"David Morgan (MAMS)" <mams@NOSPAm-a-m-s.com> wrote in message
news:ehXih.246$cI.198@trnddc05...
"BDK" <BDK@twilight-express.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1ff5d302bcdf2ade98a677@news.buckeye-express.com...
In article <Y76dnTlaxtaKIBbYnZ2dnUVZ_riknZ2d@comcast.com>,
AdmiralPee@neveragainvolunteeryourself.com says...
"David Morgan (MAMS)" <mams@NOSPAm-a-m-s.com> wrote in a message
Like I said, Harry... it's physics. That's slightly over 10 floors
per
second.
Think about that for a second... STOP!!!
.... that's all... just ONE SECOND, and ten floors have
disintegrated
downward,
throwing material for hundreds of yards.
Doesn't add up.
That's a fun little exercise Dave, but it isn't very scientific, is
it?
Please show me your physics calculations which tell you the amount of
time
the tower should have collapsed. And show me your calculations
regarding the
actual collapse.
He's seen all the monster and sci-fi movies where buildings come down
and timed them with his magic rense.com stopwatch.
Piling on is fun for you ignorant buffoons, isn't it?
The only "ignorant buffoon" here is the one who weaves some wack-nut
conspiracy theory from shards and scraps of circumstantial evidence, namely
YOU.
Come on, David, tell us what academic or vocational credentials you possess
that make you an expert on statics, metallurgy, physics, or aeronautical
engineering. Go ahead - you're so much more fucking smart and enlightened
than all those scientific and engineering professionals who has actual
access to the WTC site, samples of evidence, and lab instrumentation for
testing. You care to put your money where your mouth is, or are you going to
keep spouting the same old *****, hoping to find a sucker or two to bring
for a ride? :O(
.
