extraordinary measures.
If this were done, they contend, one of the great hoaxes of history
would stand naked before the eyes of the world and its perpetrators
would be clearly exposed, which may be the only hope for saving this
nation from ever greater abuse.
They hope this might include The New York Times, which, in their
opinion, has repeatedly failed to exercise the leadership expected from
our nation's newspaper of record by a series of inexplicable lapses. It
has failed to vigorously investigate tainted elections, lies leading to
the war in Iraq, or illegal NSA spying on the American people, major
unconstitutional events. In their view, The Times might compensate for
its loss of stature by helping to reveal the truth about one of the
great turning-point events of modern history.
Stunning as it may be to acknowledge, they observe, the government has
brought but one indictment against anyone and, to the best of their
knowledge, has not even reprimanded anyone for incompetence or
dereliction of duty. The official conspiracy theory--that nineteen Arab
hijackers under control of one man in the wilds of Afghanistan brought
this about--is unsupportable by the evidential data, which they have
studied. They even believe there are good reasons for suspecting that
video tapes officially attributed to Osama bin Laden are not genuine.
They have found the government's own investigation to be severely
flawed. The 9/11 Commission, designated to investigate the attack, was
directed by Philip Zelikow, part of the Bush transition team in the NSA
sector and the co-author of a book with Condoleezza Rice. A Bush
supporter and director of national security affairs, he could hardly be
expected to conduct an objective and impartial investigation.
They have discovered that The 9/11 Commission Report is replete with
omissions, distortions, and factual errors, which David Ray Griffin has
documented in his book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and
Distortions. The official report, for example, entirely ignores the
collapse of WTC7, a 47-story building, which was hit by no airplanes,
was only damaged by a few small fires, and fell seven hours after the
attack.
Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and
scholars find profoundly troubling:
In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise
buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or
since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is
this possible?
The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged
"hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet
according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How
is this possible?
Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were
designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact
of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito netting
with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. How is this possible?
Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700=B0F, the temperature of
jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800=B0F under optimal conditions, and
UL certified the steel used to 2,000=B0F for six hours, the buildings
cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?
Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in
the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very
close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is this
possible?
Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking
four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage
to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. How is this
possible?
Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground bunker at
the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young
officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the
Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?" The order cannot have been to
shoot it down, but must have been the opposite. How is this possible?
A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight
93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris
scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is
scattered over an area of about eight square miles. How is this
possible?
A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on
9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and
distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is
this possible?
The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL" simulating
the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and yet
Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that "no one
ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. How is
this possible?
Their own physics research has established that only controlled
demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and
virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While
turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down into
their own footprints.
These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude
that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach--which
has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser--of
"creating our own reality."
Mabon Dane wrote:
Media ... newspapers and news are so old hat... if the bloggers get
excited about something then it is news.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wings of a Dove" |
|
| Title: Re: Shocking 9/11 Documentary Is Making Waves In The Mainstream Media |
04 Jun 2006 09:32:32 PM |
|
|
EXPERTS CLAIM OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY IS A HOAX
Scholars for 9/11 Truth call for verification and publication by an
international consortium.
Duluth, MN (PRWEB) January 30, 2006 -- A group of distinguished experts
and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Wayne
Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow, have
concluded that senior government officials have covered up crucial
facts about what really happened on 9/11.
They have joined with others in common cause as members of "Scholars
for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T), because they are convinced, based on their
own research, that the administration has been deceiving the nation
about critical events in New York and Washington, D.C.
These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by
elements within the administration to manipulate Americans into
supporting policies at home and abroad they would never have condoned
absent "another Pearl Harbor."
They believe that this White House is incapable of investigating itself
and hope the possibility that Congress might hold an unaccountable
administration accountable is not merely naive or wishful thinking.
They are encouraging news services around the world to secure
scientific advice by taking advantage of university resources to verify
or to falsify their discoveries. Extraordinary situations, they
believe, require extraordinary measures.
If this were done, they contend, one of the great hoaxes of history
would stand naked before the eyes of the world and its perpetrators
would be clearly exposed, which may be the only hope for saving this
nation from ever greater abuse.
They hope this might include The New York Times, which, in their
opinion, has repeatedly failed to exercise the leadership expected from
our nation's newspaper of record by a series of inexplicable lapses. It
has failed to vigorously investigate tainted elections, lies leading to
the war in Iraq, or illegal NSA spying on the American people, major
unconstitutional events. In their view, The Times might compensate for
its loss of stature by helping to reveal the truth about one of the
great turning-point events of modern history.
Stunning as it may be to acknowledge, they observe, the government has
brought but one indictment against anyone and, to the best of their
knowledge, has not even reprimanded anyone for incompetence or
dereliction of duty. The official conspiracy theory--that nineteen Arab
hijackers under control of one man in the wilds of Afghanistan brought
this about--is unsupportable by the evidential data, which they have
studied. They even believe there are good reasons for suspecting that
video tapes officially attributed to Osama bin Laden are not genuine.
They have found the government's own investigation to be severely
flawed. The 9/11 Commission, designated to investigate the attack, was
directed by Philip Zelikow, part of the Bush transition team in the NSA
sector and the co-author of a book with Condoleezza Rice. A Bush
supporter and director of national security affairs, he could hardly be
expected to conduct an objective and impartial investigation.
They have discovered that The 9/11 Commission Report is replete with
omissions, distortions, and factual errors, which David Ray Griffin has
documented in his book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and
Distortions. The official report, for example, entirely ignores the
collapse of WTC7, a 47-story building, which was hit by no airplanes,
was only damaged by a few small fires, and fell seven hours after the
attack.
Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and
scholars find profoundly troubling:
In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise
buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or
since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is
this possible?
The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged
"hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet
according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How
is this possible?
Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were
designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact
of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito netting
with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. How is this possible?
Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700=B0F, the temperature of
jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800=B0F under optimal conditions, and
UL certified the steel used to 2,000=B0F for six hours, the buildings
cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?
Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in
the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very
close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is this
possible?
Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking
four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage
to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. How is this
possible?
Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground bunker at
the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young
officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the
Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?" The order cannot have been to
shoot it down, but must have been the opposite. How is this possible?
A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight
93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris
scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is
scattered over an area of about eight square miles. How is this
possible?
A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on
9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and
distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is
this possible?
The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL" simulating
the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and yet
Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that "no one
ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. How is
this possible?
Their own physics research has established that only controlled
demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and
virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While
turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down into
their own footprints.
These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude
that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach--which
has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser--of
"creating our own reality."
Mabon Dane wrote:
Media ... newspapers and news are so old hat... if the bloggers get
excited about something then it is news.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
