Joe King wrote:
"Attuarii" <chattengau@germania.sup> wrote in message
news:studnQtTsPTwQCfYnZ2dnUVZ_rDinZ2d@speakeasy.net...
Attuarii wrote:
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Attuarii wrote:
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Attuarii wrote:
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
IIRC there are over 100 prosecutions for terrorism currently lined
up
in Britain. We're only just getting onto the trial of the July 2005
failed bombers.
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=16921
What do you know about Jean Charles de Menezes assassination? What
was the motive?
No motive, just trigger happy police and incompetence.
If you think someone is a suicide bomber it's generally best to shoot
them in the head several times rather than try to slap on the cuffs.
AIUI those were the orders they were operating under.
Now I understand the real reason cops in London don't typically carry
guns.
That's rather a misunderstanding.
Most police on regular street duty are not armed, but there are also
plenty of Armed Response Units cruising the street. Typically they wear
body armour and carry MP5 machine pistols. Not sure what the state is
now, but last time I went through Heathrow (pre 9/11) there were such
officers walking through all the terminal buildings on a regular basis.
They're just conditioning us to start accepting that kind of
paramilitary presence as normal and acceptable.
Gotta love the British version of NWO police state. They arrest the
reporters for theft for reporting the truth.
In Britain we must be grateful because it's for our own good.
http://www.terrorize.dk/misc/london/resources.php#john.loftus
BTW, do you also believe that Usa-ma bin Laden was the mastermind of
9/11?
I think that's the most likely scenario.
http://www.terrorize.dk/misc/london/resources.php#john.loftus
Sorry that was supposed to be this:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-732845682703884418&q=alex+jones
--
"It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the
masses
or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not
change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people."
Giordano Bruno
Nor does truth change because it is not believed by a minority of the
people.
I guess I don't understand the comment.
Posting the thread to these newsgroups was an accident, but now that it's
here, this is where it started:
Waging a "Public Diplomacy" campaign to create the "myth of the nation" in
the Straussian mold.
http://www.fpri.org/footnotes/111.200603.kuehner.teaching911.html
"America defines itself as a secular country. We therefore observe a civil
religion that coexists with sectarian religions. There is a creed of
Americanism that has been present since our founding. In it, the World
Trade Center was surely a holy site. The rebuilding of the WTC symbolizes
that we will invest in restoring our sacred places. But students need to
understand that they are the ones who will be called upon to come up with
answers in the future for this new era."
[...]
"Many in the West deny that there is something called a clash of
civilizations, but its hard to deny such a conflict when the other side
declares that it exists. One promising sign, however, is that the theory
that people join terrorist organizations out of poverty, injustice, etc. is
losing ground. Initially this was the prevailing theory, even if bin Laden
was far from poor. Most known terrorists in the West have above-average
education, some have spouses and children, and none have documented mental
health problems. In Europe, the terrorist groups include no Turks,
Albanians, or Bosnians, though Turks, for example, are probably the
second-largest Muslim immigrant group. But three-quarters of the 7/07
London attackers were of Pakistani background: Pakistan is a country where
polls show greater than 50 percent support for bin Laden."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/menezes/story/0,,1964514,00.html
--
Nil conscire sibi
.
