Re: US military spending should NOT be used to feed the starving



 Politics > Politics-USA > Re: US military spending should NOT be used to feed the starving

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Erik Trammel"
Date: 04 Aug 2003 08:09:32 AM
Object: Re: US military spending should NOT be used to feed the starving
Military spending by the U.S. is not cause of Third World countries'
poverty and dysfunction.
Their problems have been self-generated.



Throughout the next decade, more than 100 million children will die from
illness and starvation. Those 100 million deaths could be prevented
for the price of ten Stealth bombers, or what the world spends on its
military in two days!

You commies are so fucking compassionate. But that didn't stop socialism
from murdering over 100 million innocent civilians in the 20th century,
did it?
These Third World countries should be practising birth control and
then there would not be so many poverty-stricken children born into a
very overpopulated world.


Most of the problems of the world would be solved,

The problems of the world will never be "solved", you idiot.
if not practically

all of them, if countries removed spending on the military. People who
support others, like Osama Bin Laden,

Ya, he's a model humanitarian, right?
would be far less likely to (sic) if

they didn't live in countries with abject poverty!

*****. Osama bin Laden and 15 of the 19 terrorists of the 9/11
atrocity were born in Saudi Arabia, which with its fabulous oil wealth
should be one of the richest countries in the world. Instead, Saudi
Arabia is a mess, economically, politically and culturally. My gawd,
but you "liberals" are stupid and naive. You must work overtime at being
so fucking simplistic and dense.
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
The Optimal Amount of Military Spending
"World military spending nears Cold War peak" (Reuters): Comment + article
GWBushLegacy: Out of control spending on the corporate-military-political complex
Beijing Accelerates Its Military Spending
DemocRAT PUSSIES AFRAID OF A LAME DUCK PRESIDENT - WASHINGTON - Democratic leaders are stripping from a military spending bill for the war in Iraq a requirement that President Bush gain approval from Congress before moving against Iran.
Over-Emphasis on Military Spending Short-Changes National Security
Military Spending
**** "THE DECIDER" SIGNS MILITARY SPENDING BILL!!! ****
military spending: US v. world
Military spending Israel v Australia
Military Spending To Stimulate the Economy
Dwight Eisenhower was a Republican who understood military spending.
That's your money Bush is spending on war.
On Spending, Bush Is No Reagan
Future depends on spending more education $$ now
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER